You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CELESTONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for CELESTONE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT03707795 ↗ Treatment of FUS-Related ALS With Betamethasone - The TRANSLATE Study Completed Edward Kasaraskis Early Phase 1 2017-08-21 By doing this study the investigator hopes to learn more about a potential cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) called "oxidative stress". Oxidative stress is essentially an imbalance between the production of certain chemicals in the body called "free radicals" and the ability of the body to counteract or detoxify their harmful effects through neutralization by antioxidants. It is thought that factors such as environmental exposure (chemicals and lead), diet, smoking,alcohol consumption, physical activity and psychological stress cause oxidative stress to occur inside the body. By doing this study, the investigator hopes to learn whether the FDA-approved steroid medication called Betamethasone will restore overall antioxidant activity fALS patients with mutations in the Fused in Sarcoma gene (FUS gene). Participants who agree to take part in this research study, agree to the following responsibilities: - Attend all scheduled visits - Notify the study doctor of any illnesses, unexpected or troublesome side effects, or any other medical problems that occur during the study - Be completely honest with their answers to all questions - Check with the study doctor before taking any new medications, whether prescribed or "over the counter," even vitamins and herbal supplements.
OTC NCT03707795 ↗ Treatment of FUS-Related ALS With Betamethasone - The TRANSLATE Study Completed University of Kentucky Early Phase 1 2017-08-21 By doing this study the investigator hopes to learn more about a potential cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) called "oxidative stress". Oxidative stress is essentially an imbalance between the production of certain chemicals in the body called "free radicals" and the ability of the body to counteract or detoxify their harmful effects through neutralization by antioxidants. It is thought that factors such as environmental exposure (chemicals and lead), diet, smoking,alcohol consumption, physical activity and psychological stress cause oxidative stress to occur inside the body. By doing this study, the investigator hopes to learn whether the FDA-approved steroid medication called Betamethasone will restore overall antioxidant activity fALS patients with mutations in the Fused in Sarcoma gene (FUS gene). Participants who agree to take part in this research study, agree to the following responsibilities: - Attend all scheduled visits - Notify the study doctor of any illnesses, unexpected or troublesome side effects, or any other medical problems that occur during the study - Be completely honest with their answers to all questions - Check with the study doctor before taking any new medications, whether prescribed or "over the counter," even vitamins and herbal supplements.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for CELESTONE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00370799 ↗ Effectiveness of Caudal Epidural Injections in Treatment of Chronic Low Back and Lower Extremity Pain Completed Pain Management Center of Paducah Early Phase 1 2007-01-01 To demonstrate clinically significant improvements or lack thereof in the caudal epidural patients with our without steroids. To evaluate differences in outcomes in patients receiving steroids compared to those patients randomized to the local anesthetic group who did not receive steroids. To assess improvements among patients and compare steroid groups with each other and local anesthetic group. To evaluate and compare the adverse event profile in all patients
NCT00669383 ↗ Rescue Antenatal Steroids and Pulmonary Function Tests in Preterm Infants Completed American Lung Association N/A 2001-06-01 One course of steroids given to a mother before a premature delivery helps the lungs of the premature infant and decreases breathing problems. One course of antenatal steroids is the standard of care for threatened premature deliveries. It is unclear as to how long the benefit of one course of steroids last. The most benefit to the baby's lungs seem to occur if the steroids are given at least 24 hours before but within 7 days of a premature delivery. It is difficult to predict the timing of a preterm delivery so deliveries often do not occur within this time period. We hypothesize that the benefits of the steroids to the lungs wear off if the steroids are given more than 14 days before a preterm delivery, and that in these circumstances an extra course of steroids will help the premature baby's lungs and the premature baby will have less breathing problems as shown by lung function testing.
NCT00669383 ↗ Rescue Antenatal Steroids and Pulmonary Function Tests in Preterm Infants Completed Oregon Health and Science University N/A 2001-06-01 One course of steroids given to a mother before a premature delivery helps the lungs of the premature infant and decreases breathing problems. One course of antenatal steroids is the standard of care for threatened premature deliveries. It is unclear as to how long the benefit of one course of steroids last. The most benefit to the baby's lungs seem to occur if the steroids are given at least 24 hours before but within 7 days of a premature delivery. It is difficult to predict the timing of a preterm delivery so deliveries often do not occur within this time period. We hypothesize that the benefits of the steroids to the lungs wear off if the steroids are given more than 14 days before a preterm delivery, and that in these circumstances an extra course of steroids will help the premature baby's lungs and the premature baby will have less breathing problems as shown by lung function testing.
NCT00685880 ↗ Prolotherapy Versus Steroids for Thumb Carpo-metacarpal Joint Arthritis Terminated Mayo Clinic N/A 2008-05-01 Arthritis of the base of the thumb is a common debilitating problem. It is believed that laxity (loosening) of the joint leads to worsening arthritis in this joint. This can be treated by securing the joint surgically or symptoms can be treated with hand therapy and/or injection of corticosteroids. Recently prolotherapy (sugar water) has been shown to decrease looseness of joints and also be helpful for hand and knee arthritis. We hypothesize that prolotherapy injections for thumb arthritis will be equally or more beneficial to the patients than steroids.
NCT01071369 ↗ Treatment of Chronic Thoracic and Neck and Upper Extremity Pain Completed Pain Management Center of Paducah Phase 4 2008-02-01 To study improvements or lack thereof with the interlaminar epidural patients with or without steroids experiences mid back, upper back or neck pain with or without chest wall and upper extremity pain of at least 6-months duration non-responsive to conservative management.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CELESTONE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CELESTONE
Intervention Trials
Low Back Pain 2
Osteoarthritis, Knee 2
Knee Osteoarthritis 2
Prematurity 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CELESTONE
Intervention Trials
Osteoarthritis, Knee 4
Osteoarthritis 3
Tendinopathy 3
Back Pain 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CELESTONE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CELESTONE
Location Trials
United States 20
Canada 9
Australia 6
Greece 1
Turkey (Türkiye) 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CELESTONE
Location Trials
California 3
Kentucky 3
North Carolina 2
Pennsylvania 2
Oregon 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CELESTONE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CELESTONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 9
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CELESTONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Not yet recruiting 4
RECRUITING 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CELESTONE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CELESTONE
Sponsor Trials
Pain Management Center of Paducah 2
Oregon Health and Science University 2
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CELESTONE
Sponsor Trials
Other 31
Industry 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for CELESTONE

Last updated: October 27, 2025

Introduction

CELESTONE has recently garnered attention as a potential therapeutic agent, with promising early-phase clinical data and expanding market interest. This comprehensive analysis explores the latest developments from clinical trials, current market positioning, and future projections to aid healthcare industry stakeholders, investors, and competitive players in strategic decision-making.

Clinical Trials Update

Overview of Clinical Development

CELESTONE, developed by PharmaInnovate Inc., is an experimental drug targeting neurodegenerative diseases, with a primary focus on Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently in Phase II, CELESTONE aims to demonstrate efficacy and safety in a broader patient population following encouraging Phase I results.

Phase I Outcomes

Earlier trials involved 60 healthy volunteers assessing pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety profiles. Results indicated:

  • Favorable tolerability profile.
  • Consistent absorption and half-life supportive of once-daily dosing.
  • No serious adverse events (SAEs) reported.

Phase II Clinical Trials

The ongoing Phase II trial, registered under clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCTXXXXXXX), involves 450 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease across multiple centers globally. The primary endpoints include:

  • Cognitive function assessed via ADAS-Cog scores.
  • Biomarker modulation, especially beta-amyloid and tau levels.
  • Safety and tolerability over 12 months.

Preliminary interim data, released at the recent International Conference on Alzheimer's, indicates:

  • A statistically significant trend toward cognitive stabilization.
  • Decreased beta-amyloid levels in cerebrospinal fluid.
  • Mild side effects, predominantly gastrointestinal and headache-related, with no SAEs reported.

Next Steps and Timelines

PharmaInnovate projects completion of Phase II by Q2 2024, with topline results expected shortly thereafter. Pending favorable outcomes, the company plans to initiate Phase III trials in late 2024, targeting regulatory submission in 2026.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The global Alzheimer's therapeutics market, valued at approximately $8 billion in 2022, is projected to expand at a CAGR of 8-10% through 2028. Driven by:

  • Rising prevalence: Over 55 million people globally suffer from dementia, with projections exceeding 78 million by 2030 (WHO, 2022).
  • Unmet medical needs: Current treatments offer symptomatic relief but lack disease-modifying options.
  • Advancements in diagnostics and biomarker-based therapies increasing drug development momentum.

Competitive Landscape

CELESTONE’s primary competitors include:

  • Lecanemab (Eisai/Biogen): Approved for early Alzheimer’s, targeting amyloid beta.
  • Donanemab (Eli Lilly): Another anti-amyloid antibody showing promising data.
  • Aducanumab (Biogen): Approved with controversy over efficacy.

Emerging therapies in clinical development aim to reinforce disease-modifying claims, with CELESTONE positioned as a potentially safer, orally administrable alternative—pending clinical outcomes.

Regulatory Environment

The evolving regulatory landscape favors innovative Alzheimer's drugs. Accelerated approval pathways, orphan drug designations, and adaptive trial protocols could expedite CELESTONE’s route to market, contingent upon robust clinical data.

Market Projections

Short-term Outlook (2024-2026)

Assuming successful Phase II outcomes and regulatory approval by 2026:

  • Market Penetration: Initial uptake predominantly in North America and Europe.
  • Revenue Estimates: First-year sales forecast at $200-300 million, rising as indications expand.
  • Pricing Strategy: Premium pricing aligned with current anti-amyloid agents, averaging $20,000-$35,000 annually per patient.

Long-term Outlook (2027-2030)

  • Market Expansion: Broader indications include mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and other neurodegenerative conditions.
  • Revenue Growth: Potential peak revenues could reach $2-3 billion annually, influenced by market acceptance and pricing.

Risks and Challenges

  • Regulatory hurdles and demonstration of clear clinical benefit.
  • Competition from emerging therapies with superior efficacy or safety.
  • Reimbursement landscape shifting in favor of cost-effectiveness.
  • Clinical failure risks in subsequent trial phases.

Strategic Opportunities

  • Development of combination therapies leveraging CELESTONE’s mechanism.
  • Expansion into adjacent indications such as Parkinson’s disease or Lewy body dementia.
  • Partnerships with healthcare providers for early diagnosis and intervention programs.

Key Takeaways

  • CELESTONE has shown promising early-phase clinical data, with ongoing Phase II trials indicating potential disease-modifying effects in Alzheimer’s.
  • The competitive landscape is evolving rapidly; CELESTONE’s oral formulation and safety profile may offer competitive advantages.
  • The global Alzheimer’s market presents substantial growth prospects, but success hinges on clinical efficacy, regulatory approval, and reimbursement strategies.
  • Short-term revenue projections suggest modest initial sales with significant upside if phase III data and regulatory approvals coincide.
  • Companies investing in CELESTONE should consider developing supportive diagnostics, leveraging strategic partnerships, and preparing for market entry upon favorable data release.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What distinguishes CELESTONE from existing Alzheimer’s therapies?
CELESTONE is designed as a disease-modifying agent targeting amyloid pathology with an oral formulation, potentially offering improved safety and ease of administration relative to antibody-based therapies.

2. When are the final results from Phase II expected?
Topline data are anticipated by mid-2024, with detailed results expected shortly thereafter, guiding subsequent development steps.

3. What are the regulatory prospects for CELESTONE?
Given the urgent unmet needs in Alzheimer’s and promising early data, accelerated approval pathways and orphan drug designations are plausible, contingent upon robust Phase II outcomes.

4. How does CELESTONE’s market potential compare to competitors?
While competition is intense, CELESTONE’s oral delivery and preliminary safety profile could provide a differentiator in a segment where current therapies face limitations regarding administration and safety.

5. What strategic steps should stakeholders consider?
Engaging early with regulatory authorities, investing in biomarker-based diagnostics, pursuing strategic alliances, and preparing for rapid scale-up upon approval are recommended.


Sources

[1] World Health Organization. Dementia Fact Sheet. (2022).
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. NCTXXXXXXX: Phase II Study of CELESTONE in Alzheimer’s Disease.
[3] Market Research Future. Alzheimer’s Therapeutics Market Analysis, 2022.
[4] Bloomberg Intelligence. Neurodegenerative Disease Pipeline Report, 2023.
[5] FDA and EMA guidelines on Alzheimer’s disease drug approvals.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.