Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00160394 ↗ Comparison of Duac® Gel And Differin® Gel in Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-12-01 Comparing the efficacy and safety of a gel formulation containing a combination of clindamycin phosphate (equivalent to 1% clindamycin) and benzoyl peroxide (5%) once daily with a gel containing 0.1% adapalene once daily in the treatment of acne vulgaris of mild to moderate severity.
NCT00160394 ↗ Comparison of Duac® Gel And Differin® Gel in Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris Completed Stiefel, a GSK Company Phase 4 2004-12-01 Comparing the efficacy and safety of a gel formulation containing a combination of clindamycin phosphate (equivalent to 1% clindamycin) and benzoyl peroxide (5%) once daily with a gel containing 0.1% adapalene once daily in the treatment of acne vulgaris of mild to moderate severity.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed Acronet Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed Bellsystem24 , Inc. Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed Mitsubishi Kagaku Bio-Clinical Laboratories, inc Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed Parexel Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed SACT INTERNATIONAL Co., LTD. Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Acne Vulgaris 19
Bacterial Vaginosis 4
Acne 2
Rosacea 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Acne Vulgaris 21
Vaginosis, Bacterial 4
Vaginal Diseases 2
Rosacea 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 91
India 19
China 10
Russian Federation 4
Puerto Rico 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
New York 7
Pennsylvania 6
Florida 5
California 5
Texas 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 10
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
Unknown status 4
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 6
Stiefel, a GSK Company 4
Zeichner, Joshua, M.D. 2
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Industry 36
Other 18
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 11, 2026

CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is the product and how is it positioned clinically?

“Clindamycin phosphate in dextrose 5% in plastic container” is an IV formulation where clindamycin phosphate is delivered in a D5W (5% dextrose) solution packaged in a plastic container. Clinically, clindamycin is used for susceptible bacterial infections, including skin and soft tissue infections and bone and joint infections, and is commonly incorporated into peri-operative antibiotic strategies depending on local protocols and allergy status. The market view for this specific carrier (D5W) and packaging (plastic container) is usually driven by hospital formulary preferences, procurement contracts, and substitution patterns within the IV clindamycin class.

What do clinical trial datasets show for clindamycin phosphate IV (class-level) and what is likely active?

Across clindamycin’s clinical development history, the evidence base for IV clindamycin is largely anchored in older pivotal studies and subsequent comparative and regimen studies. For the specific “clindamycin phosphate in D5% in plastic container” presentation, routine public registries rarely track excipients and container format as separate “products” for trial-level activity. As a result, what is investable is the class-level trial signal for IV clindamycin and the current pipeline for new formulations (or new indications) that can displace or expand hospital use.

Clinical trial update (class-level, practical interpretation for the IV hospital market):

  • The active clinical landscape for clindamycin remains focused on new indications, resistance-driven stewardship use cases, and formulation/regimen optimizations rather than frequent brand-new Phase 3 programs of the exact historical IV presentation.
  • The strongest recurring clinical demand drivers for IV clindamycin are:
    • Skin and skin structure infections
    • Bone and joint infections
    • Intra-abdominal infections (protocol-dependent)
    • Anaerobic coverage strategies
  • New entrant risk typically comes from:
    • Alternative clindamycin presentations (bag type, concentration, ready-to-use stability)
    • Combination regimens where clindamycin’s role shrinks or expands depending on local antibiogram trends
    • New antibiotics for the same clinical niches

What is the market for IV clindamycin and where does this presentation fit?

The market for IV clindamycin is segmented primarily by:

  1. Institutional channel (acute care, hospital formularies, pharmacy distribution)
  2. Form factor (IV vial vs premixed bag; bag composition and container type)
  3. Concentration and volume (pricing and substitution are sensitive to dose math and waste)

From a procurement lens, D5W bag packaging is selected for:

  • Compatibility with infusion workflows and nursing administration
  • Hospital standardization of infusion sets
  • Reduced handling steps compared with vial preparation

Market dynamics that matter for projection

Key demand drivers for IV clindamycin in hospitals include:

  • Stewardship and guideline use where clindamycin remains a recommended option for susceptible anaerobic infections and select Gram-positive infections.
  • Penicillin allergy substitution patterns (clindamycin’s persistent role when alternatives are constrained).
  • Residency in antibiograms: clindamycin susceptibility in staphylococci and streptococci drives use.
  • Cost and availability: the IV antibiotic category is sensitive to supply continuity; shortages can create temporary utilization shifts that persist into future contracting cycles.

Key headwinds include:

  • Uptake of other agents with broader resistance coverage
  • Margin pressure from generics and HA negotiations
  • Substitution to other clindamycin carriers/concentrations that improve pharmacy efficiency

Which patents and regulatory exclusivities affect pricing and supply in this specific presentation?

For an IV clindamycin phosphate premix in D5W in a plastic container, commercial product iterations are typically dominated by:

  • Generic availability (most clindamycin IV products are long off original exclusivity)
  • Orange Book listings and patent estates that may still govern specific packaging or method-of-use claims in some territories, but the practical market force is usually generic competition.

For business planning, the controlling economic variable is not container format exclusivity but contracting and substitution within the IV clindamycin class, including any ANDA-introduced differences in strength, volume, or container stability.

How does formulation and container format impact hospital adoption?

This “plastic container” presentation often competes on operational metrics:

  • Reduced risk of incorrect compounding versus multi-step vial preparation
  • Standardization for infusion workflows
  • Reduced preparation labor
  • Compatibility with IV administration standards in hospitals

Where hospitals use D5W-based formulations widely, this presentation becomes “default” in pharmacy automation and order sets. Where hospitals standardize on saline-based bags, it faces substitution risk.

What is the market projection outlook for this presentation over the next 5 years?

Because the presentation tracks a mature, generally generic molecule and dosing use cases are stable, projections in this segment are usually volume-led and price-controlled by generic contracting, with mild growth tied to:

  • Increased hospital antibiotic consumption
  • Replacement of older shortages
  • Consolidation into standardized premixed bags

In mature IV generics, typical projection patterns are:

  • Modest volume growth (or flat volumes with periodic step-ups after shortages)
  • Declining net price per unit or flat price if procurement locks in a limited number of suppliers
  • Share shifts to suppliers that deliver continuity, packaging stability, and better contracting economics

Practical projection range for IV clindamycin phosphate D5W plastic bag (5-year horizon):

  • Volume: low single-digit growth or low single-digit decline depending on local antibiogram and formulary substitution to saline bags or alternative clindamycin formats.
  • Value: generally mid to low single-digit CAGR at most, because generics keep value constrained even if unit volume rises.

A projection that is actionable for investment-grade planning must specify numeric baselines (country, year, unit volume, WAC/net price). The user request does not provide the baseline market geography or timeframe to produce a complete numeric forecast.

What are the competitive and substitution threats?

In the IV clindamycin segment, competitive pressure typically comes from:

  • Same-molecule generics with alternative bag types (glass vs plastic, or different bag materials)
  • Different diluents (D5W vs NS) where hospital protocols favor one diluent for compatibility
  • Concentration and volume options that minimize waste and improve nursing throughput
  • Broader antibiotics that displace clindamycin for anaerobe coverage or mixed infections

Substitution is especially strong where:

  • Formularies prefer a single premixed bag concentration
  • Pharmacy automation systems limit selection
  • Contracting selects 1 to 3 suppliers for a given strength/volume

Investment implications for development or supply-chain decisions

For a new entrant or an incremental supplier improving the same presentation, the economic value is usually in:

  • Supply continuity (avoiding backorders)
  • Contract readiness (pricing and volume commitments)
  • Operational fit (bag standardization, compatibility, reduced preparation steps)
  • Stability and handling claims that shorten workflow time

For R&D, the highest-return strategy typically targets:

  • Improved stability and reduced particulate risk claims (where applicable)
  • Ready-to-use configurations aligned with hospital workflows
  • Process improvements that lower landed cost without compromising regulatory acceptance

Key Takeaways

  • The product is a mature IV clindamycin formulation where demand is driven by hospital infection protocols, antibiotic stewardship choices, and formulary substitution within the clindamycin class.
  • Clinical activity for clindamycin is predominantly class-level and tends to shift through regimen, indication refinements, and competitive displacement rather than frequent new Phase 3 trials of identical premix bags.
  • Market outcomes for “clindamycin phosphate in D5W in plastic container” are largely procurement- and contracting-led: unit volume is likely stable-to-slightly growing, while net pricing is constrained by generic competition.
  • The main threats are substitution to alternative clindamycin presentations and competing antibiotics for anaerobic and mixed infections.

FAQs

  1. Is this presentation protected by new exclusivity that materially affects price?
    Typically, IV clindamycin phosphate presentations are off original exclusivity and compete on generic contracting rather than long-lived formulation exclusivity.

  2. Does “plastic container” change clinical outcomes versus other clindamycin IV formats?
    It mainly affects administration workflow and handling, not the therapeutic mechanism of clindamycin.

  3. Where does hospital demand for IV clindamycin come from most consistently?
    Skin and soft tissue infections, bone and joint infections, and protocol-dependent anaerobic coverage.

  4. What drives unit share among competing clindamycin IV generics?
    Formularies, procurement contracts, supply continuity, concentration/volume choice that reduces waste, and diluent preference (D5W vs NS).

  5. How should a company forecast this segment without overfitting clinical trial data?
    Use procurement-driven scenarios: baseline hospital utilization plus incremental volume changes from antibiogram shifts, shortage spillovers, and formulary switches.


References

  1. FDA. Drug Trials Snapshots (clindamycin). https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-trials-snapshots
  2. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (clindamycin phosphate injection listings). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. clindamycin phosphate injection search results. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.