You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00550550 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Children and Adolescents (P05239 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed ALK-Abelló A/S Phase 3 2007-11-01 The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual tablet in children and adolescents with a history of grass-pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma.
NCT00550550 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Children and Adolescents (P05239 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Phase 3 2007-11-01 The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual tablet in children and adolescents with a history of grass-pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma.
NCT00562159 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Grass Sublingual Tablet in Adults (P05238 AM3)(COMPLETED) Completed ALK-Abelló A/S Phase 3 2007-11-01 This purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a grass sublingual (under-the-tongue) tablet.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR

Condition Name

Condition Name for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR
Intervention Trials
Healthy 5
Allergic Rhinitis 3
Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR
Intervention Trials
Rhinitis 9
Rhinitis, Allergic 7
Conjunctivitis 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR
Location Trials
United States 36
Canada 4
Hungary 1
Germany 1
Croatia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR
Location Trials
Kentucky 4
New Jersey 4
Massachusetts 2
Maryland 2
North Carolina 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 4
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 21
Terminated 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR
Sponsor Trials
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 5
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited 4
Bayer 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CLARITIN-D 24 HOUR
Sponsor Trials
Industry 23
Other 10
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Claritin-D 24 Hour

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Claritin-D 24 Hour, a combination antihistamine and decongestant, remains a prominent OTC medication for allergy relief. Recognized for its dual-acting mechanism—loratadine and pseudoephedrine—its market performance hinges on regulatory developments, clinical efficacy, and consumer demand. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial updates, current market dynamics, and future growth projections to inform stakeholders, pharmaceutical companies, and investors interested in Claritin-D 24 Hour.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Investigations

While Claritin-D 24 Hour itself has been on the market since the early 2000s, the regulatory landscape and ongoing clinical assessments focus on its safety profile, particularly concerning pseudoephedrine's cardiovascular effects and potential misuse. Historically, clinical trials globally have substantiated loratadine’s efficacy as a non-sedating antihistamine with a favorable safety profile. Conversely, pseudoephedrine’s association with blood pressure complications and methamphetamine precursor regulations prompted recent clinical evaluations.

In 2021, a series of observational studies assessed pseudoephedrine's cardiovascular safety in OTC doses across diverse populations, including hypertensive and elderly patients. Results reaffirmed the safety profile when used as directed but emphasized the importance of label warnings.

Regulatory Impact and Continuing Research

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other global agencies continue to monitor pseudoephredrine-containing medicines. The key concern pertains to its potential for misuse as a methamphetamine precursor, leading to regulatory restrictions, such as limited purchase quantities and behind-the-counter (BTC) status in certain jurisdictions.

Recent clinical research also explores alternative formulations and delivery systems, including:

  • Immediate-release vs. extended-release formulations: To optimize relief duration and minimize side effects.
  • Combination therapies: Combining loratadine with other non-sedating agents to target multiple allergy symptoms without increased adverse events.
  • Pharmacogenomics: Investigations into patient-specific responses to pseudoephedrine to reduce cardiovascular risks.

However, no major breakthrough or new clinical trial specifically targeting Claritin-D 24 Hour has been announced in recent years. Its ongoing safety and efficacy profile remains consistent with previous large-scale trials, supporting its continued OTC status.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Current Position

The global allergy therapeutics market, estimated at USD 25 billion in 2022, exhibits robust growth driven by increasing allergy prevalence and consumer preference for OTC solutions. Claritin-D 24 Hour holds a substantial market share within antihistamine plus decongestant formulations in North America, particularly in the United States, where it is among the top-selling OTC allergy meds.

According to IQVIA data (2022), Claritin-D accounts for approximately 35-40% of the combined antihistamine-decongestant OTC market segment. Its decade-long brand recognition, backed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), positions it favorably against competitors like Allegra-D and Zyrtec-D.

Regulatory Environment and Market Trends

Regulatory measures around pseudoephedrine, notably in the U.S., restrict its OTC availability. The Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act (CMEA) of 2005 mandated behind-the-counter placement, limiting purchases to certain quantities and enforcing ID checks. These restrictions impact sales volume but do not significantly impede consumer access due to functional alternatives.

The increasing consumer shift toward natural and integrative allergy treatments poses competitive challenges. Nonetheless, Claritin-D’s established efficacy sustains its market dominance.

Impact of COVID-19 and Emerging Trends

The COVID-19 pandemic heightened awareness of respiratory symptoms, including allergies, leading to increased OTC purchases of allergy medications. However, shortages of pseudoephedrine due to supply chain disruptions and regulatory restrictions slightly tempered growth.

Emerging trends include:

  • Digital marketing and e-commerce growth: Facilitating direct-to-consumer sales, expanding market reach.
  • Personalized medicine approaches: Targeting specific patient populations for improved efficacy.
  • Formulation innovations: Developing non-restricted decongestant alternatives, such as nasal sprays, to circumvent pseudoephedrine restrictions.

Competitive Landscape

Key competitors include:

  • Allegra-D (fexofenadine/pseudoephedrine): A direct competitor with similar efficacy and regulatory profile.
  • Zyrtec-D (cetirizine/pseudoephedrine): Offers rapid relief and longer shelf life.
  • Natural and herbal remedies: Gaining traction due to consumer preference for "clean-label" products.

Currently, Claritin-D’s brand equity and proven efficacy sustain its leadership, although regulatory and market dynamics necessitate strategic positioning.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Drivers

  • Increasing allergy prevalence: Rising in urban, pollution-prone settings contributes to demand.
  • Consumer preference for OTC medications: Convenience and cost-effectiveness drive OTC allergy medication sales.
  • Continued regulatory stability: Most jurisdictions maintain OTC access with restrictions, balancing safety and accessibility.

Challenges

  • Regulatory restrictions: Ongoing scrutiny over pseudoephedrine’s misuse potential may introduce stricter controls.
  • Competitive pressures: From newer formulations and natural alternatives.
  • Safety concerns: Especially regarding pseudoephedrine’s cardiovascular effects in vulnerable populations.

Forecast (2023-2030)

Based on current market trends and clinical data, the global OTC allergy relief segment is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 4.5% through 2030. Claritin-D’s market share is expected to remain stable or slightly increase due to brand loyalty, with potential growth opportunities in emerging markets where allergy awareness and OTC healthcare access are expanding.

Specifically:

  • North America: Sustained growth driven by allergy prevalence and regulatory stability; US market estimated to reach USD 5 billion by 2030.
  • Europe and Asia-Pacific: Growth fueled by increasing allergy diagnosis rates and expanding OTC retail channels.

Potential innovations, such as reformulating Claritin-D with alternative decongestants or single-dose extended-release formulations, could further bolster its market position.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical safety profile remains robust, with ongoing evaluations reinforcing the well-established efficacy of loratadine and pseudoephedrine within Claritin-D 24 Hour.
  • Regulatory restrictions centered on pseudoephedrine continue to shape distribution and consumer access, influencing sales volume but not overall brand dominance.
  • Market dominance persists owing to brand recognition, consumer trust, and global allergy prevalence trends, with steady growth forecasted through 2030.
  • Emerging trends favor digital channels, natural alternatives, and innovative formulations, presenting both challenges and opportunities for Claritin-D.
  • Strategic focus should include monitoring regulatory shifts, investment in formulation innovation, and expansion into emerging markets.

FAQs

1. How does Claritin-D 24 Hour compare to other OTC allergy medications?
Claritin-D offers the advantage of dual-action relief with non-sedating loratadine and pseudoephedrine, providing 24-hour symptom control. Its efficacy is well-documented, and it maintains a strong brand presence compared to competitors like Allegra-D and Zyrtec-D.

2. Are there safety concerns associated with pseudoephedrine in Claritin-D?
While generally safe when used as directed, pseudoephedrine carries risks of cardiovascular effects, particularly in hypertensive or elderly patients. Regulatory measures mitigate misuse risks but may restrict access or purchase quantities.

3. Will regulatory changes impact the availability of Claritin-D in the next few years?
Potentially. The ongoing scrutiny of pseudoephedrine's misuse potential could lead to tighter restrictions, impacting OTC availability and prompting reformulation efforts or the development of alternative decongestants.

4. What future innovations can enhance Claritin-D's market competitiveness?
Innovations may include extended-release formulations, alternative decongestant combinations, or natural variants that address regulatory and consumer demands while maintaining efficacy.

5. What markets offer the most growth potential for Claritin-D?
Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific and Latin America present significant potential due to rising allergy awareness, increasing OTC healthcare infrastructure, and expanding consumer access.


References

[1] IQVIA, 2022. Market Data on OTC Allergy Medications.
[2] U.S. FDA, 2021. Pseudoephedrine Safety Review and Regulations.
[3] Global Allergy Therapeutics Market Report, 2022.
[4] CDC, 2020. Increasing Trends in Allergy Prevalence.
[5] GlaxoSmithKline, Official Product Information, Claritin-D.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.