Last Updated: August 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00325793 ↗ IV Double and Triple Concentrated Nicardipine for Stroke and ICH Unknown status PDL BioPharma, Inc. Phase 4 2004-01-01 Hypertension (high blood pressure) can often cause neurological worsening in patients with stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous infusion of nicardipine (Cardene) for control of hypertension is FDA approved. The disadvantage of Nicardipine IV drip is the relative large volume of fluid needed (up to 150 cc/hr). The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of double or triple concentrated peripheral intravenous (IV) Nicardipine.
NCT00325793 ↗ IV Double and Triple Concentrated Nicardipine for Stroke and ICH Unknown status OSF Healthcare System Phase 4 2004-01-01 Hypertension (high blood pressure) can often cause neurological worsening in patients with stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous infusion of nicardipine (Cardene) for control of hypertension is FDA approved. The disadvantage of Nicardipine IV drip is the relative large volume of fluid needed (up to 150 cc/hr). The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of double or triple concentrated peripheral intravenous (IV) Nicardipine.
NCT00528827 ↗ A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging Study of Cardene® I.V. in Pediatric Subjects With Hypertension Withdrawn Facet Biotech Phase 2 2007-09-01 To define the relationship between Cardene I.V. dose, serum concentrations, and blood pressure reduction in pediatric subjects with hypertension.
NCT00765648 ↗ Evaluation of Intravenous Cardene(Nicardipine)and Labetalol Use in the Emergency Department Completed EKR Therapeutics, Inc Phase 4 2008-10-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Cardene I.V. to labetalol administered intravenously for the management of hypertension in the emergency department setting.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 3
Cerebral Vasospasm 2
Acute Stroke 1
Endovascular Thrombectomy 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 3
Cerebral Hemorrhage 2
Vasospasm, Intracranial 2
Hypotension 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 18
Switzerland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
Massachusetts 2
Texas 2
Ohio 2
Florida 2
Illinois 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Withdrawn 3
Recruiting 2
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Vanderbilt University Medical Center 2
Yale University 1
Geisinger Clinic 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CARDENE IN 0.83% SODIUM CHLORIDE IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 22
Industry 4
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Cardene (nicardipine) in 0.83% sodium chloride in plastic container: clinical trials update, market analysis, and launch timing projections

Cardene In 0.83% Sodium Chloride In Plastic Container (nicardipine hydrochloride injection) is an IV calcium channel blocker indicated for hypertension. Commercial demand is tied to perioperative and critical-care use patterns, hospital formulary decisions, and IV vasodilator substitution risk. A reliable clinical-trials and exclusivity timeline cannot be produced from the available record because no trial registries, FDA status, Orange Book/NDA/ANDA identifiers, or current litigation/label-change events are provided.

What clinical trials updates exist for Cardene (nicardipine) injection and are any new studies starting or completing?

No trial-level update can be stated from the available information. A defensible “what’s new” view requires at least one of: ClinicalTrials.gov records, publication identifiers, press releases with dates, or FDA label supplements tied to ongoing studies. None are present in the input record.

Which nicardipine IV studies matter for market uptake (perioperative, ICU, hypertensive emergencies)?

No study-specific mapping to endpoints, populations, or comparators can be produced without trial entries, protocol IDs, or publication metadata.

Are there pediatric, renal/hepatic impairment, or stability/compatibility studies for the 0.83% sodium chloride plastic-container presentation?

No dossier-level evidence is available in the input record.

How big is the market for IV nicardipine (Cardene) and what drives hospital purchasing?

A quantitative market analysis cannot be completed from the available record because it lacks baseline commercialization metrics (US sales, units, channel mix), pricing, procurement contracts, and competitive substitution rates.

What are the main use-case purchase drivers for IV nicardipine in hospitals?

No use-case weightings (OR anesthesia vs ICU vs ED) can be quantified from the provided information.

Which competitors most affect Cardene pricing and volume?

No competitor list tied to the specific IV nicardipine product form (and US market shares) is available in the input record.

When does Cardene (nicardipine) lose exclusivity, and what generic or biosimilar entry risks exist?

No exclusivity timeline can be calculated. The input record does not include the NDA number, application holder, listed patents, or expiration dates, so launch timing projections are not supportable.

What patents protect Cardene injection and the 0.83% sodium chloride plastic-container presentation?

No patent estate data (listed Orange Book patents, expiration dates, claims scope) is present in the input record.

Are Paragraph IV ANDA challenges filed for IV nicardipine products?

No litigation or notice-of-certification data is provided.

What is the Orange Book status of nicardipine injection in 0.83% sodium chloride plastic container?

Orange Book listing status cannot be verified from the available record.

What regulatory status does Cardene (nicardipine) have at FDA, including label and manufacturing changes for the plastic-container presentation?

No FDA pathway status, approval history, REMS applicability, or label-change timeline can be provided because the input record does not include NDA/label identifiers, FDA supplement numbers, or postmarketing safety updates.

Is this product still marketed under the same NDA, or has it transitioned to new packaging/manufacturing sources?

No packaging transition history is available in the input record.

How does Cardene compare with alternative IV antihypertensives (clevidipine, labetalol, nitroprusside) in clinical practice and formulary access?

A comparative market projection requires evidence on guideline adherence, cost-per-treatment, availability, contraindication handling, and formulary tiering. None of those inputs are available in the provided record.

Does administration method or compatibility influence substitution for the plastic container / 0.83% sodium chloride formulation?

No compatibility or administration evidence is present in the input record.

What patent litigation affects nicardipine injection, and what settlement terms influence generic entry?

No litigation records, docket identifiers, court venues, or settlement dates are included in the input record.

What generic launch scenarios are most likely for IV nicardipine, and what timelines should investors or business planners model?

No modeled timeline can be produced without: (1) patent expiration dates, (2) exclusivity end dates, (3) ANDA status/approval dates, and (4) any 505(b)(2) or 505(j) pathways relevant to the exact presentation. The input record provides none of these.

Key Takeaways

  • Cardene In 0.83% Sodium Chloride In Plastic Container is a nicardipine IV antihypertensive, but no reliable clinical-trials update, exclusivity timeline, Orange Book/patent estate, litigation, or market sizing can be stated from the information provided.
  • Launch and generic-entry projections cannot be produced without NDA/patent and FDA status identifiers.

FAQs

  1. What is the FDA approval history for nicardipine hydrochloride injection in 0.83% sodium chloride plastic container?
  2. Which patents are listed in the Orange Book for IV nicardipine products, and when do they expire?
  3. Have any generic ANDAs for IV nicardipine been submitted or received Paragraph IV certifications?
  4. What clinical trials compare nicardipine IV to clevidipine or labetalol in hypertensive emergencies?
  5. How do hospital formularies typically decide between IV nicardipine and alternative antihypertensives on cost and protocol fit?

References

  1. No citable sources were provided in the input record.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.