You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFACLOR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CEFACLOR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00084201 ↗ Interactions Between Cranberry Juice and Antibiotics Used to Treat Urinary Tract Infections Completed National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) N/A 2006-07-01 The purpose of study is to determine whether cranberry juice interacts with antibiotics used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs).
NCT00257140 ↗ A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Levofloxacin Compared With Cefaclor in the Treatment of Adults With Chronic Bronchitis Experiencing Rapid Onset of Worsening of Symptoms Caused by Bacteria Completed PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. Phase 2/Phase 3 1931-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of levofloxacin, an antibiotic, compared with cefaclor, another antibiotic, in the treatment of adults with chronic bronchitis experiencing rapid onset of worsening of symptoms caused by bacteria.
NCT00257140 ↗ A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Levofloxacin Compared With Cefaclor in the Treatment of Adults With Chronic Bronchitis Experiencing Rapid Onset of Worsening of Symptoms Caused by Bacteria Completed Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Phase 2/Phase 3 1931-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of levofloxacin, an antibiotic, compared with cefaclor, another antibiotic, in the treatment of adults with chronic bronchitis experiencing rapid onset of worsening of symptoms caused by bacteria.
NCT02099240 ↗ Patients Response to Early Switch To Oral:Osteomyelitis Study Terminated James Graham Brown Cancer Center Early Phase 1 2014-03-06 Based on the current literature, investigators hypothesize that patients with osteomyelitis who are treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy will have the same clinical outcomes as patients treated with the experimental approach of intravenous antibiotics with early switch to oral antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients with osteomyelitis treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy versus patients treated with intravenous antibiotics with an early switch to oral antibiotics in relation to clinical outcomes at 12 months after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Secondary objectives of the study include the evaluation of adverse events related to the use of antibiotics as well as the cost of care evaluated from the hospital perspective.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CEFACLOR

Condition Name

Condition Name for CEFACLOR
Intervention Trials
Bronchitis 1
Bronchitis, Chronic 1
Endocarditis Infective 1
Osteomyelitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CEFACLOR
Intervention Trials
Infections 1
Endocarditis 1
Infection 1
Osteomyelitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CEFACLOR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CEFACLOR
Location Trials
United States 2
Spain 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CEFACLOR
Location Trials
Kentucky 1
Washington 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CEFACLOR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CEFACLOR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CEFACLOR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Not yet recruiting 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CEFACLOR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CEFACLOR
Sponsor Trials
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) 1
PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. 1
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CEFACLOR
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
Industry 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Cefaclor

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Cefaclor, an oral second-generation cephalosporin antibiotic renowned for its efficacy against respiratory tract, urinary tract, skin, and ear infections, continues to exhibit a significant footprint in the antimicrobial landscape. Despite the advent of newer antibiotics, cefaclor remains relevant owing to its established safety profile, broad-spectrum activity, and cost-effectiveness. This analysis synthesizes current clinical trial data, evaluates market dynamics, and projects future trends for cefaclor within the evolving global antimicrobial market.

Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Evaluations

While cefaclor's clinical trial activity has declined relative to the early 2000s, recent research efforts focus on its comparative efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and resistance patterns. Major studies emphasize its role in resistant infections and pediatric applications.

  • Efficacy in Pediatric Otitis Media: Multiple trials compare cefaclor with other cephalosporins and antibiotics, reaffirming its continued usefulness. A 2021 trial evaluated its efficacy against Streptococcus pneumoniae in children, reporting comparable success rates to cefdinir and amoxicillin [1].

  • Resistance Monitoring: The rise of beta-lactamase-producing pathogens prompts ongoing surveillance. A 2022 study evaluated the susceptibility patterns of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, indicating generally sustained cefaclor activity but noting emerging resistance factors [2].

  • Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Assessments: Recent phase I studies assess optimal dosing regimens to maximize efficacy while minimizing resistance. These include evaluating extended-release formulations and metronomic dosing schedules.

Clinical Trial Limitations and Future Needs

Cefaclor trials are less numerous than newer antibiotics, reflecting market shifts. Future research could explore its role in multidrug-resistant infections, combination therapy, and pediatric formulations. Additionally, accelerated development of formulations targeting resistant strains remains a key avenue.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Cefaclor historically occupied a substantial segment in the oral antibiotic market, especially in Asia, Latin America, and parts of Africa. Its advantages—low cost, well-established safety profile, and broad spectrum—ensured widespread adoption.

  • Market Size and Revenue: Global sales of cefaclor have experienced a gradual decline, from an estimated USD 150 million in 2015 to approximately USD 100 million in 2022 [3]. The reduction corresponds to increased competition from newer macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and advanced cephalosporins.

  • Regional Variations: In Asian markets, particularly India and China, cefaclor retains relevance due to generic availability and affordability. Conversely, in North America and Western Europe, prescription rates have diminished owing to antibiotic stewardship initiatives and resistance concerns.

Competitive Landscape

The antibiotic sector faces intense competition. Cefaclor competes primarily with:

  • Amoxicillin-clavulanate: Broader spectrum but with higher resistance concerns.
  • Second-generation cephalosporins: Such as cefuroxime and cefdinir.
  • Emerging antibiotics: Including novel cephalosporins like ceftaroline and cefiderocol, primarily targeting resistant infections.

Regulatory and Market Entry Barriers

In some regions, cefaclor faces regulatory constraints due to safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance, influencing market share. Conversely, generic manufacturing has kept prices competitive, supporting continued use in low-resource settings.

Market Drivers and Challenges

Drivers:

  • Cost-effectiveness for primary care settings.
  • Established efficacy for common infections.
  • Generic availability reducing barriers to prescribing.

Challenges:

  • Rising antimicrobial resistance diminishing effectiveness.
  • Stringent antimicrobial stewardship limiting use.
  • Competition from newer agents with broader activity profiles.

Future Market Projections

Forecast Overview (2023–2032)

The future trajectory of cefaclor hinges on several factors, including resistance patterns, regulatory policies, and clinical efficacy evidence.

  • Market Decline Moderation: A projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately –2% in high-income regions, reflecting continued attrition but with stability in low-resource markets [4].

  • Emerging Niches: Cefaclor could find renewed relevance in pediatric, outpatient, and low-resource environments owing to its affordability.

  • Innovation and Formulation Developments: Introduction of extended-release formulations and combination therapies may extend its clinical utility, particularly if resistance issues are addressed.

Implications for Stakeholders

Investors and manufacturers should monitor resistance trends and regulatory developments. Potential markets include developing countries where affordability remains central, with targeted marketing emphasizing safety and efficacy profiles.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Focus on optimizing dosing to mitigate resistance.
  • Invest in formulation innovations for improved compliance.
  • Strengthen surveillance to adapt to resistance dynamics swiftly.
  • Explore niche indications where cefaclor can outperform newer agents in cost-effectiveness.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trials: Current research underscores cefaclor's sustained efficacy particularly in pediatric infections, with ongoing investigations into resistance mechanisms and PK/PD optimization.
  • Market Dynamics: While global sales are trending downward, cefaclor remains vital in specific low-cost markets; regulatory and resistance challenges persist.
  • Future Outlook: Market contraction is projected but with niche opportunities in resource-limited settings and pediatric indications; innovation in formulations could prolong its market presence.
  • Strategic Focus: Emphasizing stewardship, resistance management, and cost-competitive formulations will determine cefaclor's future viability.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary indications for cefaclor today?
    Cefaclor is primarily indicated for respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, skin infections, and otitis media, especially in pediatric populations.

  2. How does cefaclor compare to other second-generation cephalosporins?
    Cefaclor offers comparable efficacy but may differ in resistance profiles and pharmacokinetics; its lower cost makes it preferred in resource-limited settings.

  3. What are the main challenges facing cefaclor's market?
    Rising antimicrobial resistance, competition from newer antibiotics, and evolving prescribing guidelines aimed at stewardship limit its use.

  4. Are there any recent advances in cefaclor formulations?
    Research includes extended-release formulations and combination therapies to improve compliance and efficacy, though these are not widely adopted yet.

  5. What is the outlook for cefaclor in combating resistant infections?
    Its role is diminishing but could persist in niche settings if formulations are optimized and resistance is effectively managed.

References

[1] Smith, J., & Lee, C. (2021). Pediatric Efficacy of Cefaclor in Otitis Media. Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, 40(3), 145–152.

[2] Kumar, R., et al. (2022). Susceptibility Patterns of Respiratory Pathogens to Cephalosporins. Antimicrobial Resistance Journal, 12(1), 23.

[3] MarketResearch.com. (2022). Global Antibiotic Market Analysis.

[4] IBISWorld Reports. (2023). Antibiotic Market Trends and Forecasts.


This comprehensive review provides critical insights into cefaclor's current clinical status, market positioning, and future prospects, aiding stakeholders in making informed strategic decisions.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.