Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02345707 ↗ Relative Bioavailability Study of Phase III Tablet Formulation of Cabotegravir Completed ViiV Healthcare Phase 1 2015-03-01 This study is a single-center, randomized, open-label, two cohorts, 3-way cross-over design in 36 subjects to assess the oral bioavailability of four new cabotegravir (CAB) sodium salt tablet formulations relative to the current CAB sodium salt formulation being used in the phase IIb studies under fasting conditions. All treatments will be administered as single 30 mg doses of CAB. Safety evaluations and serial PK samples will be collected during each treatment period. A follow-up visit will occur 10 - 14 days after the last dose of study drug. Treatment period doses will be separated by a 14 day washout. Participation in this study will be approximately 12 weeks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM

Condition Name

Condition Name for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM
Intervention Trials
Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 1
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 1
Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM
Location Trials
Kansas 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
ViiV Healthcare 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: May 2, 2026

CABOTEGRAVIR SODIUM: Clinical-Phase Update, Market Read, and Forward Projections

CABOTEGRAVIR sodium is an HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) used in combination antiretroviral therapy. Current commercially relevant demand is anchored to fixed-dose combination (FDC) products that include cabotegravir and to long-acting (LA) regimens that reduce dosing frequency versus oral INSTIs. This profile materially affects trial design, lifecycle planning, and regional market timing.

What is the current clinical trial posture for cabotegravir sodium?

A complete, trial-by-trial “update” across global registries requires an up-to-date sweep of CTR/CT.gov/EU CTs databases and label-protocol versions. This response cannot produce a complete and accurate clinical-trials update without that registry-level dataset.

What is cabotegravir sodium’s market access footprint and demand engine?

Cabotegravir drives demand through LA treatment and oral “bridging”/starter pathways used around LA initiation, and through FDC availability where marketed. The market is shaped by three measurable forces:

  1. Shift from daily oral INSTIs to LA regimens
    • LA formulations reduce pill burden and can improve persistence in target populations.
  2. Adoption depends on clinic infrastructure
    • Injection scheduling, cold-chain handling (for applicable products), and patient follow-up drive uptake more than pharmacology alone.
  3. Competitive intensity vs. other INSTIs and LA competitors
    • LA strategy competes against other long-acting platforms and optimized oral regimens.

Market-level implication: Cabotegravir’s near-term revenue trajectory tracks LA program penetration, clinician switching behavior, and payor authorization dynamics rather than incremental efficacy claims alone.

How does the product class change forecasting vs. oral-only INSTIs?

Cabotegravir’s commercial curve differs from oral daily INSTIs because the LA model creates a dosing cadence that behaves like a recurring facility-driven service. Forecasts therefore depend on:

  • Patient count on LA schedules (not just new starts)
  • Injection retention (missed doses and switchbacks)
  • Program ramp time (site readiness and payor approvals)
  • Regional adoption rates (authorization and guidelines)

Forecast implication: Even modest penetration changes can swing revenue because LA volumes are less diluted by small daily dosing changes and more concentrated in scheduled administrations.

What market projections can be supported for cabotegravir sodium from publicly citable sources?

A reliable projection requires validated baseline revenues, share, units, and explicit dataset anchors (e.g., audited sales, channel data, or consensus market research with dates). This response cannot generate a complete and accurate numeric projection without a citable sales baseline and forecast model inputs.

Where does value concentrate across regions and channels?

Commercial value concentrates where LA adoption is supported by:

  • Clinical guideline inclusion (first-line or switch use cases)
  • Payor coverage (prior authorization and step therapy)
  • Clinic capability (injection appointment availability)
  • Public-sector procurement pathways (tender cycles)

Channel implication: Commercial performance will reflect contracting cadence and tender timing in addition to clinical uptake.

What are the key business watchpoints for investors and R&D sponsors?

Even without a complete registry update, cabotegravir business risk and upside typically hinge on these levers:

  • Regulatory label expansion (new populations, dosing schedules, or combination packs)
  • Guideline movement (expansion of eligible patients)
  • Real-world persistence (retention on LA dosing)
  • Safety/tolerability in broader populations
  • Manufacturing scale and supply stability (LA formulations are supply-sensitive)

Competitive context that shapes adoption

Cabotegravir competes within INSTI-centric regimens where efficacy and resistance profiles are table stakes. The adoption differentiator is dosing convenience and service model fit. LA adoption rises when:

  • clinicians can operationalize injections reliably
  • patients accept injection-based dosing
  • payors reduce administrative friction

Key takeaways

  • Cabotegravir sodium demand is primarily driven by LA regimen adoption dynamics and FDC/oral pathways around initiation rather than oral INSTI switching alone.
  • Forecasting cabotegravir requires modeling patient persistence on scheduled injections, clinic readiness, and payor authorization cadence.
  • A complete clinical-trials “update” and numeric market projections cannot be produced here without a registry-level trial dataset and a citable sales baseline anchored to dated sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Cabotegravir sodium’s commercial engine is LA adoption and retention, which behaves like recurring facility-driven dosing.
  • Market growth is most sensitive to patient persistence, site infrastructure, and reimbursement friction.
  • Without a registry sweep and dated sales baselines, a complete trial update and quantitative projections cannot be stated accurately.

FAQs

  1. Is cabotegravir sodium an oral HIV therapy or mainly linked to long-acting regimens?
    It is an INSTI used across oral and LA treatment pathways, with commercial adoption most influenced by LA regimen rollouts.

  2. What drives cabotegravir uptake more: efficacy or treatment convenience?
    Efficacy is baseline; uptake is largely shaped by dosing convenience, site operations, and reimbursement.

  3. How does persistence on long-acting dosing affect revenue forecasting?
    Persistence determines ongoing scheduled administrations, which can dominate revenue more than new starts.

  4. What are the most material risks for cabotegravir market performance?
    Label/reimbursement delays, clinic execution constraints, supply stability, and real-world tolerability and retention.

  5. Can market projections be made without sales baselines and dated data?
    Not with accuracy suitable for investment and R&D decisions; projections must be anchored to dated, citable revenue/unit baselines and a defined forecast model.


References

[1] FDA. Drug Approval Package (CABOTEGRAVIR-containing products when applicable) and label information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Product information for cabotegravir-containing medicines. European Medicines Agency.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for “cabotegravir” and “cabotegravir sodium” (accessed by the analyst on a specific date for registry-level updates). U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.