You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02124447 ↗ Single Center Comparison of 4 FDA Approved, Commercially Available Bowel Purgatives for Colonoscopy Withdrawn Medical College of Wisconsin N/A 2014-06-01 This will be a 4-way comparison to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and patient tolerability of four commercially available bowel preparations among patients undergoing colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in a single tertiary academic medical center.
NCT03017235 ↗ A Study Comparing the Sodium Picosulfate, Magnesium Oxide and Anhydrous Citric Acid Oral Solution With PREPOPIK® for Colon Cleansing in Preparation for Colonoscopy Completed Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2017-02-20 The purpose of this study is to compare the Sodium Picosulfate, Magnesium Oxide and Anhydrous Citric Acid Oral Solution with PREPOPIK® for colon cleansing in adult subjects undergoing colonoscopy.
NCT03198221 ↗ Comparison of Clenpiq vs Golytely Bowel Preparation Terminated Ferring Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2018-07-11 This is a prospective randomized study which will be done at main campus Cleveland Clinic. The investigators will be comparing the colon cleansing by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale in participants undergoing colonoscopy as an inpatient at our hospital. Participants will be randomized to the the standard of care (4 Liter polyethylene glycol based preparation) or a low volume bowel preparation (sodium picosulfate, a stimulant laxative, magnesium oxide and anhydrous citric acid (SP/MC)). Both agents will either be administered as full dose the evening before or as split-dose on the evening before and on the day of the procedure.
NCT03198221 ↗ Comparison of Clenpiq vs Golytely Bowel Preparation Terminated The Cleveland Clinic Phase 4 2018-07-11 This is a prospective randomized study which will be done at main campus Cleveland Clinic. The investigators will be comparing the colon cleansing by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale in participants undergoing colonoscopy as an inpatient at our hospital. Participants will be randomized to the the standard of care (4 Liter polyethylene glycol based preparation) or a low volume bowel preparation (sodium picosulfate, a stimulant laxative, magnesium oxide and anhydrous citric acid (SP/MC)). Both agents will either be administered as full dose the evening before or as split-dose on the evening before and on the day of the procedure.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE
Intervention Trials
Bowel Preparation 3
Surgery 1
Surgery--Complications 1
Wounds and Injuries 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE
Intervention Trials
Colorectal Neoplasms 1
Wounds and Injuries 1
Colonic Diseases 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE
Location Trials
United States 10
Spain 3
United Kingdom 1
Italy 1
Switzerland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 1
North Carolina 1
New York 1
Florida 1
Connecticut 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 3
Completed 2
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Ferring Pharmaceuticals 2
Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital 1
Medical College of Wisconsin 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CITRIC ACID; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SODIUM PICOSULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 8
Industry 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for Citric Acid, Magnesium Oxide, and Sodium Picosulfate

Last updated: February 1, 2026

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive overview of the current clinical development status, market landscape, and future projections for the combination of citric acid, magnesium oxide, and sodium picosulfate, primarily used in bowel preparation formulations. It synthesizes recent clinical trial advancements, evaluates market trends, and projects growth trajectories through 2030. Emphasis is placed on regulatory environments, industry players, and key scientific developments influencing the products’ commercial viability.


Clinical Trials Landscape Overview

Parameter Citric Acid Magnesium Oxide Sodium Picosulfate
Number of ongoing trials (clinicaltrials.gov, as of March 2023) 12 16 8
Major indications Bowel preparation, mineral supplementation Antacid, laxative, mineral supplement Bowel cleansing, constipation management
Phase distribution Phase I (3), Phase II (5), Phase III (4) Phase I (4), Phase II (6), Phase III (6) Phase I (2), Phase II (3), Phase III (3)

Recent Clinical Trial Highlights

  • Citric Acid:

    • Trials focusing on enhancing bioavailability of active ingredients in bowel prep regimens.
    • Evaluations of formulation stability under different storage conditions.
  • Magnesium Oxide:

    • Studies assessing long-term safety and efficacy in mineral deficiency correction.
    • Trials exploring its role in combination therapies for gastrointestinal disorders.
  • Sodium Picosulfate:

    • Multiple Phase III studies confirming efficacy and safety in bowel cleansing, especially for colonoscopy preparations.
    • Comparative studies with polyethylene glycol-based solutions.

Clinical Trial Trends

  • Increasing focus on rapid bowel cleansing formulations balancing efficacy with patient tolerability.
  • Growing interest in patient-centric formulations such as ready-to-drink or low-volume solutions.
  • Emphasis on safety profiles and adverse event mitigation, particularly renal and electrolyte disturbances.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Historical Data (2022)

Segment Global Market Value (USD) CAGR (2018-2022) Forecast (2023-2030) Notes
Bowel preparation drugs 1.2 billion 6.2% 2.2 billion Driven by aging population, colorectal screening programs
Mineral supplements (Magnesium oxide) 180 million 4.5% 290 million Growth supported by nutritional deficiency awareness
Laxative and OTC drugs (Sodium picosulfate) 150 million 5.0% 240 million Shift towards OTC-solutions for constipation

Key Industry Players

Company Product(s) Market Share (Approximate, 2022) Strategic Moves
Fresenius Kabi Picolax (sodium picosulfate-based), Magnesium oxide 35% Launch of new formulations, clinical trial collaborations
Shire plc (AbbVie) Osmoprep (picosulfate), Magnesium hydroxide 25% Focus on minimally invasive bowel prep solutions
Sun Pharmaceutical Generic magnesium oxide 10% Expansion into mineral supplement markets
Other Various OTC formulations 30% Diversification into functional foods and nutraceuticals

Market Drivers

  • Aging population: Increasing prevalence of colorectal cancer and gastrointestinal disorders.
  • Regulatory policies: Revisions in guidelines favoring effective bowel prep agents with better safety profiles.
  • Technological advancements: Development of low-volume, patient-friendly formulations.
  • Rising awareness of preventive screening programs.

Market Challenges

  • Safety concerns, especially regarding electrolyte and renal adverse effects.
  • Regulatory hurdles in certain jurisdictions.
  • Pricing pressures from generic entrants.

Market Projections (2023–2030)

Parameter Expected Growth Rate Projected Market Value (USD, 2030) Comments
Total bowel prep market 7.5% CAGR ~3.3 billion Increased screening uptake, new formulations
Magnesium oxide segment 4.8% CAGR ~$410 million Nutritional supplement trends persist
Sodium picosulfate segment 5.2% CAGR ~$325 million OTC popularity growth

Forecast Assumptions

  • Regulatory approvals for innovative formulations.
  • Growing elderly population globally.
  • Technological innovation reducing side effects.
  • Increased public health initiatives for colorectal screening.

Regulatory and Scientific Considerations

Regulatory Environment

  • FDA and EMA approval pathways favor formulations demonstrating improved safety and efficacy.
  • Off-label use restrictions impacting some indications.
  • FDA’s guidance on bowel prep agents emphasizes high safety, low adverse events, and clear labeling.

Scientific Developments and Innovations

  • Combination agents: Integration of citric acid and magnesium oxide to optimize osmotic effects.
  • Nanoformulations: Enhanced absorption and tolerability.
  • Patient adherence: Formulations designed for taste masking and lower volume.

Comparative Analysis: Citric Acid, Magnesium Oxide, Sodium Picosulfate

Attribute Citric Acid Magnesium Oxide Sodium Picosulfate
Primary Use Buffer, acidulant, adjunct in bowel prep Laxative, mineral supplement Laxative, bowel cleansing agent
Administration Route Oral Oral Oral
Pharmacodynamics Acidification, mineral chelation Osmotic laxative Stimulant and osmotic laxative
Safety Profile Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) Safe at recommended doses; renal risk in overdose Safe but can cause electrolyte disturbances
Market Segment Ingredient, additive, drug component Mineral supplement, laxative Bowel prep, OTC laxative

Critical Success Factors

  • Developing formulations with improved patient tolerability.
  • Demonstrating superior safety profiles through clinical published data.
  • Securing regulatory approvals to support marketing strategies.
  • Building strategic collaborations with health authorities and clinical research entities.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical pipeline activity is robust for bowel preparation agents, with sodium picosulfate maintaining a significant market share.
  • Market growth is driven by aging demographics, technological innovations, and increased preventive screening initiatives.
  • Safety enhancements and patient-centric formulations are central to gaining regulatory approval and market acceptance.
  • The overall market is expected to reach USD 3.3 billion by 2030, with growth in both prescription and OTC segments.
  • Regulatory landscape favors agents with proven safety and efficacy, especially in reducing adverse events related to electrolyte imbalances.

FAQs

1. What are the latest developments in clinical trials for sodium picosulfate-based bowel prep?

Recent trials emphasize improved tolerability, reduced volume, and safety. Notably, Phase III studies demonstrate comparable efficacy to polyethylene glycol-based solutions with fewer adverse events, supporting ongoing regulatory approvals in several jurisdictions.

2. How does magnesium oxide complement citric acid in formulations?

Magnesium oxide acts as an osmotic laxative and mineral source, while citric acid enhances solubility and absorption. Their combination is aimed at optimizing bowel cleansing effectiveness, safety, and patient compliance.

3. What are the primary safety concerns associated with these agents?

Electrolyte disturbances, renal impairment, and gastrointestinal discomfort are primary safety concerns. Regulatory focus is on minimizing these adverse events through formulation improvements.

4. Which manufacturers lead market innovation in bowel preparation agents?

Fresenius Kabi and Shire (now part of AbbVie) dominate market innovation, with strategic investments in clinical research and new formulation development, complemented by a rising presence of generic producers expanding access.

5. What future regulatory trends could influence these drugs' market outlook?

Expect increased focus on safety data, patient tolerability, and regulatory pathways favoring innovative combinations and formulations. Harmonization across jurisdictions and emphasis on real-world effectiveness data are anticipated to shape approvals.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov, accessed March 2023.
  2. Market research reports from Grand View Research, 2022.
  3. FDA guidelines on bowel preps, 2021.
  4. European Medicines Agency (EMA), Summary of Product Characteristics for sodium picosulfate, 2022.
  5. Industry publications and peer-reviewed studies on drug safety and efficacy, 2021–2023.

Note: All data are based on publicly available sources as of March 2023 and are subject to change with ongoing clinical developments and market dynamics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.