Last Updated: September 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Dosage NCT01168895 ↗ Study in COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Subjects to Investigate Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Ciprofloxacin After Single Dose Inhalations of 50 mg and 75 mg Ciprofloxacin Inhalation Powder Completed Bayer Phase 1 2010-07-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin after inhalation of single 52.5 and 48.75 mg doses in COPD patients. In this study the 48.75 mg dose will be administered for the first time using a new high dose strength (i.e. one capsule containing 75 mg powder = 48.75 mg ciprofloxacin) formulation. Safety investigations will focus on local tolerability in the lung and evaluate whether the patient can inhale the higher amount of powder compared to the lower dose strength. Pharmacokinetics is to see how the body absorbs, distributes, breaks down and gets rid of the study drug. Results from this study will be used to decide whether the new dose strength is suitable for larger clinical trials planned for the COPD patients population.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000641 ↗ A Phase II/III Trial of Rifampin, Ciprofloxacin, Clofazimine, Ethambutol, and Amikacin in the Treatment of Disseminated Mycobacterium Avium Infection in HIV-Infected Individuals. Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To compare the effectiveness and toxicity of two combination drug treatment programs for the treatment of disseminated Mycobacterium avium infection in HIV seropositive patients. [Per 03/06/92 amendment: to evaluate the efficacy of azithromycin when given in conjunction with either ethambutol or clofazimine as maintenance therapy.] Disseminated M. avium infection is the most common systemic bacterial infection complicating AIDS in the United States. The prognosis of patients with disseminated M. avium is extremely poor, particularly when it follows other opportunistic infections or is associated with anemia. Test tube studies and clinical data indicate that the best treatment program may include clofazimine, ethambutol, a rifamycin derivative, and ciprofloxacin. Test tube and animal studies indicate that amikacin is a bactericidal (bacteria destroying) drug that works better when used with ciprofloxacin. Its role in treatment programs is a key issue because of toxicity and because it must be administered parenterally (by injection or intravenously).
NCT00002850 ↗ Antibiotic Therapy in Preventing Early Infection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Receiving Chemotherapy Completed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase 3 1997-03-01 RATIONALE: Giving antibiotics may be effective in preventing or controlling early infection in patients with multiple myeloma and may improve their response to chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying antibiotics to see how well they work compared to no antibiotics in preventing early infection in patients with multiple myeloma.
NCT00002850 ↗ Antibiotic Therapy in Preventing Early Infection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Receiving Chemotherapy Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1997-03-01 RATIONALE: Giving antibiotics may be effective in preventing or controlling early infection in patients with multiple myeloma and may improve their response to chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying antibiotics to see how well they work compared to no antibiotics in preventing early infection in patients with multiple myeloma.
NCT00002850 ↗ Antibiotic Therapy in Preventing Early Infection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Receiving Chemotherapy Completed Gary Morrow Phase 3 1997-03-01 RATIONALE: Giving antibiotics may be effective in preventing or controlling early infection in patients with multiple myeloma and may improve their response to chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying antibiotics to see how well they work compared to no antibiotics in preventing early infection in patients with multiple myeloma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Urinary Tract Infections 15
Healthy 11
Infection 8
Cystic Fibrosis 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Infections 38
Infection 32
Communicable Diseases 30
Urinary Tract Infections 28
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 471
Germany 44
United Kingdom 41
Canada 38
Spain 34
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
Texas 30
California 29
Florida 25
Ohio 22
North Carolina 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 5
PHASE3 4
PHASE2 9
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 156
Recruiting 41
Terminated 25
[disabled in preview] 24
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Bayer 22
PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. 6
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. 6
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CIPROFLOXACIN; CIPROFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 343
Industry 138
NIH 14
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Ciprofloxacin Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Revenue Projection (Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride)

Executive summary: Ciprofloxacin (including ciprofloxacin hydrochloride) remains a mature, off-patent antibacterial with broad generic availability. Commercial upside is primarily driven by (1) continued utilization in high-volume infections and (2) new clinical data supporting specific indications, dosing regimens, and combinations, not by novel monopoly drug entries. Market growth is modest and tied to global antibiotic consumption trends, antimicrobial stewardship policies, and penetration of hospital formularies.


What clinical trials are currently evaluating ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin hydrochloride) and what endpoints matter?

Core point: Most “new” ciprofloxacin clinical activity is incremental: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies, comparators for existing indications, formulation/route evaluations, and efforts to optimize dosing for resistance patterns. Trials that drive label changes are usually endpoint-driven (microbiologic eradication, clinical cure, time-to-symptom improvement) with resistance subgroup analyses.

Which ciprofloxacin trial types show the most label-change potential?

  1. New regimens or dosing schedules

    • Higher exposure strategies (AUC/MIC targets) for fluoroquinolone-susceptible organisms.
    • Shorter-course studies where stewardship policies push shorter durations.
  2. Resistance-stratified efficacy studies

    • Outcomes split by baseline MIC bands and resistance phenotypes (eg, fluoroquinolone resistance).
    • Supports label language refinement and formulary confidence in difficult pathogens.
  3. Route and formulation optimization

    • Oral versus IV bridging.
    • Bioavailability and tolerability comparisons for different salt forms and excipient packages.
  4. Special populations and adherence-focused studies

    • Pediatric, geriatric, renal impairment, and outpatient adherence settings.
    • Endpoints often include safety and exposure consistency.

What endpoints do ciprofloxacin trials use most often?

  • Clinical cure at test-of-cure (TOC)
  • Microbiologic eradication at TOC
  • Time to symptom improvement or resolution
  • PK parameters: AUC, Cmax, Tmax
  • Safety: QT risk signals, CNS adverse events, tendon/arthropathy signals where relevant, GI tolerability
  • Resistance evolution: emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates

What resistance and safety signals most often shape clinical interpretation?

  • Fluoroquinolone resistance drives subgroup variability and can shift trial results toward reduced effect sizes in high-MIC populations.
  • Safety influences uptake despite efficacy: QT prolongation risk monitoring, CNS adverse event incidence, and risk communication requirements.

How does the clinical evidence update translate into usage patterns for ciprofloxacin?

Core point: For a mature antibiotic, usage shifts typically follow (1) stewardship priorities, (2) formulary decisions, (3) local susceptibility trends, and (4) updated guideline alignment rather than a single late-stage trial.

Hospital uptake levers

  • Local antibiogram susceptibility supports active use.
  • IV-to-oral switch strategies reduce length of stay and cost.
  • Formularies favor predictable dosing and wide availability.

Outpatient and community levers

  • Adherence and tolerability in uncomplicated infections.
  • Convenience of dosing regimens.
  • Stewardship policies limiting fluoroquinolones unless criteria are met.

What is the current market size and growth outlook for ciprofloxacin (global and major regions)?

Core point: Ciprofloxacin is a large, established fluoroquinolone market with steady consumption, but price is constrained by generics. Growth is driven more by volume and treatment incidence than by price.

Market dynamics that matter

  1. Pricing pressure from generics

    • Multiple ANDA entrants create low unit economics.
    • Brand pricing is absent or limited depending on jurisdiction.
  2. Antibiotic stewardship constraints

    • Fluoroquinolone restrictions can cap growth in certain settings.
    • Use often shifts to targeted indications.
  3. Resistance pressure

    • Higher resistance rates reduce effective utility, shifting demand to other antibiotic classes.
    • Regions with stable susceptibility preserve ciprofloxacin use.
  4. Guideline behavior

    • When clinical guidelines prefer other agents for common indications, ciprofloxacin growth softens.

Regional pattern expectations (directional)

  • North America: stable-to-moderate demand; stewardship and resistance constrain expansion.
  • Europe: slower growth; prescribing controls can reduce fluoroquinolone share.
  • Asia-Pacific: higher incremental volume potential due to infectious disease burden and expanding healthcare access.
  • Latin America and Middle East/Africa: volume growth possible; procurement and local resistance trends are primary drivers.

(Directional outlook only: a quantitative market model requires current third-party market figures and segment-level prescribing data, which are not provided in this request.)


Where does ciprofloxacin generate revenue today: indications, settings, and formulations?

Core point: Revenue is dominated by generic ciprofloxacin oral and IV uses across a broad infectious disease footprint. Segmenting by formulation and route provides the most actionable commercial picture.

Commercially relevant segments

  • Oral tablets/suspension
    • High-volume outpatient and step-down use.
  • IV (intravenous) formulations
    • Hospital-driven acute and complicated infections.
  • Indication mix (high-level)
    • Gastrointestinal infections and traveler’s diarrhea subsets (where used)
    • Urinary tract infections, prostatitis subsets
    • Respiratory infections where susceptible organisms are likely and stewardship allows
    • Other labeled uses depending on region

Competitive set

  • Generic ciprofloxacin across multiple manufacturers.
  • Substitution risk from other fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) and non-fluoroquinolone antibiotics depending on susceptibility and guideline updates.

What is the revenue projection for ciprofloxacin over the next 5 years and what are the key sensitivities?

Core point: For an off-patent, multi-generic antibiotic, projection sensitivity is primarily tied to volume, not exclusivity. The range of outcomes is driven by antimicrobial stewardship intensity and resistance trends.

5-year projection framework (scenario logic)

  • Base case drivers
    • Stable global consumption with modest volume growth
    • Ongoing generics-driven price compression offsetting volume gains
  • Upside case drivers
    • Improved stewardship targeting that preserves appropriate use
    • Expansion in hospital use through IV-to-oral protocols
    • Growth in APAC procurement volumes
  • Downside case drivers
    • Rising fluoroquinolone resistance reducing effective treatment rates
    • Stricter fluoroquinolone prescribing restrictions in major markets
    • Substitution to alternative antibiotics for common indications

What you should model (commercially actionable variables)

  • Treated patient volume by infection category
  • Penetration rate of oral vs IV
  • Net price (blended) after generics competition
  • Loss of share to alternative antibiotics in resistance hotspots
  • Tendering and reimbursement behavior in key countries

(A numeric projection cannot be produced without market-size inputs and segment-level pricing assumptions.)


How does ciprofloxacin compare with other fluoroquinolones on market trajectory and lifecycle risk?

Core point: Ciprofloxacin typically sits in the middle of fluoroquinolone lifecycle value: high volume, low price, and strong generic competition. Alternatives can win on clinician familiarity for particular indications, perceived safety profiles, or local guideline preferences.

Competitive comparisons (directional)

  • Levofloxacin: often benefits from different dosing convenience and guideline inclusion patterns; shares compete heavily for respiratory and complicated infections.
  • Moxifloxacin: sometimes favored for respiratory coverage but can face its own safety and resistance dynamics.
  • Ciprofloxacin: strong in UTIs and certain GI and hospital infection subsets, subject to resistance.

Lifecycle implications

  • All major fluoroquinolones face generic saturation.
  • The differentiator is not exclusivity but prescribing behavior, resistance pattern, and local procurement.

What generic entry risks exist for ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin hydrochloride) in key jurisdictions?

Core point: For ciprofloxacin, the principal “entry risk” is less about patent barriers and more about supply chain competition, tender pricing, and regulatory quality/CMC approvals.

Commercial/IP reality

  • Ciprofloxacin is widely generic; entry barriers are mostly operational (manufacturing capacity, bioequivalence, quality systems) rather than legal exclusivity.

Pricing and supply constraints as the real risks

  • Market share can hinge on:
    • ability to meet large tenders
    • consistent quality documentation
    • stable raw material supply and manufacturing yields

What FDA status and Orange Book listings apply to ciprofloxacin hydrochloride?

Core point: Ciprofloxacin is an established drug with extensive generic coverage. Orange Book activity is consistent with numerous ANDAs and listed patents, but for market analysis the key is that exclusivity is not the dominant driver of annual demand.

Regulatory pathway realities

  • Generics typically rely on ANDA approval routes.
  • Any meaningful regulatory change affecting market uptake would come from label updates or safety communications rather than new exclusivity.

(A precise Orange Book listing table is not provided because the request does not include specific NDCs or product dossiers, and the dataset cannot be reliably reconstructed here.)


Key takeaways

  • Ciprofloxacin is a mature, off-patent antibiotic with market growth limited by generic pricing and antimicrobial stewardship.
  • Clinical trial updates are most likely to influence incremental dosing/route use and label refinement rather than generate monopoly revenue.
  • The 5-year commercial trajectory depends on treated volume and net price under generics, with sensitivities around resistance and prescribing restrictions.
  • Competitive advantage for manufacturers is operational execution: tendering, supply reliability, and consistent quality, not IP exclusivity.

FAQs

  1. Which ciprofloxacin formulations (oral vs IV) typically drive most volume in hospitals?
  2. How do fluoroquinolone resistance trends affect ciprofloxacin demand by region?
  3. What PK/PD targets in ciprofloxacin trials most influence dosing recommendations?
  4. How do antimicrobial stewardship policies change ciprofloxacin prescribing patterns?
  5. What commercial levers matter most for ciprofloxacin manufacturers in generic-heavy markets?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. Clinical pharmacology and antimicrobial dosing guidance for fluoroquinolones (peer-reviewed literature and major clinical guidelines).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.