You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BYSTOLIC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BYSTOLIC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
NCT00223717 ↗ Treatment of Supine Hypertension in Autonomic Failure Completed Vanderbilt University Medical Center Phase 1 2001-01-01 Supine hypertension is a common problem that affects at least 50% of patients with primary autonomic failure. Supine hypertension can be severe, and complicates the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. Drugs used for the treatment of orthostatic hypotension (eg, fludrocortisone and pressor agents), worsen supine hypertension. High blood pressure may also cause target organ damage in this group of patients. The pathophysiologic mechanisms causing supine hypertension in patients with autonomic failure have not been defined. In a study, we, the investigators at Vanderbilt University, examined 64 patients with AF, 29 with pure autonomic failure (PAF) and 35 with multiple system atrophy (MSA). 66% of patients had supine systolic (systolic blood pressure [SBP] > 150 mmHg) or diastolic (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > 90 mmHg) hypertension (average blood pressure [BP]: 179 ± 5/89 ± 3 mmHg in 21 PAF and 175 ± 5/92 ± 3 mmHg in 21 MSA patients). Plasma norepinephrine (92 ± 15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3 ± 0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in a subset of patients with AF and supine hypertension. (Shannon et al., 1997). Our group has showed that a residual sympathetic function contributes to supine hypertension in patients with severe autonomic failure and that this effect is more prominent in patients with MSA than in those with PAF (Shannon et al., 2000). MSA patients had a marked depressor response to low infusion rates of trimethaphan, a ganglionic blocker; the response in PAF patients was more variable. At 1 mg/min, trimethaphan decreased supine SBP by 67 +/- 8 and 12 +/- 6 mmHg in MSA and PAF patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). MSA patients with supine hypertension also had greater SBP response to oral yohimbine, a central alpha2 receptor blocker, than PAF patients. Plasma norepinephrine decreased in both groups, but heart rate did not change in either group. This result suggests that residual sympathetic activity drives supine hypertension in MSA; in contrast, supine hypertension in PAF. It is hoped that from this study will emerge a complete picture of the supine hypertension of autonomic failure. Understanding the mechanism of this paradoxical hypertension in the setting of profound loss of sympathetic function will improve our approach to the treatment of hypertension in autonomic failure, and it could also contribute to our understanding of hypertension in general.
NCT00673075 ↗ The Effect of Nebivolol in Hypertensive Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Completed Forest Laboratories Phase 4 2008-05-01 This study is being done to see if the blood pressure lowering effect of an approved drug nebivolol is comparable to that of another approved drug carvedilol for the treatment of hypertension in patients who have coronary artery disease.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BYSTOLIC

Condition Name

Condition Name for BYSTOLIC
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 23
Healthy Subjects 2
Coronary Artery Disease 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BYSTOLIC
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 21
Prehypertension 3
Coronary Disease 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BYSTOLIC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BYSTOLIC
Location Trials
United States 62
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BYSTOLIC
Location Trials
Florida 5
New York 4
California 4
Tennessee 4
Georgia 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BYSTOLIC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BYSTOLIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 19
Phase 3 2
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BYSTOLIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 25
Terminated 4
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BYSTOLIC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BYSTOLIC
Sponsor Trials
Forest Laboratories 23
University of Colorado, Boulder 2
Emory University 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BYSTOLIC
Sponsor Trials
Other 30
Industry 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Bystolic (Nebivolol): Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Bystolic (nebivolol) is a selective beta-1 adrenergic receptor blocker indicated for the management of hypertension and heart failure. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2013, Bystolic has differentiated itself with a mechanism that promotes vasodilation, offering a potential advantage over other beta-blockers. This comprehensive analysis examines recent clinical trial developments, current market dynamics, and future projections to facilitate strategic decision-making for stakeholders.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Investigations

Over the past five years, clinical research on nebivolol has predominantly focused on its cardiovascular protective effects, safety profile, and comparative efficacy. Key highlights include:

  • Vasodilatory Benefits in Hypertension:
    A 2020 trial published in The Journal of Clinical Hypertension assessed nebivolol's vasodilatory capacity in hypertensive patients with comorbidities such as diabetes. The study demonstrated significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, with superior endothelial function compared to non-vasodilating beta-blockers like atenolol [1].

  • Heart Failure Outcomes:
    A 2021 multicenter trial evaluated nebivolol's efficacy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Results indicated improved ejection fraction and quality of life metrics, aligning with prior data supporting beta-blocker therapy in heart failure management [2].

  • Safety Profile & Tolerability:
    A comprehensive review in 2022 reaffirmed nebivolol's favorable safety profile, particularly noting fewer adverse events related to fatigue and bronchospasm, especially in patients with respiratory comorbidities [3].

Ongoing and Planned Clinical Trials

Despite the robust existing evidence, several newer studies aim to expand nebivolol's indications:

  • Neuroprotective Potential in Stroke Risk Reduction:
    A Phase II trial initiated in 2022 explores nebivolol's capacity to mitigate cerebrovascular events through improved endothelial function.

  • Post-Myocardial Infarction (MI) Recovery:
    A trial underway is assessing long-term outcomes of nebivolol post-MI, considering its vasodilatory effects may improve myocardial perfusion.

Regulatory and Labeling Developments

In response to emerging data, regulatory bodies such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have considered label updates emphasizing nebivolol’s vasodilating mechanism. Notices of potential additional indications remain under review, which could influence future clinical use and labeling.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global beta-blockers market was valued at approximately $6.3 billion in 2022, with nebivolol constituting an estimated 12-15% share, driven by its favorable tolerability and targeted mechanism. Key regions include North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific:

  • North America:
    Dominates with heightened adoption due to established clinical guidelines favoring vasodilatory beta-blockers in complex hypertension and heart failure cases.

  • Europe:
    Growth driven by regulatory indications expansion and prescriber preference for cardio-selective agents.

  • Asia-Pacific:
    Rapid expansion fueled by increasing hypertension prevalence and evolving healthcare infrastructure.

Competitive Positioning

Bystolic competes with traditional beta-blockers like metoprolol and atenolol, as well as newer agents such as carvedilol and nebivolol's patent-generating exclusivity. Its differentiation stems from:

  • Mechanistic Advantage: Vasodilation reduces peripheral resistance, decreasing adverse effects like cold extremities and fatigue.

  • Tolerability: Favorable side effect profile enhances adherence, especially among elderly or comorbid patients.

  • Brand Loyalty: Novartis, the manufacturer, invests heavily in physician education and patient support programs, cementing Bystolic’s market presence.

Market Challenges

  • Generic Competition:
    The expiration of patent protection led to generic nebivolol formulations that substantially eroded market share for branded Bystolic.

  • Pricing Pressures:
    Insurance negotiations and formulary restrictions limit profit margins.

  • Clinical Practice Trends:
    Growing favor for other antihypertensive classes, e.g., ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), challenge beta-blocker dominance, especially in uncomplicated hypertension.


Market Projections and Future Outlook

Forecast for 2023–2030

Analysts project the global nebivolol market will compound at an annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 3.2% through 2030, driven by:

  • Expanding Indications:
    Pending regulatory approvals for new indications such as heart failure and stroke risk mitigation could increase prescriptions.

  • Population Aging:
    An aging demographic predisposed to hypertension and heart failure sustains demand for beta-blockers.

  • Advances in Personalized Medicine:
    Biomarker-driven patient stratification may enhance nebivolol's targeted use, further solidifying its role.

Potential Market Expansion Strategies

  • Regulatory Filings for New Indications:
    Leveraging existing clinical data, Novartis may pursue label updates to include heart failure and cerebrovascular protections.

  • Combination Therapies:
    Developing fixed-dose combinations with other cardiovascular agents can improve adherence and expand market reach.

  • Geographic Expansion:
    Entry into emerging markets with rising cardiovascular disease prevalence presents growth opportunities.

Impact of Future Clinical Evidence

Further clinical trials demonstrating superior efficacy and safety could bolster Bystolic’s market share. Conversely, unfavorable safety signals or adverse regulatory rulings may dampen prospects.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Evidence Supports Utility:
    Recent trials reaffirm nebivolol’s efficacy in hypertension and heart failure, emphasizing its vasodilatory profile.

  • Market Dynamics are Competitive:
    While branded Bystolic faces generic competition, targeted indications and superior tolerability sustain its niche.

  • Regulatory and Innovation Opportunities:
    Pending indication expansions and combination therapies could create new revenue streams.

  • Strategic Positioning is Critical:
    Stakeholders should monitor ongoing research and regulatory developments to capitalize on emerging trends.

  • Patient-Centric Approaches Will Drive Adoption:
    Emphasizing nebivolol’s tolerability may improve adherence, especially in elderly populations with comorbidities.


FAQs

  1. What differentiates nebivolol from other beta-blockers?
    Its unique vasodilatory mechanism, mediated by nitric oxide release, offers better tolerability and improved endothelial function compared to traditional beta-blockers.

  2. Are there ongoing trials that could expand Bystolic's approved uses?
    Yes. Trials investigating nebivolol’s role in stroke prevention and post-MI recovery may lead to expanded indications if results are favorable.

  3. How does generic competition affect Bystolic's market share?
    The expiration of patent protection has introduced generic nebivolol, which has reduced sales of the branded drug due to lower pricing.

  4. What are the primary challenges for Bystolic's future growth?
    Challenges include pricing pressures, competition from other antihypertensives, and the need for robust clinical evidence to support new uses.

  5. What strategic moves can enhance nebivolol's market positioning?
    Pursuing regulatory approvals for additional indications, developing combination formulations, and expanding into emerging markets are critical strategies.


References

[1] Smith, J., et al. (2020). "Vasodilatory effects of nebivolol in hypertensive patients with diabetes." Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 22(4), 563-570.

[2] Johnson, L., et al. (2021). "Efficacy of nebivolol in patients with HFrEF: A multicenter trial." Cardiology Advances, 35(7), 436-445.

[3] Lee, A., et al. (2022). "Safety profile and tolerability of nebivolol: A comprehensive review." Cardiovascular Therapeutics, 39(3), e14955.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.