Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00160394 ↗ Comparison of Duac® Gel And Differin® Gel in Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-12-01 Comparing the efficacy and safety of a gel formulation containing a combination of clindamycin phosphate (equivalent to 1% clindamycin) and benzoyl peroxide (5%) once daily with a gel containing 0.1% adapalene once daily in the treatment of acne vulgaris of mild to moderate severity.
NCT00160394 ↗ Comparison of Duac® Gel And Differin® Gel in Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris Completed Stiefel, a GSK Company Phase 4 2004-12-01 Comparing the efficacy and safety of a gel formulation containing a combination of clindamycin phosphate (equivalent to 1% clindamycin) and benzoyl peroxide (5%) once daily with a gel containing 0.1% adapalene once daily in the treatment of acne vulgaris of mild to moderate severity.
NCT00219570 ↗ Dalacin-T Gel Post Approval Study Completed Acronet Phase 4 2005-01-01 To investigate, in a comparison vs. Acuatim cream (nadifloxacin cream), the efficacy and safety of Dalacin T Gel (clindamycin phosphate gel) as a therapeutic medication for acne vulgaris in acne vulgaris patients, including children ages 13 and up, in order to clarify the clinical positioning of Dalacin T Gel.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE
Intervention Trials
Acne Vulgaris 19
Bacterial Vaginosis 4
Acne 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE
Intervention Trials
Acne Vulgaris 21
Vaginosis, Bacterial 4
Vaginal Diseases 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE
Location Trials
United States 91
India 19
China 10
Russian Federation 4
Puerto Rico 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE
Location Trials
New York 7
Pennsylvania 6
Texas 5
Florida 5
California 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
Unknown status 4
TERMINATED 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 6
Stiefel, a GSK Company 4
Watson Laboratories, Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 36
Other 18
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 26, 2026

Clindamycin Phosphate clinical trials update, market analysis, and sales projection (US and major ex-US markets)

Clindamycin phosphate is a long-established antibiotic sold in multiple dosage forms (topical, oral, injectable) and a sizable share of global demand is served by generics. Clinical activity in the drug itself is dominated by new formulations, pediatric/PK work, and narrow indications tied to dermatology and surgical infection prophylaxis rather than first-in-class innovation. Market trajectory is steady rather than growth-driven, with pricing pressure from generic competition and periodic pull-through from hospital and specialty dermatology channels.

What clinical trials are active for clindamycin phosphate?

Active clinical trial work typically clusters into three categories:

  1. Topical acne/rosacea and bacterial skin infections using clindamycin phosphate gels, foams, pledgets, or lotions, often paired with tolerability endpoints, vehicle comparisons, or real-world adherence assessments.
  2. Dental and oral cavity infections trials focused on bacteriologic endpoints, duration of therapy, and pediatric dosing regimens.
  3. Perioperative and intra-abdominal or pelvic infection settings for injectable clindamycin phosphate, typically involving PK/PD bridging, infusion-rate tolerability, and safety confirmations rather than new antimicrobial mechanisms.

Because clindamycin phosphate is generic in most markets, trial participation is more common through formulation sponsors than through single “brand” entities. Trial records in public registries also show smaller, sponsor-led studies rather than large Phase 3 brand-equivalent programs.

What does the market look like for clindamycin phosphate (demand drivers and risk factors)?

Demand is anchored by:

  • Community and outpatient acne and skin infection care where clindamycin is used as part of guideline-based regimens.
  • Dental infection management where clinicians select clindamycin for anaerobic coverage in penicillin-allergic patients.
  • Hospital antibiotic stewardship and perioperative protocols for anaerobic coverage, especially in intra-abdominal settings.

Key headwinds:

  • Ongoing generic price compression across oral and injectable SKUs.
  • Antibiotic resistance and guideline shifts that may reduce clindamycin’s role in some infection classes.
  • Formulary constraints tied to stewardship targets and comparisons to alternatives (metronidazole combinations, beta-lactams, or newer anaerobe-active regimens depending on setting).

Where is clindamycin phosphate sold and how does channel mix affect projections?

Channel mix matters by dosage form:

  • Topical dermatology is the most resilient demand pocket because acne and folliculitis indications are chronic, and adherence-driven branded vehicles can hold share even under generic competition.
  • Injectable hospital demand is cyclical with admissions and protocol use. Captive formularies can create short-term share changes, but tender-driven cycles usually reset pricing.
  • Oral is the most sensitive to substitution and pack-price dynamics.

For projections, the biggest sensitivity is not whether demand grows, but whether clinicians increase or decrease share relative to competing anaerobe-active agents and whether new vehicle approvals shift substitution patterns.

Market projection framework for clindamycin phosphate

Projections for clindamycin phosphate typically follow a stable-to-low growth shape:

  • Unit growth: modest, tied to population baseline and dermatology care utilization.
  • Revenue growth: limited by generic price erosion.
  • Price effects: pack and wholesaler pricing changes dominate revenue outcomes.

A practical projection range for global revenue over a typical 3-to-5-year window is driven by:

  • Topical volume stabilization (often low single-digit unit growth).
  • Oral and injectable decline or flat revenue due to continued pricing compression.
  • Occasional step-ups from tender wins, new dosage form launches, or regional guideline adjustments.

Sales projection (directional, by dosage form)

  • Topical clindamycin phosphate: stable revenue with low single-digit net growth where vehicle differentiation remains.
  • Oral clindamycin phosphate: flat-to-declining revenue as generics compete on price.
  • Injectable clindamycin phosphate: flat revenue with periodic volatility from procurement cycles and stock availability.

Which clinical trial endpoints matter most for clindamycin phosphate?

Clinical programs around clindamycin phosphate focus on endpoints that are readable by regulators and formulary committees:

  • Clinical response in skin infections and acne (lesion counts or investigator global assessments depending on protocol)
  • Microbiologic eradication and anaerobe coverage for infection trials
  • Safety and tolerability with adverse event rates, local tolerability, and systemic absorption monitoring (especially for topical and pediatric work)
  • PK bridging and tolerability for injectable formulations (infusion rate, peak/trough exposure)

How do biosimilar and generic entry risks apply to clindamycin phosphate?

Clindamycin phosphate is not a biologic, so “biosimilar risk” is not applicable. The relevant competitive risk is generic entry and interchangeability:

  • In markets where patents and data exclusivity blocks have expired (most), the risk is ongoing.
  • In cases where formulation patents or method-of-use exclusivities exist for specific SKUs, entry risk depends on patent claims and whether challengers pursue Paragraph IV-style strategies (US) or regulatory equivalence routes (EU and other regions).

What patents protect clindamycin phosphate (and what does that mean for competition)?

Clindamycin phosphate as an active ingredient is off-patent in most jurisdictions. Competitive protection, when present, usually sits in:

  • Specific topical vehicles and concentration ranges
  • Formulation process patents (manufacturing method and release characteristics)
  • Methods of use tied to specific dosing regimens in defined patient subgroups, when still protected

For market forecasting, this means the competitive baseline is generics, with “hold” opportunities in branded vehicles and protected combinations that reduce immediate substitution.

What is the Orange Book status of clindamycin phosphate?

Clindamycin phosphate is generally represented through multiple ANDA-listed products, reflecting extensive genericization. For market projection purposes, the key practical implication is that exclusivity-driven revenue uplift is limited to any remaining formulation-specific protected SKUs rather than to the active ingredient itself.

How does clindamycin phosphate compare with competing therapies?

Main competitive classes:

  • Other topical antibiotics for acne and folliculitis (e.g., erythromycin and combinations)
  • Anaerobe-active systemic antibiotics (metronidazole-based regimens; beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations depending on infection pattern)
  • Alternative acne agents (topical retinoids, benzoyl peroxide-based regimens, combination antibiotics)

Compared with these, clindamycin phosphate’s market position depends on:

  • guideline placement
  • penicillin allergy use cases (oral/dental)
  • tolerability and patient adherence to topical regimens

What generic entry risks exist for clindamycin phosphate?

Generic entry risk is persistent but mostly managed through:

  • pricing and supply chain
  • label and formulation equivalence
  • interchangeability and pharmacy substitution policies

For injectable and oral, entry risk is structurally highest where dosing strengths and pack sizes are standard and where originator-level brand differentiation is minimal. For topical, entry risk is higher where vehicles are easy to replicate, but can be moderated by formulation-specific patents or bioequivalence/regulatory package requirements.

Clinical development outlook: what is likely next for clindamycin phosphate?

The next wave of activity is expected to be:

  • Formulation and delivery optimization (topical vehicle improvements; injection stability and administration improvements)
  • PK/PD and pediatric bridging in subsets where dosing needs harmonization
  • Localized studies to support updated labels or to expand usage within existing indications

Large, mechanism-expanding Phase 3 programs are less likely given mature status and generic dominance.


Key Takeaways

  • Clindamycin phosphate clinical work is mainly formulation and bridging driven, not first-in-class development.
  • The market is mature and competitive; revenue growth is constrained by ongoing generic price compression.
  • Topical dosing is the most stable demand segment; oral and injectable are more exposed to tender cycles and substitution.
  • Near-term projections are best modeled as steady units with limited revenue growth, with episodic upside tied to new protected vehicles or procurement wins.

FAQs

  1. What are the most common indications driving clindamycin phosphate demand?
    Acne and bacterial skin infections (topical), dental/oral infections in penicillin-allergic patients (oral), and anaerobe-covered hospital infections (injectable).

  2. Does resistance reduce clindamycin phosphate use in skin or dental infections?
    Resistance and guideline stewardship can shift prescribing, but clindamycin remains used where anaerobic coverage and tolerability align with clinician practice.

  3. Are there active Phase 3 trials for clindamycin phosphate in the US?
    Public activity is typically smaller and more formulation- or bridging-focused rather than large Phase 3 efficacy launches by a single brand.

  4. What are the main determinants of pricing for clindamycin phosphate generics?
    Pack size, tender cadence for hospital products, wholesaler dynamics, and pharmacy substitution rules.

  5. How do topical formulation changes affect competitive entry for clindamycin phosphate?
    Vehicle composition, release characteristics, and any residual formulation IP can delay equivalence-based substitution compared with straightforward strength-and-label replication.


References

  1. U.S. FDA Drugs@FDA. Product and label information for clindamycin phosphate-containing products.
  2. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. Clindamycin phosphate listings.
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for clindamycin phosphate by interventional studies.
  4. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Public assessment and product information for clindamycin-containing medicines where applicable.
  5. PubMed. Review articles on clindamycin use in acne, dermatologic infections, and anaerobic coverage in clinical practice.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.