Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CATAPRES-TTS-2


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CATAPRES-TTS-2

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Medical Center Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
NCT00262470 ↗ Treatment of Orthostatic Intolerance Active, not recruiting National Institutes of Health (NIH) Phase 1/Phase 2 1997-04-01 This trial is designed to study the effects of various mechanistically unique medications in controlling excessive increases in heart rate with standing and in improving the symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in patients with this disorder.
NCT00262470 ↗ Treatment of Orthostatic Intolerance Active, not recruiting Satish R. Raj Phase 1/Phase 2 1997-04-01 This trial is designed to study the effects of various mechanistically unique medications in controlling excessive increases in heart rate with standing and in improving the symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in patients with this disorder.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CATAPRES-TTS-2

Condition Name

Condition Name for CATAPRES-TTS-2
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 3
Delirium 2
Fecal Incontinence 2
Nausea 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CATAPRES-TTS-2
Intervention Trials
Delirium 3
Hypertension 3
Critical Illness 2
Opioid-Related Disorders 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CATAPRES-TTS-2

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CATAPRES-TTS-2
Location Trials
United States 11
United Kingdom 2
Lithuania 1
Denmark 1
Netherlands 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CATAPRES-TTS-2
Location Trials
Minnesota 3
Maryland 2
California 2
Tennessee 2
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CATAPRES-TTS-2

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CATAPRES-TTS-2
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 3
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CATAPRES-TTS-2
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 7
Withdrawn 3
Recruiting 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CATAPRES-TTS-2

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CATAPRES-TTS-2
Sponsor Trials
Mayo Clinic 3
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) 2
The University of Queensland 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CATAPRES-TTS-2
Sponsor Trials
Other 36
NIH 5
Industry 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Catapres-TTS-2 Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, Patent Status and Forecast

Last updated: August 1, 2026

Catapres-TTS-2 is the 0.2 mg/day transdermal clonidine hydrochloride patch, indicated for hypertension. Its clinical development is complete, regulatory exclusivity has expired, and the product competes with generic clonidine patches and oral antihypertensive therapies. No active branded clinical-development program or meaningful patent barrier supports market exclusivity. Future demand is likely to remain concentrated in patients who require once-weekly transdermal delivery, have adherence problems, or cannot tolerate standard oral treatment.

What is Catapres-TTS-2?

Catapres-TTS-2 delivers approximately 0.2 mg of clonidine per day through the skin for seven days. The patch is one of three historical strengths:

Product Nominal delivery rate Weekly clonidine content
Catapres-TTS-1 0.1 mg/day 2.5 mg
Catapres-TTS-2 0.2 mg/day 5.0 mg
Catapres-TTS-3 0.3 mg/day 7.5 mg

The active ingredient, clonidine hydrochloride, is a centrally acting alpha-2 adrenergic agonist. It reduces sympathetic outflow and lowers blood pressure. The FDA label warns about hypotension, bradycardia, sedation, dry mouth, contact dermatitis and rebound hypertension after abrupt discontinuation. Patients generally transition from oral clonidine to the patch over two to three days because the transdermal system reaches therapeutic concentrations gradually (FDA, 2020).

Catapres-TTS-2 is a transdermal delivery system rather than a new chemical entity. Its commercial differentiation depends on weekly dosing, patch adhesion, tolerability and supply reliability.

What is the FDA status of Catapres-TTS-2?

Catapres-TTS was approved in the United States under NDA 018813 for hypertension. The product is an approved prescription transdermal clonidine system, not a biologic and not an over-the-counter medicine. The FDA-approved indication is hypertension, either alone or with other antihypertensive agents (FDA, 2020).

The FDA label does not establish Catapres-TTS-2 as an approved treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, opioid withdrawal, menopausal vasomotor symptoms or pain. Clonidine is used in some of those settings, but such uses are generally off-label unless supported by a separate approved product and indication.

Is Catapres-TTS-2 still marketed?

The Catapres-TTS brand has had limited commercial visibility compared with generic clonidine transdermal systems. U.S. pharmacy availability can vary by wholesaler, manufacturer and strength. Product status should be checked against current FDA drug listings and commercial distribution records rather than assumed from historical brand references.

Generic clonidine transdermal products may be listed under the active ingredient and dosage form rather than under the Catapres-TTS brand. This distinction matters for reimbursement, substitution and market-share analysis.

Are there current clinical trials for Catapres-TTS-2?

Catapres-TTS-2 has no apparent active late-stage clinical program. Its pivotal clinical development occurred before current ClinicalTrials.gov registration practices became standard. Current research involving clonidine generally concerns other formulations, indications or comparators rather than Catapres-TTS-2 as a branded product.

A ClinicalTrials.gov search for Catapres-TTS and transdermal clonidine is relevant for identifying newly registered studies, but the product’s clinical risk is regulatory and commercial rather than trial-driven. The principal evidence base consists of historical hypertension studies, pharmacokinetic work and postmarketing safety information (ClinicalTrials.gov, 2025).

What clinical evidence supports the patch?

The transdermal system provides sustained clonidine exposure over approximately seven days. Compared with immediate-release oral clonidine, the patch reduces dosing frequency and can reduce peak-to-trough fluctuations. The pharmacologic tradeoff is slower onset and slower offset.

Important clinical limitations include:

  • Sedation and fatigue.
  • Dry mouth and constipation.
  • Skin irritation or allergic contact dermatitis.
  • Bradycardia and hypotension.
  • Rebound hypertension after abrupt withdrawal.
  • Reduced suitability for patients requiring rapid dose adjustment.

The patch is most commercially defensible when adherence or oral administration is a problem. It is less attractive when clinicians want rapid titration or when the patient has sensitivity to adhesive systems.

What patents protect Catapres-TTS-2?

The original Catapres-TTS patent estate is effectively expired in the United States. The product launched decades ago, and any core composition, reservoir, adhesive or delivery patents associated with the original system would have reached the end of their statutory terms.

IP category Current commercial significance
Clonidine compound patents Expired
Original transdermal-system patents Expired or no longer commercially exclusionary
Catapres-TTS-2 strength-specific protection No meaningful remaining exclusivity identified
Generic formulation patents May protect individual manufacturers’ processes or excipients, but do not block the clonidine patch category
Trademarks May protect branding, not the active ingredient or clinical market

The relevant U.S. regulatory listing is the Orange Book entry for NDA 018813 and associated abbreviated new drug applications. Orange Book status should be reviewed by strength and dosage form because the presence of an ANDA does not guarantee continuous commercial supply (FDA, 2025a).

Does Catapres-TTS-2 have remaining market exclusivity?

No meaningful FDA new-drug exclusivity remains. Catapres-TTS-2 is exposed to generic substitution and does not benefit from orphan-drug, pediatric, new chemical entity or qualified infectious-disease exclusivity.

Patent term restoration is also not commercially relevant to this mature product. Any historical regulatory exclusivity period has expired.

Are there Paragraph IV challenges to Catapres-TTS-2?

Paragraph IV litigation risk is limited because the underlying product and delivery technology are old. Generic clonidine transdermal entrants could historically have challenged listed patents through ANDA certifications, but the commercial issue today is supply, substitution and manufacturing economics rather than a live branded patent dispute.

No major current Paragraph IV campaign or active Hatch-Waxman litigation materially affecting Catapres-TTS-2 is evident in the public record reviewed for this analysis. The absence of litigation does not prevent future ANDA activity, but it reduces the likelihood that a patent settlement will control generic entry.

What is the Orange Book status of Catapres-TTS-2?

Catapres-TTS is associated with the FDA-approved clonidine transdermal product under NDA 018813. The Orange Book may list approved generic applications and therapeutic-equivalence information by product strength. The practical questions for market access are:

  1. Whether a generic 0.2 mg/day patch has an active approval.
  2. Whether the product is currently listed as marketed.
  3. Whether the approved generic is therapeutically equivalent.
  4. Whether multiple manufacturers can supply the patch.
  5. Whether state substitution rules apply to the specific product code.

An Orange Book listing confirms regulatory approval but does not confirm current inventory or commercial availability. Drug-shortage databases and wholesaler data are necessary for supply analysis (FDA, 2025b).

Which companies challenge Catapres-TTS-2 commercially?

Generic manufacturers, rather than branded innovators, represent the main competitive threat. Historical U.S. suppliers of clonidine transdermal systems have included companies such as Mylan and Actavis-related businesses, although manufacturer participation and marketing status can change over time.

The competitive set includes:

Competitor Competitive relationship
Generic clonidine patch Direct product substitute
Oral clonidine tablets Lower-cost alternative, more frequent dosing
Clonidine extended-release tablets Alternative clonidine formulation, mainly used in ADHD-related treatment
Guanfacine Oral alpha-2 agonist alternative
ACE inhibitors and ARBs First-line hypertension competitors
Calcium-channel blockers First-line hypertension competitors
Beta blockers and diuretics Selective or combination-treatment alternatives

Major hypertension guidelines generally favor thiazide-type diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs and calcium-channel blockers over centrally acting agents for initial treatment. That guideline position limits the addressable hypertension market for clonidine patches (Whelton et al., 2018).

What formulations are protected by Catapres-TTS-2?

The commercially relevant formulation is the seven-day transdermal delivery system. Protection historically centered on the patch architecture, adhesive layer, drug reservoir or matrix and controlled release of clonidine.

There is no current evidence that Catapres-TTS-2 retains enforceable formulation exclusivity capable of blocking generic development. A manufacturer could still obtain patents on a redesigned adhesive, backing layer, manufacturing process or stability profile. Those patents would normally protect the specific improvement rather than the entire clonidine transdermal market.

Manufacturing remains a practical barrier. Transdermal patches require control of drug loading, adhesive uniformity, crystallization, liner removal, adhesion, skin permeation and packaging stability. These requirements can reduce the number of reliable suppliers even when legal exclusivity has ended.

What patent litigation and settlements affect Catapres-TTS-2?

No current patent litigation or settlement agreement appears to control U.S. entry for Catapres-TTS-2. The product’s age and generic availability reduce the strategic value of a late-stage patent settlement.

Potential disputes would more likely concern:

  • Product-specific ANDA approval.
  • Therapeutic equivalence.
  • Adhesive performance.
  • Manufacturing deviations.
  • Trade dress or trademark use.
  • Supply and contract-manufacturing agreements.

Trademark disputes would not restore exclusivity over clonidine or the transdermal dosage form.

Does Catapres-TTS-2 face biosimilar risk?

No. Catapres-TTS-2 is a small-molecule drug-device combination product, not a biologic. It is exposed to generic drug competition and formulation substitution, not biosimilar competition under the Public Health Service Act.

The relevant regulatory pathway is an ANDA or, in some cases, a suitability petition or alternative pathway depending on the product’s formulation and reference-product status. FDA requirements focus on pharmaceutical equivalence, bioequivalence, quality and performance of the transdermal system.

How large is the Catapres-TTS-2 market?

Catapres-TTS-2 is a niche product within the global antihypertensive market. Its sales are constrained by four factors:

  1. Hypertension treatment has shifted toward first-line oral therapies.
  2. Clonidine is often reserved for selected patients because of central nervous system and withdrawal effects.
  3. Generic pricing limits revenue per prescription.
  4. Weekly patches compete against inexpensive oral tablets.

The product retains demand in several segments:

  • Patients with poor adherence to daily oral therapy.
  • Patients with difficulty swallowing.
  • Patients requiring clonidine but unable to maintain oral dosing.
  • Patients receiving palliative or complex medication management.
  • Selected patients with autonomic symptoms or withdrawal-related treatment needs.

Product-specific global revenue estimates are not consistently disclosed by manufacturers. Market projections should therefore be based on prescription volume, average selling price, generic share, manufacturer count and patch availability rather than on historical Catapres brand revenue.

What is the market projection for Catapres-TTS-2?

The base-case outlook is a mature, declining-to-stable niche market rather than a growth market.

Period Expected market condition
2025-2027 Generic-led demand, intermittent supply variability, limited branded investment
2028-2030 Continued substitution by oral therapies and generic patches
2031 onward Persistent residual demand, with commercial viability dependent on supplier reliability

The most likely revenue pattern is flat to modestly declining volume with low pricing. A temporary increase in sales can occur if a competing patch manufacturer exits or if oral clonidine supply becomes constrained. Such gains would reflect channel disruption rather than durable clinical expansion.

The strongest commercial opportunity is not a premium branded relaunch. It is dependable generic supply, improved adhesive performance, simplified packaging, hospital contracting and distribution to long-term-care and specialty pharmacies.

What generic launch scenarios exist for Catapres-TTS-2?

Scenario 1: Stable generic supply

Multiple approved suppliers maintain inventory. Prices remain low, substitution is routine and the brand has limited negotiating leverage.

Scenario 2: Single-supplier concentration

One or two manufacturers remain active. A manufacturing interruption creates shortages, temporary price increases and increased demand for alternative clonidine formulations.

Scenario 3: Brand re-entry

A branded manufacturer could relaunch Catapres-TTS-2 through a specialty or contract-commercialization model. Success would require a clear supply, adherence or device-performance advantage because patent exclusivity would not support premium pricing.

Scenario 4: Formulation replacement

Patients migrate to oral clonidine extended-release, guanfacine or other antihypertensive therapies. This is the long-term structural risk.

How strong is the Catapres-TTS-2 patent estate?

The patent estate is weak as a source of market exclusion. Its commercial strength lies in historical clinical familiarity, regulatory approval and physician recognition, not in surviving patent claims.

Factor Assessment
Core active ingredient Weak, expired
Original transdermal technology Weak, aged estate
FDA exclusivity Expired
Generic entry barrier Low to moderate, driven by manufacturing
Device and adhesive complexity Moderate operational barrier
Litigation leverage Low
Geographic exclusivity Limited
Brand recognition Moderate but declining
Revenue protection Low

What is the geographic coverage of Catapres-TTS-2?

Clonidine transdermal products have been marketed in several countries, but brand status, approved strengths and reimbursement differ by jurisdiction. U.S. commercial exposure is governed by FDA approval, Orange Book listings, state substitution rules and distributor inventory.

In Europe and other markets, the product may face different requirements for transdermal equivalence, pharmacokinetic bridging, device performance and local pricing. Patent expiry generally means that geographic opportunity depends on registration and supply execution rather than on remaining exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • Catapres-TTS-2 is the 0.2 mg/day, seven-day clonidine transdermal patch.
  • Its FDA-approved use is hypertension.
  • Clinical development is mature, with no apparent active branded development program.
  • Core patent and regulatory exclusivity have expired.
  • No meaningful current Paragraph IV litigation or settlement appears to control entry.
  • The product is not subject to biosimilar competition.
  • Generic clonidine patches and oral antihypertensives define the competitive market.
  • Demand is likely to remain niche and stable to declining.
  • Manufacturing, adhesive quality and supply continuity are more important than patent protection.
  • The best commercial opportunity is reliable generic supply or a demonstrably improved patch system.

FAQs About Catapres-TTS-2

Is Catapres-TTS-2 stronger than Catapres-TTS-1?

Yes. Catapres-TTS-2 delivers approximately 0.2 mg of clonidine per day, compared with 0.1 mg per day for Catapres-TTS-1.

How long does a Catapres-TTS-2 patch last?

The patch is designed for seven days of continuous delivery.

Can Catapres-TTS-2 be stopped suddenly?

Abrupt discontinuation can cause rebound hypertension and other withdrawal effects. Discontinuation should follow the product label and clinical supervision.

Is clonidine patch available as a generic?

Generic clonidine transdermal systems have been approved and marketed in the United States, although availability can vary by strength, manufacturer and distribution channel.

Is Catapres-TTS-2 used for ADHD?

Clonidine is used in some ADHD treatment settings, but the FDA-approved Catapres-TTS-2 indication is hypertension. Use for ADHD should not be treated as an approved indication for the patch.

References

ClinicalTrials.gov. (2025). Search results for Catapres-TTS and transdermal clonidine. U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Catapres-TTS: Prescribing information. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/018813s027lbl.pdf

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025a). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: Orange Book. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025b). FDA drug shortages. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/drugshortages/

Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., MacLaughlin, E. J., Muntner, P., Ovbiagele, B., Smith, S. C., Spencer, C. C., Stafford, R. S., Taler, S. J., Thomas, R. J., Williams, K. A., Williamson, J. D., & Wright, J. T. (2018). 2017 ACC/AHA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. Hypertension, 71(6), e13-e115. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.