Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00633126 ↗ Pharmacokinetics of Ceftaroline in Subjects 12 to 17 Years of Age Completed Forest Laboratories Phase 1 2008-03-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in pediatric subjects
NCT00633152 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Ceftaroline Versus Linezolid in Subjects With Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Completed Forest Laboratories Phase 2 2008-02-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections in adults.
NCT01281462 ↗ Comparative Study of Coadministered Ceftaroline Fosamil and NXL104 vs. Intravenous Doripenem in Adult Subjects With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Completed Forest Laboratories Phase 2 2010-12-01 This is a study in adult subjects with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) comparing treatment with intravenous (IV) coadministered ceftaroline fosamil and NXL104 versus treatment with IV doripenem.
NCT01290900 ↗ A Single-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Four Way Crossover Phase I Study to Investigate the Effect on QT/QTc Interval of Ceftazidime NXL104 or Ceftaroline Fosamil NXL104, Compared With Placebo, Using Moxifloxacin (Avelox®) as Completed AstraZeneca Phase 1 2011-02-01 This is a single dose study in healthy male volunteers to investigate the effect of high doses of ceftazidime NXL104 (CAZ104) or ceftaroline fosamil NXL104 (CXL104) on the QT interval
NCT01290900 ↗ A Single-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Four Way Crossover Phase I Study to Investigate the Effect on QT/QTc Interval of Ceftazidime NXL104 or Ceftaroline Fosamil NXL104, Compared With Placebo, Using Moxifloxacin (Avelox®) as Completed Pfizer Phase 1 2011-02-01 This is a single dose study in healthy male volunteers to investigate the effect of high doses of ceftazidime NXL104 (CAZ104) or ceftaroline fosamil NXL104 (CXL104) on the QT interval
NCT01298843 ↗ Study of Blood Levels of Ceftaroline Fosamil in Children Who Are Receiving Antibiotic Therapy in the Hospital Completed Forest Laboratories Phase 4 2011-04-01 The purpose of this study is to assess blood levels of Ceftaroline fosamil in children.
NCT01400867 ↗ Safety and Efficacy Study of Ceftaroline Versus a Comparator in Pediatric Subjects With Complicated Skin Infections Completed AstraZeneca Phase 2/Phase 3 2011-12-01 This is a study of safety, effectiveness, blood levels and tolerance of Ceftaroline fosamil in children with skin infections receiving antibiotic therapy in the hospital.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL

Condition Name

Condition Name for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL
Intervention Trials
Infections 4
Osteomyelitis 2
Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infection 2
Pneumonia 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL
Intervention Trials
Infections 9
Infection 9
Communicable Diseases 7
Pneumonia 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL
Location Trials
United States 124
Spain 6
Poland 6
Greece 6
Romania 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL
Location Trials
California 11
Ohio 10
Texas 9
Florida 8
Michigan 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 7
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 22
Unknown status 2
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL
Sponsor Trials
Forest Laboratories 20
AstraZeneca 12
Pfizer 9
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CEFTAROLINE FOSAMIL
Sponsor Trials
Industry 43
Other 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ceftaroline Fosamil: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis and Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

What is ceftaroline fosamil and where is it positioned clinically?

Ceftaroline fosamil is an injectable prodrug of the active ceftaroline, a cephalosporin-class antibiotic designed for activity against a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. In development and use, it has been framed around settings where bacterial resistance, including MRSA, and high-acuity infections drive formulary decisions.

Across the product life cycle, the competitive lane for ceftaroline fosamil is “hospital injectable” infections, where formulary adoption depends on:

  • confirmed spectrum performance (including MRSA relevance),
  • dosing practicality,
  • safety tolerability vs. comparator beta-lactams,
  • and price and contracting under US and EU acute-care procurement.

Status note (market impact relevance): The commercial trajectory for ceftaroline fosamil depends heavily on whether ongoing or planned programs extend label breadth and maintain differentiation versus newer MRSA-active and cephalosporin/beta-lactam combinations. Without label expansion and sustained comparative wins, market adoption tends to flatten.

What clinical trials matter, and what is the latest update by program?

No complete, citable, current “clinical trials update” dataset is available in the provided context to accurately list ongoing studies, endpoints, readouts, and timelines for ceftaroline fosamil. Under the operating constraints, this prevents a complete and accurate trial-by-trial update.

What does the market look like today for ceftaroline fosamil?

Ceftaroline fosamil competes in hospital-acquired and acute bacterial infection segments that typically include:

  • complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI),
  • community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP),
  • and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), depending on jurisdiction and label scope.

Competitive structure of the hospital injectable antibiotics market

In these segments, buying behavior is driven by:

  • local antibiogram patterns and stewardship protocols,
  • formulary status and automatic substitution policies,
  • relative efficacy and safety versus comparators such as other cephalosporins, MRSA-active agents, and combination regimens,
  • and contract pricing and tender cycles in integrated delivery networks.

Where ceftaroline fosamil is advantaged

Ceftaroline’s market positioning is tied to whether it can:

  • reduce the need for broader MRSA coverage,
  • support de-escalation pathways when pathogen identification supports it,
  • and maintain consistent activity in the treatment setting where clinicians often prefer a single-agent regimen.

Where adoption can stall

Adoption typically slows when:

  • newer agents with stronger comparative trial results reach preferred formulary status,
  • stewardship protocols shift toward narrower-spectrum or rapid biomarker-guided algorithms,
  • or payer contracting pressures compress price in high-volume indications.

How should investors and R&D teams project demand and revenue?

A credible projection model must be grounded in measurable inputs: addressable patient volumes in labeled indications, penetration rates by hospital formulary status, dosing regimen and course length, and net price after discounts and rebates.

That full input set is not present in the provided context. Under the operating constraints, this prevents producing a complete and accurate numeric forecast for ceftaroline fosamil.

What are the key commercial drivers for ceftaroline fosamil over the next 3 to 7 years?

Even without a numeric forecast, decision-grade commercial drivers can be mapped to levers that directly affect uptake:

1) Label breadth and any new guideline inclusion

  • Expanded label indications increase addressable patient pools.
  • Guideline inclusion supports guideline-driven ordering in hospitals and pharmacy committees.
  • Any resistance signal (activity against clinically relevant phenotypes) affects formulary rationales in stewardship review.

2) Competitive differentiation vs. MRSA-active standards

  • If ceftaroline maintains a comparative advantage in efficacy or safety versus MRSA-active options in the same inpatient settings, it can retain formulary status.
  • If comparative wins erode, hospitals may switch to preferred contracting products.

3) Contracting, tender cycles, and net price

  • In acute-care procurement, net price after rebates and tender terms can determine whether a product stays on contract.
  • Switching costs matter, because pharmacy systems and stewardship algorithms often require revalidation.

4) Safety and administration practicality

  • Administration schedule and tolerability shape nursing workflow and protocol adoption.
  • Adverse event profiles influence risk acceptance in high-use centers.

5) Supply chain continuity

  • Antibiotic category supply integrity can drive restricted purchasing in case of shortages.
  • Any supply instability can produce formulary reoptimization even when clinical efficacy is unchanged.

Actionable market scenarios (qualitative, decision-focused)

These scenarios reflect how the hospital antibiotic market typically behaves and what it implies for ceftaroline fosamil business planning. They are qualitative only due to missing citable numeric inputs.

Base case scenario

  • Ceftaroline remains on contract in core hospitals for its existing labeled use.
  • Adoption holds steady, with modest share gains where MRSA-relevant coverage and stewardship preference align.

Downside scenario

  • Competitive intraclass movement displaces ceftaroline from preferred status in major purchasing groups.
  • Net price compression accelerates as tender competition intensifies.

Upside scenario

  • Label expansion and/or strong supportive comparative outcomes extend differentiation.
  • Stewardship adoption improves through guideline uptake and better alignment with local antibiograms.

Key Takeaways

  • Ceftaroline fosamil is an injectable cephalosporin prodrug competing in high-acuity hospital antibiotic categories where formulary contracting and stewardship adoption drive net demand.
  • A complete, citable “clinical trials update” and numeric market projection cannot be produced from the provided context without risking inaccurate claims.
  • The decision-grade business outlook depends on label breadth, MRSA-active differentiation vs. evolving comparators, net price under tender cycles, and stewardship protocols.

FAQs

1) What is the primary market for ceftaroline fosamil?
It is the hospital injectable antibiotic market focused on acute inpatient bacterial infections, subject to jurisdictional label scope.

2) What most influences formulary adoption for ceftaroline fosamil?
Net contracting terms, demonstrated clinical performance in relevant indications, and stewardship protocol fit.

3) What indicators signal an upside trajectory?
Label expansion, guideline or pathway inclusion, and sustained comparative differentiation versus MRSA-active competitors.

4) What indicators signal share erosion risk?
Loss of preferred formulary status, accelerating net price compression in tender cycles, and substitution by newer or more strongly contracted alternatives.

5) Can a reliable revenue forecast be built without trial and pricing inputs?
No. Forecast accuracy requires addressable volume, expected penetration, dosing-based utilization, and net price assumptions.


References

[1] EMA. (n.d.). Product information and assessment reports for ceftaroline fosamil (if applicable).
[2] FDA. (n.d.). Drug label and review documents for ceftaroline fosamil (if applicable).
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Ceftaroline fosamil clinical studies database entry.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.