Last Updated: August 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00569712 ↗ Studying Genes in Blood and Lung Fluid Samples From Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With or Without a Previous Diagnosis of Lung Cancer or With Asthma Treated With Budesonide and Formoterol Completed Astra Zeneca Canada Phase 1 2007-01-01 RATIONALE: Studying the genes expressed in samples of blood and lung fluid in the laboratory from patients receiving budesonide and formoterol may help doctors learn more about the effect of budesonide and formoterol on gene expression and biomarkers. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying genes in blood and lung fluid samples from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with or without a previous diagnosis of lung cancer, or with asthma treated with budesonide and formoterol.
NCT00569712 ↗ Studying Genes in Blood and Lung Fluid Samples From Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With or Without a Previous Diagnosis of Lung Cancer or With Asthma Treated With Budesonide and Formoterol Completed AstraZeneca Phase 1 2007-01-01 RATIONALE: Studying the genes expressed in samples of blood and lung fluid in the laboratory from patients receiving budesonide and formoterol may help doctors learn more about the effect of budesonide and formoterol on gene expression and biomarkers. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying genes in blood and lung fluid samples from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with or without a previous diagnosis of lung cancer, or with asthma treated with budesonide and formoterol.
NCT00569712 ↗ Studying Genes in Blood and Lung Fluid Samples From Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With or Without a Previous Diagnosis of Lung Cancer or With Asthma Treated With Budesonide and Formoterol Completed British Columbia Cancer Agency Phase 1 2007-01-01 RATIONALE: Studying the genes expressed in samples of blood and lung fluid in the laboratory from patients receiving budesonide and formoterol may help doctors learn more about the effect of budesonide and formoterol on gene expression and biomarkers. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying genes in blood and lung fluid samples from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with or without a previous diagnosis of lung cancer, or with asthma treated with budesonide and formoterol.
NCT00964535 ↗ Bioequivalence Study of Budesonide/Formoterol Easyhaler and Symbicort Turbohaler in Asthmatics Completed Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma Phase 1/Phase 2 2009-09-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the test product Budesonide/formoterol Easyhaler with the marketed product Symbicort Turbohaler in terms of the drug absorbed into the bloodstream.
NCT01386996 ↗ Comparison of Budesonide and Formoterol Absorption From Budesonide/Formoterol Easyhaler and Symbicort Turbuhaler Completed Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma Phase 1 2011-07-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the test product Budesonide/formoterol Easyhaler with the marketed product Symbicort Turbuhaler in terms of the drug absorbed into the bloodstream.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE
Intervention Trials
Asthma 9
Bioequivalence 1
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 1
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE
Intervention Trials
Asthma 4
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 3
Lung Diseases, Obstructive 2
Lung Diseases 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE
Location Trials
United States 44
Finland 3
United Kingdom 2
Austria 1
Denmark 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE
Location Trials
Oregon 2
Oklahoma 2
Ohio 2
Nebraska 2
Montana 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 4
Phase 1/Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Not yet recruiting 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE
Sponsor Trials
Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma 3
Intech Biopharm Ltd. 2
AstraZeneca 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BUDESONIDE; FORMOTEROL FUMARATE DIHYDRATE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 13
Other 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 25, 2026

Budesonide; Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate (ICS/LABA) Clinical Trials Update, Market Outlook, and Forecast Drivers (2026-2035)

Executive summary

Budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate, an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) combination, remains a core controller therapy in asthma and is used in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in specific geographies and label contexts. Growth is driven by (1) continued guideline adherence to ICS/LABA for patients with exacerbations or inadequate control on monotherapy, (2) substitution dynamics as multiple strengths and device SKUs broaden access, (3) competitive pressure from triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) and newer once-daily inhalers, and (4) incremental life-cycle programs around device performance, particle engineering, and new trial endpoints (exacerbations, lung function, and patient-reported outcomes).
The key market risk over the forecast horizon is class-level erosion from triple therapy uptake and payor preference for lower-cost regimens. Patent and exclusivity posture depends on product-specific formulation, device, and jurisdictional filings, not on the single API pair alone.

What clinical trials are ongoing for budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate in asthma and COPD?

Featured-snippet answer: Current development activity in the budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate class concentrates on comparative efficacy in real-world-like populations, exacerbation reduction, switching studies between inhaler devices, and head-to-head trials versus alternative controller regimens, including ICS/LABA competitors and triple therapy.

Asthma: what trial endpoints are most targeted

Across recent study designs for ICS/LABA combinations using budesonide/formoterol (including studies that compare to other controller strategies), endpoints typically center on:

  • Rate of severe asthma exacerbations over 24 to 52 weeks
  • Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 change from baseline and/or time to treatment failure
  • Symptom control measures (ACQ-5, ACT) and rescue medication use
  • Safety and tolerability, including dysphonia, oral candidiasis, and systemic steroid signals (growth in pediatric cohorts where applicable)

COPD: which study designs repeat for ICS/LABA

In COPD, trials using budesonide/formoterol combinations generally focus on:

  • Exacerbation rate reduction in patients with history of exacerbations
  • Subgroup effects in eosinophil-enriched populations (where label or reimbursement allows)
  • Comparative persistence and adherence outcomes by device type
  • Safety signals related to pneumonia risk, a key ICS class variable

Device switching and usability trials

A large share of practical clinical activity for this combination is not “new drug substance” development but device and regimen optimization:

  • “Switch” trials between inhaler types and strengths
  • Inhaler technique training protocols versus standard-of-care
  • Patient adherence and persistence endpoints, including days covered (where captured)

Trial-phase distribution: what to expect

For established ICS/LABA pairings, development pipelines typically skew toward:

  • Late-stage comparative efficacy and safety studies (Phase 3 or Phase 4)
  • Post-marketing commitments and labeling expansions (Phase 4)
  • Device performance and clinical bridging (Phase 3/4 or device-specific cohorts)

How does budesonide/formoterol compare with fluticasone/salmeterol, mometasone/formoterol, and triple therapy?

Featured-snippet answer: Efficacy and exacerbation outcomes for ICS/LABA are generally comparable within classes, but differentiation for budesonide/formoterol is often device-driven, adherence-driven, and influenced by patient selection, particularly eosinophil strata for COPD and prior exacerbation history.

Competitive comparisons in asthma

Key comparator sets in asthma include:

  • Other ICS/LABA inhalers (fluticasone/salmeterol; mometasone/formoterol; beclomethasone/formoterol where marketed)
  • Single-inhaler maintenance-and-reliever therapy (MART) strategies using formoterol-containing regimens in jurisdictions that support it
  • Triple therapy for patients with persistent uncontrolled disease despite ICS/LABA

Competitive comparisons in COPD

COPD differentiation typically hinges on:

  • ICS class risk-benefit balance in patients with exacerbations
  • EOS biomass markers (blood eosinophils) used for selecting patients most likely to benefit from ICS
  • Triple therapy adoption, where LAMA + LABA + ICS reduces exacerbations and improves lung function more consistently in broader populations

Where budesonide/formoterol can win commercially

  • Patients stable on ICS/LABA regimens, especially where reimbursement supports ICS/LABA controller coverage
  • Formoterol-based MART or reliever frameworks in asthma labels where applicable
  • Device familiarity and refill inertia where patients already use budesonide/formoterol

What is the market size and forecast for budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (2026-2035)?

Featured-snippet answer: Budesonide/formoterol remains a high-volume, mature controller therapy in asthma and a meaningful controller option in COPD where prescribed. Forecast growth is expected to be steady but moderated by triple therapy switching and patent-life-cycle effects on branded economics.

Market model structure for this asset class

A practical projection for budesonide/formoterol is best built from:

  1. Diagnosis incidence and treated-prevalence growth (asthma and COPD)
  2. Controller penetration rates (ICS/LABA uptake vs monotherapy)
  3. Switching dynamics to triple therapy and newer inhaler formats
  4. Pricing erosion: generic competition for branded inhalers, tender pressures, and national formulary dynamics
  5. Patient adherence and device substitution effects

Base-case projection logic (directional)

  • Asthma: modest growth in treated populations and controller adherence, offset by triple therapy expansion and payer-driven step-down.
  • COPD: slower growth than triple therapy segments in markets where triple therapy is incentivized; more durable performance in eosinophil-enriched and exacerbation-focused prescribing.

Forecast drivers and headwinds

Drivers

  • Persistent guideline recommendation for ICS/LABA in uncontrolled asthma
  • Evolving payor models that keep controller combination therapy within preferred tiers
  • Device usability and training programs that reduce discontinuation

Headwinds

  • Triple therapy substitution (ICS/LABA/LAMA) in COPD
  • Class concerns over ICS-associated pneumonia risk influencing physician prescribing patterns
  • Price compression from multiple branded-to-generic transitions by jurisdiction

What are the main revenue levers for branded and generic budesonide/formoterol combinations?

Featured-snippet answer: Revenue is driven less by “molecule IP” and more by formulation/device SKU portfolio, tender pricing, and label-specific positioning in asthma (including MART where allowed) versus COPD exacerbation selection.

SKU and device mix

  • Metered-dose inhaler (MDI) versus dry powder inhaler (DPI) or other delivery formats
  • Strength variations and inhaler usability attributes
  • Regional device approvals that determine substitution velocity

Formulation and lifecycle contributions

  • Particle engineering and aerosol plume optimization where relevant
  • Dose counters, ergonomics, and device training support
  • Product bundling approaches in national programs

Pricing and tender dynamics

  • National tendering in EU and other procurement regimes
  • Wholesale acquisition cost (WAC)-to-generic discount spreads in the US
  • Payor step therapy rules affecting controller switching

What patents protect budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate, and how strong is the patent estate?

Featured-snippet answer: Patent protection is product-specific and typically anchored in combinations, compositions, device delivery features, and manufacturing/process claims rather than broad coverage of the API pair alone.

How to think about “estate strength” for this combination

  • Composition-of-matter: often limited by earlier filings and generic entry realities for well-established combinations
  • Formulation/process patents: can remain active longer if tied to manufacturing improvements or aerosol characteristics
  • Device patents: can create practical barriers if a particular inhaler platform has exclusive improvements

Jurisdictional coverage

Enforceability and claim strength vary widely across:

  • US (Orange Book and patent registration for approved products)
  • EU (national and EPC validation paths; timing driven by EP grant and validations)
  • UK and other jurisdictions with different litigation and exclusivity frameworks

Commercial implication

Even where some formulation or device patents remain, multiple players can often use design-around strategies via alternative particle sizes, excipients, or device platforms, reducing the practical value of “API-level” exclusivity.

When does budesonide/formoterol lose exclusivity in major markets (US, EU, UK)?

Featured-snippet answer: Exclusivity loss is driven by individual product marketing authorization dates and any listed patents in the relevant regulator systems, not by the general drug substance. For mature ICS/LABA combinations, exclusivity windows have largely normalized into generic competition in many jurisdictions, with residual protection mainly from device/formulation patents for specific SKUs.

US-specific pathway framing

  • Orange Book status determines what is protected by patents listed for specific NDA/ANDA products
  • Time-to-generic depends on patent expiration and whether Paragraph IV challenges occurred and settled

EU-specific pathway framing

  • Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) and national validations are key for life-cycle extensions
  • Orphan or pediatric exclusivities typically do not apply for a mature ICS/LABA combination unless specific conditions exist

What Paragraph IV challenges and generic entry risks exist for budesonide/formoterol?

Featured-snippet answer: Generic entry risk is structurally high for established ICS/LABA inhalers due to widespread generic availability, with residual litigation primarily tied to device/formulation patents and product-specific listed patents rather than the active ingredients.

Typical litigation and settlement patterns

  • Challenges tied to listed patents where a brand maintains one or more still-active patents
  • Settlements that allow launch at a defined date or after certain exclusivity milestones
  • Cross-licensing or covenant not to sue based on design-around claims

What is the Orange Book status of budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate?

Featured-snippet answer: Orange Book status is inherently product- and NDA/ANDA-specific; for mature inhaler combinations, many formulations have long transitioned to generic listings. Without specifying the exact branded NDA and strength/device, the Orange Book listing set cannot be mapped cleanly to a single consolidated answer.

What regulatory status and FDA pathway issues affect budesonide/formoterol products?

Featured-snippet answer: The regulatory landscape is dominated by ANDA approvals for generic ICS/LABA combinations and by product-specific labeling and device updates. Any new entrant usually relies on bioequivalence and/or clinical bridging rather than full-scale efficacy trials.

Key FDA considerations for controller inhalers

  • Bioequivalence and inhaler performance
  • Device change reporting and labeling consistency
  • Safety labeling around ICS class risks, including pneumonia signals in COPD where applicable

Label nuances that affect uptake

  • Asthma indication scope, including allowance of reliever use if supported in the jurisdiction
  • COPD patient selection language (exacerbation history, eosinophil enrichment guidance where present)

Where are growth opportunities likely to be concentrated (by geography and payer)?

Featured-snippet answer: Growth is typically concentrated in markets with higher COPD/asthma treated prevalence and stable controller coverage, with muted growth where triple therapy incentives and aggressive tendering push ICS/LABA step-down.

High-potential segments

  • Asthma maintenance populations where adherence programs and controller coverage are stable
  • COPD patients with repeated exacerbations where prescribers favor ICS-containing regimens
  • Regions with slower tender discount cycles or entrenched patient-device fit

Low-growth segments

  • COPD populations rapidly shifting to triple therapy
  • Highly price-competitive markets where branded product economics compress quickly

Commercial projection: scenarios for market share, volumes, and pricing

Featured-snippet answer: Expect volume stability with moderate share pressure from triple therapy and newer inhalers; pricing declines are likely to continue in line with tender and generic penetration.

Three-scenario frame (directional)

  • Base case: steady growth in units in asthma; COPD growth modest with ongoing erosion vs triple therapy
  • Upside: stronger asthma persistence and device-driven adherence gains; better payer retention in ICS/LABA tiering
  • Downside: faster triple therapy substitution and tighter restrictive formularies for ICS-containing doublets in COPD

Key Takeaways

  • Budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate is a mature ICS/LABA controller with durable demand anchored in asthma guideline use and selected COPD prescribing.
  • Competitive pressure is strongest from triple therapy in COPD and from class-equivalent ICS/LABA inhalers in asthma, with differentiation often driven by device and adherence rather than mechanism.
  • Forecast growth is likely steady but constrained by pricing compression, generic substitution, and step-down policies, particularly in COPD where triple therapy benefits are routinely emphasized.
  • Patent protection is product-SKU-specific (formulation/device/manufacturing) and determines litigation and generic timing more than any generic “API pair” exclusivity narrative.

FAQs

  1. How do eosinophil-based prescribing rules change budesonide/formoterol COPD outcomes and utilization?
  2. Which device type (MDI vs DPI) typically drives better adherence for budesonide/formoterol inhaler users?
  3. What real-world factors most influence switching from budesonide/formoterol to triple therapy in COPD?
  4. How do inhaler technique training programs affect exacerbation rates in ICS/LABA regimens including budesonide/formoterol?
  5. What are the most common design-around strategies generics use when device or formulation patents remain listed?

References

(No specific clinical trial registry records, Orange Book entries, or patent numbers were provided in the prompt; therefore no citations can be compiled without risking incorrect attributions.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.