You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CINOXACIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CINOXACIN

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02099240 ↗ Patients Response to Early Switch To Oral:Osteomyelitis Study Terminated James Graham Brown Cancer Center Early Phase 1 2014-03-06 Based on the current literature, investigators hypothesize that patients with osteomyelitis who are treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy will have the same clinical outcomes as patients treated with the experimental approach of intravenous antibiotics with early switch to oral antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients with osteomyelitis treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy versus patients treated with intravenous antibiotics with an early switch to oral antibiotics in relation to clinical outcomes at 12 months after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Secondary objectives of the study include the evaluation of adverse events related to the use of antibiotics as well as the cost of care evaluated from the hospital perspective.
NCT02099240 ↗ Patients Response to Early Switch To Oral:Osteomyelitis Study Terminated University of Louisville Early Phase 1 2014-03-06 Based on the current literature, investigators hypothesize that patients with osteomyelitis who are treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy will have the same clinical outcomes as patients treated with the experimental approach of intravenous antibiotics with early switch to oral antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients with osteomyelitis treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy versus patients treated with intravenous antibiotics with an early switch to oral antibiotics in relation to clinical outcomes at 12 months after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Secondary objectives of the study include the evaluation of adverse events related to the use of antibiotics as well as the cost of care evaluated from the hospital perspective.
NCT02099240 ↗ Patients Response to Early Switch To Oral:Osteomyelitis Study Terminated Julio Ramirez Early Phase 1 2014-03-06 Based on the current literature, investigators hypothesize that patients with osteomyelitis who are treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy will have the same clinical outcomes as patients treated with the experimental approach of intravenous antibiotics with early switch to oral antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients with osteomyelitis treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy versus patients treated with intravenous antibiotics with an early switch to oral antibiotics in relation to clinical outcomes at 12 months after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Secondary objectives of the study include the evaluation of adverse events related to the use of antibiotics as well as the cost of care evaluated from the hospital perspective.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CINOXACIN

Condition Name

Condition Name for CINOXACIN
Intervention Trials
Osteomyelitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CINOXACIN
Intervention Trials
Osteomyelitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CINOXACIN

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CINOXACIN
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CINOXACIN
Location Trials
Kentucky 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CINOXACIN

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CINOXACIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Early Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CINOXACIN
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CINOXACIN

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CINOXACIN
Sponsor Trials
James Graham Brown Cancer Center 1
University of Louisville 1
Julio Ramirez 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CINOXACIN
Sponsor Trials
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Cinoxacin

Last updated: November 12, 2025

Introduction

Cinoxacin, a synthetic fluoroquinolone antibiotic, has historically been used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs). Developed in the late 1970s, its broad-spectrum activity includes efficacy against common uropathogens such as Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. Despite its initial widespread adoption, the drug’s market share declined due to concerns over bacterial resistance, side-effect profiles, and the advent of newer antibiotics. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, a thorough assessment of ongoing clinical trials, market dynamics, and future projections for cinoxacin is necessary for stakeholders considering its potential repositioning or resurgence.

Clinical Trials Status and Updates

Historical and Current Clinical Development

Historically, cinoxacin's clinical development was robust during the 1970s and 1980s, with multiple phase II and III trials establishing its efficacy and safety profile for UTIs. Further research was largely discontinued in the early 2000s due to pharmacokinetic concerns and safety issues, notably gastrointestinal disturbances and potential for cartilage toxicity, similar to other fluoroquinolones.

In recent years, there have been minimal reports of active clinical trials involving cinoxacin. A search in clinical trial databases indicates the absence of ongoing or new Phase I-III trials explicitly focusing on cinoxacin. However, some preclinical investigations explore its derivatives to enhance microbiological spectrum and reduce adverse effects. Furthermore, a limited number of investigator-initiated studies examine its utility in resistant infections, but such efforts are not registered as formal clinical trials under major regulatory agencies.

Recent Innovations and Repurposing Efforts

While direct clinical trials investigating cinoxacin have stagnated, research interest persists in cellular and molecular modifications to develop newer fluoroquinolone analogs with improved safety profiles. Innovative approaches include nanoparticle delivery systems and nanotechnological enhancements aimed at targeting UTIs more effectively. These initiatives, although promising, are predominantly in early preclinical stages and do not yet influence clinical trial pipelines for cinoxacin itself.

Regulatory Environment and Considerations

In jurisdictions like the United States and European Union, cinoxacin has largely been withdrawn from the market due to safety concerns, with no recent approval or advanced clinical testing. The absence of active trials reflects the regulatory cautiousness stemming from safety profiles and emerging resistance patterns against fluoroquinolones.

In contrast, some emerging markets with less stringent regulatory oversight might still see sporadic, small-scale clinical studies, often focused on comparing existing fluoroquinolones rather than cinoxacin specifically.

Market Analysis

Historical Market Performance

The global antibiotics market was valued at approximately $52 billion in 2022, with fluoroquinolones constituting a significant segment prior to the rise of resistance issues and safety concerns. Cinoxacin, once a notable member, experienced market contraction, particularly after safety warnings associated with fluoroquinolones led to regulatory restrictions and declining prescriptions.

In the United States, cinoxacin was voluntarily withdrawn from the market by manufacturers in the early 2000s. The European market followed suit after safety reviews highlighted the drug’s adverse effect profile, especially concerns related to tendon damage and neurological effects.

Current Market Position

Today, cinoxacin's presence is virtually null in major pharmaceutical markets. Its primary competitors include newer fluoroquinolones like ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, which, despite safety issues, have broad indications and extensive clinical data supporting their use.

However, the rising tide of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), particularly multidrug-resistant uropathogens, prompts a reevaluation of older antibiotics, including fluoroquinolones. Some niche markets, especially in developing countries, continue to utilize older antibiotics due to accessibility and cost factors, although this practice is increasingly scrutinized.

Market Opportunities and Challenges

Opportunities:

  • Repositioning as a targeted therapy: If safety concerns are mitigated through formulation modifications, cinoxacin could re-enter the market for specific UTIs, especially in populations with limited access to newer antibiotics.
  • Combination therapies: Combining cinoxacin with other agents to minimize resistance development or adverse effects may offer niche benefits.

Challenges:

  • Safety and resistance issues: The primary hurdles remain safety concerns and established bacterial resistance.
  • Regulatory barriers: Strict regulatory approval processes and the need for extensive clinical data pose significant hurdles to market re-entry.
  • Market preference for newer agents: Clinicians favor newer agents with better safety profiles, making market penetration difficult without substantial clinical advantages.

Forecast and Future Market Dynamics

Given the current landscape, the market for cinoxacin is projected to remain niche unless significant breakthroughs occur. The global antibiotics market is expected to grow at a CAGR of roughly 3.5% through 2030, driven by rising AMR and unmet needs in developing economies [1].

Potential scenarios:

  • Reintroduction with improved safety profile: If derivative formulations or delivery systems demonstrate reduced adverse effects in clinical studies, cinoxacin could see a localized resurgence, particularly in lower-income markets.
  • Abandonment: Without new clinical data or formulation improvements, cinoxacin’s market prospects will further diminish, confined to historical use and in specific markets with limited drug regulation.

Market projection (2023–2030):
The global fluoroquinolone market will continue to decline for older agents like cinoxacin, with an estimated share reduction of 10%-15%. Conversely, specialized fluoroquinolones will maintain dominance, with a combined market value exceeding $20 billion in 2030 [2].

Conclusion

While cinoxacin historically served as a key antibiotic for UTIs, its clinical and market relevance has declined sharply due to safety concerns and resistance issues. Current clinical trial activity is minimal or absent, and prospects for reintegration into the modern therapeutic arsenal hinge on safety improvements and pharmacological innovation. The market environment favors newer agents, but urgent public health needs related to antimicrobial resistance may incentivize niche applications or reformulation efforts.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development of cinoxacin has largely ceased, with no recent phase trials or regulatory approvals.
  • Safety concerns and bacterial resistance are key barriers limiting market re-entry.
  • Niche potential exists if formulations demonstrate improved safety and efficacy, especially in underserved markets.
  • Market projections indicate a continued decline in cinoxacin’s relevance, with an overall shift toward newer fluoroquinolones and alternative antibiotics.
  • Stakeholders should closely monitor advancements in drug reformulation, resistance patterns, and regulatory policies for potential future opportunities.

FAQs

1. Why was cinoxacin withdrawn from the market in many regions?
Cinoxacin was withdrawn primarily due to safety concerns, including risks of tendinopathy, neurological adverse effects, and gastrointestinal disturbances, which paralleled issues seen with other fluoroquinolones.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials exploring cinoxacin’s use?
Currently, there are no known active clinical trials focusing specifically on cinoxacin. Most research has shifted towards newer fluoroquinolones and alternative antibiotics.

3. Could cinoxacin make a comeback in the future?
A resurgence is possible if innovative formulations or derivatives significantly improve safety profiles. However, regulatory approval and overcoming resistance issues remain substantial hurdles.

4. How does antimicrobial resistance impact the market for older antibiotics like cinoxacin?
AMR diminishes the effectiveness of antibiotics, often leading clinicians to favor newer agents with broader safety data. This diminishes market share for older drugs unless resistance patterns create a niche.

5. What are the prospects for cinoxacin’s use in developing countries?
In regions with limited regulatory oversight and accessibility issues, older antibiotics like cinoxacin still see limited use. Nonetheless, global efforts to curb antibiotic misuse and resistance may reduce such practices over time.


References

[1] Markets and Markets. (2022). Antibiotics Market by Type, Application, and Region.
[2] Research and Markets. (2023). Global Fluoroquinolone Market Forecast.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.