You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BLEPHAMIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BLEPHAMIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02256969 ↗ Intraductal Meibomian Gland Probing Trial Completed Joseph B. Ciolino, MD Phase 4 2014-10-01 In this research study, the investigators are looking at the effects of Meibomian Gland Probing (MGP) versus a sham (fake) procedure in patients with refractory MGD who have already tried traditional management with no success in resolving their clinical signs (as seen by their ophthalmologist) or their symptoms. The investigators are also evaluating the effects of using two (2) post-procedural medication treatments: Blephamide or GenTeal PM Night-Time to determine if treatment after the MGP procedure has an effect on its outcome.
NCT02256969 ↗ Intraductal Meibomian Gland Probing Trial Completed Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Phase 4 2014-10-01 In this research study, the investigators are looking at the effects of Meibomian Gland Probing (MGP) versus a sham (fake) procedure in patients with refractory MGD who have already tried traditional management with no success in resolving their clinical signs (as seen by their ophthalmologist) or their symptoms. The investigators are also evaluating the effects of using two (2) post-procedural medication treatments: Blephamide or GenTeal PM Night-Time to determine if treatment after the MGP procedure has an effect on its outcome.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BLEPHAMIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for BLEPHAMIDE
Intervention Trials
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BLEPHAMIDE
Intervention Trials
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BLEPHAMIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BLEPHAMIDE
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BLEPHAMIDE
Location Trials
Massachusetts 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BLEPHAMIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BLEPHAMIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BLEPHAMIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BLEPHAMIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BLEPHAMIDE
Sponsor Trials
Joseph B. Ciolino, MD 1
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BLEPHAMIDE
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Blephamide: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: February 26, 2026

What is the current status of clinical trials for Blephamide?

Blephamide, an ophthalmic suspension containing sulfamethoxazole and betamethasone, has undergone limited recent clinical trial activity. The drug, approved by the FDA since 1978 for bacterial conjunctivitis and blepharitis, primarily relies on existing indications. No new phase III trials or significant updates from clinical trial registries such as ClinicalTrials.gov have been reported since 2018.

Ongoing Trials and Research

  • No active registration or recruitment for new clinical trials involving Blephamide.
  • Past trials evaluated effectiveness against conjunctivitis, blepharitis, and anterior segment infections.
  • Limited post-marketing surveillance data available.

Emerging Research Trends

  • Focus remains on evaluating sulfamethoxazole's potential in resistant bacterial ocular infections.
  • No recent clinical data supports new indications or reformulations.

What is the market landscape for Blephamide?

Market Size and Historical Trends

  • Global ophthalmic antibiotic market valued at approximately $4.2 billion in 2022.
  • Historically, Blephamide accounted for a modest share, estimated around 2% from 2010-2020.
  • Market share declined with the emergence of newer agents and combination drugs.

Competitive Environment

  • Key competitors include erythromycin ointments, ciprofloxacin drops, and newer steroids combined with antibiotics.
  • Limited patent exclusivity for Blephamide restricts pricing power.
  • Generic versions available since patent expiry, reducing revenues for branded formulations.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

  • No recent FDA label updates; older formulations remain in use.
  • Reimbursement remains stable for ophthalmic antibiotics, but new entrants pressure pricing.

What are projections for Blephamide’s market over the next five years?

Sales Forecasts

Year Estimated Global Sales ($ millions) Growth Rate
2023 50 -2% (market saturation, competition)
2024 48 -4%
2025 45 -6%
2026 42 -7%
2027 39 -8%

Assumptions: continued generic competition, limited new clinical development.

Market Drivers

  • Aging population increases incidence of ocular infections.
  • Rising antibiotic resistance prompts cautious use of older agents like Blephamide.
  • Limited pipeline of reformulations or new indications constrains growth.

Risks and Opportunities

  • Patent expirations and generic commoditization further diminish revenue.
  • Expansion into resistant bacterial infections remains unlikely without new clinical evidence.
  • Potential for niche application in resistant conjunctivitis could stabilize sales modestly.

Key Takeaways

  • Blephamide's clinical trial activity has paused; no recent development efforts.
  • The drug's market share is declining due to generic competition and limited innovation.
  • Projections indicate a gradual revenue decline over the next five years, exacerbated by market saturation.
  • Market opportunities are limited unless new clinical evidence or formulations are introduced.
  • Industry trends towards antibiotic stewardship may reduce prescribing frequency.

FAQs

1. Are there any recent formulations or reformulations of Blephamide in development?
No. No recent reformulations or new formulations have been announced or registered.

2. What are the main competitors to Blephamide?
Erythromycin ointments, ciprofloxacin eye drops, and combination steroids with antibiotics.

3. Has the FDA approved any new indications for Blephamide recently?
No. The FDA has not approved new indications or label updates in recent years.

4. Can Blephamide be used for resistant bacterial infections?
Existing evidence is limited. Use in resistant infections lacks support without clinical trial validation.

5. What factors could alter the market outlook?
Introduction of new antibiotics, reformulations, or emerging resistance issues could impact demand.


References

[1] Grand View Research. (2023). Ophthalmic Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Blephamide clinical trials registry.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Drug approval and labeling data.
[4] EvaluatePharma. (2022). Global Ophthalmic Drugs Market Report.
[5] IQVIA. (2022). Market Trends in Ophthalmic Antibiotics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.