Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00774280 ↗ Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide vs Fludarabine as a Conditioning Regimen Completed Cooperative Study Group A for Hematology Phase 3 2002-05-01 1. At the same time of registration, patients will be randomized to one of the two conditioning therapy groups; Arm I (intravenous busulfan plus cyclophosphamide; BuCy) or Arm II (intravenous busulfan plus fludarabine; BuFlu). 2. Randomization will be a stratified permuted-block design. 2.1The patients will be stratified into standard risk vs. high risk group, and related vs. unrelated donor. Standard risk group will be defined as follows: patients with acute leukemia in first remission, CML in chronic phase, and MDS (RA or RARS categories). High risk group will be defined as follows: patients with acute leukemia in relapse or in second or subsequent remission, CML in accelerated or blastic phase, and MDS (CMMoL or RAEB categories). 2.2.Pre-assigned block size is 8.
NCT00980876 ↗ A Comparative Study Between Two Formulations of the Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride + Hydrocortisone Otic Suspension Completed Pharmagenix Projetos em Medicina Farmacêutica Ltda. Phase 3 2012-04-01 The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of the test product containing 2 mg/mL ciprofloxacin hydrochloride associated with 10 mg/mL of hydrocortisone with the reference product Cipro HC®, in patients with acute otitis externa.
NCT00980876 ↗ A Comparative Study Between Two Formulations of the Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride + Hydrocortisone Otic Suspension Completed Farmoquimica S.A. Phase 3 2012-04-01 The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of the test product containing 2 mg/mL ciprofloxacin hydrochloride associated with 10 mg/mL of hydrocortisone with the reference product Cipro HC®, in patients with acute otitis externa.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
Leukemia 1
Metastatic Cancer 1
Myelodysplastic Syndrome 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE
Intervention Trials
Otitis 1
Syndrome 1
Preleukemia 1
Myelodysplastic Syndromes 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE
Location Trials
Brazil 2
China 1
Korea, Republic of 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE
Sponsor Trials
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
Alphacait, LLC 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE AND HYDROCORTISONE
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: June 18, 2026

Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride and Hydrocortisone: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast (Ophthalmic + Otic Combination)

Executive summary: Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and hydrocortisone is a fixed-dose antibiotic-steroid combination used for ocular and otic inflammatory infections. The clinical-trial pipeline is thin relative to single-agent antibiotics and broad anti-infectives, and commercial value is concentrated in a small number of branded generics/authorized products. Demand is driven by episodic infection incidence, formulary preference for combination products, and clinician switching within fluoroquinolone and steroid frameworks. Near-term growth is limited by generic penetration and patent expirations typical for combination ophthalmic/otic products. The most credible upside comes from lifecycle expansions (reformulation, dosing regimen improvements, and new indications) and from manufacturing continuity in the wake of supply volatility in older ophthalmic brands.


What clinical trials exist for ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and hydrocortisone right now?

Bottom line: Trial activity for the combination is generally low and tends to be concentrated in bioequivalence studies, post-approval formulation work, or label-expansion efforts, rather than large, novel Phase 3 programs.

Which trial types dominate

  • Bioequivalence and formulation scale-up (typical for generic entrants and lifecycle changes).
  • Safety/PK bridging (for reformulated suspensions, solutions, or delivery-system tweaks).
  • Label-expansion trials (less common; usually small Phase 2/3 or controlled studies in defined infection syndromes).

Common endpoints used in combo antibiotic-steroid programs

  • Clinical resolution of infection/inflammation (sign scores such as discharge, redness, pain)
  • Time to symptom improvement
  • Microbiological eradication (where required by study design)
  • Steroid safety markers (IOP monitoring in ocular programs, and symptom rebound)

Where trials usually run

  • Ophthalmic programs: sites aligned with aqueous/ocular infection epidemiology
  • Otic programs: sites aligned with external ear infection and inflammatory otitis syndromes

Data note: A complete “right now” clinical-trials map requires a live query of CT registries (ClinicalTrials.gov/WHO ICTRP). No registry-level dataset was provided in the prompt, and no drug-specific registry identifiers were included. A clinical-trials update with named studies, NCT numbers, enrollment, and status cannot be produced accurately without a current registry extract.


Which indications are most relevant for ciprofloxacin + hydrocortisone, and how does that shape the pipeline?

Bottom line: The combination is used where bacterial coverage and steroid-mediated inflammation control are required together, which restricts use to specific clinical syndromes rather than broad empiric anti-infective categories.

Ophthalmic infection-inflammation

Typical clinical logic:

  • Fluoroquinolone for bacterial pathogens
  • Hydrocortisone to reduce inflammatory signs and symptom burden

Key implications for trials:

  • Outcome measures are sign-based and time-to-improvement focused
  • Inclusion criteria are stricter (specific clinical picture of conjunctival/ocular infection with inflammation)

Otic infection with inflammatory component

Key implications for trials:

  • Endpoint selection prioritizes pain, discharge, and otoscopic findings
  • Safety monitoring focuses on steroid-related risks where relevant and steroid duration

Regulatory sensitivity

  • Combination products face scrutiny for correct dosing of antibiotic-steroid ratios
  • Resistance patterns matter because fluoroquinolone stewardship affects positioning and use

How big is the market for ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and hydrocortisone (and where is spend concentrated)?

Bottom line: The market is small-to-mid relative to standalone fluoroquinolone ophthalmics and broad OTC/primary-care anti-infectives. Revenue is concentrated in:

  1. ophthalmic infection-inflammation treatments,
  2. otic inflammatory infection treatments where combination therapy is preferred.

Commercial drivers

  • Infection incidence (episodic demand, seasonal variability)
  • Formulary and substitution in ophthalmology and ENT settings
  • Clinical preference for a “one-bottle” regimen when steroid use is appropriate

Commercial headwinds

  • Generic penetration (combination products are often earlier in the generics cycle)
  • Stewardship and guideline behavior reducing fluoroquinolone overuse
  • Steroid-risk perceptions leading clinicians to opt for alternatives when uncertain about etiology

Where the bulk of revenue typically sits

  • US: ophthalmic/otic prescribing and pharmacy distribution
  • EU/UK: similar pattern by local authorization status
  • Emerging markets: usually via generics with variable quality and supply continuity

Data note: A quantified market sizing model (TAM/SAM/SOM, revenue by geography, and unit volumes) requires specific dataset access (e.g., IQVIA, GlobalData, EMA/NSD sales proxies). The prompt did not supply market figures or brand/generic-level revenue histories, so a precise market number and projection range cannot be produced without inventing data.


How does exclusivity work for ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and hydrocortisone products?

Bottom line: Most combination products in this space have expired or near-expired core composition and formulation protections, leaving exclusivity primarily driven by:

  • later-filed reformulation patents,
  • manufacturing process patents,
  • regulatory exclusivity blocks (rare, depending on NDA/ANDA history),
  • 3-year/5-year exclusivity mechanisms tied to specific approvals.

What to expect in the patent estate

  • Older composition protection likely expired long ago for fluoroquinolone + steroid combinations as a class.
  • Product-specific patents usually concern:
    • suspension stability and viscosity targets
    • particle-size distributions
    • preservative systems and pH windows
    • delivery container compatibility

Featured “how-to” in exclusivity searches

For a full exclusivity map, you would typically reconcile:

  • FDA Orange Book listings (drug substance + dosage form),
  • patent term and listed expiration dates,
  • pediatric exclusivity or patent term adjustments,
  • any new exclusivity tied to supplemental applications.

Data note: No Orange Book extract or FDA listing identifiers were supplied. A claim-by-claim patent and exclusivity timeline cannot be generated accurately.


What patent risks exist for generic entry of ciprofloxacin + hydrocortisone products?

Bottom line: The generic risk is commonly driven by whether the reference product has enforceable formulation/manufacturing patents that survive later filings. In many cases, generics enter as soon as listed patents are cleared or designed around, especially when the active ingredients and general dosing are long-established.

Most common Paragraph IV posture in this category

  • ANDA filers typically challenge listed patents tied to formulation/process, then launch after settlement or at expiration.

What tends to block entry

  • Narrow, enforceable formulation patents with proven infringement barriers
  • Manufacturing process claims difficult to design around
  • Potential additional regulatory submissions that keep the reference product in a protected regulatory posture

Data note: A credible “generic entry risks exist for…” answer requires specific patent numbers, Orange Book listings, and any filed ANDA litigation. None were provided.


Which companies compete in ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and hydrocortisone, and how does the competitive landscape look?

Bottom line: Competition is dominated by:

  • original branded products (where still authorized),
  • multiple generic manufacturers,
  • supply-line continuity as a key determinant of realized share.

Competition shape in ophthalmic/otic combo space

  • A few players win via pharmacy distribution and consistent supply.
  • Others compete mainly on price and ability to meet commercial demand without backorders.

What determines share

  • Formulary inclusion (especially in institutional settings)
  • Rebate structure and contract positioning
  • Clinical familiarity and switching behavior
  • Packaging and dosing convenience

Data note: No brand roster, authorized products list, or NDC-to-holder mapping was provided, so a named-company competitive landscape cannot be produced without risking factual errors.


What does the clinical and safety profile imply for market adoption?

Bottom line: The combination is adopted when clinicians want concurrent bacterial suppression and inflammation control. Adoption is sensitive to:

  • correct patient selection (presence of bacterial component)
  • duration of steroid exposure
  • monitoring practices (especially in ocular products)

Key safety considerations that influence prescribing

  • For ophthalmic use: steroid-associated risks including increased intraocular pressure in susceptible patients
  • For both routes: masking of infection progression if steroid is used inappropriately

How this shapes trial design and labeling

  • Studies typically focus on clinical signs resolution and safety monitoring during treatment windows
  • Label language often constrains use cases and discourages prolonged steroid exposure

Market projection: What growth outlook should be modeled for ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and hydrocortisone?

Bottom line: Forecasts typically show low-to-moderate growth in units offset by price compression from generic entry. Any meaningful revenue upside is most likely to come from:

  • new formulations with improved dosing adherence,
  • broader indication expansion,
  • region-by-region supply stabilization enabling better fulfillment rates.

Model structure to use

  • Units: track prescriptions and claim-level volume proxy (by NDC)
  • Price: average net price erosion driven by generic competition
  • Channel mix: retail vs institutional changes
  • Policy sensitivity: fluoroquinolone stewardship and formulary restrictions

Forecast ranges (non-quantified)

  • Base case: flat-to-low growth in revenue due to ongoing price compression
  • Upside: modest growth if a dominant authorized product remains supply-stable and a lifecycle reformulation limits competitive substitution
  • Downside: rapid decline if new generics launch into thin formularies or if supply disruptions reduce fill rates

Data note: Specific numeric projections (CAGR, revenue by year) cannot be stated without underlying unit/price baselines. The prompt requests projections, but no market baseline inputs were provided.


How does ciprofloxacin + hydrocortisone compare with alternative antibiotic-steroid options?

Bottom line: The combination competes against other fluoroquinolone-steroid combinations and against antibiotic-only regimens plus separate steroid (or anti-inflammatory agent) approaches.

Competitive comparison axes

  • Spectrum and pathogen coverage behavior
  • Steroid potency and dosing tolerance
  • Dosing convenience (single agent vs split regimen)
  • Formulation tolerability (comfort, redness, preservative irritation profile)

Where substitution happens

  • When clinicians prefer antibiotic-only first-line and reserve steroid for select inflammatory phenotypes
  • When formulary requires step edits or excludes certain steroid-containing options

Data note: A drug-by-drug comparative patent and market position requires a competitor list and data sources not provided.


What regulatory status affects launch timing and access for ciprofloxacin + hydrocortisone?

Bottom line: Regulatory access in the US and EU depends on authorization for specific dosage forms, route, and indication. For generics, approval timing depends on ANDA submission quality, bioequivalence, and patent status.

FDA pathway dynamics

  • NDA for reference products
  • ANDA for generics and authorized generics
  • Label alignment and clinical data packages for any new dosage form or indication

EU pathway dynamics

  • National authorizations and mutual recognition
  • Differing review timelines by member state

Data note: No FDA/EU approval history identifiers were provided, preventing an accurate “Orange Book status of…” or authorization timeline.


Key Takeaways

  • Ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and hydrocortisone is used for infection plus inflammation syndromes in ophthalmic and otic settings; this limits broad uptake but supports targeted clinical value.
  • Clinical trial activity for the combination is typically limited to reformulation/bioequivalence and label-support efforts; novel late-stage programs are less common.
  • Market growth is constrained by generics and price erosion; unit growth can be modest if supply and formulary access remain stable.
  • The primary business lever is lifecycle management (formulation and dosing improvements) and supply continuity rather than expecting sustained monopoly pricing.
  • Producing a precise clinical trials update, patent/exclusivity timeline, and numeric market projections requires registry-level and market-analytics inputs that are not present in the prompt.

FAQs

  1. Which antibiotic-steroid combinations compete most directly with ciprofloxacin plus hydrocortisone in ophthalmology?
  2. Do ciprofloxacin plus hydrocortisone products face sterility, preservative, or stability barriers that delay generic launches?
  3. How do formulary restrictions on fluoroquinolones affect prescribing of this combination?
  4. What endpoints matter most in trials for ocular versus otic antibiotic-steroid combinations?
  5. Which lifecycle strategies (pH, viscosity, particle size, device/container) most often extend product relevance for this class?

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (accessed 2026-06-18). https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  2. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (accessed 2026-06-18). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  3. EMA. Human medicines: European public assessment reports (EPAR). (accessed 2026-06-18). https://www.ema.europa.eu/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.