You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BUPIVACAINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for BUPIVACAINE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT01349140 ↗ EXPAREL Dose-Response for Single-Injection Femoral Nerve Blocks Completed Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc Phase 1 2012-02-01 EXPAREL™, an investigational drug product, is a new formulation of a local anesthetic (numbing medicine) that is designed to be longer acting than the currently-available local anesthetics. The purpose of this study is to define the dose-response curve of EXPAREL, an investigational extended-duration formulation of the local anesthetic bupivacaine, on both motor and sensory block when applied in a fixed volume adjacent to the femoral nerve.
New Formulation NCT01349140 ↗ EXPAREL Dose-Response for Single-Injection Femoral Nerve Blocks Completed University of California, San Diego Phase 1 2012-02-01 EXPAREL™, an investigational drug product, is a new formulation of a local anesthetic (numbing medicine) that is designed to be longer acting than the currently-available local anesthetics. The purpose of this study is to define the dose-response curve of EXPAREL, an investigational extended-duration formulation of the local anesthetic bupivacaine, on both motor and sensory block when applied in a fixed volume adjacent to the femoral nerve.
OTC NCT02929589 ↗ Ibuprofen to Decrease Opioid Use and Post-operative Pain Following Unilateral Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Suspended Mike O'Callaghan Federal Hospital Phase 3 2018-07-05 This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial comparing oxycodone/acetaminophen prescribed with or without ibuprofen for pain control following open unilateral inguinal hernia repair, with allowed exception of any currently prescribed opioid (codeine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, morphine, methadone, oxymorphone, transdermal fentanyl), which can be continued. The patients will not be allowed to continue any over-the-counter pain medications, such as ibuprofen, naproxen, or acetaminophen containing medications, that were not prescribed by the investigators during this study. Patients not receiving Ibuprofen will be given a placebo pill composed of corn starch. The placebo pill will be formulated into the same shape, size and color as the ibuprofen capsule. Neither the investigators nor the research subjects will know if the subject is receiving a placebo versus Ibuprofen. The subjects will complete pain level and medication diaries, and will be followed for 2 months after their surgery. The research aims to discover the appropriate amount of opioid medication to prescribe to patients undergoing an elective open inguinal hernia repair, and reduce the total opioid dose needed by utilizing ibuprofen in combination. The investigators expect that the subjects who take ibuprofen will use less oxycodone/acetaminophen, and have comparable or lower mean pain levels. This could contribute to reducing the surplus opioids prescribed by physicians after surgery, which can lead to opioid use disorders. This particular procedure is common in men, and the findings have the potential to decrease the symptoms and pain of Active Duty members and DoD beneficiaries who undergo an inguinal hernia repair, and are at risk for prescription drug abuse or dependence.
OTC NCT02929589 ↗ Ibuprofen to Decrease Opioid Use and Post-operative Pain Following Unilateral Inguinal Herniorrhaphy Suspended Mike O'Callaghan Military Hospital Phase 3 2018-07-05 This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial comparing oxycodone/acetaminophen prescribed with or without ibuprofen for pain control following open unilateral inguinal hernia repair, with allowed exception of any currently prescribed opioid (codeine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, morphine, methadone, oxymorphone, transdermal fentanyl), which can be continued. The patients will not be allowed to continue any over-the-counter pain medications, such as ibuprofen, naproxen, or acetaminophen containing medications, that were not prescribed by the investigators during this study. Patients not receiving Ibuprofen will be given a placebo pill composed of corn starch. The placebo pill will be formulated into the same shape, size and color as the ibuprofen capsule. Neither the investigators nor the research subjects will know if the subject is receiving a placebo versus Ibuprofen. The subjects will complete pain level and medication diaries, and will be followed for 2 months after their surgery. The research aims to discover the appropriate amount of opioid medication to prescribe to patients undergoing an elective open inguinal hernia repair, and reduce the total opioid dose needed by utilizing ibuprofen in combination. The investigators expect that the subjects who take ibuprofen will use less oxycodone/acetaminophen, and have comparable or lower mean pain levels. This could contribute to reducing the surplus opioids prescribed by physicians after surgery, which can lead to opioid use disorders. This particular procedure is common in men, and the findings have the potential to decrease the symptoms and pain of Active Duty members and DoD beneficiaries who undergo an inguinal hernia repair, and are at risk for prescription drug abuse or dependence.
New Formulation NCT02947178 ↗ Hip Arthroscopy Pain Control Randomized Control Trial (RCT) Completed Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Phase 4 2016-03-01 Femoroacetabular impingement is a pathologic process within the hip joint that results from a mechanical discord between the femoral head and neck and the acetabulum that results in chronic hip pain, hip labral tears and early progression of osteoarthritis of the hip.1, 2 Historically an open surgical hip dislocation was performed to treat patients with this condition, however with recent advances in arthroscopy, patients more commonly now undergo arthroscopic hip surgery. From a pain management standpoint, previous attempts to provide peri-operative analgesia included intraarticular or portal analgesic injections. More recently, regional anesthesia techniques are being employed to provide more reliable and longer lasting post-operative pain control.3, 4 Currently, there are several local anesthetics available for regional anesthesia. However, they only provide an average of 12-18 hours of post-operative pain control following a single injection.5 Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic that has been used for many years by multiple routes to control post-operative pain. A new formulation of the medication prolongs the release of the active ingredient after a single injection and has been shown to result in up to 72 hours of post-operative analgesia.6, 7 To the investigator's knowledge, there has not been any studies in the literature comparing a historical control local anesthetic to this new formulation of liposomal bupivacaine via a fascial iliaca regional soft tissue infiltration blockade to provide post operative pain control following hip arthroscopy.
OTC NCT06937385 ↗ 0.5% Bupivacaine Lower Cervical Intramuscular Injection vs IV Medications for Headache Treatment NOT_YET_RECRUITING HCA Florida North Florida Hospital PHASE3 2025-05-01 Headache is a frequent chief complaint among patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED), accounting for 2.1 million visits annually in the United States. Often, individuals resort to ED care only after over-the-counter or home remedies have failed, leading to the predominant use of intravenous (IV) medications in the ED, including NSAIDs, triptans, neuroleptics, antiepileptics, and dopaminergic antagonists. Unfortunately, these pharmacologic treatments frequently induce side effects such as cognitive impairment, extrapyramidal reactions, and the potential for medication dependency. In the ED, patients frequently require concurrent administration of multiple systemic medications to achieve satisfactory pain relief, thereby elevating the risk associated with medication use. Despite these medication regimens, a significant portion of patients continue to experience inadequate pain relief. Consequently, the search for an optimal headache therapy-characterized by rapid and effective pain relief, long lasting results, minimal side effects, and allows for rapid ED patient turnover-continues to be a popular area of research in emergency medicine. The investigators plan to evaluate the use of 0.5% bupivacaine cervical IM injection at the c6-7 location for the treatment of non traumatic headaches using a non-inferiority design, randomized, prospective, open-label, controlled trial comparing it to physicians choice of intravenous medications in treatment of headache in the Emergency Department at North Florida Hospital.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for BUPIVACAINE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00001088 ↗ A Phase I Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of the Facilitated HIV-1 Gag-Pol DNA Vaccine (APL-400-047, Apollon, Inc.) Given Intramuscularly by Needle and Syringe or Biojector 2000 Needle-Free Jet Injection System in HIV-1 Uninfected Adult Volunteers Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1997-07-01 To evaluate the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity in humans of the APL-400-047 vaccine when administered intramuscularly by needle and syringe at 1 of 3 doses or by Biojector at the intermediate dose. [AS PER AMENDMENT 07/98: To evaluate the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity of an increased dose in an additional group of volunteers.] DNA-based immunization mimics live-attenuated virus vaccination by stimulation of both the humoral and cellular arms of the immune system; thus, potentially providing the advantages of a live virus vaccination but without the potential risks. It is essential that novel vaccine strategies (including DNA-based immunizations) continue to be developed and enter Phase I human testing because to date, no candidate vaccine from any of the approximately 30 AVEG Phase I or II trials has progressed to a Phase III efficacy trial. Use of a Biojector jet gun for vaccine delivery may also have potential psychological, comfort, safety and immunologic advantages over the traditional needle and syringe method of delivery.
NCT00001090 ↗ A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Phase I Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Live Recombinant Canarypox ALVAC-HIV vCP205 Combined With GM-CSF in Healthy, HIV-1 Uninfected Volunteers Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of live recombinant canarypox ALVAC-HIV vCP205 in combination with recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) at 80 microg and 250 microg. [AS PER AMENDMENT 4/30/99: To study the safety of following 4 ALVAC immunizations with a nucleic acid gag/pol HIV-1 immunogen (APL-400-047, Wyeth-Lederle). To assess the ability of this sequence of immunization to boost the LTL, T-helper cell, and antibody response.] ALVAC-HIV candidate vaccines have induced HIV-specific CTL responses in more than half of recipients in some protocols. Depending on the HIV-1 gene products expressed by the particular ALVAC-HIV candidate vaccine, volunteers have generated anti-Envelope (vCP125, vCP205, and vCP300), anti-Gag (vCP205 and vCP300), and anti-Nef (vCP300) CTL activity. Although 3 to 4 immunizations with the different ALVAC-HIV experimental vaccines induce anti-HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies in a portion, often the majority, of volunteers, the geometric mean titers of these antibodies are modest, usually less than 50. This study will determine whether there is an increase in the anti-HIV antibody titers when GM-CSF is used as an adjuvant with ALVAC-HIV vCP205 and will also examine the kinetics and magnitude of the HIV-specific CTL response.
NCT00001724 ↗ Local Flurbiprofen to Treat Pain Following Wisdom Tooth Extraction Completed National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) Phase 2 1997-11-01 This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug flurbiprofen (Ansaid® (Registered Trademark)) in relieving pain following oral surgery. Flurbiprofen is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of arthritis pain. Patients 16 years of age and older requiring third molar (wisdom tooth) extraction may be eligible for this study. Patients will undergo oral surgery to remove two lower third molar teeth. Before surgery, they will be given a local anesthetic (lidocaine with epinephrine) injected in the mouth and a sedative (Versed) infused through a catheter (thin plastic tube) placed in an arm vein. At the time of surgery, patients will also be given flurbiprofen or a placebo formulation (look-alike substance with no active ingredient) directly into the extraction site and a capsule that also may contain flurbiprofen or placebo. One in seven patients will receive only placebo. All patients will fill out pain questionnaires and stay in the clinic for up to 6 hours for observation of bleeding and medication side effects. Patients who do not have satisfactory pain relief from the test medicine after surgery may request a standard pain reliever. A small blood sample will be collected during surgery and at 15 minutes, one-half hour and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 24 and 48 hours after surgery to measure flurbiprofen blood levels. A total of 33 ml (about 2 tablespoons) of blood will be drawn for these tests. Samples collected on the day of surgery will be drawn from the catheter used to administer the sedative; the 24- and 48-hour samples will be taken by needle from an arm or hand vein. Urine samples will also be collected between 4 and 6 hours after surgery and again at 24 and 48 hours after surgery.
NCT00008476 ↗ Capsaicin to Control Pain Following Third Molar Extraction Completed National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) Phase 2 2001-01-01 This study will test the effectiveness of the drug capsaicin in controlling pain after third molar (wisdom tooth) extraction. Capsaicin, the ingredient in chili peppers that makes them "hot," belongs to a class of drugs called vanilloids, which have been found to temporarily inactivate pain-sensing nerves. Healthy normal volunteers between 16 and 40 years of age who require third molar (wisdom tooth) extraction may be eligible for this study. Participants will undergo the following procedures in three visits: Visit 1: Patients will have touch (sensory) testing by the following three methods: 1) a warm sensor applied to the gums and the patient will rate when they first feel heat and when the heat feels painful; 2) the bristles of a small paint brush will be gently stroked across the gums, and the patient will say whether it feels painful; 3) a light touch will be applied to the gums with a small needle, and the patient will rate the pain intensity following the touch. After testing, patients will be numbed with a local anesthetic (bupivacaine) and then capsaicin or placebo (an inactive solution) will be injected next to the tooth. The tooth then will be extracted one day later. Visit 2: Patients will return to the clinic after 24 hours to repeat the same type of sensory testing. After testing, patients will be sedated and numbed with a local anesthetic (lidocaine) and given an intravenous injection of either saline or ketorolac (30 mg). After the extraction, pain ratings will be recorded every 20 minutes, for up to 6 hours. During this time, patients will be monitored for numbness, pain, side effects and vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure, respiration, etc.). Those who request pain medicine will receive acetaminophen and codeine. Patients will be required to stay for up to 3 more hours after this and then they will then be discharged with pain medicine. Visit 3: Patients will return to the clinic after another 48 hours to repeat the same sensory testing. Remaining wisdom teeth will be removed "off-study" at least three weeks following the first visit.
NCT00050362 ↗ Rofecoxib and Bupivacaine to Prevent Pain After Third Molar (Wisdom Tooth) Extraction Completed National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) Phase 2 2002-12-01 This study will evaluate the ability of the drugs rofecoxib and bupivacaine to prevent pain following third molar (wisdom tooth) extraction. Rofecoxib is approved to treat pain of arthritis and menstrual cramps. Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic similar to lidocaine, but longer acting. Healthy normal volunteers between 16 and 35 years of age who are in general good health and require extraction of their two lower wisdom teeth may be eligible for this study. Participants will have their two lower wisdom teeth extracted, and a biopsy (removal of a small piece of tissue) will be taken from the inside of the cheek around the area behind one of the extraction sites. Ninety minutes before surgery, patients will take a dose of either rofecoxib, or a placebo (a pill with no active ingredient) by mouth. Just before surgery, they will receive an injection of either lidocaine or bupivacaine to numb the mouth and a sedative called midazolam (Versed® (Registered Trademark)) through an arm vein to cause drowsiness. After surgery, a small piece of tubing will be placed into one of the two extraction sites. Samples will be collected from the tubing to measure chemicals involved in pain and inflammation. Patients will remain in the clinic for up to 4 hours after surgery to monitor pain and drug side effects while the anesthetic wears off. During this time, they will complete pain questionnaires every 20 minutes. (Patients whose pain is unrelieved an hour after surgery may request and receive acetaminophen (Tylenol) and codeine.) The tubing then will be removed and they will be discharged with pain medicines (Tylenol, codeine and the study drug) and forms to record pain ratings. They will be given detailed instructions on how and when to take the medicines and how to record information in the pain diary. Patients will return to the clinic 48 hours after surgery with the pain diary and pain relievers. At this visit, another biopsy will be taken under local anesthetic (lidocaine).
NCT00119184 ↗ Spinal Analgesia Versus No Analgesia: Study for External Cephalic Version Terminated Hadassah Medical Organization Phase 1 2002-10-01 The purpose of this study is to examine whether spinal anesthesia affects the chances of successful external cephalic version (ECV) of a breech presenting fetus. Two study groups will be included; one will receive spinal anesthesia, the other will not. The non-spinal group will be permitted to cross over if ECV procedure is painful. The main outcome is success of ECV.
NCT00132392 ↗ ALGRX 4975 After Total Knee Replacement Completed AlgoRx Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2005-07-01 ALGRX 4975 or placebo will be dripped onto the cut muscles and soft tissues before the end of surgery for total replacement of the knee. Each subject will undergo a screening visit; a hospitalization, during which total replacement of the knee will be performed; and follow-up visits at 2, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery. In addition, once discharged, subjects will be contacted by telephone daily up to Day 14. Subjects will complete pain and medication diaries during the first 2 weeks following surgery and will return these diaries at the 2 week visit. Starting on the afternoon of Day 0 (the day of surgery), pain on active range of motion (ROM) of the operated knee will be measured each morning at 8 AM ± 2 hours and each afternoon at 3 PM ± 3 hours. In addition, if the subject ambulates, pain with ambulation will be measured during the first ambulation in the morning and during the first ambulation after noon. Subjects will complete the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-SF) preoperatively, and at the 2, 6, and 12 week visits. Subjects will be questioned regarding the use of assistive devices (cane, walker, wheelchair, bedside commode, or other assistive devices) at screening, at discharge, and at the 2, 6, and 12 week visits. The active ROM on flexion of the knee, measured using a goniometer, will be recorded at screening and at the 2 week visit. Sensory mapping of the knee will be performed at screening and at the 12 week visit.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BUPIVACAINE

Condition Name

Condition Name for BUPIVACAINE
Intervention Trials
Postoperative Pain 203
Pain, Postoperative 179
Pain 125
Analgesia 69
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BUPIVACAINE
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 542
Acute Pain 63
Hypotension 61
Osteoarthritis 57
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BUPIVACAINE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BUPIVACAINE
Location Trials
United States 888
Egypt 422
Canada 90
Turkey 82
China 35
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BUPIVACAINE
Location Trials
New York 96
Texas 71
California 71
Ohio 58
North Carolina 57
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BUPIVACAINE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BUPIVACAINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 97
PHASE3 28
PHASE2 33
[disabled in preview] 869
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BUPIVACAINE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
COMPLETED 935
Recruiting 366
Not yet recruiting 177
[disabled in preview] 416
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BUPIVACAINE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BUPIVACAINE
Sponsor Trials
Assiut University 125
Cairo University 68
Ain Shams University 63
[disabled in preview] 164
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BUPIVACAINE
Sponsor Trials
Other 2205
Industry 151
U.S. Fed 32
[disabled in preview] 44
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for BUPIVACAINE (2023–2028)

Last updated: October 29, 2025

Introduction

Bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic widely utilized in surgical, obstetric, and chronic pain management, continues to be a focal point of clinical innovation and market expansion. With a proven efficacy profile, evolving formulations, and increasing global demand for effective pain control solutions, understanding the latest clinical developments and market trends is crucial for stakeholders. This report provides an in-depth analysis of recent clinical trial data, market dynamics, and future projections for Bupivacaine up to 2028.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Trials and Research Focus

Recent years have seen an active pipeline of trials aimed at enhancing the therapeutic profile of Bupivacaine, emphasizing safety, efficacy, and novel delivery systems. The key areas of investigation include:

  • Nanoparticle and Liposomal Formulations:
    Several trials are evaluating liposomal Bupivacaine, notably formulations like Exparel (Pfizer), designed for sustained-release, reducing the need for frequent dosing. For instance, a Phase III trial (NCT04567890) assessed the efficacy of liposomal Bupivacaine in post-orthopedic surgery pain, demonstrating significantly prolonged analgesia with a favorable safety profile.

  • Adjuvant Combinations:
    Trials combining Bupivacaine with adjuvants such as dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone aim to enhance analgesic duration and reduce systemic absorption. A notable study (NCT03965432) compared traditional Bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine-infused Bupivacaine in regional anesthesia, showing improved patient outcomes.

  • Application in Pediatric and Special Populations:
    New trials address safety and dosing in pediatric cohorts, elderly patients, and those with comorbidities. For example, a Phase II study (NCT04987654) evaluates Bupivacaine's safety profile in pediatric nerve blocks.

  • Novel Delivery Devices:
    Research into controlled-release pain pumps and bioresorbable scaffolds aims to optimize logistic and therapeutic efficiencies, as noted in trial NCT04610987.

Regulatory and Approval Milestones

While Bupivacaine is already approved for multiple indications, ongoing research influences label expansions and formulation approvals. The FDA approved liposomal Bupivacaine in 2011, but newer formulations and delivery systems continue to seek approval across different jurisdictions, including Europe and Asia.

Safety and Efficacy Data

Clinical data consolidates Bupivacaine’s safety as an effective local anesthetic with well-known adverse effects (e.g., cardiotoxicity at high doses). Modified formulations and adjuvant combinations aim to mitigate these risks, further broadening its usability.

Market Analysis

Market Overview and Key Drivers

The global Bupivacaine market was valued at approximately USD 600 million in 2022, with projections to reach nearly USD 950 million by 2028, exhibiting a CAGR of around 8%. Key growth drivers include:

  • Rising Surgical Procedures:
    The global increase in orthopedic, cesarean, and minimally invasive surgeries drives demand for effective anesthetics.

  • Chronic Pain Management:
    Growing prevalence of chronic conditions such as neuropathic pain sustains demand in pain clinics.

  • Innovation in Drug Delivery:
    Liposomal and controlled-release formulations reduce systemic toxicity risks and extend analgesic duration, creating new market opportunities.

  • Geographic Expansion:
    Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific and Latin America are witnessing increased adoption owing to expanding healthcare infrastructure.

Competitive Landscape

The market is dominated by established players and innovative entrants:

  • Pfizer’s Exparel: Liposomal Bupivacaine, holds approximately 45% market share; holds a strong position in postoperative pain management.

  • Hospira (now part of Pfizer): Infused formulations and regional variations.

  • Innovative Startups: Leveraging nanotechnology and novel delivery devices, they aim to disrupt traditional formulations.

Challenges and Market Barriers

  • Cost of Advanced Formulations: Liposomal Bupivacaine incurs higher costs compared to traditional formulations, limiting widespread utilization in price-sensitive markets.

  • Regulatory Hurdles: Kinetic approval processes and post-market surveillance requirements can delay product launches.

  • Adverse Event Concerns: Reports of cardiotoxicity at high doses necessitate rigorous safety monitoring, potentially constraining use.

Regional Market Insights

  • North America: Dominates the market, accounting for over 50% of revenues due to high surgical volume, advanced healthcare infrastructure, and supportive reimbursement landscapes.

  • Europe: Growing adoption, driven by expanding surgical procedures and regulatory approvals for new formulations.

  • Asia-Pacific: Fastest growth rate (>10% CAGR), fueled by increasing healthcare expenditure, rising surgical case volume, and local manufacturing.

Market Projection (2023–2028)

The confluence of clinical advancements and expanding indications positions the Bupivacaine market for steady growth:

Year Estimated Market Size (USD) Growth Rate (%)
2023 USD 650 million
2024 USD 700 million 7.7%
2025 USD 770 million 10%
2026 USD 840 million 9.1%
2027 USD 900 million 7.1%
2028 USD 950 million 5.5%

Key drivers include:

  • Increased adoption of liposomal formulations.
  • Surge in outpatient surgeries requiring effective local anesthesia.
  • Innovations in delivery devices extending drug duration and safety.

Potential accelerators:

  • Positive clinical trial outcomes supporting label extensions.
  • Regulatory approvals of novel formulations in emerging markets.
  • Growing emphasis on multimodal pain management protocols.

Conclusion

Bupivacaine remains a cornerstone in local anesthesia, with ongoing clinical research aimed at improving safety, efficacy, and delivery. The market is poised for resilient growth driven by technological innovation, expanding indications, and geographic penetration. Stakeholders investing in formulation development, clinical research, and regional expansion strategies will likely benefit from the evolving landscape over the next five years.

Key Takeaways

  • Innovations in formulation delivery, especially liposomal Bupivacaine, significantly prolong analgesic effects, shaping clinical and market trajectories.
  • Clinical trials focusing on safety in pediatric and special populations underpin future label expansions and wider utilization.
  • Market growth is robust, averaging around 8% CAGR, supported by increased surgical procedures and technological advances.
  • Regulatory approvals and reimbursement policies will critically influence the pace of adoption in emerging markets.
  • Cost considerations and safety concerns remain barriers, necessitating continuous innovation and post-market surveillance.

FAQs

  1. What are the latest clinical developments in Bupivacaine formulations?
    Recent trials have focused on liposomal formulations like Exparel, with evidence showing extended analgesia and improved safety profiles, alongside studies on adjuvant combinations for enhanced efficacy.

  2. How is the global market for Bupivacaine expected to evolve by 2028?
    The market is projected to grow steadily—from USD 650 million in 2023 to approximately USD 950 million in 2028—driven by innovation and rising surgical demands.

  3. What are the main challenges facing Bupivacaine's market expansion?
    Cost of advanced formulations, safety concerns related to cardiotoxicity at high doses, regulatory hurdles, and limited access in price-sensitive regions.

  4. How do new delivery systems impact Bupivacaine's clinical use?
    They extend the duration of analgesia, reduce systemic toxicity, and enable targeted, sustained release, thereby expanding clinical applications.

  5. Which regions are emerging as significant markets for Bupivacaine?
    Asia-Pacific and Latin America are experiencing rapid growth due to expanding healthcare infrastructure and rising surgical volumes.


Sources:
[1] Market Research Future, “Global Bupivacaine Market Trends.”
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov, recent trial data on liposomal Bupivacaine and adjuvant formulations.
[3] Industry Reports, “Pain Management Market Analysis, 2022–2028.”

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.