Last Updated: August 3, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CITANEST


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CITANEST

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01880775 ↗ Discharge Conditions of Spinal Anesthesia With Heavy Prilocaine-Fentanyl and Heavy Bupivacaine-Fentanyl Completed Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital Phase 4 2012-04-01 In this prospective randomized study the investigators aimed to investigate difference of the duration of spinal anesthesia, discharge times and efficacy between low dose heavy Prilocaine-Fentanyl and heavy Bupivacaine-Fentanyl in outpatient minor anal surgery.
NCT02820688 ↗ Concentration-Volume Relationship in Infraclavicular Block Completed Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital Phase 4 2016-06-01 This prospective, randomized, double blind study aims to determine the optimal volume for adequate sensorial and motor blockade following an infraclavicular block. Patients will be randomized into three groups. Using a constant dose of local anesthetics (45mg bupivacaine 180mg prilocaine), different volumes will be used in each of the groups (First group; 18mL, second group; 27mL, third group; 36mL). Onset, duration and quality of sensory and motor block will be compared for patients between groups
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CITANEST

Condition Name

Condition Name for CITANEST
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhoid 1
Peri Anal Fistula 1
Brachial Plexus Blockade 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CITANEST
Intervention Trials
Rectal Fistula 1
Hemorrhoids 1
Fistula 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CITANEST

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CITANEST
Location Trials
Turkey 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CITANEST

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CITANEST
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CITANEST
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CITANEST

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CITANEST
Sponsor Trials
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital 1
Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CITANEST
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: June 19, 2026

Citanest (prilocaine) clinical trials update, market analysis, and 2025-2035 sales projection

Citanest is a brand of prilocaine hydrochloride used as a local anesthetic (typically for dental, minor surgical, and obstetric anesthesia settings depending on country product labeling). Market outlook is driven by (1) procedural volume for dentistry and minor surgeries, (2) substitution among local anesthetic brands and generic prilocaine, (3) regional pricing and reimbursement, and (4) safety and formulation preferences (dose strength, delivery system, and combination products where approved).

No complete, decision-grade clinical-trials and market-revenue dataset was provided or determinable from the prompt alone, and a definitive sales projection requires (i) validated current unit and/or revenue base by geography and (ii) an identified regulatory product variant (strength, formulation, route, and label). Under these constraints, a complete and accurate update and projection cannot be produced.

What clinical trials involve Citanest (prilocaine) and what is the latest status?

Which trial registries typically cover prilocaine local anesthetic programs?

Prilocaine local anesthetics are commonly studied in:

  • Dental pain control and infiltration/nerve block comparisons
  • Obstetric anesthesia settings (where country labeling supports it)
  • Comparisons against lidocaine and articaine for onset and duration
  • Formulation work (concentration, buffering, vasoconstrictor combinations where applicable)

What trial endpoints matter for local anesthetics?

For Citanest-style products, regulators and payers typically focus on:

  • Onset time and peak effect
  • Duration of analgesia
  • Supplemental dosing rate
  • Adverse event frequency (especially methemoglobinemia risk in prilocaine contexts)
  • Patient-reported pain and procedure success rates

What counts as “latest” for a market-facing update?

A clinical trials update used for commercial planning needs:

  • Phase and recruitment status (or completion/termination)
  • Primary endpoints and comparator drug(s)
  • Sites and geography (impacts regulatory transferability and adoption)
  • Data availability (results posted vs. not posted)

What is the Orange Book status of Citanest (prilocaine) and how does exclusivity work?

Does Citanest have active FDA-listed patents or exclusivity now?

A current Orange Book status requires mapping:

  • Exact U.S. drug product (strength, dosage form, route)
  • NDC to listed patents
  • Patent expiration dates and exclusivity codes

How to interpret local anesthetic “expiration” timelines

Local anesthetics often have:

  • Expired composition and/or formulation patents for generic availability
  • Remaining method-of-use or formulation patents only in limited cases
  • Potential pediatric exclusivity, but that rarely extends broadly for long-established local anesthetics

(Without the exact product mapping to NDC and listed patents, exclusivity status cannot be stated.)

How big is the local anesthetics market where Citanest competes, and what share could it capture?

Citanest competitive set

Citanest competes in local anesthetic procedural use cases against:

  • Amide anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine brands and generics)
  • Articaine products (strong dental penetration in many markets)
  • Prilocaine generics and alternative delivery/formulation offerings

Market sizing inputs that determine projection

A defensible projection needs a base for:

  • Dental procedures and minor surgery volumes in target markets
  • Local anesthetic units per procedure and typical dosing conversion
  • Brand vs. generic mix and average selling price (ASP) trends
  • Tendering dynamics in public procurement regions

What generic entry risks exist for Citanest (prilocaine) and how do biosimilar rules differ?

Generic entry risk profile for an old small-molecule local anesthetic

Local anesthetics like prilocaine face:

  • High substitution and low switching costs (ingredient identity)
  • Competitive pricing by multi-source generics
  • Limited product differentiation beyond concentration, formulation, and device delivery format

Biosimilar risk

Prilocaine is a small molecule; biosimilar pathways do not apply.

Which formulations and dosing strengths are most important for Citanest commercial performance?

Why strength and route drive utilization

Citanest performance depends on:

  • Approved dose strength availability by market
  • Route compatibility with common clinical workflows (dental infiltration vs. nerve block)
  • Handling and shelf logistics for providers and clinics

Combination products and differentiation

If a country’s labeled product includes combinations (for example with vasoconstrictors), market outcomes can differ materially from plain prilocaine products.

What is the lawsuit and patent litigation landscape for Citanest (prilocaine)?

What patent disputes typically arise

Where litigation exists for local anesthetics, it usually concerns:

  • Formulation/process claims
  • Method-of-use claims for specific indications
  • Orange Book patent lists driving Paragraph IV filings

What a commercial risk review needs

A litigation-aware projection requires:

  • Case docket status
  • Settlement dates
  • Claimed patent scope and court rulings
  • Market impact from injunctions or shared launch timelines

(Without case identification and cited filings tied to the exact drug product, litigation status cannot be compiled accurately.)

How does Citanest compare with lidocaine and articaine brands on effectiveness and safety?

Effectiveness tradeoffs

Local anesthetic adoption depends on:

  • Onset and duration relative to comparators
  • Supplementation rates
  • Procedure success without re-dosing

Safety tradeoffs

For prilocaine, methemoglobinemia risk is a key safety differentiator in dosing and patient risk profiles. Market usage can shift based on:

  • Provider comfort with monitoring
  • Label warnings and local clinical guidelines
  • Availability of alternative drugs with different risk profiles

2025-2035 market projection for Citanest (prilocaine): base case, drivers, and downside

A projection requires a verified starting revenue or unit base and an identified product variant (NDC/strength/formulation and geography). Without that, any numerical forecast would be fabricated.

What the projection model would use (decision-grade inputs)

  • Market size: local anesthetics by segment (dentistry, minor surgery, obstetrics)
  • Share: Citanest/NDC-level share vs. generics
  • Pricing: ASP trend and tender price elasticity
  • Regulatory: exclusivity end and generic substitution timing (if any residual barriers)
  • Volume: procedure growth and migration between local anesthetic choices

Base case drivers

  • Growth in outpatient dental and minor surgical procedures
  • Stable generic substitution with gradual price compression
  • Potential share shifts based on safety labeling and guideline adoption

Downside drivers

  • Faster-than-expected generic price erosion
  • Provider preference shift to alternative amide anesthetics or articaine products
  • Expanded safety restrictions that reduce eligible dosing

Upside drivers

  • Improved differentiation via delivery format or higher convenience
  • Tendering advantage in specific regions
  • Expanded labeled indications in key markets (if regulatory approvals exist)

Key Takeaways

  • Citanest (prilocaine) competes in a mature, substitution-heavy local anesthetic market where generic pricing pressure and procedural volume trends dominate outcomes.
  • A credible clinical-trials update, Orange Book exclusivity assessment, and 2025-2035 revenue projection require exact product identification (NDC or equivalent in each target jurisdiction) and validated trial/market datasets.
  • Without those inputs, producing a complete and accurate decision-grade market and clinical update is not possible.

FAQs

  1. What FDA approval does Citanest (prilocaine) have for dental use, and how does labeling vary by country?
  2. What is prilocaine’s methemoglobinemia risk profile, and how does it affect provider prescribing behavior?
  3. Which generic prilocaine products most directly substitute for Citanest in dental and minor procedure settings?
  4. How do tender and reimbursement policies influence local anesthetic brand retention versus generics?
  5. How should companies evaluate Orange Book patents for mature small-molecule local anesthetics when planning launches or licensing?

References

  1. (No sources were provided in the prompt, and no verifiable trial registry, Orange Book, litigation docket, or market dataset identifiers were supplied.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.