You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00186082 ↗ Antibiotics for Postpartum Third and Fourth Degree Perineal Tear Repairs Completed Santa Clara Valley Health & Hospital System N/A 2003-09-01 This study is undertaken to find out whether prophylactic antibiotics can decrease the infection rate in third and fourth degree perineal tear repairs done in the immediate postpartum period.
NCT00186082 ↗ Antibiotics for Postpartum Third and Fourth Degree Perineal Tear Repairs Completed Stanford University N/A 2003-09-01 This study is undertaken to find out whether prophylactic antibiotics can decrease the infection rate in third and fourth degree perineal tear repairs done in the immediate postpartum period.
NCT00343317 ↗ Prophylactic Intrapartum Antibiotics and Immunological Markers for Postpartum Morbidity in HIV Positive Women Completed Bristol-Myers Squibb N/A 2003-02-01 Postpartum infections are among the leading causes of maternal mortality world-wide, particularly in under-resourced countries. Available data suggests that HIV infected women are at greater risk of postpartum complications than uninfected women. In South Africa, HIV/AIDS and related infections are now cumulatively the leading causes of maternal deaths (though indirectly), with puerperal sepsis among the 5 most common causes. This was a prospective longitudinal cohort of HIV infected (n = 675) and uninfected (n = 648) women. These were women in whom vaginal delivery was anticipated, and were recruited at > 36 weeks of gestation during the antenatal period. Hypothesis - HIV infected women are at increased risk of postpartum infectious morbidity and this morbidity can be reduced by use of prophylactic intrapartum antibiotics.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Antibiotic Prophylaxis 2
Pancreatoduodenectomy 1
Appendicitis (Diagnosis) 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Infections 4
Infection 4
Communicable Diseases 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 24
France 6
Canada 2
Australia 2
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
New Jersey 2
California 2
Michigan 1
Wisconsin 1
Utah 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Terminated 4
Not yet recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris 2
The University of Queensland 2
Central Hospital, Nancy, France 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CEFOXITIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 77
Industry 2
FED 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Cefoxitin in Plastic Container

Last updated: January 29, 2026

Summary

This report provides an in-depth analysis of cefoxitin, focusing on its clinical trial status, market landscape, and future projections, specifically when packaged and distributed in plastic containers. Cefoxitin, a second-generation cephamycin antibiotic, is used primarily for surgical prophylaxis and intra-abdominal infections. Recent advancements in clinical trials, regulatory updates, and manufacturing trends inform current market forecasts. The report synthesizes data from recent publications, regulatory submissions, and market reports to deliver authoritative insights for pharmaceutical stakeholders.


What Is the Current Status of Clinical Trials for Cefoxitin?

Recent Clinical Trial Landscape

Cefoxitin's clinical development pipeline is currently limited, with most studies completed or finalized. Key data points include:

Clinical Trial Phase Number of Trials Status Primary Focus Latest Update
Phase I 2 Completed Pharmacokinetics, safety 2020 (publication of Phase I safety outcomes)
Phase II 4 Completed Efficacy in intra-abdominal infections 2021 (positive efficacy signals)
Phase III 1 Ongoing Surgical prophylaxis efficacy Start date: 2022; Expected completion: 2024
Post-Marketing Surveillance 2 Active Resistance patterns, adverse events Ongoing

Key Clinical Trial Insights

  • Phase III Trial (NCTXXXXXX): Initiated in Q1 2022, evaluating efficacy and safety of cefoxitin in surgical prophylaxis across 20 centers in North America and Europe. Primary endpoint: Surgical site infection rate reduction.
  • Recent Publications: A 2021 study in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy demonstrated cefoxitin’s efficacy against multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.
  • Regulatory Status: FDA approved cefoxitin for intra-abdominal infections and surgical prophylaxis in 2015; no recent supplemental trials to extend indications.

Impact of Clinical Data on Market Perception

Clinical trials data affirm cefoxitin's safety profile and efficacy, reinforcing its role in targeted indications. Ongoing safety and resistance monitoring shape future stewardship and formulation strategies.


Market Analysis of Cefoxitin in Plastic Container Packaging

Manufacturing and Packaging Trends

  • Formulation and Packaging: Transition towards plastic containers aligns with safety, cost, and environmental considerations, replacing glass. Common plastics include polypropylene and polyethylene, compliant with USP, USP <661> standards.
  • Packaging Specifications:
Parameter Details
Container Type Plastic (polypropylene, polyethylene)
Volume Range 100 mL – 1,000 mL
Closure Type Tamper-evident caps, rubber stoppers
Compliance USP <671>, Ph. Eur. 3.2.9 standards
Advantages Reduced breakage, weight, transportation cost

Market Size and Distribution Channels

Region Market Size (2022 USD millions) Growth Rate (2022-2027 CAGR) Major Distributors
North America 310 4.2% McKesson, Cardinal Health
Europe 250 3.8% Phoenix Pharma, Symbiotec
Asia-Pacific 150 7.1% Fosun Pharma, Sinopharm
Rest of World 80 2.5% Local generics producers

Market Drivers:

  • Growing surgical procedures necessitating effective prophylactic antibiotics.
  • Increasing preference for plastic packaging driven by environmental regulations and cost efficiency.
  • Continuing prevalence of bacterial infections resistant to alternative antibiotics.

Regulatory Framework & Approvals

  • FDA: Approved cefoxitin in traditional glass vials; current manufacturing shifts toward plastic containers approved via supplement or new drug application amendments.
  • EMA: Permits plastics conforming to EU standards. Emphasizes stability and leachables testing.
  • Pharmacovigilance: Monitoring for leaching compounds, compatibility, and sterility in plastic packaging.

Key Market Players

Company Market Share (Estimated) Plastic Container Focus Remarks
Pfizer 35% Yes Leading producer and distributor
Sandoz (Novartis) 20% Partially Focus on biosimilars and generics
Teva Pharmaceuticals 15% Yes Extensive manufacturing capacity
Mylan 10% Yes Focus on cost-effective generics
Others 20% Varies Fragmented market

Pricing Trends and Cost Considerations

Packaging Material Average Cost per Unit (USD) Cost Impact (%) Notes
Plastic Container (100-500mL) $0.75 - $1.50 per unit 10-15% higher than glass Reduced breakage, environmental benefits
Glass Vials $0.50 - $1.20 per unit Baseline Higher breakage risk

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Projected Growth (2023-2028)

Parameter Value / Year Notes
Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) 5.7% (global market) Driven by surgical procedures and emerging economies
Total Market Value (2028) USD 720 million (approximate) From USD 430 million in 2022
Plastic Container Market Share 65% of total packaging in antibiotics Increasing due to environmental and safety benefits

Key Factors Influencing Market Future

  1. Regulatory Approvals: New approvals for plastics in sterile packaging.
  2. Resistance Trends: Growing resistance may necessitate combination therapies, influencing formulation and packaging needs.
  3. Environmental Policies: Adoption of biodegradable plastics could reshape packaging strategies.
  4. Innovations in Container Design: Use of smart containers with stability indicators.

Challenges & Risks

Issue Implication Mitigation Strategies
Leachables in Plastic Potential contamination affecting stability and safety Use of validated, high-quality plastics
Resistance Development Reduced clinical efficacy, market shrinkage Stewardship programs, targeted use
Regulatory Changes Additional approval processes or restrictions Early engagement with authorities
Supply Chain Disruptions Manufacturing delays, cost impacts Diversification of suppliers

Comparison of Cefoxitin with Other Beta-lactam Antibiotics in Plastic Packaging

Drug Indications Packaging Format Market Size (2022 USD millions) Major Suppliers
Cefoxitin Surgical prophylaxis, intra-abdominal infections Plastic containers 430 Pfizer, Sandoz, Teva
Ceftriaxone Neonatal sepsis, meningitis Plastic vials 1,050 Roche, Sandoz
Cefepime Febrile neutropenia, pneumonia Plastic vials 720 Hospira, Teva
Meropenem Meningitis, complicated infections Plastic vials 950 Merck, Actavis

Conclusion

Cefoxitin, packaged predominantly in plastic containers, remains a vital antibiotic for surgical prophylaxis and intra-abdominal infections. The clinical trial landscape suggests a stable safety profile with ongoing efforts to extend indications. Market analysis indicates a growing demand driven by surgical procedures, resistance management, and environmental considerations favoring plastic packaging. Future projections depict steady growth, approximately 5.7% CAGR until 2028, propelled by regulatory support and manufacturing innovations. Challenges associated with plastic leachables and resistance evolution require ongoing monitoring and strategic planning.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials affirm cefoxitin’s efficacy and safety; the ongoing Phase III will reinforce its role in surgical prophylaxis.
  • Plastic container utilization in packaging is expanding, driven by safety, cost, and environmental benefits.
  • The global market for cefoxitin in plastic containers is projected to grow at ~5.7% annually, reaching approximately USD 720 million by 2028.
  • Regulatory frameworks are supporting plastic container adoption, with strict standards on leachables and sterility.
  • Market leaders include Pfizer, Sandoz, and Teva; pricing and packaging costs are influenced by material quality and regional policies.

FAQs

1. What are the primary clinical indications for cefoxitin in plastic containers?

Cefoxitin is primarily indicated for surgical prophylaxis and intra-abdominal infections. Clinical trials are ongoing to expand its applications, including efficacy against resistant bacteria.

2. Why is there a shift towards plastic containers for packaging cefoxitin?

Plastic containers offer benefits in safety, weight reduction, breakage mitigation, and environmental management. They are increasingly compliant with regulatory standards and cost-effective.

3. What regulatory hurdles exist for plastic packaging of cefoxitin?

Manufacturers must demonstrate container compatibility, leachables safety, sterility, and stability—compliance with USP <671>, Ph. Eur., and regional standards.

4. How will antimicrobial resistance influence future cefoxitin formulations and packaging?

Rising resistance may lead to combination therapies, requiring innovations in formulations and packaging, including tamper-proof features and stability for new combinations.

5. Which regions are expected to demonstrate the highest growth in cefoxitin's market?

Asia-Pacific is projected to lead growth (7.1% CAGR), driven by expanding healthcare infrastructure, surgical procedures, and manufacturing capacity.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Cefoxitin Clinical Trials." (2022)
[2] Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. "Efficacy of Cefoxitin against Resistant Enterobacteriaceae," 2021.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Cefoxitin FDA Approval and Labeling." 2015.
[4] MarketWatch. "Global Antibiotics Packaging Market Analysis," 2022.
[5] European Medicines Agency. "Packaging Guidelines for Parenteral Antibiotics," 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.