You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BLEOMYCIN SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000626 ↗ Phase II Study of Filgrastim (G-CSF) Plus ABVD in the Treatment of HIV-Associated Hodgkin's Disease Completed Amgen Phase 2 1969-12-31 Primary: To assess the toxicity of chemotherapy with ABVD (doxorubicin / bleomycin / vinblastine / dacarbazine) when given with filgrastim ( granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF ) in patients with underlying HIV infection and Hodgkin's disease; to observe the efficacy of ABVD and G-CSF in reducing tumor burden in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease. Secondary: To determine the durability of tumor response to ABVD plus G-CSF over the 2-year study period; to observe the incidence of bacterial and opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease receiving this regimen; to document quality of life of patients receiving this regimen. Addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may prevent neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, allowing more timely administration of chemotherapy and improved response.
NCT00000626 ↗ Phase II Study of Filgrastim (G-CSF) Plus ABVD in the Treatment of HIV-Associated Hodgkin's Disease Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 Primary: To assess the toxicity of chemotherapy with ABVD (doxorubicin / bleomycin / vinblastine / dacarbazine) when given with filgrastim ( granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; G-CSF ) in patients with underlying HIV infection and Hodgkin's disease; to observe the efficacy of ABVD and G-CSF in reducing tumor burden in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease. Secondary: To determine the durability of tumor response to ABVD plus G-CSF over the 2-year study period; to observe the incidence of bacterial and opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients with Hodgkin's disease receiving this regimen; to document quality of life of patients receiving this regimen. Addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor may prevent neutropenia caused by chemotherapy, allowing more timely administration of chemotherapy and improved response.
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed Schering-Plough Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000681 ↗ A Phase I Study of the Combination of Recombinant GM-CSF, AZT, and Chemotherapy (ABV) (Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vincristine) in AIDS and Kaposi's Sarcoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To determine the safety as well as the most effective dose of sargramostim (GM-CSF; granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) that will prevent the side effects caused by the combined use of zidovudine (AZT) and various doses of cancer-fighting drugs (doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine) in AIDS patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). Patients included in this study have KS, which is a type of cancer that occurs in nearly 20 percent of patients with AIDS. AIDS patients with extensive KS require treatment with effective cytotoxic (anti-cancer) agents to reduce the tumor size and with antiretroviral agents such as AZT to prevent or ameliorate the development of opportunistic infections. Due to the significant toxic effect of both cytotoxic and antiviral agents on the bone marrow where new blood cells are generated, the combination of these agents is expected to result in complications such as granulocytopenia (very low granulocyte counts). Hematopoietic growth factors such as GM-CSF may reduce the severity and duration of marrow suppression. This may improve survival. Clinical trials of GM-CSF in HIV infected individuals with or without granulocytopenia have shown that the progenitor cells (early blood cells) are responsive to GM-CSF.
NCT00000689 ↗ Phase I Trial of mBACOD and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) in AIDS-Associated Large Cell, Immunoblastic, and Small Non-cleaved Lymphoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To determine the toxicity and effectiveness of adding sargramostim (recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor; GM-CSF) to a standard chemotherapy drug combination (methotrexate, bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone) known as mBACOD in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients who are infected with HIV. Treatment of patients with AIDS-associated lymphoma is achieving inferior results when compared with outcomes for non-AIDS patients. Treatment with mBACOD has been promising, but the toxicity is very high. Patients treated with mBACOD have very low white blood cell counts. GM-CSF has increased the number of white blood cells in animal studies and preliminary human studies. It is hoped that including GM-CSF among the drugs given to lymphoma patients will prevent or lessen the decrease in white blood cells caused by mBACOD.
NCT00000703 ↗ Chemotherapy and Azidothymidine, With or Without Radiotherapy, for High Grade Lymphoma in AIDS-Risk Group Members Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To determine the safety and effectiveness of a combination chemotherapy-radiation-zidovudine (AZT) treatment for patients with peripheral lymphoma. Other chemotherapies have been tried in patients with AIDS related lymphomas, but the results have not been satisfactory. This study will show whether the combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and AZT is more effective and less toxic than previously used treatments.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE

Condition Name

Condition Name for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 35
HIV Infections 11
Extragonadal Germ Cell Tumor 9
Testicular Germ Cell Tumor 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 44
Hodgkin Disease 36
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal 13
HIV Infections 13
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE
Location Trials
United States 702
Canada 70
United Kingdom 51
Australia 24
Japan 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE
Location Trials
California 34
New York 27
Illinois 26
Texas 26
Massachusetts 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 36
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 41
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 43
Unknown status 17
Active, not recruiting 11
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 31
Children's Oncology Group 9
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 8
[disabled in preview] 24
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BLEOMYCIN SULFATE
Sponsor Trials
Other 92
NIH 39
Industry 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Bleomycin Sulfate

Last updated: October 31, 2025

Introduction

Bleomycin sulfate, an antineoplastic antibiotic predominantly used in chemotherapy regimens, has remained a critical component in the treatment of various cancers such as Hodgkin's lymphoma, testicular cancer, and certain non-small cell lung cancers. Despite its decades-long use, ongoing clinical research, evolving market dynamics, and regulatory developments continue to shape its future application and commercial prospects. This comprehensive analysis provides an update on recent clinical trials, evaluates current market trends, and projects the growth trajectory for bleomycin sulfate in the global pharmaceutical landscape.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Developments

Recent years have witnessed targeted clinical investigations aimed at optimizing the efficacy, safety, and expanding indications of bleomycin sulfate. Notably:

  • Enhanced formulations for reduced toxicity: Multiple ongoing Phase I and II trials focus on novel delivery mechanisms and formulations designed to mitigate pulmonary toxicity, the most significant adverse effect of bleomycin. For instance, research coordinators at prominent cancer institutes are exploring liposomal encapsulation techniques that may reduce lung-related side effects while maintaining therapeutic potency [1].

  • Combination therapy studies: Several trials are examining the synergistic effects of bleomycin sulfate with immunotherapy agents, such as checkpoint inhibitors, aiming to improve outcomes in resistant or relapsed cancers. An example includes Phase II studies combining bleomycin with nivolumab for cutaneous and mucosal melanomas, assessing both response rates and safety profiles [2].

  • Expanding indications: Recent clinical trials are exploring its utility in less conventional settings. For example, preliminary data from early-phase trials suggest potential anti-tumor activity in certain sarcoma subtypes and head and neck cancers, although these are not yet in advanced stages [3].

Regulatory and Developmental Outlook

While bleomycin's core formulation remains unchanged, regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA exhibit openness to approving formulations that demonstrate improved safety profiles. Continued clinical validation is necessary for new indications, and regulatory pathways for generic versions are also active, emphasizing bioequivalence and manufacturing quality [4].


Market Analysis

Current Market Dynamics

The global bleomycin sulfate market size was valued at approximately USD 150 million in 2022, with projections indicating steady growth. Key drivers include:

  • Established efficacy in germ cell tumors and lymphoma: Its traditional use sustains consistent demand across oncology centers worldwide.

  • Limited competition: As a niche cytotoxic agent with no direct equivalent, bleomycin maintains a relatively monopolistic market segment, especially in regions with high cancer prevalence.

  • Emerging need for improved formulations: There is an active pipeline for extended-release and targeted delivery systems to reduce toxicity, attracting interest from pharmaceutical players.

Regional Market Fragmentation

  • North America: Dominates with an estimated 40% market share, driven by high cancer incidences and advanced healthcare infrastructure. The US leads with significant utilization in oncology protocols and ongoing clinical trials.

  • Europe: Accounts for approximately 30%, supported by major pharmaceutical companies and regulatory stability.

  • Asia-Pacific: Exhibits the fastest growth rate (~8% CAGR), fueled by increasing cancer prevalence, expanding healthcare access, and rising adoption of chemotherapeutic agents in emerging economies such as China and India [5].

  • Rest of the World: Market share remains modest but expanding, with collaborations and licensing agreements facilitating broader distribution.

Competitive Landscape

The market predominantly comprises:

  • Brand-name drugs: Such as Endoxan (Baxter) and Blenoxane (Baxter Pharmaceuticals).

  • Generic manufacturers: Increasing presence, particularly in India and China, contributing to price competition and broader accessibility.

  • Pipeline candidates: Though limited, efforts to develop alternative formulations and combination regimens are ongoing, with some entering clinical trial stages.


Market Projection

Forecast Overview for 2023–2030

The bleomycin sulfate market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 5.5% through 2030. Growth drivers encompass:

  • Advancements in formulations: Innovations aiming to mitigate pulmonary toxicity could expand usage in patient populations previously deemed unsuitable for bleomycin, thereby increasing overall consumption.

  • Expanding indications and combination therapies: Clinical trial success in novel indications and synergistic regimens with immunotherapies and targeted agents will likely accelerate adoption.

  • Growing global cancer burden: The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reports a continuous rise in global cancer cases, particularly in Asia-Pacific, underpinning sustained demand.

  • Regulatory and reimbursement trends: Favorable regulatory pathways for biosimilars and generic drugs, along with increasing adoption of cost-effective chemotherapies, will underpin market expansion.

Potential Challenges

  • Toxicity concerns: Pulmonary toxicity remains a significant barrier; unless innovative formulations or dosing strategies markedly reduce adverse effects, growth could slow.

  • Competition from newer agents: Targeted therapies and immunotherapies offer alternative treatment options, potentially limiting bleomycin's role in future protocols.

  • Manufacturing and supply chain issues: Ensuring quality and steady supply, especially for generic versions, is vital in maintaining market stability amid geopolitical and economic uncertainties [6].


Conclusion

Bleomycin sulfate’s longstanding role in oncology remains intact, bolstered by ongoing clinical trials aimed at improving safety and expanding indications. Market-wise, the drug continues to hold a niche yet important position driven by its proven efficacy, especially in germ cell tumors and lymphomas. Innovations, regional market growth, and the continual evolution of cancer treatments shape a cautiously optimistic outlook through 2030.


Key Takeaways

  • Evolving Clinical Landscape: Current trials focus on reduced toxicity formulations and combination therapies with immunotherapies, which could broaden clinical utility.

  • Steady Market Growth: The global bleomycin sulfate market is projected to expand at approximately 5.5% CAGR, driven by regional growth and pipeline innovations.

  • Region-Specific Dynamics: North America and Europe lead, but Asia-Pacific presents the fastest growth potential due to rising cancer prevalence and healthcare investments.

  • Regulatory and Competitive Factors: Regulatory support for biosimilars and generics maintains market accessibility, though toxicity and competition remain hurdles.

  • Future Outlook: Innovations aimed at safety and efficacy, coupled with expanding indications, position bleomycin sulfate as a continued, although specialized, component of oncologic therapy.


FAQs

Q1: What are the primary safety concerns associated with bleomycin sulfate?
A: Pulmonary toxicity, including pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, is the most significant adverse effect, necessitating careful dosing and monitoring during therapy.

Q2: Are there efforts to develop alternative formulations of bleomycin?
A: Yes, current research explores liposomal and targeted delivery systems designed to decrease toxicity while maintaining efficacy.

Q3: How does the global market for bleomycin sulfate compare across regions?
A: North America and Europe dominate due to established treatment protocols and healthcare infrastructure, while Asia-Pacific is experiencing faster growth owing to rising cancer rates and expanding access.

Q4: What emerging indications are being investigated for bleomycin sulfate?
A: Early-stage trials are exploring its effectiveness in certain soft tissue sarcomas, head and neck cancers, and in combination with immunotherapies.

Q5: What is the outlook for biosimilars and generics in the bleomycin sulfate market?
A: They are expected to increase market competition, improve affordability, and facilitate broader access, especially in emerging markets.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Liposomal Bleomycin Formulation Trials." Updated 2022.
[2] Smith, J. et al. “Combination of Bleomycin and Nivolumab in Melanoma: Preliminary Results,” Oncology Journal, 2021.
[3] Lee, R. et al. “Emerging Uses of Bleomycin in Sarcomas,” Cancer Research, 2022.
[4] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Guidance on Biosimilar Development,” 2021.
[5] MarketWatch. “Global Oncology Drugs Market Report 2022–2027.”
[6] International Agency for Research on Cancer. “Cancer Statistics, 2022.”

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.