You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 11, 2024

~ Buy the BIKTARVY (bictegravir sodium; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate) Drug Profile, 2024 PDF Report in the Report Store ~

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BIKTARVY


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Biktarvy

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03259698 ↗ Optimizing the Delivery of HIV nPEP Recruiting Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Phase 2 2021-10-01 Despite decades of traditional prevention efforts based on behavior change and condom use, Ontario has seen over 700 new HIV infections annually over the past 10 years. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is one such approach, in which uninfected persons use 28 days of antiretroviral medications (ARVs) shortly after an HIV exposure to minimize the risk of acquiring HIV. PEP is highly efficacious, is considered a standard of care intervention based on medical and ethical grounds, and is supported by treatment guidelines. Yet several implementation challenges have limited its clinical and public health impact in Ontario, where no formal PEP policy exists. Our proposal seeks to optimize two aspects of delivering PEP for sexual exposures (nPEP). Results will inform the development of a standardized approach to nPEP both province-wide and elsewhere. Thus study has pragmatic, multicenter randomized controlled trial using a 2x2 factorial design to determine whether the proportion of nPEP patients that successfully complete follow-up: 1. is higher among those receiving mobile phone-based text messaging support than among those receiving standard care; and 2. is non-inferior among those receiving care from a sexual health clinic nurse compared to those receiving hospital-based physician care. The prospective, randomized, non-blinded, 2x2 factorial trial that will enroll 318 study participants in Toronto. In Intervention A, we will randomize half of study participants to a text messaging support service ('WelTel'), in which a trained, community-based counselor provides standardized weekly 'check-in' messages during their 12-week course of PEP follow-up. The other half will receive standard care, which does not include any form of active outreach or reminders outside of scheduled appointments. In Intervention B, we will randomize half of participants to receive nurse-led care for PEP follow-up at a local sexual health clinic; the other half will receive standard care by a hospital-based ID physician. The specific activities for each follow-up visit will be clearly defined in a medical directive. In keeping with Ontario legislation on medical directives, nurses will review cases with their authorizing physician or nurse practitioner on a routine basis.
NCT03259698 ↗ Optimizing the Delivery of HIV nPEP Recruiting CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network Phase 2 2021-10-01 Despite decades of traditional prevention efforts based on behavior change and condom use, Ontario has seen over 700 new HIV infections annually over the past 10 years. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is one such approach, in which uninfected persons use 28 days of antiretroviral medications (ARVs) shortly after an HIV exposure to minimize the risk of acquiring HIV. PEP is highly efficacious, is considered a standard of care intervention based on medical and ethical grounds, and is supported by treatment guidelines. Yet several implementation challenges have limited its clinical and public health impact in Ontario, where no formal PEP policy exists. Our proposal seeks to optimize two aspects of delivering PEP for sexual exposures (nPEP). Results will inform the development of a standardized approach to nPEP both province-wide and elsewhere. Thus study has pragmatic, multicenter randomized controlled trial using a 2x2 factorial design to determine whether the proportion of nPEP patients that successfully complete follow-up: 1. is higher among those receiving mobile phone-based text messaging support than among those receiving standard care; and 2. is non-inferior among those receiving care from a sexual health clinic nurse compared to those receiving hospital-based physician care. The prospective, randomized, non-blinded, 2x2 factorial trial that will enroll 318 study participants in Toronto. In Intervention A, we will randomize half of study participants to a text messaging support service ('WelTel'), in which a trained, community-based counselor provides standardized weekly 'check-in' messages during their 12-week course of PEP follow-up. The other half will receive standard care, which does not include any form of active outreach or reminders outside of scheduled appointments. In Intervention B, we will randomize half of participants to receive nurse-led care for PEP follow-up at a local sexual health clinic; the other half will receive standard care by a hospital-based ID physician. The specific activities for each follow-up visit will be clearly defined in a medical directive. In keeping with Ontario legislation on medical directives, nurses will review cases with their authorizing physician or nurse practitioner on a routine basis.
NCT03259698 ↗ Optimizing the Delivery of HIV nPEP Recruiting St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto Phase 2 2021-10-01 Despite decades of traditional prevention efforts based on behavior change and condom use, Ontario has seen over 700 new HIV infections annually over the past 10 years. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is one such approach, in which uninfected persons use 28 days of antiretroviral medications (ARVs) shortly after an HIV exposure to minimize the risk of acquiring HIV. PEP is highly efficacious, is considered a standard of care intervention based on medical and ethical grounds, and is supported by treatment guidelines. Yet several implementation challenges have limited its clinical and public health impact in Ontario, where no formal PEP policy exists. Our proposal seeks to optimize two aspects of delivering PEP for sexual exposures (nPEP). Results will inform the development of a standardized approach to nPEP both province-wide and elsewhere. Thus study has pragmatic, multicenter randomized controlled trial using a 2x2 factorial design to determine whether the proportion of nPEP patients that successfully complete follow-up: 1. is higher among those receiving mobile phone-based text messaging support than among those receiving standard care; and 2. is non-inferior among those receiving care from a sexual health clinic nurse compared to those receiving hospital-based physician care. The prospective, randomized, non-blinded, 2x2 factorial trial that will enroll 318 study participants in Toronto. In Intervention A, we will randomize half of study participants to a text messaging support service ('WelTel'), in which a trained, community-based counselor provides standardized weekly 'check-in' messages during their 12-week course of PEP follow-up. The other half will receive standard care, which does not include any form of active outreach or reminders outside of scheduled appointments. In Intervention B, we will randomize half of participants to receive nurse-led care for PEP follow-up at a local sexual health clinic; the other half will receive standard care by a hospital-based ID physician. The specific activities for each follow-up visit will be clearly defined in a medical directive. In keeping with Ontario legislation on medical directives, nurses will review cases with their authorizing physician or nurse practitioner on a routine basis.
NCT03259698 ↗ Optimizing the Delivery of HIV nPEP Recruiting Unity Health Toronto Phase 2 2021-10-01 Despite decades of traditional prevention efforts based on behavior change and condom use, Ontario has seen over 700 new HIV infections annually over the past 10 years. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is one such approach, in which uninfected persons use 28 days of antiretroviral medications (ARVs) shortly after an HIV exposure to minimize the risk of acquiring HIV. PEP is highly efficacious, is considered a standard of care intervention based on medical and ethical grounds, and is supported by treatment guidelines. Yet several implementation challenges have limited its clinical and public health impact in Ontario, where no formal PEP policy exists. Our proposal seeks to optimize two aspects of delivering PEP for sexual exposures (nPEP). Results will inform the development of a standardized approach to nPEP both province-wide and elsewhere. Thus study has pragmatic, multicenter randomized controlled trial using a 2x2 factorial design to determine whether the proportion of nPEP patients that successfully complete follow-up: 1. is higher among those receiving mobile phone-based text messaging support than among those receiving standard care; and 2. is non-inferior among those receiving care from a sexual health clinic nurse compared to those receiving hospital-based physician care. The prospective, randomized, non-blinded, 2x2 factorial trial that will enroll 318 study participants in Toronto. In Intervention A, we will randomize half of study participants to a text messaging support service ('WelTel'), in which a trained, community-based counselor provides standardized weekly 'check-in' messages during their 12-week course of PEP follow-up. The other half will receive standard care, which does not include any form of active outreach or reminders outside of scheduled appointments. In Intervention B, we will randomize half of participants to receive nurse-led care for PEP follow-up at a local sexual health clinic; the other half will receive standard care by a hospital-based ID physician. The specific activities for each follow-up visit will be clearly defined in a medical directive. In keeping with Ontario legislation on medical directives, nurses will review cases with their authorizing physician or nurse practitioner on a routine basis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Biktarvy

Condition Name

Condition Name for Biktarvy
Intervention Trials
HIV-1-infection 10
HIV Infections 6
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 5
HIV 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Biktarvy
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 17
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 9
Infections 5
Infection 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Biktarvy

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Biktarvy
Location Trials
United States 57
Canada 7
Italy 6
United Kingdom 5
China 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Biktarvy
Location Trials
Massachusetts 5
Georgia 4
California 4
Texas 3
North Carolina 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Biktarvy

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Biktarvy
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 22
Phase 3 9
Phase 2 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Biktarvy
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 16
Not yet recruiting 9
Active, not recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Biktarvy

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Biktarvy
Sponsor Trials
Gilead Sciences 13
ViiV Healthcare 4
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Biktarvy
Sponsor Trials
Other 59
Industry 22
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.