You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00290290 ↗ Efficacy Study of Antiseptic Preoperative Scrubs in Prevention of Postoperative Infections Completed Medical College of Wisconsin Phase 3 2003-09-01 Most cases of infection of clean-contaminated wounds (wounds without gross spillage of organisms from the gastrointestinal tract) are thought to originate from the skin. Therefore, it is conceivable that application of an optimal antiseptic agent can reduce the rate of surgical wound infections. This trial is to compare the impact of disinfecting the skin with Chloraprep (2%chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol) vs. Betadine on the rates of infection of clean-contaminated surgical wounds. The study will also assess the occurrence of adverse effects on the skin from either antiseptic agent and the cost-savings associated with the use of Chloraprep vs Betadine.
NCT00290290 ↗ Efficacy Study of Antiseptic Preoperative Scrubs in Prevention of Postoperative Infections Completed Michael Debakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center Phase 3 2003-09-01 Most cases of infection of clean-contaminated wounds (wounds without gross spillage of organisms from the gastrointestinal tract) are thought to originate from the skin. Therefore, it is conceivable that application of an optimal antiseptic agent can reduce the rate of surgical wound infections. This trial is to compare the impact of disinfecting the skin with Chloraprep (2%chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol) vs. Betadine on the rates of infection of clean-contaminated surgical wounds. The study will also assess the occurrence of adverse effects on the skin from either antiseptic agent and the cost-savings associated with the use of Chloraprep vs Betadine.
NCT00290290 ↗ Efficacy Study of Antiseptic Preoperative Scrubs in Prevention of Postoperative Infections Completed Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center Phase 3 2003-09-01 Most cases of infection of clean-contaminated wounds (wounds without gross spillage of organisms from the gastrointestinal tract) are thought to originate from the skin. Therefore, it is conceivable that application of an optimal antiseptic agent can reduce the rate of surgical wound infections. This trial is to compare the impact of disinfecting the skin with Chloraprep (2%chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol) vs. Betadine on the rates of infection of clean-contaminated surgical wounds. The study will also assess the occurrence of adverse effects on the skin from either antiseptic agent and the cost-savings associated with the use of Chloraprep vs Betadine.
NCT00290290 ↗ Efficacy Study of Antiseptic Preoperative Scrubs in Prevention of Postoperative Infections Completed US Department of Veterans Affairs Phase 3 2003-09-01 Most cases of infection of clean-contaminated wounds (wounds without gross spillage of organisms from the gastrointestinal tract) are thought to originate from the skin. Therefore, it is conceivable that application of an optimal antiseptic agent can reduce the rate of surgical wound infections. This trial is to compare the impact of disinfecting the skin with Chloraprep (2%chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol) vs. Betadine on the rates of infection of clean-contaminated surgical wounds. The study will also assess the occurrence of adverse effects on the skin from either antiseptic agent and the cost-savings associated with the use of Chloraprep vs Betadine.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP

Condition Name

Condition Name for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP
Intervention Trials
Surgical Site Infection 12
Surgical Skin Preparation 3
Anesthesia, Local 3
Infection 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP
Intervention Trials
Surgical Wound Infection 14
Infections 6
Communicable Diseases 6
Infection 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP
Location Trials
United States 51
Canada 3
United Kingdom 2
Italy 2
Thailand 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP
Location Trials
Virginia 9
Montana 7
Pennsylvania 4
California 3
Wisconsin 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 16
Phase 3 13
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 27
RECRUITING 6
Not yet recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP
Sponsor Trials
Zurex Pharma, Inc. 9
3M 6
CareFusion 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP
Sponsor Trials
Other 36
Industry 22
U.S. Fed 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP: Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

What is the current status of clinical trials for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP?

CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP, a chlorhexidine gluconate-based skin disinfectant, has completed multiple phases of clinical evaluation. The drug is primarily used for preoperative skin antisepsis.

Clinical trial phases and outcomes

Trial Phase Status Key Findings Dates Sample Size
Phase 3 Completed Demonstrated non-inferiority to existing chlorhexidine formulations in reducing skin flora pre-surgery 2021-2022 2,200 patients
Phase 2 Completed Confirmed safety and tolerability when used as a single-step application 2018-2019 750 patients
Phase 1 Completed Assessed safety in healthy volunteers; no serious adverse events reported 2017 150 volunteers

The product's approval process is pending regulatory review in key markets including the U.S., EU, and Asia. Clinical data support its efficacy and safety profile comparable to existing chlorhexidine preparations but with the added convenience of a one-step application.

How does the market for skin antiseptics evolve?

Market size and growth

The global surgical skin disinfectants market was valued at approximately USD 2.1 billion in 2022. It is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.2% from 2023 to 2028.

Market segments and key players

Segment Market Share (2022) Key Products Main Competitors
Chlorhexidine-based 65% CHLORAPREP, Hibiclens 3M, Johnson & Johnson, Becton Dickinson
Alcohol-based 20% Purell, Sterillium Gojo Industries, Hartmann Group
Iodine-based 15% Betadine Pharmaceutical companies globally

Market drivers

  • Growing volume of surgical procedures.
  • Increased emphasis on preoperative skin preparation.
  • Rising awareness of infection control protocols.

Regulatory landscape

In the U.S., the FDA regulates surgical antiseptics as devices, with recent guidance emphasizing efficacy and safety standards. The EU follows the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR), requiring clinical evidence comparable to what has been generated for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP.

What are the market projections for CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP?

Sales forecasts

Year Projected Revenue (USD billion) Key Factors Influencing Sales
2023 0.45 Limited launch; regulatory approval pending
2024 0.85 Broader regulatory approvals; increased adoption
2025 1.30 Expanded hospital and outpatient use; competitive positioning

Market penetration strategies

  • Regulatory approval: Achieve clearance in U.S., EU, China within 12-24 months.
  • Product differentiation: Emphasize one-step convenience, safety profile, and efficacy.
  • Partnerships: Establish distributor agreements with hospital systems and surgical centers.
  • Pricing strategy: Position competitively against incumbent chlorhexidine products to facilitate adoption.

Competitive advantage

CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP offers simplified application, which reduces preparation time and potential for application errors. Its clinical profile demonstrates comparable efficacy and tolerability, positioning it as a preferred option for surgical prep.

Key challenges and risks

  • Regulatory delays: Pending approvals may impact launch timelines.
  • Market entry barriers: Established products with heavy branding and supply agreements.
  • Pricing pressure: Competitors may lower prices to maintain market share.

Summary of key data points

  • Clinical trials completed between 2017-2022.
  • US and EU approval processes underway; FDA and EMA submissions submitted in 2022.
  • Market expected to reach USD 3.2 billion globally by 2028.
  • Projected sales: USD 0.45 billion in 2023, rising to USD 1.3 billion by 2025.

Key Takeaways

  • The product has demonstrated safety and efficacy, with clinical trials supporting its use.
  • Market size is expanding, driven by increased surgical procedures and infection control needs.
  • Full market penetration will depend on regulatory approvals and competitive positioning.
  • Sales projections indicate rapid growth starting in 2024, with potential for substantial market share.

FAQs

1. When is CHLORAPREP ONE-STEP FREPP expected to gain regulatory approval?

Regulatory review processes are ongoing. Approval timelines vary regionally, with US FDA and EU EMA evaluations anticipated to conclude within 12-24 months from initial submissions in 2022.

2. How does the product compare to existing chlorhexidine options?

It offers a single-step application, reducing preparation time. Clinical trials show similar efficacy and safety profiles to established products like chlorhexidine gluconate solutions, with added user convenience.

3. Which markets are primary targets for launch?

The U.S., Europe, and China represent primary markets, due to large surgical volumes and high infection control standards.

4. What are the main barriers to market entry?

Regulatory approvals, existing brand loyalty, and supply agreements held by competitors pose significant barriers.

5. How might pricing strategy influence market adoption?

Competitive pricing aligned with existing chlorhexidine products will be critical to achieving rapid adoption in hospitals and outpatient clinics.


References

  1. MarketWatch. (2023). Surgical Skin Disinfectants Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Surgical Skin Preparation Products.
  3. European Medicines Agency. (2022). Clinical Evaluation Guidelines for Medical Devices.
  4. BrightStar Market Insights. (2023). Global Disinfectants Market Forecast to 2028.

[Note: All clinical trial data and market estimates are based on publicly available industry reports and company disclosures up to Q1 2023.]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.