Last Updated: June 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
NCT03299452 ↗ Clinical Studies by Using Alphacait to Screen Drugs for Advanced Solid Tumor Unknown status Alphacait, LLC Phase 2 2017-01-01 This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study designed to evaluate PFS, safety, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (OPR), disease control rate (DCR) and biomarkers of cancer therapy based on Alphacait screening system in subjects with advanced malignant tumor.
NCT03299452 ↗ Clinical Studies by Using Alphacait to Screen Drugs for Advanced Solid Tumor Unknown status Haining Health-Coming Biotech Co., Ltd. Phase 2 2017-01-01 This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study designed to evaluate PFS, safety, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (OPR), disease control rate (DCR) and biomarkers of cancer therapy based on Alphacait screening system in subjects with advanced malignant tumor.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM

Condition Name

Condition Name for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
Metastatic Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM
Intervention Trials
Neoplasm Metastasis 1
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM
Location Trials
Brazil 1
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
Alphacait, LLC 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

CEFTIZOXIME SODIUM: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: May 3, 2026

What is ceftizoxime sodium and what is its clinical status?

Ceftizoxime sodium is a parenteral third-generation cephalosporin marketed in some geographies for treatment of bacterial infections. It is the active ingredient used in ceftizoxime-containing injectable products; the “sodium” form is the salt for formulation and intravenous or intramuscular use. The clinical development footprint for “ceftizoxime sodium” is fragmented by geography, and public trial records are not consistently indexed under a single global sponsor name, route, or trade name.

What do publicly available clinical-trial records show?

A complete, current “clinical trials update” requires a single authoritative registry pull for all geographies and all synonyms (including trade names and salt forms) under one standardized query. That level of registry-specific completeness is not available in this response. As a result, no definitive, trial-by-trial status update (enrollment, completion dates, readouts, sites, or phase transitions) can be issued without risking factual errors.

What is the commercial and competitive landscape?

Ceftizoxime sits in the competitive class of parenteral cephalosporins and broad-spectrum hospital antibiotics. Demand typically tracks:

  • Hospital admissions for bacterial infections
  • Antimicrobial stewardship policies
  • Replacement cycles driven by formulary access, supply stability, and price corridors
  • Shift to newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations in many markets

Competitive pressure usually comes from:

  • Newer parenteral agents with stronger stewardship positioning
  • Regional generics with lower acquisition costs
  • Formulary exclusions for older cephalosporins when local resistance patterns shift

What is the market size baseline and how is it projected?

A numeric market projection requires at minimum:

  • Market definition (global vs country-level)
  • Indication mix (hospital-acquired infections, intra-abdominal infections, community-acquired infections, etc.)
  • Pricing basis (ex-manufacturer vs hospital net price)
  • Forecast horizon and assumptions (growth rates, share shifts, generic entry, tender outcomes)
  • Verified historical sales data for ceftizoxime sodium products

None of those inputs are present in the available source set for this response. Issuing a forecast with numbers would introduce fabricated precision.

What is the correct business takeaway on commercialization timing?

For older injectable antibiotics like ceftizoxime sodium, near-term commercial outcomes tend to be dominated by:

  • Generics and supply chain reliability
  • Tender/insurer formulary cycles
  • Regional resistance trends and infection-control guidelines
  • Availability of alternative regimens under local clinical pathways

Without verified country-level sales history and registry-level development status, the only operationally safe projection is that incremental growth, if any, is likely incremental and tied to contracting cycles rather than to new clinical differentiation.

What would an investment-grade projection framework look like (without inventing numbers)?

A credible projection model for ceftizoxime sodium in hospitals should be built from three layers:

Layer 1: Channel and usage drivers

  • Hospital consumption by inpatient-days and case-mix for bacterial infection categories
  • Formulary share and reorder cadence from major purchasing groups
  • Tender price corridor and contract duration

Layer 2: Competitive displacement and lifecycle

  • Share loss or retention vs newer beta-lactam regimens
  • Generic penetration rate and price compression
  • Stock-out risk and manufacturing capacity

Layer 3: Resistance and guideline effects

  • Guideline updates at national society and ministry level
  • Local antibiogram trends impacting cephalosporin use
  • Stewardship edits that restrict broad-spectrum use

What risks matter most for ceftizoxime sodium?

The practical risk stack for an older injectable cephalosporin is dominated by:

  • Formulary exclusion or restriction
  • Price compression from generic competition
  • Supply disruptions impacting tender awards
  • Indication narrowing driven by stewardship and resistance

Key Takeaways

  • Ceftizoxime sodium is a parenteral third-generation cephalosporin; its commercial outcomes in most markets are primarily controlled by hospital contracting and formulary access, not by new clinical differentiation.
  • A complete clinical-trials update and an evidence-based market projection require authoritative registry and sales/tender data that are not available in this response.
  • Any investment or R&D decision tied to ceftizoxime sodium should focus on tender/price corridor dynamics, supply reliability, and guideline-aligned positioning rather than expecting phase-driven demand expansion.

FAQs

1) Is ceftizoxime sodium actively in late-stage clinical development globally?

No verified, registry-complete evidence is available here to confirm current late-stage activity across all jurisdictions.

2) What drives hospital demand for ceftizoxime sodium?

Formulary status, tender award outcomes, and replacement pressure from competing parenteral antibiotics.

3) How does generic competition typically affect ceftizoxime sodium pricing?

It compresses net prices through tender competition and recurring procurement cycles, often shifting the product to a lower-growth, volume-driven profile.

4) Can resistance trends materially change ceftizoxime sodium usage?

Yes. Local antibiograms and stewardship policies can restrict cephalosporin use, reducing share even if overall infection rates hold.

5) What is the most actionable go-to-market lever for ceftizoxime sodium?

Securing and renewing hospital and purchasing-group contracts through consistent supply and competitively positioned pricing.

References

[1] No sources were provided for this request, and no registry or market databases were accessed in this response.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.