You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BINOSTO


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BINOSTO

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02781805 ↗ Pilot Study of Bisphosphonates for Breast Cancer Terminated National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 2016-08-05 The goal of this study is to mechanistically define the potential anticancer activities of the osteoporosis bisphosphonate (BP) drug alendronate, and extend the analysis to learn novel information about the impact of BP on gamma delta (γδ) T cells in breast tissues as well as epithelial breast cell differentiation of high-risk women. To this end, we have designed a BP "window trial" to examine the effect of 1 - 3 weeks administration of alendronate on women at high-risk for breast cancer, at the level of immunosurveillance and mammary epithelial cell differentiation.
NCT02781805 ↗ Pilot Study of Bisphosphonates for Breast Cancer Terminated Wisconsin Partnership Program Phase 1 2016-08-05 The goal of this study is to mechanistically define the potential anticancer activities of the osteoporosis bisphosphonate (BP) drug alendronate, and extend the analysis to learn novel information about the impact of BP on gamma delta (γδ) T cells in breast tissues as well as epithelial breast cell differentiation of high-risk women. To this end, we have designed a BP "window trial" to examine the effect of 1 - 3 weeks administration of alendronate on women at high-risk for breast cancer, at the level of immunosurveillance and mammary epithelial cell differentiation.
NCT02781805 ↗ Pilot Study of Bisphosphonates for Breast Cancer Terminated University of Wisconsin, Madison Phase 1 2016-08-05 The goal of this study is to mechanistically define the potential anticancer activities of the osteoporosis bisphosphonate (BP) drug alendronate, and extend the analysis to learn novel information about the impact of BP on gamma delta (γδ) T cells in breast tissues as well as epithelial breast cell differentiation of high-risk women. To this end, we have designed a BP "window trial" to examine the effect of 1 - 3 weeks administration of alendronate on women at high-risk for breast cancer, at the level of immunosurveillance and mammary epithelial cell differentiation.
NCT04403698 ↗ The Use of Steovess/Binosto After Denosumab Discontinuation to Prevent Increase in Bone Turnover Recruiting Amgen Phase 2 2019-11-13 It is hypothesized that effervescent alendronate will be able to maintain bone turnover markers within the pre-menopausal reference range and thereby reducing the likelihood of bone turnover associated changes (rebound effect), after discontinuation of denosumab treatment in a non-osteoporotic population.
NCT04403698 ↗ The Use of Steovess/Binosto After Denosumab Discontinuation to Prevent Increase in Bone Turnover Recruiting EffRx Pharmaceuticals Phase 2 2019-11-13 It is hypothesized that effervescent alendronate will be able to maintain bone turnover markers within the pre-menopausal reference range and thereby reducing the likelihood of bone turnover associated changes (rebound effect), after discontinuation of denosumab treatment in a non-osteoporotic population.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BINOSTO

Condition Name

Condition Name for BINOSTO
Intervention Trials
Sickle Cell Disease 1
Avascular Necrosis 1
Breast Neoplasms 1
Erosive Osteoarthritis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BINOSTO
Intervention Trials
Osteonecrosis 1
Necrosis 1
Anemia, Sickle Cell 1
Osteoarthritis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BINOSTO

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BINOSTO
Location Trials
Belgium 1
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BINOSTO
Location Trials
Wisconsin 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BINOSTO

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BINOSTO
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 2 2
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BINOSTO
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Not yet recruiting 1
Recruiting 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BINOSTO

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BINOSTO
Sponsor Trials
Wisconsin Partnership Program 1
University of Wisconsin, Madison 1
Amgen 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BINOSTO
Sponsor Trials
Other 6
NIH 2
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for BINOSTO (Fosfestrol)

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

Binosto (tradename for fosfestrol) is a phosphatase-resistant oral estrogen used primarily in the management of prostate cancer, particularly for hormone therapy. While historically utilized in certain regions, recent developments, clinical trial activity, and market dynamics have shaped its current standing and future prospects. This analysis provides a comprehensive update on clinical trials, examines market trends, and projects future growth pathways for Binosto, tailored for stakeholders seeking data-driven insights.


Clinical Trials Update

Historical Clinical Context

Fosfestrol, a synthetic estrogen, primarily functions by suppressing testosterone levels, thus inhibiting prostate tumor growth. It has been employed in androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) but has seen varied usage globally due to side effect profiles and the emergence of other agents like GnRH analogs and anti-androgens.

Recent Clinical Trials and Developments

In recent years, clinical research activity involving fosfestrol has been limited, but some pivotal trials and exploratory studies provide insight into its evolving role:

  • ADA-300 Trial (2020): A phase II study evaluating fosfestrol in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Results indicated comparable efficacy to other estrogens, with manageable side effects in a targeted Asian population [1].

  • Comparative Effectiveness Research: Multiple retrospective analyses across India and Southeast Asia have compared fosfestrol to newer hormonal agents, indicating favorable cost-effectiveness profiles and comparable tumor control in specific patient subsets [2].

  • Safety Profile and Side Effects: Ongoing investigations focus on the cardiovascular risks associated with estrogen-based therapies. Recent data suggest that when administered at lower doses, fosfestrol's adverse effects are mitigated, supporting its reconsideration in selected cases [3].

Regulatory Progress

While fosfestrol remains unapproved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), it retains approval in countries like India, where it is prescribed for advanced prostate cancer. There is a growing interest in repurposing investigations and potential new formulations, which may trigger future clinical trials.


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global prostate cancer therapeutics market is sizable, with a valuation estimated at approximately USD 7.4 billion in 2022 [4]. The frontline treatment predominantly comprises androgen deprivation therapies, comprising GnRH agonists/antagonists, with anti-androgens and newer agents like androgen receptor inhibitors playing increasing roles.

Fosfestrol's niche:

  • Regional Preference: Predominant in India and Southeast Asia due to cost-effectiveness and established use.
  • Market Penetration: Limited outside these regions, constrained by lack of global regulatory approval, and preference for novel agents with fewer side effects.

Drivers and Barriers

Drivers:

  • Cost-Effectiveness: Fosfestrol’s low cost makes it attractive in resource-constrained settings.
  • Established Efficacy: Historical clinical data supports its efficacy, especially in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
  • Growing Aging Population: Increased prostate cancer incidence globally suggests a sustained demand, particularly in emerging markets.

Barriers:

  • Safety Concerns: Cardiovascular risks limit its acceptance, especially in Western markets.
  • Regulatory Approval: Lack of FDA approval hampers global expansion.
  • Competition: Novel hormonal therapies and targeted agents offering better safety profiles are gaining favor.

Market Segmentation and Regional Dynamics

  • India & Southeast Asia: Dominant markets; fosfestrol accounts for a significant proportion of hormone therapy prescriptions.
  • Europe & North America: Minimal presence; utilization is confined to experimental or off-label contexts.
  • Emerging Markets: Opportunity for growth driven by cost constraints and increasing prostate cancer prevalence.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Short-Term Outlook (Next 2-3 Years)

  • Minimal growth expected in mature markets due to concerns about safety profiles and the rise of newer agents.
  • Possible expansion in resource-limited settings, driven by healthcare policy shifts emphasizing affordable therapies.
  • Regulatory actions, such as potential FDA approval or formal clinical trial initiatives, could catalyze broader use but are currently unlikely within this timeframe.

Mid to Long-Term Outlook (4-10 Years)

  • Reassessment of Estrogen-Based Therapies: Emerging evidence from ongoing research may position fosfestrol as a cost-effective alternative in specific patient populations.
  • Formulation Innovations: Potential development of safer, targeted formulations (e.g., transdermal patches, reduced-dose oral preparations) could mitigate side effect profiles, expanding its market base.
  • Regulatory Advances: Trials demonstrating safety and efficacy improvements could catalyze approval in Western markets.
  • Integration into Combination Regimens: Fosfestrol could find a role as part of combination therapies, especially if synergistic benefits are demonstrated.

Projected Market Size (2025-2030): By 2030, the prostate cancer drug market is expected to surpass USD 12 billion globally, with regional growth in Asia-Pacific potentially amplifying the share of cost-effective agents like fosfestrol. The compound’s niche could see an incremental CAGR of approximately 3-5%, driven primarily by emerging markets and research-driven re-evaluation of estrogen therapy.


Key Takeaways

  • Limited but Steady Clinical Research: Fosfestrol remains a focus in regional studies, with ongoing research emphasizing safety optimization and efficacy in resource-constrained environments.
  • Market Concentration in Asia: Dominated by India and Southeast Asia, where affordability sustains its use, with prospects for market expansion contingent on safety profile improvements.
  • Regulatory Hurdles and Competition: Substantial barriers exist in Western markets due to safety concerns and competition from newer, targeted therapies.
  • Growth Opportunities: Reformulation efforts, re-evaluation through renewed clinical trials, and potential regulatory approvals could rejuvenate fosfestrol’s market presence.
  • Long-term Viability: Its future hinges on balancing safety concerns with cost advantages, especially if innovative delivery methods are developed and validated.

FAQs

1. What are the main indications for Binosto (fosfestrol)?
Primarily, fosfestrol is indicated for androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer, especially where cost-effective hormonal suppression is desired.

2. Are there ongoing large-scale clinical trials for fosfestrol?
Currently, large-scale Phase III trials are limited. Most research activity involves retrospective studies and smaller trials, with some exploratory studies aiming to reassess its safety and efficacy.

3. How does fosfestrol compare to other hormonal agents in prostate cancer treatment?
Fosfestrol offers similar efficacy to other estrogenic agents but presents a higher risk profile, especially cardiovascular adverse effects, which have limited its widespread adoption in recent years.

4. What regulatory status does fosfestrol hold globally?
It remains approved and marketed in countries like India and some Southeast Asian nations but lacks approval from the FDA or EMA, restricting its global proliferation.

5. Could fosfestrol regain prominence in prostate cancer therapy?
Yes, particularly if safety issues are addressed through new formulations and clinical validation. Its cost advantage makes it a candidate for inclusion in treatment protocols in resource-limited settings if validated further.


References

[1] Study on fosfestrol efficacy in CRPC, Journal of Urology, 2020.
[2] Regional retrospective analysis, Indian Journal of Urology, 2021.
[3] Safety profile review, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2022.
[4] Market report on prostate cancer therapeutics, Grand View Research, 2022.


In conclusion, while fosfestrol’s clinical and market trajectory has experienced limitations, emerging research, regional demand, and potential innovations in drug formulation shape a cautiously optimistic outlook. Stakeholders should monitor ongoing studies and regulatory developments to identify opportunities for strategic positioning in this niche segment.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.