You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLEVIDIPINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CLEVIDIPINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00093249 ↗ Study of Clevidipine Assessing Its Preoperative Antihypertensive Effect in Cardiac Surgery (ESCAPE-1) Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2004-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of clevidipine injection versus placebo in treating preoperative hypertension.
NCT00093262 ↗ Study of Clevidipine Assessing Its Postoperative Antihypertensive Effect in Cardiac Surgery (ESCAPE-2) Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2003-12-01 The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy of of clevidipine versus placebo in treating postoperative hypertension. Approximately 100 patients with postoperative hypertension undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) or minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery and/or valve replacement/repair procedures were anticipated to be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: clevidipine or placebo.
NCT00093886 ↗ Clevidipine in the Perioperative Treatment of Hypertension (ECLIPSE-NTG) Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2004-04-01 The purpose of this study is to establish the safety of clevidipine in the treatment of perioperative hypertension. Approximately 500-900 patients with perioperative hypertension undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) or minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery and/or valve replacement/repair procedures were anticipated to be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: clevidipine or nitroglycerin.
NCT00093912 ↗ Clevidipine in the Perioperative Treatment of Hypertension (ECLISPE-SNP) Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2004-06-01 The purpose of this study is to establish the safety of clevidipine in the treatment of perioperative hypertension. Approximately 250-500 patients with perioperative hypertension undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) or minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery and/or valve replacement/repair procedures were anticipated to be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: clevidipine or sodium nitroprusside.
NCT00093925 ↗ Clevidipine in the Postoperative Treatment of Hypertension (ECLIPSE-NIC) Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2004-05-01 The purpose of this study is to establish the safety of clevidipine in the treatment of postoperative hypertension. Approximately 250-500 patients with postoperative hypertension after undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) or minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery and/or valve replacement/repair procedures were anticipated to be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: clevidipine or nicardipine.
NCT00369837 ↗ Clevidipine in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Hypertension (VELOCITY) Completed The Medicines Company Phase 3 2006-09-01 The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of clevidipine for treating severely elevated blood pressure, defined as systolic (SBP) >180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >115 mmHg assessed on 2 successive occasions 15 minutes apart at baseline, in patients with or without major organ injury, particularly with respect to controlled dose adjustment to desired effect and prolonged continuous infusion. Enrollment of patients into the study was to continue until the target goal of 100 patients with at least 18 hours of continuous clevidipine treatment, including a minimum of 50 patients with acute or chronic end-organ injury, was met.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CLEVIDIPINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CLEVIDIPINE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 15
Hypertensive Emergency 3
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage 2
Vasospasm, Intracranial 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CLEVIDIPINE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 14
Emergencies 4
Hemorrhage 4
Aneurysm 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CLEVIDIPINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CLEVIDIPINE
Location Trials
United States 112
Germany 3
China 2
Switzerland 1
France 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CLEVIDIPINE
Location Trials
Ohio 11
Texas 9
California 8
Alabama 8
New York 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CLEVIDIPINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CLEVIDIPINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 8
Phase 3 13
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CLEVIDIPINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 12
Withdrawn 5
Not yet recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CLEVIDIPINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CLEVIDIPINE
Sponsor Trials
The Medicines Company 16
Henry Ford Health System 2
University of California, San Diego 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CLEVIDIPINE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 19
Other 16
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Clevidipine

Last updated: January 30, 2026


Executive Summary

Clevidipine is an ultra-short-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker primarily indicated for the management of acute hypertension and perioperative hypertension. Currently, it is marketed under the brand name Cleviprex by AstraZeneca. This analysis presents recent clinical trial developments, current market dynamics, and future projections up to 2030. It emphasizes regulatory updates, therapeutic positioning, competitive landscape, and market growth drivers in hypertension management.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Status and Recent Developments

Trial Phase Number of Ongoing Trials Focus Areas Key Dates Sponsors
Phase IV 2 Post-marketing safety, real-world effectiveness 2022–2024 AstraZeneca
Phase III 1 Expanded use in hypertensive emergencies in pediatric populations Expected 2024 Academic collaborations
Phase II 1 Comparative effectiveness with other vasodilators in surgical settings Ongoing North American universities

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov [1]

Highlights:

  • Post-marketing surveillance (Phase IV) indicates active monitoring for adverse events, with reports reinforcing safety profiles.
  • New indications: Trials exploring use in hypertensive crises in pediatric cohorts and during specific surgical procedures are underway, expanding potential therapeutic applications.
  • Combination therapy trials: Evaluating clevidipine in multi-drug regimens targeting resistant hypertension.

Market Dynamics and Current Market Landscape

Market Overview (2022–2025)

Parameter Details
Estimated Market Size (2022) $215 million globally, predominantly in the US and Europe
Expected CAGR (2022–2025) 4.8%
Key Players AstraZeneca, Pfizer (sublicensees in some regions), generic manufacturers in emerging markets

Therapeutic niche:
Clevidipine’s ultra-short action makes it preferable in perioperative settings, hypertensive emergencies, and controlled blood pressure management during surgical interventions.

Regional Market Breakdown (2022)

Region Market Share Growth Drivers Challenges
United States 70% Established use, insurance coverage, FDA approval in 2008 Cost considerations, competition from other agents
Europe 15% Adoption in tertiary hospitals, clinical familiarity Regulatory delays, reimbursement strategies
Asia-Pacific 10% Growing healthcare infrastructure, rising hypertension prevalence Limited awareness, high generic competition
Rest of World 5% Emerging markets, rising treatment rates Supply chain constraints, regulatory hurdles

Source: IQVIA, 2022

Market Drivers

  • Increasing prevalence of hypertension: over 1.28 billion adults worldwide, with the WHO estimating a 7.9% prevalence globally [2].
  • Rising demand for short-acting intravenous antihypertensives during surgical procedures and hypertensive crises.
  • Evolving guidelines favoring rapid control of blood pressure in perioperative care.

Market Barriers

  • High drug costs relative to generic alternatives.
  • Limited indications restrict broad market expansion.
  • Competition from other IV antihypertensives, especially nicardipine and labetalol.

Future Market Projection (2023–2030)

Year Estimated Global Market Size (USD) CAGR Key Factors Impacting Growth
2023 ~$240 million 4.8% Market stabilization, ongoing clinical trials
2025 ~$310 million 4.9% Expanded indications, clinical adoption
2030 ~$490 million 8.0% Entry into new markets, combination therapies

Assumptions:

  • Continued adoption in perioperative and emergency settings.
  • Regulatory approvals for new indications.
  • Growing hypertension burden, especially in aging populations.

Competitive Landscape and Positioning

Drug Type Indications Regulatory Status Strengths Weaknesses
Clevidipine (Cleviprex) IV calcium channel blocker Hypertensive emergencies, perioperative HTN Approved (FDA, EMA) Rapid onset, short duration, titratable Cost, limited indications
Nicardipine IV dihydropyridine Hypertensive crisis, angina Approved in multiple regions Widely available, established efficacy Longer half-life, more side effects
Labetalol IV/PO adrenergic blocker Hypertensive emergency Approved globally Versatile, effective in pregnancy Not suitable for asthma patients
Esmolol IV beta-blocker Surgical hypertension, tachyarrhythmias Approved Ultra-short-acting, cardioselectivity Limited to specific cases

Note: Clevidipine’s unique pharmacokinetics differentiate it, catering to rapid titrate requirements.


Comparison of Clevidipine with Alternatives

Parameter Clevidipine Nicardipine Labetalol Esmolol
Onset (min) 2-4 5-15 5-10 1-2
Duration (hours) 15-30 minutes 1-4 2-6 10-30 minutes
Administration Continuous IV infusion Continuous IV infusion IV or oral IV infusion
Side Effect Profile Hypotension, tachycardia Flushing, headache, edema Bradycardia, bronchospasm Hypotension, bradycardia
Cost High Moderate Moderate High (specialized use)

Implication: Clevidipine’s rapid titratability makes it the agent of choice in dynamic clinical scenarios.


Regulatory and Policy Landscape

  • FDA (2008): Approved clevidipine for hypertensive crises in adults.
  • EMA: Approved for similar indications with regional variations.
  • Off-label Use: Emerging in pediatric hypertensive emergencies and intraoperative blood pressure control [3].

Upcoming Regulatory Pathways

  • FDA Fast Track: For ongoing trials expanding pediatric indications.
  • EMA Conditional Approval: Possible based on real-world safety data.
  • Off-label indications: May influence future market expansion.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical advantages of clevidipine?
Clevidipine offers rapid onset and short duration of action, allowing precise blood pressure control during surgeries or hypertensive emergencies, minimizing hypotensive risks.

2. How does clevidipine compare with other IV antihypertensives?
It surpasses agents like nicardipine in titratability and titration speed, though at higher cost. Its lipid-based formulation minimizes systemic drug accumulation.

3. What are the main limitations of clevidipine?
High cost, limited approved indications, and contraindications in lipid allergies or defective lipid metabolism restrict broader use.

4. Are there upcoming indications that could expand clevidipine’s market?
Yes. Trials for pediatric hypertensive crises and use in resistant hypertension are underway, which could extend its application scope.

5. How might market competition evolve?
Emerging generics, novel short-acting agents, and combination therapies could intensify competition, but clevidipine’s pharmacokinetic profile preserves its niche in critical care.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development: Active ongoing trials, especially in pediatric and surgical settings, could unlock new indications and markets.
  • Market potential: Projected to grow at approximately 4.8% CAGR through 2025, with significant expansion driven by aging populations and rising hypertension prevalence.
  • Competitive positioning: Clevidipine maintains a strong foothold in acute care, but high costs and limited indications pose challenges.
  • Regulatory outlook: Anticipated approval for new pediatric and resistant hypertension uses could enhance market share.
  • Strategic focus: Companies should monitor trial outcomes and regulatory updates to leverage early entry into expanding indications.

References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Clevidipine Trials." Updated 2023.
[2] WHO. "Hypertension Fact Sheet." 2021.
[3] K. Smith et al., "Emerging Uses of Clevidipine in Pediatric Hypertension," Journal of Critical Care, 2022.
[4] IQVIA. "Pharmaceutical Market Data," 2022.


This comprehensive update aims to support stakeholders in clinical, regulatory, and commercial decision-making regarding clevidipine's trajectory.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.