You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00173901 ↗ Adverse Drug Reactions of Different Brands of Ceftazidime Injection Unknown status National Taiwan University Hospital Phase 4 2001-03-01 The purpose of this study is to understand whether generic ceftazidime causes different adverse drug reaction incidence from the brand drug.
NCT00210964 ↗ Ceftobiprole in Hospital Acquired Pneumonia Completed Basilea Pharmaceutica Phase 3 2005-04-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical cure rate of ceftobiprole medocaril (the water-soluble prodrug [form] of ceftobiprole) referred to as ceftobiprole versus a comparator in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
NCT00229008 ↗ Ceftobiprole in Hospital Acquired Pneumonia Completed Basilea Pharmaceutica Phase 3 2005-11-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical cure rate of ceftobiprole medocaril (the water-soluble prodrug [form] of ceftobiprole) referred to as ceftobiprole versus a comparator in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia.
NCT00333385 ↗ Continuous Versus Short Infusions of Ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis Terminated Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 4 2001-10-01 The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of courses of tobramycin and ceftazidime, administered intravenously as either thrice daily short infusions or 24 h continuous infusion, in cystic fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary PA infection. In conventional treatment regimens, ceftazidime is administered in the form of thrice daily short infusions, but pharmacodynamic considerations suggest that continuous infusion could be more effective.
NCT00333385 ↗ Continuous Versus Short Infusions of Ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis Terminated GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2001-10-01 The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of courses of tobramycin and ceftazidime, administered intravenously as either thrice daily short infusions or 24 h continuous infusion, in cystic fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary PA infection. In conventional treatment regimens, ceftazidime is administered in the form of thrice daily short infusions, but pharmacodynamic considerations suggest that continuous infusion could be more effective.
NCT00333385 ↗ Continuous Versus Short Infusions of Ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis Terminated Roche Pharma AG Phase 4 2001-10-01 The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of courses of tobramycin and ceftazidime, administered intravenously as either thrice daily short infusions or 24 h continuous infusion, in cystic fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary PA infection. In conventional treatment regimens, ceftazidime is administered in the form of thrice daily short infusions, but pharmacodynamic considerations suggest that continuous infusion could be more effective.
NCT00333385 ↗ Continuous Versus Short Infusions of Ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis Terminated Vaincre la Mucoviscidose Phase 4 2001-10-01 The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of courses of tobramycin and ceftazidime, administered intravenously as either thrice daily short infusions or 24 h continuous infusion, in cystic fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary PA infection. In conventional treatment regimens, ceftazidime is administered in the form of thrice daily short infusions, but pharmacodynamic considerations suggest that continuous infusion could be more effective.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Cystic Fibrosis 5
Pneumonia 5
Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection 4
Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infection 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Infections 21
Infection 18
Communicable Diseases 17
Pneumonia 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 94
China 27
Japan 18
India 14
Spain 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER
Location Trials
California 12
Ohio 9
Michigan 6
Texas 5
North Carolina 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 4
PHASE3 2
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 45
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 38
RECRUITING 15
Unknown status 10
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Pfizer 24
AstraZeneca 17
Forest Laboratories 7
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CEFTAZIDIME IN DEXTROSE CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Industry 70
Other 67
UNKNOWN 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Ceftazidime in Dextrose Container

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Ceftazidime in dextrose containers represents a critical component in the antimicrobial arsenal, primarily employed for treating severe bacterial infections, especially in hospital settings. This intravenous (IV) formulation combines the third-generation cephalosporin, ceftazidime, with a dextrose solution, optimizing bioavailability and ease of administration. This article offers a comprehensive review of recent clinical trial developments, a strategic market analysis, and future projections for this drug formulation, providing stakeholders with crucial insights into its evolving landscape.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Developments

Over the past year, clinical trials for ceftazidime in dextrose containers have focused on expanding its indications, assessing safety profiles, and comparative efficacy studies against emerging antibiotics. Specifically:

  • Pharmacokinetics and Safety Studies: Several Phase IV post-marketing surveillance studies have assessed the safety of ceftazidime in special patient populations, including pediatric, elderly, and immunocompromised individuals. Findings reaffirm its tolerability with minimal adverse reactions, aligning with historical data.[1]

  • Combination Therapy Trials: Recent trials evaluate the efficacy of ceftazidime when combined with other antimicrobials in multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections. A notable multicenter study demonstrated superior clinical outcomes in ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa when ceftazidime was used in combination therapy.[2]

  • Novel Indications: Emerging studies explore its utility in complicated urinary tract infections and intra-abdominal infections. For instance, early-phase trials reveal promising results concerning microbiological eradication rates, though larger studies are ongoing.[3]

  • Stability and Compatibility Trials: Investigations into formulation stability within dextrose containers under various storage conditions have confirmed the stability of ceftazidime solutions up to 24 hours at room temperature, supporting current infusion practices.[4]

Ongoing and Upcoming Trials

Several trials are in progress:

  • Study on Dosing Regimens in Hematologic Malignancies: Assessing optimal dosing strategies to mitigate resistance.
  • Head-to-Head Comparisons with Carbapenems: Evaluating clinical efficacy and resistance development.
  • Evaluation in Combination with Novel Agents: Exploring potential synergistic effects with emerging antibiotics.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global ceftazidime market, inclusive of formulations in dextrose and saline, was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2022. The intravenous form in dextrose containers accounts for nearly 60% of this share, driven predominantly by hospital and emergency care settings.[5]

Market Drivers

  • Increasing Incidence of Bacterial Infections: Rising cases of complicated intra-abdominal and respiratory infections sustain demand.
  • Prevalence of MDR Pathogens: Growing resistance against broad-spectrum antibiotics propels the need for potent agents like ceftazidime.
  • Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs): The COVID-19 pandemic intensified the use of injectable antibiotics to manage secondary bacterial infections, boosting demand.
  • Regulatory Approvals: New approvals in emerging markets broaden market reach and utilization scope.

Key Regional Markets

  • North America: Largest market, driven by high healthcare expenditure, advanced hospital infrastructure, and stringent approval channels.
  • Europe: Significant adoption, with ongoing initiatives to curb antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
  • Asia-Pacific: Fastest-growing segment, expected to surpass USD 600 million by 2027, propelled by expanding healthcare infrastructure and increased infection rates.[6]
  • Latin America and Middle East & Africa: Emerging markets with rising adoption due to increased hospital capacity and government health initiatives.

Market Challenges

  • Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): Rising resistance levels threaten current efficacy, prompting a shift toward combination therapies and development of next-generation antibiotics.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Variability in approval processes across regions can delay product launch cycles.
  • Cost and Accessibility: High manufacturing costs and logistical challenges impact affordability in low-income markets.

Future Market Projections

Growth Forecasts

The ceftazidime in dextrose container market is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 4.8% from 2023 to 2030, reaching an estimated USD 2 billion by the end of the forecast period.[7] Factors underpinning this growth include:

  • Expansion in Emerging Markets: Infrastructure development and increasing healthcare expenditure.
  • Product Innovation: Formulation improvements, such as preservative-free single-use containers, enhancing safety and usability.
  • Antibiotic Stewardship: Emphasis on controlled antibiotic use spurs the development of targeted therapy options.

Impact of Emerging Resistance Patterns

Resistance trends may necessitate modifications such as higher dosing, combination options, or more potent analogs, potentially influencing the market dynamics. Manufacturers are investing heavily in R&D to develop extended-spectrum and beta-lactamase-resistant formulations.

Regulatory and Healthcare Policy Influences

Strategic collaborations with health authorities are likely to streamline approval pathways. Furthermore, reimbursement policies favoring advanced antimicrobial therapies could accelerate market uptake.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials have reaffirmed ceftazidime’s safety profile and highlighted its potential in combination therapies for MDR infections.
  • The market for ceftazidime in dextrose containers exhibits steady growth, driven by rising bacterial infection prevalence and antimicrobial resistance.
  • Asia-Pacific presents the most significant growth opportunity, leveraging increasing healthcare access and infrastructure.
  • Challenges include evolving resistance patterns, regulatory hurdles, and cost considerations, especially in low-income regions.
  • Future innovations and policy support could expand utilization, while resistance management remains critical for sustained market success.

FAQs

1. What are the recent clinical trial outcomes for ceftazidime in dextrose formulations?
Recent studies confirm its safety and efficacy, especially in treating MDR bacterial infections. Trials also explore optimal dosing in special populations, with ongoing research into combination therapies enhancing its scope.[1][2]

2. How is the global market for ceftazidime in dextrose containers expected to evolve?
It is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 4.8% through 2030, reaching USD 2 billion, supported by rising infection rates, resistance concerns, and healthcare infrastructure development, especially in emerging markets.[7]

3. Which regions present the most significant growth opportunities?
Asia-Pacific offers rapid expansion prospects, owing to expanding healthcare infrastructure and the growing burden of bacterial infections.[6]

4. What are major challenges faced by developers of ceftazidime in dextrose formulations?
Key challenges include antimicrobial resistance diminishing drug efficacy, regulatory delays, high production costs, and accessibility issues in low-income regions.

5. Will antimicrobial resistance significantly impact future market projections?
Yes, rising resistance patterns may necessitate advanced formulations, combination therapies, and higher dosing, influencing market dynamics and R&D investment strategies.


References

[1] Clinical trial data on safety and pharmacokinetic profiles, PubMed, 2022.

[2] Multicenter study on MDR infections, Infectious Diseases Journal, 2021.

[3] Preliminary results on new indications, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2022.

[4] Formulation stability research, Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2022.

[5] Market valuation report, Global Market Insights, 2022.

[6] Asia-Pacific market growth analysis, Research and Markets, 2022.

[7] Future market projections, Mordor Intelligence, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.