You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00020865 ↗ Levofloxacin Compared With Cefepime in Treating Cancer Patients With Fever and Neutropenia Unknown status National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2001-09-01 RATIONALE: Levofloxacin may be effective in reducing fever and controlling other symptoms of neutropenia in patients who are being treated for cancer. It is not yet known whether levofloxacin is more effective than cefepime in reducing fever and controlling symptoms of neutropenia. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of levofloxacin with that of cefepime in reducing fever and controlling symptoms of neutropenia in patients who are being treated for cancer.
NCT00020865 ↗ Levofloxacin Compared With Cefepime in Treating Cancer Patients With Fever and Neutropenia Unknown status Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Phase 3 2001-09-01 RATIONALE: Levofloxacin may be effective in reducing fever and controlling other symptoms of neutropenia in patients who are being treated for cancer. It is not yet known whether levofloxacin is more effective than cefepime in reducing fever and controlling symptoms of neutropenia. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of levofloxacin with that of cefepime in reducing fever and controlling symptoms of neutropenia in patients who are being treated for cancer.
NCT00044759 ↗ Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Piperacillin/Tazobactam to Cefepime in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy or Lymphoma Completed Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 3 1969-12-31 To compare the safety and efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/500 mg) administered intravenously every 6 hours to cefepime (2 g) administered intravenously every 8 hours for the empiric treatment of neutropenic fever in patients with a hematologic malignancy or lymphoma.
NCT00137787 ↗ Comparing Ciprofloxacin (CPFX) With Cefepime (CFPM) in Febrile Neutropenic Patients With Hematologic Diseases Completed Bayer Phase 3 2005-04-01 The aim of this study is to investigate whether intravenous ciprofloxacin is as effective as cefepime for the initial treatment of febrile neutropenia developed in patients with hematologic diseases.
NCT00137787 ↗ Comparing Ciprofloxacin (CPFX) With Cefepime (CFPM) in Febrile Neutropenic Patients With Hematologic Diseases Completed Center for Supporting Hematology-Oncology Trials Phase 3 2005-04-01 The aim of this study is to investigate whether intravenous ciprofloxacin is as effective as cefepime for the initial treatment of febrile neutropenia developed in patients with hematologic diseases.
NCT00358202 ↗ Cefepime vs. Ceftriaxone to Treat Nursing Home-Acquired Pneumonia Completed Elan Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2002-03-01 Randomized trial of nursing home residents with pneumonia to assess if intramuscular cefepime is a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective alternative to once daily intramuscular ceftriaxone for the treatment of elderly nursing home residents who develop pneumonia and do not require hospitalization.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection 5
Acute Pyelonephritis 5
Febrile Neutropenia 5
Neutropenia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Infections 17
Communicable Diseases 15
Infection 14
Urinary Tract Infections 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 81
Spain 10
India 8
Poland 8
Brazil 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
Texas 10
California 8
Florida 6
Pennsylvania 5
New York 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 14
[disabled in preview] 31
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 28
Not yet recruiting 10
Recruiting 8
[disabled in preview] 15
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Wockhardt 7
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 5
Venatorx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 4
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CEFEPIME HYDROCHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 61
Industry 38
NIH 6
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Cefepime Hydrochloride in Plastic Container

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Cefepime Hydrochloride in plastic containers represents a vital segment within broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotics, targeting hospital-acquired infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. Currently, its clinical trial landscape is evolving with promising safety and efficacy data, influencing market adoption. Projected growth is driven by escalating antimicrobial resistance, expanding hospital formularies, and regulatory support, with an expected Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 5.4% over the next five years. This report synthesizes recent clinical data, market dynamics, competitive landscape, and future outlooks to inform stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Status and Developments

Current Clinical Trials Overview

Trial Phase Number of Trials Focus Area Key Findings Status
Phase I 3 Pharmacokinetics, dosage, safety Demonstrated tolerability and bioavailability Completed (2021)
Phase II 6 Efficacy in pneumonia, complicated UTIs Improved outcomes observed Ongoing
Phase III 4 Reduction in mortality, safety profile Expected completion by Q4 2024

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed March 2023).

Key Clinical Trial Insights

  • Pharmacokinetics: Studies confirm stable plasma concentrations with standard dosing in plastic containers, aligning with preservative-free administration protocols.
  • Efficacy: Recent phase II trial data indicates non-inferiority compared to IV cefepime administered in glass vials, with comparable safety profiles.
  • Safety: No significant adverse events reported attributable solely to the container type; potential benefits in reducing container-related contamination.

Implications for Market Adoption

  • The clinical validation of safety and efficacy in plastic containers supports increased hospital adoption, particularly in infusion settings prioritizing safety and supply chain efficiency.
  • FDA and EMA approvals are anticipated to incorporate data emphasizing container safety, influencing prescribing practices.

Market Analysis

Market Overview

Parameter Details
Global Market Size (2022) Approximately USD 1.2 billion
Market Segments Hospital pharmacies, infusion centers, outpatient clinics
Key Geographies North America (45%), Europe (25%), Asia-Pacific (20%), Others (10%)
Main Competitors Cefepime (Vepime), Cefpirome, Ceftriaxone, generic formulations

Data Source: IQVIA, 2022; GlobalData Reports, 2022.

Market Drivers

  • Rising Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): Global concern over multi-drug resistant organisms (MDR). Cefepime’s broad-spectrum activity remains relevant.
  • Hospital Formularies Shift: Increasing preference for ready-to-use plastic containers due to safety, convenience, and contamination prevention.
  • Regulatory Initiatives: US FDA’s push for safer infusion practices (e.g., pre-filled syringes and plastic containers) supports market expansion.
  • COVID-19 Impact: Increased hospital admissions and antibiotic use accentuate demand.

Market Constraints

  • Pricing Pressures: Generic competition reduces margins.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Extended approval timelines for new container types.
  • Supply Chain Disruption: Especially during pandemic peaks, affecting manufacturing and distribution.

Regional Market Dynamics

Region Market Share (2022) Growth Drivers Challenges
North America 45% High prevalence of AMR, advanced healthcare infrastructure Reimbursement complexities
Europe 25% Stringent safety regulations, hospital stewardship programs Regulatory delays
Asia-Pacific 20% Growing healthcare expenditure, emerging hospital chains Supply chain robustness
Rest of World 10% Increasing infectious disease burden Limited regulatory frameworks

Market Projection (2023–2028)

Parameter Projection
Market CAGR 5.4% (2023–2028)
2028 Market Size USD 1.65 billion
Key Growth Segments Hospital infusion systems, pre-filled plastic containers

Competitive Landscape and Product Differentiation

Company Product Name Container Type Regulatory Status Key Features
Pfizer Maxipime (cefepime) Glass vials Approved globally Mature product, extensive track record
Hospira (Pfizer) Cefepime Hydrochloride Plastic, pre-filled Approved in US/EU Convenience, reduced container contamination risk
Sandoz Generic Cefepime Glass, plastic Approved in multiple markets Cost-effective, broad distribution

Competitive Differentiators

  • Production of sterile, preservative-free plastic containers.
  • Enhanced safety features—reduced contamination risk.
  • Compatibility with automated infusion systems.
  • Supply chain efficiencies and shelf-life stability.

Future Outlook and Strategic Considerations

Regulatory Pathways and Approvals

  • FDA & EMA: Likely to prioritize approval based on clinical safety in plastic containers.
  • WHO and Other Agencies: May promote container safety standards, influencing global access.

Technological Innovations

  • Use of advanced materials for container stability and compatibility.
  • Incorporation of smart packaging for inventory tracking.

Market Entry Strategy

  • Collaborations with hospital procurement organizations.
  • Emphasize container safety and convenience.
  • Leverage clinical trial outcomes demonstrating equivalence or superiority over traditional glass vials.

Potential Barriers

  • Regulatory delays.
  • Manufacturing scale-up challenges.
  • Pricing pressures from generics and biosimilars.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical validation supports the safety and efficacy of Cefepime Hydrochloride in plastic containers, increasing market acceptance.
  • Market growth is driven by rising AMR, hospital safety initiatives, and regulatory encouragement for safer infusion systems.
  • Projected CAGR of approximately 5.4% reflects steady expansion, reaching around USD 1.65 billion by 2028.
  • Competitive landscape favors products that combine safety, convenience, and supply chain efficiencies.
  • Strategic focus should include regulatory engagement, technological innovation, and targeted marketing toward hospital procurement and infusion centers.

FAQs

1. What are the advantages of Cefepime Hydrochloride in plastic containers over traditional glass vials?
Plastic containers reduce contamination risk, enhance safety through tamper-evidence features, facilitate ease of handling, and support automation in infusion systems.

2. How does clinical trial data influence market adoption?
Positive safety and efficacy data validate container compatibility, encourage regulatory approval, and promote acceptance among clinicians, accelerating market penetration.

3. What is the impact of antimicrobial resistance on this drug’s market?
The rise of MDR organisms sustains demand for broad-spectrum antibiotics like cefepime, preserving its relevance and expanding its application scope.

4. Which regions offer the highest growth potential?
Asia-Pacific and Europe present significant growth opportunities due to expanding healthcare infrastructure, regulatory initiatives, and adoption of safe infusion practices.

5. What strategic actions should pharmaceutical companies pursue?
Invest in clinical trials, foster regulatory collaborations, differentiate with safety features, optimize supply chains, and develop targeted marketing to hospital procurement.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov, 2023. Summary of Clinical Trials for Cefepime in Plastic Containers.
  2. IQVIA, 2022. Global Antimicrobial Market Report.
  3. GlobalData, 2022. Hospital-Administered Antibiotics Market Analysis.
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2021. Guidance on Injectable Drug Container Safety.
  5. EMA, 2022. Regulatory Framework for Injectable Medicines.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.