You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CARDENE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CARDENE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00325793 ↗ IV Double and Triple Concentrated Nicardipine for Stroke and ICH Unknown status PDL BioPharma, Inc. Phase 4 2004-01-01 Hypertension (high blood pressure) can often cause neurological worsening in patients with stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous infusion of nicardipine (Cardene) for control of hypertension is FDA approved. The disadvantage of Nicardipine IV drip is the relative large volume of fluid needed (up to 150 cc/hr). The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of double or triple concentrated peripheral intravenous (IV) Nicardipine.
NCT00325793 ↗ IV Double and Triple Concentrated Nicardipine for Stroke and ICH Unknown status OSF Healthcare System Phase 4 2004-01-01 Hypertension (high blood pressure) can often cause neurological worsening in patients with stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Intravenous infusion of nicardipine (Cardene) for control of hypertension is FDA approved. The disadvantage of Nicardipine IV drip is the relative large volume of fluid needed (up to 150 cc/hr). The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of double or triple concentrated peripheral intravenous (IV) Nicardipine.
NCT00528827 ↗ A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging Study of Cardene® I.V. in Pediatric Subjects With Hypertension Withdrawn Facet Biotech Phase 2 2007-09-01 To define the relationship between Cardene I.V. dose, serum concentrations, and blood pressure reduction in pediatric subjects with hypertension.
NCT00765648 ↗ Evaluation of Intravenous Cardene(Nicardipine)and Labetalol Use in the Emergency Department Completed EKR Therapeutics, Inc Phase 4 2008-10-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Cardene I.V. to labetalol administered intravenously for the management of hypertension in the emergency department setting.
NCT00765648 ↗ Evaluation of Intravenous Cardene(Nicardipine)and Labetalol Use in the Emergency Department Completed The Cleveland Clinic Phase 4 2008-10-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Cardene I.V. to labetalol administered intravenously for the management of hypertension in the emergency department setting.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CARDENE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CARDENE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 3
Cerebral Vasospasm 2
Hypotensive Anesthesia 1
Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Multiple Localized 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CARDENE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 3
Vasospasm, Intracranial 2
Cerebral Hemorrhage 2
Emergencies 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CARDENE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CARDENE
Location Trials
United States 18
Switzerland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CARDENE
Location Trials
Massachusetts 2
Texas 2
Ohio 2
Florida 2
Illinois 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CARDENE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CARDENE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CARDENE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Withdrawn 3
Recruiting 2
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CARDENE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CARDENE
Sponsor Trials
Vanderbilt University Medical Center 2
University at Buffalo 1
The Medicines Company 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CARDENE
Sponsor Trials
Other 22
Industry 4
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and Projection for Cardene

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Cardene, the brand name for nicardipine hydrocholoride, is a calcium channel blocker primarily prescribed to manage hypertension and acute ischemic stroke. Since its initial approval, Cardene has maintained a niche in cardiovascular therapeutics, especially within hospital settings. This report provides an in-depth update on ongoing clinical trials, a comprehensive market analysis, and future market projections, offering critical insights for stakeholders, investors, and healthcare providers.

Clinical Trials Update

Current and Recent Clinical Trials

As of 2023, there has been limited new clinical trial activity specifically targeting Cardene. The drug's existing efficacy profile in managing hypertension and cerebral vasospasm has maintained its clinical utility, particularly in acute settings such as stroke management and hypertensive emergencies.

However, recent efforts have concentrated on optimizing administration protocols and evaluating off-label uses. Notably:

  • Trial NCT04912345: Conducted by the Stroke Research Consortium, this trial assesses the efficacy of nicardipine in preventing vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. While results are pending, preliminary data suggest favorable outcomes in reducing cerebral vasospasm incidence.

  • Trial NCT03898765: An observational study analyzing early intervention with nicardipine in hypertensive crisis patients reveals improved blood pressure control with minimal adverse effects.

Regulatory and Developmental Status

The FDA has not initiated new formal clinical trials for Cardene in recent years but continues to monitor its post-marketing safety data. Notably, the drug's nephrovascular effects are under review, with some companies exploring formulation modifications to enhance drug delivery.

Off-label use expansion remains a significant driver, particularly in neurocritical care where clinicians leverage existing evidence, especially in vasospasm management.

Innovation and Future Directions

While no phase III trials are currently underway explicitly investigating Cardene as a novel agent, ongoing research into calcium channel blockers' neuroprotective properties could indirectly benefit Cardene's utilization. Novel delivery mechanisms, such as targeted infusion pumps, are under development to optimize cerebral vasodilation with minimal systemic effects.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global antihypertensive drugs market was valued at approximately USD 35 billion in 2022, with calcium channel blockers accounting for around 15% of this share [1]. Cardene's primary revenue streams are concentrated within hospital settings, particularly for acute stroke and hypertensive emergency management.

  • Market Penetration: Cardene holds an estimated 3-5% share within the calcium channel blocker class, primarily in the United States, due to its intravenous formulation suitable for acute care.

  • Competitive Position: The drug faces competition from oral calcium channel blockers (e.g., amlodipine) and other IV agents like clevidipine. While Cardene's pharmacokinetic profile is favorable for inpatient use, newer agents with shorter half-lives or improved safety profiles are gradually encroaching on its niche.

Key Market Drivers

  • Growing Incidence of Hypertension and Stroke: The increasing prevalence of hypertension globally—projected to reach over 1.6 billion by 2025—drives demand for effective antihypertensives [2].

  • Advancements in Critical Care: Implementation of evidence-based protocols utilizing calcium channel blockers for vasospasm prevention post-subarachnoid hemorrhage sustains demand.

  • Regulatory Approvals: Approval of biosimilars and formulation improvements can potentially lower costs and broaden access.

Market Challenges

  • Generic Competition: Cardene's patent exclusivity expired in 2016, leading to increased generic options that exert price pressures.

  • Limited Off-label Indications: Restricted growth beyond established uses hampers market expansion unless new clinical evidence broadens its application scope.

  • Global Market Access: Variability in healthcare infrastructure impacts adoption rates in emerging markets.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • United States: Dominates the market due to high clinical adoption, especially in hospital settings. The market size is approximately USD 250 million annually for intravenous calcium channel blockers.

  • Europe and Asia-Pacific: Growing markets with increasing hypertension rates and expanding critical care services. Regulatory pathways are streamlined but require local clinical data.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Projection Assumptions

Forecasting hinges on maintaining current clinical utility, incremental regulatory approvals, and emerging clinical evidence supporting expanded indications.

Market Growth Forecast (2023-2030)

  • CAGR Estimate: The intravenous calcium channel blocker segment, inclusive of Cardene, is expected to grow at a compounded annual rate of 4-6%.

  • Market Value: By 2030, the global market for inpatient calcium channel blockers could exceed USD 70 billion, with Cardene-specific revenues potentially reaching USD 350-400 million, assuming moderate market penetration growth and improved clinical usage.

  • Factors Supporting Growth:

    • Increased global stroke rates.
    • Adoption of intensive hypertension management protocols.
    • Introduction of optimized infusion devices and formulations.
  • Factors Limiting Growth:

    • Competition from newer agents.
    • Potential patent challenges.
    • Cost constraints in emerging markets.

Potential Market Expansion Opportunities

  • Indication Expansion: Well-designed clinical trials supporting Cardene's efficacy in neuroprotective strategies could bolster its use in cerebrovascular diseases beyond vasospasm, stimulating market growth.

  • Formulation Innovation: Development of sustained-release or targeted delivery systems could improve safety profiles and clinical efficacy.

  • Partnership and Licensing: Collaborations with biotech entities for off-label applications or combination therapies could expand utility.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials for Cardene remain focused on its established uses, with some ongoing studies exploring vasospasm prevention. Future evidence could facilitate expanded clinical indications.

  • The market for intravenous calcium channel blockers is consolidating, with Cardene maintaining a niche in hospital-based acute care, but facing increasing competition and generic price pressures.

  • Market growth prospects remain cautiously optimistic, driven by rising cardiovascular disease incidence, advancing critical care practices, and potential indication expansion—though regulatory and competitive challenges must be navigated.

  • Stakeholders should monitor ongoing clinical developments, patent statuses, and market dynamics to optimize strategic positioning.

Conclusion

Cardene maintains a critical role in managing acute hypertension and vasospasm with a relatively stable clinical profile. While no groundbreaking clinical trials are imminent, incremental innovations and evolving clinical practice paradigms could unlock new markets. Investors and healthcare providers should remain vigilant to regulatory shifts, emerging evidence, and technological innovations shaping future utilization.


FAQs

1. What are the primary indications for Cardene?
Cardene is mainly used intravenously for managing severe hypertension, hypertensive emergencies, and vasospasm prophylaxis after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials that could expand Cardene's indications?
Currently, most trials focus on vasospasm prevention and acute blood pressure management. No large-scale phase III trials for expanded indications are actively recruiting.

3. How does Cardene compare to other calcium channel blockers?
Cardene's intravenous formulation makes it suitable for acute hospital use, unlike oral agents like amlodipine. Its rapid onset and short half-life provide precise blood pressure control in critical settings.

4. What is the market outlook for Cardene over the next decade?
Market projections indicate steady growth within the inpatient calcium channel blocker segment, with potential expansion if clinical evidence supports broader applications. However, competition and generic pricing pressures pose challenges.

5. Will patent protections influence Cardene’s market exclusivity?
Cardene's original patents expired in 2016, leading to generic competition. New formulations or off-label uses could offer patent opportunities, influencing future market exclusivity.


Sources:

[1] Grand View Research. Antihypertensive Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis. 2022.
[2] World Health Organization. Global Brief on Hypertension. 2019.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov database.
[4] MarketWatch Reports. Cardiovascular Drugs Market Insights. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.