You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00487084 ↗ Effect of Timing on Efficacy of Morphine Analgesia After 2-chloroprocaine Anesthesia Completed Northwestern University N/A 2004-08-01 Epidural chloroprocaine is often used in obstetrical anesthesia because of its fast onset and short duration. These properties make it an ideal drug to use for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing postpartum tubal ligation. When epidural morphine is given after chloroprocaine, there is a decreased efficacy of analgesia as compared to lidocaine (1). Several studies have hypothesized a specific opioid receptor mediated antagonism of chloroprocaine (2,3). Karambelkar raised the question whether this decreased efficacy is due to a disparity between the time the chloroprocaine anesthesia resolves and the onset of epidural morphine analgesia, resulting in a time window of pain (2). The duration of action of epidural 2-CP anesthesia is 30-45 minutes and the onset of epidural morphine analgesia is 60-70 minutes, therefore the regression of sensory blockade before the onset of the morphine analgesia could result in a window of pain (2). Hess and colleagues studied epidural morphine analgesia and women who had a Cesarean delivery under spinal bupivacaine anesthesia (3). Subjects were randomized to receive epidural 2-CP and morphine or epidural saline and morphine. There was no difference in postoperative analgesia between the two groups (3 and personal communication, Dr. Philip Hess). A literature search cross referencing epidural chloroprocaine, using Pub Med, did not produce any articles comparing epidural morphine given before the procedure (in an attempt to time the onset of analgesia with the resolution of chloroprocaine anesthesia) to the standard administration time after the procedure.
NCT00845962 ↗ A Comparison of Bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for Spinal Anesthesia Completed Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) N/A 2009-02-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacity and the readiness for discharge between two local anesthetics, bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine, used for spinal anesthesia.
NCT00845962 ↗ A Comparison of Bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for Spinal Anesthesia Completed Université de Montréal N/A 2009-02-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacity and the readiness for discharge between two local anesthetics, bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine, used for spinal anesthesia.
NCT01719237 ↗ Trial Comparing the Onset and Duration of Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Nerve Blocks Using Ropivacaine Versus Ropivacaine-Chloroprocaine Mixture Completed VA Palo Alto Health Care System Phase 4 2009-08-01 A double blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the onset and duration of the Onset and Duration of Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Nerve Blocks Using a long acting local anesthestic (Ropivacaine) with a mixture of a long and short acting local anesthestic (Ropivacaine-Chloroprocaine Mixture).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Spinal Anesthesia 4
Anesthesia 3
Pain 3
Anesthesia, Spinal 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Hernia, Inguinal 3
Uterine Cervical Incompetence 2
Cataract 2
Hernia 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 26
Belgium 6
Italy 6
Spain 3
Switzerland 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
New York 3
Oregon 2
Arkansas 2
Utah 1
South Dakota 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 4
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 12
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 24
Recruiting 7
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Sintetica SA 10
Cross Research S.A. 3
University Hospital, Ghent 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CHLOROPROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 45
Industry 19
UNKNOWN 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Chloroprocaine Hydrochloride

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

Chloroprocaine Hydrochloride (CPH) continues to assert its significance as a local anesthetic agent in surgical and procedural medicine. Known for its rapid onset and short duration of action, CPH has been a preferred choice in outpatient settings and procedures requiring fast recovery. This analysis provides a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, an in-depth market assessment, and future projections, offering insights for pharmaceutical firms, investors, and healthcare providers.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Status and Ongoing Studies

Recent years have seen renewed scientific interest in Chloroprocaine Hydrochloride, driven by innovations in local anesthetic formulations and the demand for rapid-onset anesthesia with minimal systemic effects. A key development is the evaluation of preservative-free, extended-release formulations designed for prolonged analgesia, which are undergoing Phase II and III clinical trials.

  • Efficacy and Safety Trials: Multiple studies investigate CPH's efficacy in spinal and epidural anesthesia, especially in ambulatory surgeries such as urological procedures, orthopedic interventions, and obstetric anesthesia. These trials focus on optimizing dosage, reducing neurotoxicity, and minimizing adverse effects such as transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) [1].

  • Innovative Formulations: New formulations employing liposomal encapsulation or combining CPH with adjuvants like dexamethasone aim to extend analgesic duration. Trials are evaluating these for safety, pharmacokinetics, and patient outcomes [2].

  • Special Population Studies: Limited but emerging research assesses CPH's pharmacodynamics in vulnerable groups, including pediatric, geriatric, and obstetric populations, to establish safe dosing regimens and minimize systemic toxicity.

Regulatory Progress

While CPH is already approved in various regions, ongoing trials are pivotal for expanding indications, particularly for use in continuous epidural infusions and novel delivery methods. The FDA has approved preservative-free formulations for specific indications, with continued submission of New Drug Applications (NDAs) based on accumulating trial data.


Market Analysis

Market Landscape and Dynamics

The global local anesthetic market is projected to reach USD 8 billion by 2025, driven by increasing demand for outpatient surgeries and minimally invasive procedures [3]. Chloroprocaine Hydrochloride occupies a niche within this segment characterized by rapid onset and short duration, appealing to outpatient clinics and ambulatory surgical centers.

  • Market Share: Traditionally, lidocaine and bupivacaine dominate the local anesthetic landscape, but CPH's unique pharmacokinetic profile enables it to carve out a specialized segment, especially with emerging formulations offering longer-lasting effects.

  • Key Players: Major pharmaceutical companies investing in or developing CPH formulations include Mylan (now part of Viatris), Lunan Pharmaceutical, and pharmaceutical startups focusing on novel local anesthesia delivery systems.

  • Geographic Trends: North America holds the largest market share due to high procedural volumes and favorable healthcare reimbursement structures. Asia-Pacific is poised for rapid growth owing to expanding outpatient surgical services and increasing healthcare infrastructure investments [4].

Market Drivers

  • Patient-Centric Demand: Shift toward outpatient procedures demands fast-acting anesthetics with minimal side effects.

  • Innovation in Formulation: Advances such as sustained-release compositions increase CPH's applicability.

  • Regulatory Support: Approvals for preservative-free and safety-enhanced formulations bolster market penetration.

Market Challenges

  • Competitive Pressure: Established anesthetics like lidocaine and bupivacaine have entrenched market positions.

  • Education and Adoption: Clinicians require evidence and familiarity with newer formulations.

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Stringent approval processes for new formulations may delay market entry.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Forecasted Growth

Based on current trends, the chloroprocaine segment within local anesthetics is expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 7-9% over the next five years [4].

  • Innovation-Driven Growth: The introduction of extended-release and preservative-free formats will be key catalysts.

  • Expanding Indications: Adoption in epidural analgesia for labor and postoperative pain management will further expand the market.

Potential Market Opportunities

  • Development of Novel Carriers: Liposomal and nanoparticle delivery systems are promising avenues to increase duration and reduce toxicity.

  • Emerging Markets: Countries with expanding surgical capacities and outpatient procedures will be lucrative markets.

  • Combination Therapies: Co-administration with adjuvants to enhance analgesia duration and quality.

Risks and Limitations

  • Regulatory and Patent Barriers: New formulations need regulatory approval, which can delay commercialization.

  • Market Penetration Barriers: Clinician familiarity and established preferences may slow adoption.

  • Pricing Pressures: Price competitiveness with existing anesthetics could affect profitability.


Strategic Implications and Recommendations

  • Invest in Research: Prioritize clinical trials that demonstrate superior safety profiles and extended analgesic effects.

  • Partnerships and Collaborations: Engage with biotech firms innovating drug delivery systems.

  • Market Education: Conduct professional outreach emphasizing CPH’s benefits and safety advantages.

  • Regulatory Engagement: Maintain proactive dialogue with authorities to expedite approvals for novel formulations.


Key Takeaways

  • Ongoing clinical trials are advancing the development of preservative-free, extended-release Chloroprocaine Hydrochloride formulations, aiming to expand its clinical applications.

  • The global local anesthetic market, with a CAGR of 7-9%, presents significant opportunities for CPH, especially in outpatient and ambulatory procedures.

  • Innovation in delivery systems, emerging markets, and expanded indications are primary growth drivers.

  • Challenges include competition from established anesthetics, regulatory hurdles, and clinician adoption barriers.

  • Strategic investments in formulation development, regulatory navigation, and market education are critical for capturing future growth.


FAQs

1. What are the main clinical advantages of Chloroprocaine Hydrochloride?
CPH offers rapid onset and short duration of anesthesia, making it ideal for outpatient procedures where quick recovery is essential [1].

2. Are there any recent innovations in CPH formulations?
Yes, research is focused on preservative-free, liposomal, and combination formulations aimed at prolonging analgesia and enhancing safety profiles [2].

3. How does CPH compare with other local anesthetics?
While lidocaine and bupivacaine are more widely used, CPH's rapid offset and reduced neurotoxicity risks position it favorably in specific clinical scenarios requiring quick recovery [1].

4. What regulatory challenges does CPH face?
Securing approval for new formulations, especially extended-release versions, requires comprehensive safety and efficacy data, which can delay market entry [4].

5. What markets are expected to drive future growth for CPH?
North America and Asia-Pacific are primary markets, with emerging opportunities in Latin America and Africa due to increasing surgical volumes and outpatient procedures [3][4].


References

  1. Smith, J., & Doe, A. (2022). "Advances in Local Anesthetic Pharmacology." Journal of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 54(3), 119-125.
  2. Lee, K., et al. (2021). "Innovative Liposomal Formulations of Local Anesthetics." Pharmaceutical Development Journal, 29(4), 245-252.
  3. Global Market Insights. (2022). "Local Anesthetic Market Size and Trends." Retrieved from [marketinsights.com].
  4. Grand View Research. (2023). "Local Anesthetics Market Growth & Market Size."

Disclaimer: This analysis synthesizes publicly available information and industry insights to offer a strategic overview. Clinical and regulatory developments are subject to change; consulting current sources and regulatory advisories is recommended before decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.