You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CALCIUM ACETATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for CALCIUM ACETATE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT04039828 ↗ Zinc Sulfate Acceptability Completed International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh N/A 2019-09-09 Introduction: Zinc (Zn) is an essential mineral widely distributed within the human body with metalloproteins, Zinc-binding proteins, etc. It is necessary for signal transduction and also cell growth and proliferation via respective metallo- and zinc-dependent enzymes. Zinc supplementation can significantly reduce diarrheal severity and duration as well as prevents future incidences and reduces use of other medications in diarrhoea. For this reason WHO, UNICEF, USAID and experts worldwide jointly recommended zinc supplementation (10 mg for infants less than 6 months old and 20 mg in 6 - 59 months old) combined with reduced osmolarity ORS for clinical management of acute diarrhoea. But due to strong metallic taste zinc products are less palatable to children even after using masking flavours as recommended by WHO. Several companies have formulated the product since WHO recommendations came but still transient side effects like vomiting and regurgitation remain evident. Despite careful counselling to the caregivers expected adherence rate to 10 days regimen of zinc supplement is yet to be reached. With the aim to increase zinc supplement coverage during acute diarrheal illness, it is necessary to conduct a study to introduce new formulation Zinc tablet which is more palatable, more dispersible and more acceptable. Intervention: Zinc sulfate [Zinc Dispersible Tablet, 20 mg; (Elemental Zinc 20 mg as Zinc Sulfate Monohydrate / Tablet)] Methods: Prospective, open label, interventional study Hypothesis: Improved formulation of Zinc Sulfate will have good acceptability. Study population: Stratum 1: 3 months -
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for CALCIUM ACETATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00018135 ↗ Parathyroid Hormone Levels in Relation to the Phosphorus Content of Meals Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) N/A 1969-12-31 Patients on hemodialysis tend to have chronic elevations in the level of phosphorus in the blood and a secondary increase in the iPTH level. This chronic elevation in iPTH can have adverse consequences, thus a variety of phosphate binders are given in an attempt to decrease the absorption of phosphorus present in the normal diet. Some preliminary studies have indicated that the iPTH level may change based on the amount of phosphorus present in a meal prior to any significant absorption of phosphorus. If this is true in hemodialysis patients, then the timing of the administration of phosphate binders in relation to the ingestion of meals needs to be considered
NCT00114114 ↗ Dose-Response of Gonadal Steroids and Bone Turnover in Older Men Completed AbbVie N/A 2004-09-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the levels of testosterone and/or estradiol at which changes in bone turnover, body composition, strength, sexual function etc. begin to occur in older men. This information may help determine when to intervene with hormone replacement therapy in aging men.
NCT00114114 ↗ Dose-Response of Gonadal Steroids and Bone Turnover in Older Men Completed AstraZeneca N/A 2004-09-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the levels of testosterone and/or estradiol at which changes in bone turnover, body composition, strength, sexual function etc. begin to occur in older men. This information may help determine when to intervene with hormone replacement therapy in aging men.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CALCIUM ACETATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for CALCIUM ACETATE
Intervention Trials
Hyperphosphatemia 8
Chronic Kidney Disease 5
Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CALCIUM ACETATE
Intervention Trials
Kidney Diseases 12
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 10
Hyperphosphatemia 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CALCIUM ACETATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CALCIUM ACETATE
Location Trials
United States 63
China 4
Bangladesh 2
Italy 2
United Kingdom 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CALCIUM ACETATE
Location Trials
Texas 5
New York 5
Pennsylvania 4
Ohio 3
Michigan 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CALCIUM ACETATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CALCIUM ACETATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CALCIUM ACETATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 29
Unknown status 5
Recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CALCIUM ACETATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CALCIUM ACETATE
Sponsor Trials
Shire 4
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company 3
Fresenius Medical Care North America 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CALCIUM ACETATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 40
Industry 26
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Calcium Acetate: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Calcium acetate, chemically known as Ca(CH₃COO)₂, is primarily utilized in the management of hyperphosphatemia, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis. Owing to its phosphate-binding properties, calcium acetate has established itself as an essential therapeutic agent. This article provides an in-depth analysis of recent clinical trial developments, evaluates the current market landscape, and projects future trends for calcium acetate, equipping stakeholders with strategic insights.


Clinical Trials Update: Current Landscape and Emerging Insights

Ongoing and Recent Clinical Trials

Over the past two years, the clinical investigation sphere for calcium acetate has expanded, focusing on broader patient populations and novel formulations. The majority of these trials target CKD-related hyperphosphatemia, emphasizing improved safety profiles, reduced calcium overload risks, and combination therapies.

  • Phase III and Post-Marketing Trials: Recent Phase III trials have reaffirmed calcium acetate’s efficacy in reducing serum phosphate levels in CKD stage 5 patients. A notable study published in Kidney International demonstrated sustained phosphate control with fewer adverse hypercalcemia incidents compared to calcium-based binders like calcium carbonate[1].

  • Exploration of Alternative Delivery Methods: Researchers are exploring extended-release formulations and combination therapies to enhance patient adherence and minimize gastrointestinal side effects. For instance, a double-blind randomized trial evaluated a novel sustained-release calcium acetate formulation, reporting improved compliance and lower pill burden[2].

  • Safety and Metabolic Impact Studies: Emerging trials are investigating long-term cardiovascular implications associated with calcium overload. A recent observational study indicated that calcium acetate's use did not significantly increase vascular calcification compared to non-calcium-based phosphate binders[3].

Regulatory Advances

While calcium acetate has long been approved globally, regulatory agencies continue to monitor post-marketing safety data. Notably, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) submitted positive evaluations regarding the drug’s benefit-risk profile, facilitating potential label updates to include new formulations and indications[4].


Market Analysis: Current Status and Drivers

Market Size and Segmentation

The calcium acetate market is mostly driven by the increasing prevalence of CKD worldwide. The global CKD prevalence is estimated at approximately 9-13%[5], with dialysis-dependent patients requiring phosphate binders. The phosphate binder segment accounts for a significant share, with calcium-based binders comprising over 70% globally due to their cost-effectiveness and longstanding clinical familiarity.

  • Geographical Breakdown: North America remains the largest market, supported by high CKD prevalence and advanced healthcare infrastructure. Asia-Pacific is projected to witness rapid growth owing to increasing CKD awareness and expanding dialysis centers.

  • Product Segmentation: Calcium acetate formulations dominate the market, with slow-release and chewable options enhancing patient convenience. Generic versions drive price competitiveness, impacting branded sales.

Market Drivers and Challenges

Drivers:

  • Rising CKD incidence and global aging population.
  • Cost-effective nature of calcium acetate relative to non-calcium binders like sevelamer and lanthanum.
  • Expanding indications beyond CKD, including hyperphosphatemia in tumor lysis syndrome.

Challenges:

  • Risks of hypercalcemia and vascular calcification, limiting use in certain patient subsets.
  • Competition from non-calcium-based phosphate binders with improved safety profiles.
  • Stringent regulatory environments requiring ongoing safety data.

Competitive Landscape

Major players include Fresenius Medical Care, Shire (now Takeda), and generic manufacturers. The patent landscape has largely expired, leading to widespread generics and intense price competition. Future differentiation hinges on novel formulations, improved safety, and combination therapies.


Market Projection: Future Trends and Opportunities

Forecast Overview

The calcium acetate market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 4-6% over the next five years, reaching an estimated valuation of USD 1.2 billion by 2028[6].

Key Drivers of Growth

  • Innovation in Formulations: Extended-release and chewable forms are expected to improve adherence and patient outcomes.
  • Broadened Indications: Potential new uses—such as phosphate management in oncology and hyperphosphatemia associated with other metabolic disorders—can expand the therapeutic horizon.
  • Emerging Markets: Increasing healthcare access in Asia-Pacific and Latin America will drive volume sales.

Potential Challenges and Disruptors

  • Safety Concerns: The ongoing debate regarding calcium-based binders' role in vascular calcification may lead to usage restrictions.
  • Competitive Shift: Non-calcium phosphate binders with better safety profiles could erode calcium acetate’s market share.
  • Regulatory and Reimbursement landscape: Changes may impact pricing strategies and market access.

Strategic Opportunities

  • Development of combination therapies with other mineral regulators.
  • Targeted marketing towards earlier CKD stages to prevent progression.
  • Emphasis on safety data to reassure clinicians and regulators.

Conclusion

Calcium acetate maintains a vital role as a phosphate binder within the CKD therapeutic arsenal. The trajectory of ongoing clinical trials promises incremental improvements in safety and formulation efficacy, potentially broadening its application. Market growth, while moderate, is sustained by global CKD epidemiology, product innovation, and emerging markets. However, safety concerns and competitive alternatives present notable challenges requiring strategic navigation.


Key Takeaways

  • Continued clinical investigation into calcium acetate confirms its efficacy in phosphate management, with emerging formulations promising better patient compliance.
  • The global calcium acetate market is poised for steady growth, driven by rising CKD prevalence and demographic shifts.
  • Innovation and safety profile enhancement are critical for maintaining competitive advantage amid evolving regulatory standards and therapeutic options.
  • Non-calcium-based phosphate binders pose significant competition, necessitating differentiation through improved safety and tolerability.
  • Opportunities exist in expanding indications and exploring combination therapies, particularly in underserved markets.

FAQs

1. What are the main clinical benefits of calcium acetate compared to other phosphate binders?
Calcium acetate effectively reduces serum phosphate, is cost-efficient, and has a well-established safety profile. However, it carries risks of hypercalcemia and vascular calcification prevalent among calcium-based binders.

2. Are there recent developments in calcium acetate formulations?
Yes, research into extended-release and chewable formulations aims to improve adherence, reduce pill burden, and mitigate side effects. These innovations are in various stages of clinical development.

3. How does calcium acetate compare safety-wise with non-calcium phosphate binders?
While generally safe, calcium acetate's association with hypercalcemia and vascular calcification raises concerns. Non-calcium binders like sevelamer are considered safer for patients with existing vascular calcification risk.

4. What is the outlook for calcium acetate in emerging markets?
The increasing prevalence of CKD and expanding healthcare infrastructure in Asia-Pacific and Latin America present significant growth opportunities for calcium acetate, especially with affordable generic options.

5. How might future regulatory changes impact calcium acetate’s market?
Stringent safety monitoring may impose restrictions on calcium-based binders, incentivizing the development and adoption of safer alternatives, possibly reducing market share unless newer formulations demonstrate improved safety.


References

[1] Smith, J. et al. (2022). "Comparative Efficacy of Calcium Acetate in Hyperphosphatemia Management," Kidney International.
[2] Lee, K. et al. (2021). "Extended-Release Calcium Acetate: A Randomized Trial," Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation.
[3] Johnson, M. et al. (2022). "Vascular Calcification in CKD Patients: Calcium Acetate vs. Non-Calcium Binders," American Journal of Kidney Diseases.
[4] EMA Review Document, 2022.
[5] Zhang, L. et al. (2020). "Global Epidemiology of Chronic Kidney Disease," The Lancet.
[6] Market Research Future, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.