Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03587441 ↗ Intrathecal Neostigmine for Prevention of PDPH Completed Fayoum University Hospital Phase 4 2018-08-04 Neuraxial blocks continue to be the cornerstone of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for normal vaginal delivery and elective caesarean section due to its approved safety and efficiency for decades. Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is still one of the most common complications of neuraxial anesthetic techniques. The headache could be severe and limit the activities of the new mother to care for her baby, prolong hospital stay. PDPH is defined as a headache that develops within five days of dural puncture and can't be attributed to any other types of headache and mostly is postural in character. Neostigmine methylsulfate is a synthetic carbamic acid ester which reversibly inhibits the enzyme Acetylcholine esterase (AChE) that makes more Acetylcholine molecules available at cholinergic receptors. Neostigmine is used in anesthesia mainly as a reversal for non-depolarizing neuromuscular agents. Intrathecal (IT) neostigmine was tried as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in IT block for elective cesarean sections to decrease local anesthetic consumption and to prolong postoperative analgesia. Side effects of IT neostigmine are dose-dependent with doses more than 25 µg especially nausea and vomiting and could be decreased by increasing the baricities of the local anesthetic solutions and by early head up position after IT injection. However, its effect on PDPH was not investigated before in literature. Parturients will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: the intervention group will receive 20 µg with IT Bupivacaine and the control group will receive an equivalent volume of dextrose 5% with the IT Bupivacaine. The objective of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IT neostigmine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in reducing the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache in parturients scheduled for an elective cesarean section.
NCT03853096 ↗ P.Acnes Colony Count Following Subdermal Cefazolin Unknown status University of British Columbia Early Phase 1 2019-04-01 The specific outcome is to determine whether the colony count of Propionibacterium acnes, one of the commonest causes of shoulder infection and not eradicated by conventional forms of surgical preparatory solutions and antibiotics, in a shoulder surgical wound will be altered by the use of subdermal cefazolin.
NCT06631625 ↗ Effect of Addition of Dexmedetomidine or Ketamine to Intravenous Infusion of Lidocaine on Proinflammatory Cytokines in Pelvi-abdominal Cancer Surgeries. COMPLETED Alexandria University PHASE1 2023-09-24 The investigators hypothesize that effect of addition of dexmedetomidine or ketamine by IV infusion to lidocaine infusion may be more beneficial than lidocaine infusion alone on proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6 and TNF), and postoperative pain relief and decreased opioid consumption, reduced Length of stay.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE
Intervention Trials
Surgery 1
Surgical Site Infection 1
Abdominal Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE
Intervention Trials
Infection 1
Communicable Diseases 1
Post-Dural Puncture Headache 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE
Location Trials
Egypt 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 1
Early Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
COMPLETED 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE
Sponsor Trials
Fayoum University Hospital 1
University of British Columbia 1
Alexandria University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 26, 2026

Ceftriaxone Sodium; Lidocaine clinical trials update, market analysis, and launch projections (2025–2035)

Ceftriaxone sodium; lidocaine is an injectable antibiotic combination used to improve injection tolerability by pairing ceftriaxone with lidocaine as a local anesthetic. Public sources for a single, clearly defined “ceftriaxone sodium; lidocaine” branded drug (specific NDC, NDA/BLA, single reference product) are not provided here, so this update is limited to what can be stated at the level of the active drug class and formulation approach.

Bottom line: The competitive and regulatory path for generic ceftriaxone injectables is dominated by ceftriaxone drug substance and injectable formulation/IP around reconstitution volume, concentration, sterility assurance, and stability with added lidocaine. Market growth is constrained by mature antibiotic demand, stewardship policies, and price pressure from generics. Near-term revenue uplift is more likely to come from shifts in distribution, hospital formularies, and reimbursement coding rather than new clinical efficacy.

No complete, source-grounded, drug-specific clinical-trials dataset, Orange Book listing, or FDA approval timeline for “CEFTRIAXONE SODIUM; LIDOCAINE” as a unique product can be produced from the information available in this chat.


What clinical trials exist for ceftriaxone sodium plus lidocaine injections?

Are there outcome trials on ceftriaxone efficacy when lidocaine is added?

For most injectable antibiotic “lidocaine diluent” combinations, clinical evidence typically focuses on:

  • Pain on injection (local tolerability endpoints)
  • Pharmacokinetics (ceftriaxone exposure)
  • Safety signals related to local anesthetic use
  • Sterility, compatibility, and reconstitution/administration feasibility

Efficacy endpoints (infection cure, microbiologic eradication) usually rely on the established ceftriaxone clinical package rather than new superiority trials.

Typical trial design patterns for lidocaine-containing antibiotic injections

Common elements include:

  • Randomized, controlled comparisons against ceftriaxone reconstituted with sterile water (no lidocaine) or buffered diluents
  • Subjective pain scoring at injection site (VAS or similar)
  • Adverse event monitoring focusing on lidocaine-related events (CNS symptoms, hypersensitivity, local reactions)
  • PK sampling to confirm exposure comparability

Clinical update constraint: A product-level trial registry sweep (ClinicalTrials.gov and regional registries) tied to the exact marketed combination is required to enumerate study IDs, dates, phases, and results. No such registry data is present here.


What is the current market size and demand outlook for injectable ceftriaxone with local anesthetic?

How large is the injectable ceftriaxone market and what portion uses lidocaine?

Ceftriaxone is a high-volume, generic-dominated antibiotic globally. The “with lidocaine” subset is typically a smaller segment within injectable ceftriaxone portfolios, driven by:

  • Hospital use cases that emphasize injection tolerability
  • Outpatient and emergency settings where pain control matters for adherence or repeat dosing
  • Regions where formulation standardization and tender specifications favor lidocaine-containing presentations

Projection constraint: A credible forecast for “ceftriaxone sodium; lidocaine” specifically requires market-share data by presentation (strength, diluent, NDC) which is not available here.

Key demand drivers

  1. Stewardship and guideline placement: Ceftriaxone is broadly used but is subject to antimicrobial stewardship and restriction policies in many health systems.
  2. Hospital procurement cycles: Tender-based switching among generic suppliers is common.
  3. Safety and tolerability requirements: Lidocaine-containing presentations can be favored where injection pain is a limiting factor.

When does ceftriaxone sodium; lidocaine lose exclusivity and what patents matter?

Patent estate structure for combination injectables

For older antibiotics, exclusivity is usually exhausted for the core ceftriaxone product. IP that can still matter for lidocaine-containing versions typically includes:

  • Formulation patents: specific concentrations, ratios, pH windows, and stabilizers that preserve ceftriaxone integrity
  • Manufacturing process patents: sterilization, filtration, filling parameters, and lyophilization/reconstitution stability procedures
  • Packaging and compatibility patents: container closure systems and diluent interaction

Exclusivity timelines (market reality)

For ceftriaxone, generic entry is already broadly available in most jurisdictions. The specific “ceftriaxone sodium; lidocaine” combination product could still have:

  • Local exclusivity if a particular formulation was approved later than standard ceftriaxone references
  • Patent-protected stability or tolerability formulation claims that block “AB-rated” generic substitutions in certain markets

Exclusivity constraint: A precise “lose exclusivity on date X” answer depends on the exact reference product identity and Orange Book entries. No reference product identifiers are provided here.


What is the Orange Book status of ceftriaxone sodium; lidocaine in the US?

Orange Book status requires:

  • NDA number and listed drug name
  • Strength, dosage form, and applicant
  • Patent numbers listed for drug substance, formulation, and methods of use

Status constraint: No NDA or Orange Book listing is supplied in this chat, so the Orange Book status cannot be enumerated without producing inaccurate entries.


How strong is the patent estate for ceftriaxone sodium plus lidocaine formulations?

Likely patent strengths vs typical generic design-around

Even without a named product estate, the patent landscape for injectable antibiotic formulations typically shows:

  • Medium formulation risk when patents claim precise stability windows and specific excipient/diluent compositions.
  • High genericability when patents are limited to manufacturing details that do not prevent the same end-point formulation using alternative processes.
  • Ongoing litigation risk mainly when a patent covers reconstitution conditions or a clinically relevant tolerability claim that is required by labeling.

Strength constraint: Without specific listed patents (numbers, assignees, jurisdictions, expirations), an estate score would be speculative and cannot be produced.


Which companies are challenging ceftriaxone sodium; lidocaine and what generic entry risks exist?

Typical Paragraph IV posture for generic antibiotic injectables

For mature antibacterials, Paragraph IV challenges usually target:

  • Formulation patents (method to mix, diluent composition, stability enhancements)
  • Manufacturing process patents
  • Device/package compatibility patents for sterile injectables

Generic entry risk drivers

  • Patent coverage breadth (claim scope on concentration, pH, and excipient set)
  • Whether generic applicants can use lidocaine only at labeling-equivalent levels
  • Whether testing (assay, impurities, sterility, particulate matter) supports label substitution

Company/filing constraint: No NDA, ANDA, or Paragraph IV case list is provided here.


What FDA pathway would a generic ceftriaxone sodium; lidocaine injectable use (ANDA vs 505(b)(2)?

Most likely regulatory pathway

For ceftriaxone and generic antibiotic injectables, the typical pathway is:

  • ANDA for an approved drug with bioequivalence approach, often using existing reference standards for PK/BA requirements depending on formulation category.

If the lidocaine addition changes labeling or formulation in a way that relies on additional studies, applicants may use:

  • 505(b)(2) if they reference published data or an approved product but require bridging studies for tolerability or stability.

Pathway constraint: The exact pathway depends on the specific US reference listing and what differs between the applicant’s product and the reference.


What is the competitive landscape for ceftriaxone injectables with local anesthetic?

Competitive axes

  1. Tender pricing and supply reliability
  2. Presentation parameters: vial size, reconstitution volume, injection comfort
  3. Stability and shelf life: impurities over time, compatibility with diluent
  4. Labeling tolerability: whether pain reduction is explicitly referenced in prescribing information

How lidocaine-containing presentations compete

  • Hospitals may standardize on the presentation that reduces patient complaints and injection-related discontinuations.
  • Pharmacies and formularies may award based on contracting price and procurement availability.

Competitor constraint: No NDC-level brand/generic list is available here.


Market projection: how much growth is realistic for ceftriaxone sodium; lidocaine through 2035?

Projection framework (presentation-level)

A credible projection for this specific combination normally combines:

  • Total ceftriaxone volume forecast by region and care setting
  • Share of lidocaine-containing presentations within ceftriaxone injectables
  • Price erosion for generics
  • Tender and reimbursement dynamics
  • Biosafety and sterility supply constraints

Projection constraint: Without region, NDC mapping, and market-share inputs, only class-level qualitative direction can be stated, not a numeric forecast.


Key takeaways

  • Ceftriaxone + lidocaine is a tolerability-focused injectable formulation approach around an established antibiotic.
  • Market dynamics are dominated by generic pressure, hospital tendering, and antimicrobial stewardship, not by new clinical efficacy differentiation.
  • Patent and regulatory risk concentrates on formulation stability, excipient/diluent composition, manufacturing process, and labeling-tied tolerability claims.
  • A drug-specific clinical trials enumeration, Orange Book status, and exclusivity/expiration timeline cannot be produced from the information available here.

FAQs

  1. Is ceftriaxone with lidocaine considered a new indication requiring clinical efficacy trials?
  2. Do generic manufacturers usually need to re-run bioequivalence studies when adding lidocaine to ceftriaxone injectables?
  3. What formulation attributes most often appear in patents for antibiotic injections with reconstitution diluents?
  4. How do hospital formularies typically evaluate injection pain differences between ceftriaxone diluents?
  5. What regulatory pathway is most common for generic ceftriaxone injectable products that change only the diluent?

References

No sources were provided in the prompt, and no drug-specific FDA/Orange Book, patent, or trial registry data is present in the chat; therefore no citations can be generated without fabricating entries.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.