Last Updated: July 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BICILLIN L-A


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BICILLIN L-A

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00031499 ↗ Azithromycin/Bicillin Syphilis Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 2000-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if azithromycin, a drug approved for treatment of other infections, is as effective for syphilis (a sexually transmitted disease) as the standard treatment. Approximately 600 healthy adults, who are HIV-negative, ages 18 to 55 years of age, with primary, secondary or early latent syphilis, will participate in this research study. Volunteers will be enrolled in 5 U.S. cities and in Madagascar. Participants will be chosen randomly (by chance) to receive 1 of 2 study drugs: benzathine penicillin given (2 shots in the buttocks) or 4 tablets of azithromycin. Subjects who report a history of a penicillin allergy will be given either 2.0 g of oral azithromycin or 100 mg doxycycline taken orally, twice a day for 14 days. Over 2 years, 10 visits will be required. Procedures will include blood samples, physical exams, and swabs of sores.
NCT00427609 ↗ Bicillin L-A vs Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic, Plaque-Type Psoriasis Unresponsive to Topical Medications Terminated University of Tennessee Phase 2 2007-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy for Bicillin L-A, administered intramuscularly in a dose of 2.4 million units every three (3) weeks, for the treatment of chronic, plaque-type psoriasis unresponsive to topical medications or when other systemic therapies are contraindicated.
NCT06391125 ↗ LIMIT Trial - Lidocaine With Intramuscular Injection of Benzathine Penicillin G for Treponema Pallidum Treatment RECRUITING Washington University School of Medicine PHASE3 2024-07-01 There is evidence to suggest that lidocaine can help reduce the pain associated with intramuscular injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) or Bicillin, used to treat syphilis infections. A study published in the Journal of Family Practice in 2001 compared the pain experienced during bicillin injections with and without the use of lidocaine. The study found that patients who received lidocaine injections before receiving bicillin reported significantly less pain compared to those who received bicillin injections without lidocaine. Per the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI) European Guidelines for syphilis management, lidocaine has been used as a diluent for BPG since 1998. In the United States (US), BPG often comes prepackaged and lidocaine is unable to be used as a diluent with the same ease as it is in Europe. In light of this, the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial of benzathine penicillin G with and without lidocaine to quantify any site pain reduction with lidocaine in patients being treated for syphilis. This study is a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled trial. During this study, patients needing BPG treatment for syphilis will be screened for any penicillin allergies and consented to their participation. Each participant will receive 2 injections of BPG, 1.2 million units each (2x1.2 million units = 2.4 million units, the standard dose for syphilis treatment), as intramuscular injections, one in each gluteal muscle, with one of the injections randomly having 0.5ml of 1% lidocaine added while the other has 0.5 ml normal saline solution. The side of each injection will be randomized by the medical assistant (MA)/nurse filling the vials and the injecting MA will be blinded, as well as the study participant, as to which vial contains lidocaine and which contains normal saline. The participants will then be asked to rate their pain from 0-10 on each site of injection at 10 minutes post injection, then again at 24 hours after injection via email electronic survey (via RedCap). The differences in pain from the two injections will be compared and analyzed to see if lidocaine reduces pain associated with BPG injections compared to the control of normal saline added to BPG.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BICILLIN L-A

Condition Name

Condition Name for BICILLIN L-A
Intervention Trials
Syphilis Infection 1
Benzathine Penicillin Adverse Reaction 1
Psoriasis 1
Syphilis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BICILLIN L-A
Intervention Trials
Syphilis 2
Psoriasis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BICILLIN L-A

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BICILLIN L-A
Location Trials
United States 7
Madagascar 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BICILLIN L-A
Location Trials
Missouri 1
Tennessee 1
North Carolina 1
Maryland 1
Louisiana 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BICILLIN L-A

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BICILLIN L-A
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BICILLIN L-A
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 1
Completed 1
RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BICILLIN L-A

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BICILLIN L-A
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 1
University of Tennessee 1
Washington University School of Medicine 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BICILLIN L-A
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Bicilllin L-A (Penicillin G Benzathine) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity/Generic Outlook

Last updated: May 23, 2026

Executive summary

  • Drug: Bicillin L-A (penicillin G benzathine; intramuscular depot penicillin formulation).
  • Clinical trial activity: No current, registrational late-stage development program for Bicillin L-A is identifiable from standard public trial registries in the information available here.
  • Market structure: Bicillin L-A is treated as a legacy, off-patent commodity class product (benzathine penicillin G) used for streptococcal prophylaxis and selected other indications; pricing and supply are driven more by manufacturing capacity, sterility/release controls, and procurement contracts than by new clinical evidence.
  • Exclusivity and patent risk: For a commodity long-established product, brand-specific exclusivities/patents (if any) are typically narrow to formulation, packaging, or manufacturing controls rather than to the active ingredient class; generic entry has historically occurred at the product level once Orange Book protections and exclusivities lapse.

What is Bicillin L-A and what indications drive demand?

Featured snippet answer: Bicillin L-A is an IM depot formulation of penicillin G benzathine, used for prolonged penicillin exposure. Demand is driven by secondary prevention of rheumatic fever/streptococcal infections, outbreaks requiring prophylaxis, and inpatient/clinic procurement.

What active ingredient is in Bicillin L-A?

  • Active ingredient: penicillin G benzathine
  • Dosage form: intramuscular (IM) injection suspension (depot release)

Which clinical use cases typically impact purchasing?

Common clinical scenarios that translate into procurement demand include:

  • Secondary prophylaxis against Group A Streptococcus for rheumatic fever prevention (where local guidance uses benzathine penicillin)
  • Tertiary settings: ED and inpatient administration following streptococcal diagnosis when prophylaxis or treatment protocols apply
  • Low-resource and public health programs: where single-dose depot therapy reduces adherence risk

What is the latest clinical trials update for Bicillin L-A?

Featured snippet answer: Bicillin L-A is best characterized as an established product with limited observable ongoing clinical development in public registries, with attention focused on comparability, supply, and quality rather than new efficacy trials.

Are new phase 2/3 trials for Bicillin L-A underway?

  • In the absence of identifiable active late-stage trials tied specifically to “Bicillin L-A” in the available information, the practical conclusion for planning is that current clinical development momentum is low.
  • Trial activity in this drug class is more commonly seen as:
    • formulation comparability work,
    • pharmacokinetic bridging for generics,
    • manufacturing validation studies required by regulators and compendial standards.

Does Bicillin L-A development focus on new indications?

  • No distinct new indication development track is evidenced in the available information.
  • Strategy for companies in the benzathine penicillin space is typically defensive (maintain registrations, ensure supply continuity) rather than expansive (new label expansions).

What is the market size and demand profile for penicillin G benzathine products?

Featured snippet answer: The benzathine penicillin market behaves like a multi-source hospital/clinic commodity with demand linked to streptococcal seasonal incidence, guideline-driven prophylaxis programs, and government purchasing.

What drives unit volumes?

  • Guideline adherence: secondary prophylaxis protocols influence consistent procurement.
  • Outbreak response: local spikes increase short-term purchasing.
  • Supply stability: availability constraints can shift demand between branded and generic equivalents.
  • Site of administration: IM injection capacity and clinician workflow are practical determinants.

What drives price and margin?

  • Contracting dynamics with GPOs, wholesalers, and government tenders
  • Sterility and lot release throughput at manufacturing plants
  • Exchange rate and raw material costs (benzathine penicillin synthesis and intermediates)
  • Regulatory inspection outcomes that affect supply

How will Bicillin L-A market growth likely evolve over the next 3–5 years?

Featured snippet answer: Base-case growth is likely low single-digit at best in mature markets unless supply disruptions cause temporary price lift, with longer-run demand anchored to prophylaxis guideline use.

Key projection drivers

  • Volume: stable, guideline-backed prophylaxis use; modest increases tied to population growth and program funding
  • Pricing: tends toward competitive erosion as multi-source products exist
  • Supply: capacity expansions at competent manufacturing sites can stabilize market share for compliant suppliers
  • Regulatory enforcement: batch quality failures can create short-term shortages and pricing volatility

Base case market projection (framework)

  • Scenario 1: Stable supply, competitive pricing: flat-to-low growth.
  • Scenario 2: Supply constraints: transient revenue spikes for available SKUs, then normalization.
  • Scenario 3: Quality/manufacturing disruptions: intermittent shortages, preferential purchasing of best-supplied vendors.

What patents protect Bicillin L-A and how strong is the patent estate?

Featured snippet answer: For benzathine penicillin G depot products like Bicillin L-A, the actionable IP question is typically whether product-specific patents exist (formulation, manufacturing method, particle size/process controls) or whether the active ingredient is effectively unprotected.

What to expect in a legacy depot penicillin portfolio

Typical IP coverage (where present) falls into:

  • specific formulation and suspension characteristics (particle size distribution, excipients)
  • manufacturing steps (sterility assurance, crystallization and filtration controls)
  • packaging or administration system features
  • limited method-of-use claims only if tied to a later-discovered clinical use

Practical implication for market access

  • If active-ingredient protection is expired, the competitive barrier for generics is usually regulatory equivalence and manufacturing consistency, not patent litigation.

When does Bicillin L-A lose exclusivity for generic entry risk?

Featured snippet answer: For legacy products such as Bicillin L-A, exclusivity is usually already expired for the active ingredient class, and generic entry risk is governed by remaining product-level patent filings and Orange Book status.

Generic entry mechanics in this drug class

  • ANDA pathway for generic IM depot penicillin products
  • Competitive entry often occurs once:
    • any relevant listed patents are expired, or
    • patent challenges (Paragraph IV) resolve via settlement or judgment.

What is the Orange Book status of Bicillin L-A?

Featured snippet answer: Determining Orange Book status requires the active, exact Orange Book listing for Bicillin L-A (strength, dosage form, and manufacturer). In the information available here, Orange Book listing details cannot be deterministically verified to produce an accurate status summary.

Why that matters for diligence

  • Orange Book status dictates:
    • the remaining listed patents by NDA,
    • whether any 30-month stay is triggered in a given challenge,
    • and whether authoritative pediatric exclusivity (if any) extends timelines.

What generic entry risks exist for Bicillin L-A?

Featured snippet answer: Generic entry risk is structurally moderate for a depot benzathine penicillin product because these are typically multi-source once regulatory and patent hurdles clear.

What determines whether a generic can launch quickly?

  • Ability to meet bioequivalence for IM depot release
  • Manufacturing validation and sterility assurance
  • Compliance with impurity profiles and suspension stability requirements
  • Alignment with label expectations and substitution rules

Litigation and settlements

  • For commodity legacy injectables, litigation, when it occurs, is often concentrated around:
    • listed patents tied to manufacturing or formulation,
    • injunction leverage to prevent premature launch.

How does Bicillin L-A compare with other benzathine penicillin products?

Featured snippet answer: Bicillin L-A competes in the benzathine penicillin depot segment with equivalent-therapy brands and authorized generics, and substitution depends on availability, contracting, and local formularies.

Comparison dimensions investors use

  • Strength and dosing regimen alignment (per vial concentration and intended administration)
  • Procurement availability and contract inclusion
  • Reconstitution and administration workflow (site preference)
  • Lot-to-lot consistency and perceived reliability by clinics

What manufacturing/IP barriers can affect supply of Bicillin L-A?

Featured snippet answer: The key barrier is not usually novel IP, but manufacturing process control for depot penicillin suspensions and consistent regulatory compliance.

Manufacturing constraints typical to depot penicillin products

  • Crystallization and suspension homogeneity control
  • Filtration and sterility assurance workflow
  • Particle size distribution and stability during shelf life
  • Batch release testing timelines impacting distribution lead times

Regulatory and quality sensitivity

  • Sterility, particulate matter, and impurity specifications drive risk
  • Plant inspections and remediation can cause temporary supply disruption, creating pricing spikes

Key takeaways

  • Bicillin L-A (penicillin G benzathine IM depot) is a legacy commodity segment where clinical development velocity is low and demand is anchored to guideline-based prophylaxis use.
  • Market outcomes over 3–5 years are primarily shaped by supply stability, contracting, and manufacturing compliance, not new efficacy trials.
  • Generic and competitive pressure is typically driven by product-level regulatory and patent status, with Orange Book diligence required to map remaining listed protections at the SKU level.
  • The most actionable risk for revenue projections is availability and batch release performance, since shortages can temporarily shift purchasing and pricing.

FAQs

  1. How does penicillin G benzathine IM dosing affect procurement in rheumatic fever prophylaxis programs?
  2. What manufacturing quality attributes most commonly drive batch rejection risk for depot penicillin products?
  3. When do ANDA generic benzathine penicillin products typically launch relative to Orange Book patent expiration windows?
  4. How do public health tender cycles and stocking practices change benzathine penicillin pricing volatility?
  5. Which competitive factors decide formulary preference between branded Bicillin L-A and authorized generics?

References (APA)

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (Accessed 2026-05-24).
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical Studies for “penicillin G benzathine” and “Bicillin L-A”. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (Accessed 2026-05-24).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.