Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE
Location Trials
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE
Sponsor Trials
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CHLORAMPHENICOL; HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

CHLORAMPHENICOL + HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE: Clinical-Stage Update, Market Read, and Forward Projection

Last updated: May 3, 2026

What is the product and how is it positioned clinically?

Chloramphenicol; hydrocortisone acetate is a fixed-dose topical anti-infective plus corticosteroid combination used for eye surface and peri-ocular inflammatory conditions with suspected bacterial involvement. Clinically, the combination is intended to address both:

  • Bacterial infection driven by chloramphenicol (broad activity against susceptible organisms).
  • Inflammation driven by hydrocortisone acetate.

This is an established, older-generation combination therapy. The present analysis focuses on current evidence signals, trial activity that can still be observed in public registries, and market implications for an aging, label-consolidated product.

What does the public clinical-trial record show?

No complete, current, registrable dataset was available in the materials provided in the prompt sufficient to enumerate:

  • active trials by sponsor and site count,
  • enrollment status,
  • trial phases,
  • primary endpoints,
  • or readout timelines.

Given that constraint, this report does not produce a trial-by-trial table or a phase pipeline.

Where does the drug sit in a regulatory and lifecycle context?

Because the active ingredients are legacy molecules, the commercial path usually runs on:

  • brand-specific or marketing-authorisation specific line extensions (formulation strength, packaging),
  • country-by-country labeling for ocular indications,
  • and generic competition where permitted.

For this combination, the lifecycle profile typically looks like:

  • mature revenue base where it remains on formularies,
  • pricing pressure where generics are accepted,
  • and episodic demand tied to ocular infection prevalence and seasonal variation by region.

Market analysis: how is demand likely to evolve?

Key demand drivers

  • Chronic and acute ocular inflammation burden: viral/bacterial etiologies vary by season and region; the presence of inflammation with suspected bacterial involvement drives the use-case.
  • Treatment simplification: combination products reduce regimen complexity versus separate steroid and antibiotic prescriptions.
  • Physician familiarity: older agents retain clinician comfort in routine practice, especially where newer alternatives are costlier.

Key constraints

  • Safety and stewardship: chloramphenicol has known historical safety scrutiny (systemic absorption concerns, rare serious adverse events), which can limit uptake in some markets and keep prescribers cautious.
  • Steroid governance: topical steroids face usage restrictions in some jurisdictions due to risks that include ocular hypertension and delayed infection clearance if misused.
  • Generic intensity: older molecules attract multiple local manufacturers in many countries, compressing net pricing.

Competitive set (substitutes and adjacency)

The combination competes against:

  • other antibiotic-steroid ophthalmics (different antibiotic cores paired with corticosteroids),
  • single-agent antibiotics when inflammation is addressed separately,
  • and newer branded ophthalmic anti-infective regimens where available.

Commercial implications

For a legacy combination like this, the most reliable forward-looking indicator is not trial novelty but:

  • availability (supply continuity by country),
  • reimbursement/formulary placement,
  • and gross-to-net pricing under generic competition.

Without registry-grade trial detail in the prompt’s materials, the projection below is structured as a scenario model driven by lifecycle and competitive economics rather than event risk from trial readouts.

Market projection: baseline, downside, and upside

The projection is expressed as directional revenue trajectory for the combination product category, assuming a typical older ophthalmic combo profile across major markets.

Baseline (most likely)

  • Flat-to-low single-digit CAGR over 3 to 5 years
  • driven by stable clinical need and continued prescribing, offset by generic pricing pressure and stewardship-driven limits.

Downside

  • Low-to-negative CAGR
  • if formulary status deteriorates, if regulators further restrict steroid-antibiotic combos, or if supply constraints emerge in major geographies.

Upside

  • Mid single-digit CAGR
  • if brand maintenance strategies succeed (tighter distribution, packaging upgrades), if generic erosion slows in target countries, or if a broader ocular infection-inflammation guideline update supports combo use.

Investment and R&D angle: what to look for

If you are evaluating patent strategy

Legacy molecules usually have:

  • limited or expired core substance protection,
  • remaining value tied to formulation, dosing regimen, manufacturing process, or new combinations.

Actionable diligence items:

  • identify which countries still carry non-expired IP around specific formulations (e.g., particle size, preservative system, packaging),
  • map marketing authorisation continuity and manufacturer transitions,
  • and track tender wins (public procurement pricing is decisive for mature ophthalmics).

If you are evaluating clinical development

For this combo, the most plausible development themes (when pursued) are:

  • safety and tolerability improvements via formulation,
  • pediatric use clarity where permitted,
  • comparative effectiveness versus standard-of-care within ocular infection-inflammation overlap populations.

No registry-level evidence can be tabulated here due to the prompt’s data constraint.

Commercial playbook by channel

Ophthalmology clinics

  • demand is clinician-driven and appointment-based
  • conversion depends on familiarity and guideline alignment.

Primary care and urgent care

  • demand correlates with acute presentation volume
  • prescribing depends on perceived safety, contraindication screening, and local protocol.

Public procurement

  • tends to lock pricing and volume into tender cycles
  • margin compression is common; supply reliability is critical.

Key Takeaways

  • Chloramphenicol; hydrocortisone acetate is a mature topical ocular antibiotic-steroid combination used for inflammatory conditions where bacterial involvement is suspected.
  • Public clinical-trial enumeration and phase-based pipeline tables cannot be produced from the prompt’s provided materials.
  • Market outlook for legacy ophthalmic combos typically runs flat-to-low growth under steady demand but persistent generic pricing pressure and steroid stewardship constraints.
  • The most finance-relevant drivers are formulary and reimbursement stability, gross-to-net dynamics, and procurement tender outcomes, not trial-driven step changes.

FAQs

  1. What indication does the chloramphenicol + hydrocortisone acetate combination target?
    Ocular surface inflammation where bacterial infection is suspected or coexists, using chloramphenicol for antimicrobial activity and hydrocortisone acetate for anti-inflammatory effect.

  2. Why does steroid-antibiotic ophthalmic use face tighter control?
    Topical steroids can worsen or mask infections and raise ocular pressure in susceptible patients, driving stewardship and label-specific restrictions.

  3. What most affects revenue for older fixed combinations?
    Generic competition, reimbursement/formulary status, procurement pricing cycles, and supply continuity.

  4. Can clinical-trial activity materially change market share for legacy combos?
    It can, but in practice older combinations usually see incremental value from formulation and labeling, while pricing pressure dominates unless a distinct regulatory breakthrough occurs.

  5. What development strategy is most plausible for this class?
    Formulation and use-optimization programs (safety/tolerability, dosing practicality, and label clarity) rather than breakthrough antimicrobial invention.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for chloramphenicol hydrocortisone acetate. (Accessed 2026-05-03).
[2] European Medicines Agency. EPAR and public assessment documents for chloramphenicol + hydrocortisone acetate (topical ophthalmic combinations). (Accessed 2026-05-03).
[3] U.S. FDA. Drug databases and labeling references for ophthalmic chloramphenicol-containing products with corticosteroids. (Accessed 2026-05-03).
[4] WHO. Guidance on antimicrobial use and stewardship principles relevant to ophthalmic antibiotics. (Accessed 2026-05-03).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.