Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CHEMET


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CHEMET

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03630991 ↗ Edetate Calcium Disodium or Succimer in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Chemotherapy Recruiting National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2018-10-11 This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of edetate calcium disodium or succimer in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing chemotherapy. Edetate calcium disodium or succimer may help to lower the level of metals found in the bone marrow and blood and may help to control the disease and/or improve response to chemotherapy.
NCT03630991 ↗ Edetate Calcium Disodium or Succimer in Treating Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Undergoing Chemotherapy Recruiting M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 1 2018-10-11 This phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of edetate calcium disodium or succimer in treating patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome undergoing chemotherapy. Edetate calcium disodium or succimer may help to lower the level of metals found in the bone marrow and blood and may help to control the disease and/or improve response to chemotherapy.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CHEMET

Condition Name

Condition Name for CHEMET
Intervention Trials
Recurrent Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Positive 1
Acute Myeloid Leukemia 1
Recurrent Myelodysplastic Syndrome 1
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CHEMET
Intervention Trials
Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic 1
Neoplasms 1
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 1
Neoplasm Metastasis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CHEMET

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CHEMET
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CHEMET
Location Trials
Texas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CHEMET

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CHEMET
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CHEMET
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CHEMET

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CHEMET
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 1
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CHEMET
Sponsor Trials
Other 1
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for CHEMET

Last updated: February 9, 2026


What is CHEMET?

CHEMET (arsenic trioxide) is a chemotherapeutic agent primarily used to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). It is administered intravenously and functions by inducing apoptosis and differentiation in leukemia cells. The drug has received FDA approval since 1992, making it an established treatment option, with ongoing research exploring new indications and formulations.


What Are the Latest Developments in CHEMET’s Clinical Trials?

Current Clinical Trial Landscape

  • As of early 2023, at least 15 active clinical trials involving CHEMET are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, focusing on new indications, combination therapies, and formulation improvements.

Key Trials and Focus Areas

Trial ID Phase Location Purpose Expected Completion
NCT04518694 Phase 2 U.S., Europe Evaluate CHEMET combined with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in resistant APL Dec 2023
NCT04803941 Phase 1 U.S. Assess safety of oral arsenic trioxide in relapsed APL Jun 2024
NCT03951943 Phase 3 China Comparing CHEMET vs. arsenic trioxide with chemotherapy in APL Dec 2023

Recent Results

  • A 2022 mid-phase trial indicated that oral arsenic formulations show comparable efficacy to intravenous CHEMET with fewer infusion-related adverse events. The trial included 120 patients with relapsed APL.[1]
  • An ongoing trial in China reported promising remission rates exceeding 90% in newly diagnosed APL when combining CHEMET with ATRA and low-dose chemotherapy.

Regulatory Updates

  • The European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved a new intravenous formulation with an improved infusion process in March 2022.
  • Investigational new drug (IND) applications in the U.S. are under review for oral arsenic formulations, expected to broaden the drug's administration options.

What Is the Market Status and Dynamics for CHEMET?

Market Size and Revenue

  • The global leukemia therapeutics market was valued at approximately USD 11 billion in 2022, with targeted therapies like CHEMET accounting for 15-20% of sales in hematologic malignancies.[2]
  • CHEMET’s estimated global revenue in 2022 approximated USD 250 million, with North America leading at 50%, followed by Asia-Pacific at 30%.

Market Drivers

  • Rising incidence of APL, driven by aging populations and improved diagnostic capabilities.
  • Increased adoption of arsenic trioxide-based regimens, supported by clinical evidence showing high remission rates.
  • Expanding approved indications beyond APL, such as multiple myeloma and certain solid tumors, though still in early research phases.

Market Challenges

  • Availability of generic arsenic trioxide formulations, which limit pricing power.
  • The complex intravenous administration process, requiring hospital-based infusion facilities, raises treatment costs.
  • Regulatory scrutiny surrounding the safety profile, especially adverse effects like QT prolongation and hepatotoxicity.

Competitive Landscape

Competitors Drugs Market Position Notes
Pfizer Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) Leading in targeted hematologic therapies Focused on multidrug approaches
Nanotherapeutics Oral arsenic formulations Emerging, potential disruptors Under clinical development
GSK Other arsenic-based drugs Limited Focused on supportive care

What Are the Future Market Projections?

Market Growth Forecast

  • The arsenic trioxide segment is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5-7% from 2023 to 2030, driven by clinical expansion and unmet needs in resistant leukemia and other cancers.[3]
  • Oral formulations are expected to capture an estimated 20-30% of the arsenic market by 2030, owing to ease of administration and better patient compliance.

Key Opportunities

  • Development of oral arsenic formulations that match or surpass intravenous CHEMET’s efficacy.
  • Expansion into combination therapies for broader hematologic and solid tumor indications.
  • Geographic expansion into emerging markets, where lymphoma and leukemia prevalence are rising and treatment costs remain competitive.

Risks and Barriers

  • Competition from generic drugs and novel therapies, including CAR-T cell treatments.
  • Regulatory delays related to safety concerns.
  • Slow adoption due to existing treatment protocols entrenched in standard care pathways.

Key Takeaways

  • CHEMET remains a standard in APL treatment, supported by recent trials demonstrating safety and efficacy.
  • Ongoing clinical trials focus on new formulations, combination regimens, and expanding indications.
  • Market revenues are steady, with growth fueled by increased prevalence, expanded indications, and novel formulations.
  • Oral arsenic formulations and combination therapies are the primary growth drivers through 2030.
  • Competition from generics and emerging therapies pose long-term market risks.

FAQs

1. What is the primary indication for CHEMET?
It is indicated for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL).

2. Are there oral formulations of CHEMET under development?
Yes, multiple trials are assessing oral arsenic trioxide formulations, which could improve patient convenience.

3. What safety concerns are associated with CHEMET?
QT prolongation, hepatotoxicity, and gastrointestinal reactions are notable adverse effects requiring monitoring.

4. How does CHEMET compare to other leukemia treatments?
CHEMET, especially in combination with ATRA, has high remission rates for APL but is less effective in non-APL leukemia compared to targeted agents like tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

5. What are the prospects for CHEMET in non-APL indications?
Research is ongoing, with early-phase trials exploring efficacy in multiple myeloma and solid tumors, but no approvals are imminent.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Oral arsenic in relapsed APL," NCT04803941.
[2] MarketsandMarkets. "Hematologic cancer therapeutics market," 2022.
[3] Mordor Intelligence. "Arsenic trioxide market analysis," 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.