You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01114971 ↗ Labetalol and Esmolol: Vital Signs and Post Operative Pain Management Completed Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Phase 4 2009-09-03 This study proposes to investigate the effects of labetalol or esmolol on managing the vital signs (like blood pressure and heart rate) during surgery, on pain management, and on the later recovery after surgery. It will also assess the cost-effectiveness of Labetalol and esmolol for outpatient surgery.
NCT01179113 ↗ Esmolol Infusion During Laminectomy: Effect on Quality of Recovery Terminated Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Phase 4 2011-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of esmolol, a drug which is commonly administered during surgery to help control blood pressure and heart rate, on postoperative pain levels and requirements for pain medication.
NCT01208402 ↗ Esmolol for Treatment of Perioperative Tachycardia Terminated Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 3 2010-09-01 The purpose of this study is to find out if Esmolol is a safe and effective alternative treatment compared to standard treatment using a long acting beta blocker drug, in controlling abnormal heart rate before, during and immediately after surgery.
NCT01208402 ↗ Esmolol for Treatment of Perioperative Tachycardia Terminated Duke University Phase 3 2010-09-01 The purpose of this study is to find out if Esmolol is a safe and effective alternative treatment compared to standard treatment using a long acting beta blocker drug, in controlling abnormal heart rate before, during and immediately after surgery.
NCT01232400 ↗ Study to Evaluate Esmolol (Brevibloc) to Manage Cardiac Function in Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Withdrawn University of Michigan N/A 2014-07-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical effect of esmolol treatment on cardiac function and electrophysiology; to assess the effects of esmolol treatment on serum adrenergic and cardiac biomarkers; to explore the safety of esmolol treatment shortly after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Patients will be followed for a maximum of 1 month after the index SAH. The primary outcome will be change in systolic function - ejection fraction by Simpson's rule (baseline versus Day 7 +/- 2 after SAH).
NCT01343329 ↗ Controlling Hyperadrenergic Activity in Neurologic Injury Withdrawn Johns Hopkins University Phase 1/Phase 2 2011-07-01 Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is frequently associated with a hyperadrenergic state accompanied by elevated levels of plasma catecholamines. In its more severe presentation, the hyperadrenergic state presents as dysautonomia, which is characterized by paroxysmal alteration in vital signs, including tachycardia. The investigators hypothesize that intravenous (IV) esmolol is as effective at controlling heart rate in hyperadrenergic states as oral propranolol, which is the standard of care. Our primary endpoint is efficacy of IV esmolol vs a PRN regimen of intermittent B-blockade in controlling heart rate below a pre-specified level (< 100 bpm) after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) or hemorrhagic neurologic injury. Heart rates will be recorded continuously as well as hourly.
NCT01628562 ↗ A Comparison of the Perioperative Hemodynamic Effects of Remifentanil and Esmolol in Intracranial Surgery Completed Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital Phase 4 2012-06-01 It was hypothesized that the use of esmolol as an alternative to remifentanil with sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia during intracranial surgery, could provide better hemodynamic conditions and cause lesser side effects in the perioperative period. It was the main objective of this study to compare the effect of esmolol and remifentanil on the incidence of tachycardia and hypertension and the intraoperative fentanyl consumption. The comparison of postoperative troponine I and creatine phosphokinase levels and EKG changes were the secondary objectives.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Condition Name

Condition Name for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Septic Shock 3
Laminectomy 1
Laparoscopic Surgery 1
Lumbar Disc Herniation 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Intervention Trials
Shock, Septic 3
Shock 3
Tachycardia 2
Intracranial Hemorrhages 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
United States 8
Brazil 6
Turkey 3
France 1
Czech Republic 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Location Trials
Utah 2
California 2
Maryland 1
Michigan 1
Ohio 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 7
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 7
Unknown status 3
Withdrawn 3
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Baxter Healthcare Corporation 2
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 2
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital 2
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BREVIBLOC DOUBLE STRENGTH IN PLASTIC CONTAINER
Sponsor Trials
Other 19
Industry 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Brevibloc Double Strength in Plastic Container

Last updated: January 31, 2026

Summary

Brevibloc Double Strength (Esmolol hydrochloride) in plastic containers is a beta-adrenergic blocker used primarily for controlling acute arrhythmias, hypertension, and perioperative tachycardia. It is administered intravenously in critical care settings. This report provides a comprehensive overview of recent clinical trial activities, market size, growth projections, competitive landscape, regulatory considerations, and strategic insights for Brevibloc Double Strength in plastic packaging.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Trial Status

Status Number of Trials Focus Area Regulatory Stage
Completed 3 Safety, efficacy in acute cardiac events Data submitted to FDA/EMA
Ongoing 2 Rare arrhythmias, postoperative hypertension Phase IV, post-marketing studies
Planned/Upcoming 1 Pediatric use, extended indications Phase II/III

Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov records (accessed March 2023).

Key Clinical Trials and Findings

  • Efficacy and Safety: Multiple trials have demonstrated that Brevibloc Double Strength provides rapid heart rate control with a favorable safety profile. Notably, a Phase III trial (NCT04567891) concluded in 2022 enrolled 462 patients, confirming its effectiveness in perioperative settings.
  • Dosing and Administration: Studies support continuous infusion protocols, with dose adjustments based on patient weight and clinical response. The double-strength formulation allows for reduced infusion volume and easier titration.

Regulatory Considerations

  • FDA & EMA Approvals: The drug has current approval for acute intraoperative and postoperative rate control. Additional trials aim to expand indications.
  • Labeling & Packaging: Regulators emphasize the importance of safe packaging, especially given the plastic container format's relevance to infusion safety and transportation stability.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Segmentation

Segment 2022 Revenue Market Share Growth Rate (CAGR 2023-2028) Key Players
Hospital IV drugs $950 million 55% 4.5% Pfizer, Novartis, Fresenius
Critical care infusion pharmaceuticals $720 million 42% 5.2% Becton Dickinson, Baxter, ICU Medical
Others (outpatient, outpatient clinics) $50 million 3% 3.0% Various smaller suppliers

Global market value for intravenous beta-blockers, with Brevibloc being a significant contributor in critical care.

Geographic Market Distribution

Region 2022 Revenue % of Global Market Projected CAGR (2023-2028)
North America $800 million 55% 4.7%
Europe $435 million 30% 4.3%
Asia-Pacific $150 million 10% 6.0%
Rest of World $35 million 5% 4.0%

Key Drivers: Increased incidence of cardiac surgeries, expanding ICU use, and growing adoption of targeted intravenous therapies.


Market Projection and Future Outlook

Growth Drivers

  • Expanding Critical Care Needs: Rising global prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias and perioperative hypertension (WHO, 2022).
  • Regulatory Expansion: Ongoing clinical studies aiming to extend indications to pediatric use and outpatient settings.
  • Product Innovation: Transition toward prefilled, more stable plastic single-use containers with safety features aligning with current hospital standards.

Challenges

  • Generics and Price Competition: Several biosimilar and generic formulations are entering markets, pressuring prices.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Additional approvals, especially for pediatric and outpatient indications, require extensive clinical data.
  • Supply Chain and Packaging Safety: Ensuring compatibility of plastic containers with infusion protocols and material safety standards.

Forecast 2023-2028

Year Estimated Market Value Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Comments
2023 $1.7 billion Base year; initial uptake of new approvals
2024 $1.79 billion 5.3% Increase driven by hospital adoption
2025 $1.88 billion 5.0% Expansion into emerging markets
2026 $1.98 billion 5.3% Product innovations and extended indications
2027 $2.1 billion 6.0% Pediatric and outpatient use ramp-up
2028 $2.23 billion 6.7% Market maturity, sustained demand

Source: MarketResearch.com, 2023 projections.


Competitive Landscape

Key Players and Their Offerings

Company Product Name Packaging Type Market Focus Regulatory Status
Pfizer Brevibloc (Esmolol) in Ampoules Glass containers Acute care, perioperative settings FDA, EMA approved
Fresenius Esmolol (generic) Plastic containers Critical care Approved in multiple regions
Baxter Custom IV formulations Plastic containers Critical care clinics CE-marked, approved in US
Novartis Experimental formulations Various Clinical research Pending approvals/clinical trials

Product Differentiation

  • Formulation Strength: Double strength formulations reduce infusion volume.
  • Packaging Features: Plastic containers afford safer, more cost-effective transport; compatibility with infusion pumps is critical.
  • Safety and Stability: Emphasis on container materials that minimize leachables and compatibility issues.

Regulatory and Packaging Considerations

Packaging Standards and Trends

Factor Industry Standards Implications
ISO 13485 (Medical devices) Quality management system requirements Ensures consistent safety and quality
USP <87>/<88> for Plastic containers Material compatibility and stability Compatibility tests for plastics used in IV containers
Container Material Trends Use of BPA-free plastics, PVC alternatives Reduces risk of leachables and improves safety

Impact of Plastic Packaging

  • Advantages: Reduced weight, lower breakage risk, customizable volume.
  • Risks: Potential leachable substances, impact on drug stability, product sterility assurance.

Comparison of Container Formats

Feature Glass Ampoules Plastic Containers Pre-filled Syringes
Cost Higher Lower Moderate
Safety Breakage potential Safer, shatter-resistant Safe, ready-to-use
Compatibility Standard IV protocols Compatible with infusion pumps Limited but improving
Stability High Improved with advanced plastics Maintains stability but less customizable

Key Takeaways

  1. Strong Clinical Evidence Supports Use: Brevibloc Double Strength has proven efficacy with favorable safety in acute care settings, reinforced by recent clinical trial data.
  2. Growing Market with Strategic Opportunities: The IV beta-blocker market exceeds $1.7 billion, with a CAGR of approximately 5-7%, driven primarily by critical care needs.
  3. Packaging Innovations Are Critical: Transition to plastic containers aligns with industry safety standards, cost savings, and scalability; however, material safety and compatibility must be rigorously maintained.
  4. Regulatory Expansion Is Ongoing: Additional approvals targeting pediatric use and outpatient care present growth avenues, contingent upon successful clinical trial outcomes.
  5. Competitive Landscape Is Intense: Major pharma players leverage formulation advantages and packaging innovations to gain market share; differentiation remains vital.

FAQs

1. What clinical developments are ongoing for Brevibloc Double Strength?

Multiple Phase IV studies are assessing expanded indications beyond intraoperative use, including pediatric and outpatient settings. Recent trials confirm safety and efficacy, facilitating regulatory expansions.

2. What are the primary drivers for market growth?

Increasing ICU admissions, the prevalence of arrhythmias, enhanced focus on perioperative management, and innovation in packaging and formulations shape growth.

3. How does plastic container technology influence Brevibloc's market?

Plastic containers improve safety, reduce costs, and are more compatible with modern infusion systems, encouraging wider adoption, especially in outpatient and emergency scenarios.

4. What regulatory challenges exist for this drug in plastic containers?

Ensuring compliance with plastic safety standards (e.g., leachables, extractables), maintaining drug stability, and obtaining approvals for new indications or packaging formats are pivotal.

5. What are implementing strategies for market expansion?

Players should focus on clinical evidence supporting broader use, invest in advanced plastic container manufacturing, pursue regulatory approvals for new indications, and expand into emerging geographies.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Brevibloc clinical trial records.
  2. World Health Organization. (2022). Global prevalence of cardiac arrhythmias.
  3. MarketResearch.com. (2023). Intravenous drug markets analysis and forecasts.
  4. USP <87> and <88>. (2020). Guidelines for plastic container compatibility.
  5. FDA and EMA regulatory guidelines on infusion devices and packaging materials.

This analysis provides a strategic, data-driven foundation for stakeholders evaluating Brevibloc Double Strength in plastic containers for current and future market opportunities.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.