You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00298571 ↗ Cesarean Delivery and Post-operative Pain Management With Local Anesthesia Completed University of South Florida Phase 2/Phase 3 2006-02-01 The use of .5% Bupivacaine with epinephrine at the time of skin closure in cesarean deliveries will decrease post-op pain.
NCT00458003 ↗ Phenylephrine in Spinal Anesthesia in Preeclamptic Patients Completed Northwestern University N/A 2006-07-01 Hypotension remains a common clinical problem after induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Maternal hypotension has been associated with considerable morbidity (maternal nausea and vomiting and fetal/neonatal acidemia). Traditionally, ephedrine has been the vasopressor of choice because of concerns about phenylephrine's potential adverse effect on uterine blood flow. This practice was based on animal studies which showed that ephedrine maintained cardiac output and uterine blood flow, while direct acting vasoconstrictors, e.g., phenylephrine, decreased uteroplacental perfusion. However, several recent studies have demonstrated that phenylephrine has similar efficacy to ephedrine for preventing and treating hypotension and may be associated with a lower incidence of fetal acidosis. All of these studies have been performed in healthy patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Preeclampsia complicates 5-6% of all pregnancies and is a significant contributor to maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Many preeclamptic patients require cesarean delivery of the infant. These patients often have uteroplacental insufficiency. Given the potential for significant hypotension after spinal anesthesia and its effect on an already compromised fetus, prevention of (relative) hypotension in preeclamptic patients is important. Spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic patients has been shown to have no adverse neonatal outcomes as compared to epidural anesthesia when hypotension is treated adequately. Due to problems related to management of the difficult airway and coagulopathy, both of which are more common in preeclamptic women, spinal anesthesia may be the preferred regional anesthesia technique. Recent studies have demonstrated that preeclamptic patients may experience less hypotension after spinal anesthesia than their healthy counterparts. To our knowledge, phenylephrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension has not been studied in women with preeclampsia. The aim of our study is to compare intravenous infusion regimens of phenylephrine versus ephedrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension in preeclamptic patients undergoing cesarean delivery. The primary outcome variable is umbilical artery pH.
NCT00519584 ↗ Interscalene Nerve Blocks With Ropivacaine Alone, With Dexamethasone, Plus Systemic Dexamethasone Terminated The Cleveland Clinic N/A 2007-07-01 This study will test the hypothesis that ropivacaine in combination with either systemic or local steroid provides comparably longer-lasting analgesia tha ropivacaine alone.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE
Intervention Trials
Postoperative Pain 22
Pain, Postoperative 22
Pain 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 57
Acute Pain 13
Osteoarthritis 10
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE
Location Trials
United States 98
Canada 23
Egypt 15
Brazil 6
Chile 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE
Location Trials
New York 11
California 9
Massachusetts 9
North Carolina 8
Texas 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 7
PHASE3 3
PHASE2 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 76
RECRUITING 38
Not yet recruiting 24
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE
Sponsor Trials
Federal University of São Paulo 6
University of California, San Diego 6
Wake Forest University Health Sciences 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BUPIVACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND EPINEPHRINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 214
Industry 10
U.S. Fed 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Epinephrine

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Bupivacaine Hydrochloride combined with Epinephrine is a well-established local anesthetic formulation used predominantly in surgical, dental, and diagnostic procedures. Its innovative pharmacological profile offers prolonged anesthesia and decreased systemic absorption, leading to improved patient safety and comfort. Despite its long-standing clinical use, ongoing research, evolving regulatory landscapes, and market dynamics continue to shape its future trajectory. This analysis provides a comprehensive update on current clinical trials, delves into market trends, and offers projections grounded in recent developments.


Clinical Trials Landscape for Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Epinephrine

Current Stage and Focus of Clinical Trials

Recent years have witnessed a surge in clinical investigations aimed at optimizing the efficacy, safety, and delivery methods for Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Epinephrine. The predominant research focus encompasses:

  • Enhanced formulations: Novel delivery systems such as liposomal encapsulation and controlled-release matrices aim to extend anesthetic duration and reduce adverse events.
  • Safety profile assessments: Trials evaluating cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and systemic absorption continue to inform guidelines, especially for high-risk populations.
  • Comparative effectiveness: Studies comparing new formulations with traditional solutions to establish superior safety and efficacy.

As of 2023, there are approximately 15-20 active or recruiting clinical trials globally, chiefly in North America and Europe. Notably:

  • Liposome-encapsulated Bupivacaine (Exparel): Multiple Phase IV and post-marketing surveillance studies aim to assess long-term safety and effectiveness.
  • Combination therapies: Trials exploring additive or synergistic effects with adjuncts like clonidine or dexmedetomidine.

Regulatory and Post-Market Surveillance

While most formulations are off-patent or have generic equivalents, regulatory agencies like the FDA continue to monitor post-market data for adverse event trends. The approval landscape reflects ongoing efforts to improve administration techniques and patient outcomes, rather than new drug approvals per se.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Segmentation

The global local anesthetic market, within which Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Epinephrine are pivotal, was valued at approximately USD 2.8 billion in 2022. It is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.5% through 2030, driven by increasing surgical procedures and outpatient interventions.

Segmentation highlights:

  • Product Type: Bupivacaine-based formulations account for around 40% of local anesthetics by revenue.
  • Application Area: Orthopedic surgeries (~35%), dental procedures (~25%), and general surgical procedures (~20%) constitute primary markets.
  • Geography: North America leads with approximately 45% market share, followed by Europe (25%), and Asia-Pacific (20%), with emerging markets exhibiting robust growth.

Competitive Landscape

Key players include Pfizer (Procaine), AstraZeneca (Marcain, now merged with Pfizer), Mylan, and Teva. The proliferation of generic versions has intensified price competition. Specialized formulations like liposomal Bupivacaine (e.g., Exparel by Pacira BioSciences) command premium pricing owing to extended release features and demonstrated efficacy.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Dynamics

In developed markets, reimbursement policies favor minimally invasive procedures and outpatient surgeries, augmenting demand. Regulatory bodies are increasingly emphasizing safety profiles, influencing formulation approvals and market entry.


Market Projections

Growth Drivers

  • Advancements in drug delivery: Nanotechnology and controlled-release systems are expected to expand the repertoire of formulations, improving patient outcomes.
  • Rise in outpatient and ambulatory surgeries: The shift towards minimally invasive procedures will sustain demand for Bupivacaine and Epinephrine combinations.
  • Aging population: Increased surgical interventions among elderly patients elevate the need for effective, longer-lasting anesthesia with favorable safety profiles.

Challenges

  • Generic competition: Price erosion and patent expirations may constrain profitability.
  • Regulatory hurdles: Stringent safety assessments could delay novel formulations.
  • Adverse event concerns: Cardiotoxicity risks necessitate cautious clinical application and innovation.

Forecast Statement

By 2030, the local anesthetic market, focusing on agents like Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Epinephrine, is projected to reach USD 4.9 billion, with Bupivacaine-based products contributing over USD 2 billion. Innovations such as liposomal delivery systems are expected to capture approximately 20-25% of this segment, driven by their capacity to prolong anesthesia while minimizing systemic toxicity.


Conclusions

The clinical landscape for Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Epinephrine remains robust, with ongoing trials aimed at enhancing safety and efficacy. Market trends indicate sustained growth, underpinned by technological innovations, procedural shifts, and demographic factors. Companies investing in novel delivery systems and exploring expanded indications will likely maintain competitive advantages.


Key Takeaways

  • Continuous clinical trials are focusing on innovative formulations like liposomal encapsulations, promising extended anesthesia and improved safety profiles.
  • The global local anesthetic market is expanding, with significant growth potential for Bupivacaine-based products, particularly those offering prolonged effects.
  • Regulatory bodies emphasize safety, encouraging development of formulations with reduced adverse effects, especially cardiotoxicity.
  • Market growth is driven by rising outpatient procedures, aging populations, and technological advancements in drug delivery.
  • Price competition from generics and regulatory challenges pose ongoing risks; thus, innovation remains key for differentiation and profitability.

FAQs

1. Are there any new formulations of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Epinephrine in clinical trials?
Yes, liposomal and controlled-release formulations are currently in clinical evaluations, aiming to extend anesthesia duration and improve safety.

2. How does the safety profile of Bupivacaine with Epinephrine compare to other local anesthetics?
Traditional formulations are effective but carry cardiotoxicity risks, especially at high doses. Newer formulations focus on minimizing systemic absorption, thereby enhancing safety.

3. What is the market forecast for Bupivacaine-based products over the next decade?
The market is projected to grow to nearly USD 2 billion by 2030, driven by technological innovations and increasing procedural volume.

4. How might regulatory trends impact the development of new Bupivacaine formulations?
Regulators prioritize safety and efficacy, prompting developers to focus on formulations that reduce adverse events, which may extend approval timelines but improve market viability.

5. Are generic Bupivacaine formulations expected to dominate the market?
Yes, after patent expiries, generic versions are expected to account for a significant majority due to cost advantages, but branded, innovative formulations may command premium pricing.


Sources

  1. MarketsandMarkets. Local Anesthetics Market by Product, Application, and Region - Global Forecast to 2030.
  2. FDA. Post-Market Surveillance Data on Bupivacaine Liposomal.
  3. Pfizer Annual Report 2022.
  4. Pacira BioSciences Investor Presentation.
  5. World Health Organization. Surgical Procedures and Anesthetic Utilization Data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.