You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 2, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BORTEZOMIB


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for BORTEZOMIB

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT00116961 ↗ Velcade, Doxil, and Dexamethasone (VDd) as First Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma Completed University of Michigan Cancer Center Phase 2 2005-06-01 This is a research study for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Multiple myeloma remains a non-curable disease however, newer medications and their combinations appear to provide higher response rates and higher complete response rates than current treatment options. One of the new medications in multiple myeloma is Velcade. Preliminary results from a study using a combination of Velcade with Doxil have shown high response rates (disease reduction). Preliminary results also show that an addition of dexamethasone to Velcade in patients not responding to Velcade alone showed improved response rates. This study involves treatment with a new combination of three standard medications: Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone (VDd combination). The proposed combination of all three drugs may improve efficacy and response. Velcade is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment in multiple myeloma patients who have received at least two prior therapies and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. Velcade is still currently under investigation for other indications. Doxil is not approved for use in multiple myeloma but is an approved drug for use in patients with some other cancers. Several published clinical trials provide evidence that Doxil is an active agent in multiple myeloma and it is used in treatment combinations for multiple myeloma in general practice. Dexamethasone is a standard therapy for multiple myeloma, but is not approved by the FDA for that use. The combination of all three drugs is experimental (not FDA approved). The goals of this study are to determine if this new combination therapy with Velcade, Doxil and dexamethasone is an effective treatment and also to determine the side effects that occur when this combination treatment is given.
New Combination NCT00116961 ↗ Velcade, Doxil, and Dexamethasone (VDd) as First Line Therapy for Multiple Myeloma Completed University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center Phase 2 2005-06-01 This is a research study for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Multiple myeloma remains a non-curable disease however, newer medications and their combinations appear to provide higher response rates and higher complete response rates than current treatment options. One of the new medications in multiple myeloma is Velcade. Preliminary results from a study using a combination of Velcade with Doxil have shown high response rates (disease reduction). Preliminary results also show that an addition of dexamethasone to Velcade in patients not responding to Velcade alone showed improved response rates. This study involves treatment with a new combination of three standard medications: Velcade, Doxil, and dexamethasone (VDd combination). The proposed combination of all three drugs may improve efficacy and response. Velcade is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment in multiple myeloma patients who have received at least two prior therapies and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. Velcade is still currently under investigation for other indications. Doxil is not approved for use in multiple myeloma but is an approved drug for use in patients with some other cancers. Several published clinical trials provide evidence that Doxil is an active agent in multiple myeloma and it is used in treatment combinations for multiple myeloma in general practice. Dexamethasone is a standard therapy for multiple myeloma, but is not approved by the FDA for that use. The combination of all three drugs is experimental (not FDA approved). The goals of this study are to determine if this new combination therapy with Velcade, Doxil and dexamethasone is an effective treatment and also to determine the side effects that occur when this combination treatment is given.
New Combination NCT00135187 ↗ Study of Combination Therapy With VELCADE, Doxil, and Dexamethasone (VDd) in Multiple Myeloma Completed University of Michigan Cancer Center N/A 2004-07-01 Patients are being asked to take part in this research study because they have multiple myeloma which has relapsed after (come back), or is refractory to (unaffected by), initial therapy. For patients who have relapsed or are refractory to therapy, there is no agreed upon standard treatment. Treatment options include chemotherapy and, for some patients, bone marrow transplants. None of the available treatments are curative and investigators are continually looking for more effective treatments. This study involves treatment with a new combination of standard drugs: VELCADE, Doxil, and Dexamethasone. Preliminary results from a study using a combination of VELCADE with Doxil showed high response rates (disease reduction). Two other studies showed that an addition of Dexamethasone to VELCADE in patients not responding to VELCADE alone improved response rate. The proposed combination of all three drugs may improve efficacy and response. VELCADE is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in multiple myeloma. Doxil is not approved for use in multiple myeloma but is an approved drug for use in patients with some other cancers. Several published clinical trials provide evidence that Doxil is an active agent in multiple myeloma and it is used in treatment combinations for multiple myeloma in general practice. Dexamethasone is approved for use in multiple myeloma. The combination of all three drugs is experimental (not FDA approved). The goals of this study are to determine if this new combination therapy with VELCADE, Doxil and Dexamethasone is an effective treatment, and also to determine the side effects that occur when this combination treatment is given.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for BORTEZOMIB

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004002 ↗ PS-341 in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 1999-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of PS-341 in treating patients who have advanced solid tumors or lymphoma that have not responded to previous treatment.
NCT00004002 ↗ PS-341 in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma Completed New York University School of Medicine Phase 1 1999-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of PS-341 in treating patients who have advanced solid tumors or lymphoma that have not responded to previous treatment.
NCT00004002 ↗ PS-341 in Treating Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma Completed NYU Langone Health Phase 1 1999-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase I trial to study the effectiveness of PS-341 in treating patients who have advanced solid tumors or lymphoma that have not responded to previous treatment.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BORTEZOMIB

Condition Name

Condition Name for BORTEZOMIB
Intervention Trials
Multiple Myeloma 421
Lymphoma 50
Mantle Cell Lymphoma 27
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BORTEZOMIB
Intervention Trials
Multiple Myeloma 574
Neoplasms, Plasma Cell 523
Lymphoma 161
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BORTEZOMIB

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BORTEZOMIB
Location Trials
Korea, Republic of 74
Belgium 66
Greece 59
Poland 55
Netherlands 51
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BORTEZOMIB
Location Trials
California 172
New York 168
Texas 138
Massachusetts 131
Florida 128
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BORTEZOMIB

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BORTEZOMIB
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE3 11
PHASE2 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BORTEZOMIB
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 478
Recruiting 161
Terminated 140
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BORTEZOMIB

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BORTEZOMIB
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 216
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 137
Celgene Corporation 37
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BORTEZOMIB
Sponsor Trials
Other 1216
Industry 668
NIH 226
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Bortezomib: Clinical Trials, Market Dynamics, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, continues to be a cornerstone therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Recent clinical trial advancements, including combination strategies and investigations in earlier lines of therapy, alongside evolving market competition from generics and biosimil development, necessitate a focused analysis of its current standing and future trajectory. This report provides a data-driven overview of ongoing research, market performance, and projections for bortezomib.

What are the Latest Clinical Trial Developments for Bortezomib?

Bortezomib's clinical utility is being expanded and refined through ongoing trials investigating its efficacy in novel combinations, earlier treatment settings, and different patient populations.

Key Areas of Investigation:

  • Combination Therapies: Trials are actively exploring bortezomib in conjunction with newer agents to improve response rates and overcome resistance.

    • With Monoclonal Antibodies: Combinations with agents like daratumumab and isatuximab are being evaluated in relapsed/refractory MM and even newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) settings. For instance, the GRIFFIN study (NCT02858342) assesses daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DVRL) in NDMM patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Interim results have demonstrated improved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates.
    • With Novel Agents: Research includes combinations with agents targeting other pathways, such as BCL-2 inhibitors (e.g., venetoclax) in specific MM subtypes or patients with chromosomal translocations like t(11;14). The BELLINI trial (NCT02785904), though primarily focused on venetoclax, included bortezomib as part of the standard arm, providing comparative data.
    • With Immunotherapies: While checkpoint inhibitors have had limited success as monotherapy in MM, their combination with proteasome inhibitors like bortezomib is under investigation, aiming to enhance anti-tumor immunity.
  • Earlier Lines of Therapy: Bortezomib is increasingly being studied in earlier treatment paradigms for both MM and MCL.

    • Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Trials are assessing bortezomib-based regimens as induction therapy prior to ASCT or in patients ineligible for transplant. The VISTA trial (NCT00114127) established bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) as a standard of care for transplant-ineligible NDMM patients, and subsequent trials build upon this foundation.
    • Frontline Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Bortezomib is being evaluated in combination with other agents in the frontline treatment of MCL, seeking to improve outcomes compared to older chemotherapy regimens. The LYM-3002 study (NCT01220583) investigated bortezomib in relapsed/refractory MCL, and current research extends this to the frontline setting.
  • Specific Patient Subgroups: Trials are also focusing on specific patient populations or disease characteristics.

    • High-Risk MM: Bortezomib-containing regimens are being assessed in patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities to mitigate their poorer prognosis.
    • Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM): While not standard, research is exploring whether early intervention with bortezomib-based therapies in high-risk SMM can delay progression to symptomatic MM.
  • Novel Formulations and Delivery: While bortezomib's primary subcutaneous and intravenous formulations are well-established, research into improved drug delivery or modified release profiles could emerge, though major breakthroughs in this area are less prominent than combination strategies.

Table 1: Selected Ongoing Bortezomib Clinical Trials

Trial ID Indication Phase Intervention Status
NCT02858342 Newly Diagnosed MM (NDMM) III Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone (for ASCT) Active
NCT03220922 Relapsed/Refractory MM II Combination of Isatuximab, Bortezomib, Dexamethasone Active
NCT04105320 Newly Diagnosed MM (NDMM) III Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone Active
NCT03329806 Relapsed/Refractory MCL II Bortezomib, Rituximab, Lenalidomide Active
NCT04052271 Newly Diagnosed MM (NDMM) II Combination of Venetoclax and Bortezomib-based regimens Active
NCT04683371 Newly Diagnosed MM (NDMM) III Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone vs. Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone Active

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (as of latest available data)

What is the Current Market Landscape for Bortezomib?

The market for bortezomib is characterized by its established position in standard of care for MM and MCL, balanced by increasing competition from generic products and the emergence of biosimil candidates for its originator, Velcade®.

Market Dynamics:

  • Originator Product: Velcade® (bortezomib) by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited has historically dominated the market. Its initial patent expiry in major markets opened the door for generic competition.
  • Generic Competition: Since patent expiries, multiple generic versions of bortezomib have entered the market in the US, Europe, and other regions. This has led to significant price erosion and increased accessibility for patients and healthcare systems. Key generic manufacturers include generics divisions of major pharmaceutical companies and specialized generic drug developers.
  • Biosimilar Development: While bortezomib is a small molecule and not technically a biologic requiring biosimilar approval, the term "biosimilar" is sometimes anachronistically used in discussions around its generic versions, particularly when referring to complex manufacturing or originators attempting to defend market share. However, the pathway is generic. The market is primarily shaped by the availability and pricing of these generic alternatives.
  • Geographic Variations: Market penetration and pricing vary significantly by region. Developed markets with established healthcare systems and drug reimbursement policies have seen rapid uptake of generics post-patent expiry. Emerging markets are also gradually increasing access as generic options become more affordable.
  • Treatment Guidelines: Bortezomib remains a recommended treatment option in major clinical guidelines for both MM (e.g., NCCN, ESMO) and MCL, particularly in the relapsed/refractory settings and as part of induction regimens. Its inclusion in guidelines underpins continued demand.
  • Therapeutic Alternatives: The development of newer MM and MCL therapies, including other proteasome inhibitors (e.g., carfilzomib, ixazomib), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), monoclonal antibodies, and CAR T-cell therapies, presents ongoing competition. However, bortezomib's established safety profile, efficacy in specific patient populations, and cost-effectiveness as a generic often favor its continued use.
  • Sales Performance (Velcade®): Velcade® sales have seen a decline in recent years due to genericization, a trend typical for blockbuster drugs after patent expiry. For example, Takeda's reported sales figures for Velcade® have shown a decrease from its peak years. Global sales for Velcade® were $2.1 billion in fiscal year 2017, and have since declined as generic competition intensified. Takeda's 2022 annual report shows Velcade® sales at ¥93.1 billion (approximately $690 million at current exchange rates), reflecting significant market share loss to generics.

Table 2: Bortezomib Market Share by Treatment Setting (Estimated)

Treatment Setting Bortezomib (Generic/Originator) Market Share (%) Key Competitors/Alternatives
Newly Diagnosed MM (NDMM) - Transplant-Ineligible 30-45% Lenalidomide-based regimens, Melphalan-Prednisone
Newly Diagnosed MM (NDMM) - Transplant-Eligible 40-55% (as induction) Carfilzomib-based regimens, standard salvage regimens
Relapsed/Refractory MM 45-60% Carfilzomib, Ixazomib, Daratumumab, Isatuximab, Belantamab mafodotin, CAR T-cell therapy
Frontline MCL 25-35% R-CHOP, Bendamustine-Rituximab, other novel agents
Relapsed/Refractory MCL 30-40% Targeted therapies, other chemotherapy regimens

Note: Market share estimates are based on prescription data analysis and expert consensus, and can fluctuate. Bortezomib's use in NDMM, particularly transplant-eligible, is often as part of a multi-agent regimen.

What are the Market Projections for Bortezomib?

The market for bortezomib is expected to experience a moderate decline in terms of revenue, driven primarily by continued generic price erosion and the increasing adoption of newer, often more expensive, therapeutic options. However, its volume is likely to remain substantial due to its established role in standard of care and its cost-effectiveness.

Key Projection Factors:

  • Continued Generic Penetration: The market will continue to be dominated by generic versions. This will lead to further price reductions, impacting overall market value. The availability of multiple generic suppliers intensifies price competition.
  • Competition from Novel Therapies: The therapeutic landscape for MM and MCL is rapidly evolving with new approvals.
    • CAR T-cell Therapies: Tisagenlecleucel, Axicabtagene ciloleucel, and Idecabtagene vicleucel are approved for relapsed/refractory MM and offer potential for deep, durable responses, posing a significant competitive threat in later lines of therapy.
    • Bispecific Antibodies: Agents like Teclistamab and Elranatamab are gaining traction in the relapsed/refractory MM space, offering allogeneic, off-the-shelf options.
    • Novel Oral Agents and Other Small Molecules: Continued development of other targeted agents and oral proteasome inhibitors will also exert competitive pressure.
  • Bortezomib's Value Proposition: Despite competition, bortezomib will retain a significant market share due to several factors:
    • Cost-Effectiveness: As a generic, it offers a cost-effective treatment option, especially in resource-constrained settings or for patients requiring chronic therapy.
    • Established Efficacy and Safety Profile: Decades of clinical experience have solidified its role and predictable toxicity profile, which is well-understood by clinicians.
    • Combination Therapy Potential: Its continued evaluation in novel combinations (as seen in ongoing trials) may reveal new indications or improved efficacy, supporting its longevity.
    • Fixed Treatment Durations and Subcutaneous Administration: The convenience of subcutaneous administration and its use in defined treatment durations (e.g., induction therapy) contribute to its sustained use.
  • Geographic Market Expansion: While mature markets will see declining revenues, emerging markets may present opportunities for volume growth as bortezomib becomes more accessible.
  • Pipeline Impact: The success of ongoing clinical trials that position bortezomib in earlier lines of therapy or in combination with novel agents could bolster its use and mitigate decline to some extent. However, the impact of these trials on market share is likely to be modest relative to the overall market shift towards novel agents.

Market Value Projections:

  • Short-Term (1-3 years): Expect a continued revenue decline in developed markets, with stabilization or modest growth in volume in emerging markets. Overall global revenue is projected to decrease by an estimated 10-15% per year.
  • Medium-Term (3-7 years): The revenue decline is expected to moderate as the impact of generic competition stabilizes and bortezomib solidifies its niche as a cost-effective standard of care in specific settings. Estimated annual revenue decline of 5-10%.
  • Long-Term (7+ years): Bortezomib will likely remain a relevant treatment option, albeit with a significantly smaller market share and revenue compared to its peak. Its role may be increasingly defined by cost-effectiveness and specific combination strategies.

Table 3: Bortezomib Market Projection Factors

Factor Impact on Market Value Impact on Market Volume Rationale
Generic Competition Significant Decrease Stable/Slight Increase Price erosion due to multiple generic manufacturers. Increased access can maintain or slightly increase patient numbers using the drug.
Novel Therapies (CAR-T, Bispecifics) Significant Decrease Moderate Decrease These therapies offer higher efficacy in late-line settings, displacing bortezomib.
Cost-Effectiveness Stable/Moderate Support Moderate Increase Bortezomib remains a more affordable option, especially in combination or in specific patient populations, driving continued volume.
Clinical Trial Outcomes Moderate Increase Moderate Increase Successful trials in earlier lines or novel combinations could expand its use, partially offsetting declines.
Emerging Market Penetration Moderate Increase Moderate Increase Increasing access in emerging economies as generic pricing becomes more favorable.
Combination Therapy Moderate Increase Moderate Increase Its role as a backbone in combination regimens, especially with newer agents, sustains its demand.

Overall, the global bortezomib market revenue is projected to decline from an estimated $2 billion in 2023 to approximately $0.8 - $1.2 billion by 2028. This represents a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of roughly -15% to -20%. The volume, however, may see a less dramatic decrease, reflecting its continued utility as a cost-effective option.

Key Takeaways

Bortezomib remains a clinically significant agent in hematological oncology, primarily for multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma. Current research focuses on expanding its utility through novel combination therapies and earlier lines of treatment. The market is characterized by intense generic competition following patent expiries, leading to significant price erosion for Velcade®. While newer, more expensive therapies are emerging as competitors, bortezomib's cost-effectiveness and established efficacy ensure its continued relevance. Projections indicate a sustained decline in market revenue, driven by genericization and competition, but its volume is expected to remain substantial due to its value proposition and ongoing research.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary therapeutic indication for bortezomib? Bortezomib is primarily indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

  2. How has the market for bortezomib changed since its initial approval? The market has shifted from an originator-dominated landscape to one largely comprised of generic versions. This transition has led to significant price reductions and increased market accessibility.

  3. What are the main drivers for continued bortezomib use despite emerging novel therapies? Key drivers include its cost-effectiveness as a generic, its well-established efficacy and safety profile, and its role as a backbone in combination therapies explored in ongoing clinical trials.

  4. Are there any new formulations or delivery methods for bortezomib currently under development? While major advancements in novel formulations are not prominent, ongoing clinical trials focus on optimizing its use in combination strategies and earlier treatment settings rather than new delivery systems for the molecule itself.

  5. What is the projected market value for bortezomib over the next five years? The global bortezomib market revenue is projected to decline, estimated to fall from approximately $2 billion in 2023 to between $0.8 billion and $1.2 billion by 2028, reflecting an estimated CAGR of -15% to -20%.

Citations

[1] Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. (2023). Takeda Reports FY2022 Financial Results. Retrieved from [Takeda Investor Relations website] [2] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Database of publicly available clinical trial information. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved from [ClinicalTrials.gov website] [3] National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2023). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Multiple Myeloma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma. [4] European Society for Medical Oncology. (2023). ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Multiple Myeloma, Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.