Last Updated: July 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BICILLIN C-R


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BICILLIN C-R

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00031499 ↗ Azithromycin/Bicillin Syphilis Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 2000-06-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if azithromycin, a drug approved for treatment of other infections, is as effective for syphilis (a sexually transmitted disease) as the standard treatment. Approximately 600 healthy adults, who are HIV-negative, ages 18 to 55 years of age, with primary, secondary or early latent syphilis, will participate in this research study. Volunteers will be enrolled in 5 U.S. cities and in Madagascar. Participants will be chosen randomly (by chance) to receive 1 of 2 study drugs: benzathine penicillin given (2 shots in the buttocks) or 4 tablets of azithromycin. Subjects who report a history of a penicillin allergy will be given either 2.0 g of oral azithromycin or 100 mg doxycycline taken orally, twice a day for 14 days. Over 2 years, 10 visits will be required. Procedures will include blood samples, physical exams, and swabs of sores.
NCT00427609 ↗ Bicillin L-A vs Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic, Plaque-Type Psoriasis Unresponsive to Topical Medications Terminated University of Tennessee Phase 2 2007-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy for Bicillin L-A, administered intramuscularly in a dose of 2.4 million units every three (3) weeks, for the treatment of chronic, plaque-type psoriasis unresponsive to topical medications or when other systemic therapies are contraindicated.
NCT06391125 ↗ LIMIT Trial - Lidocaine With Intramuscular Injection of Benzathine Penicillin G for Treponema Pallidum Treatment RECRUITING Washington University School of Medicine PHASE3 2024-07-01 There is evidence to suggest that lidocaine can help reduce the pain associated with intramuscular injections of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) or Bicillin, used to treat syphilis infections. A study published in the Journal of Family Practice in 2001 compared the pain experienced during bicillin injections with and without the use of lidocaine. The study found that patients who received lidocaine injections before receiving bicillin reported significantly less pain compared to those who received bicillin injections without lidocaine. Per the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI) European Guidelines for syphilis management, lidocaine has been used as a diluent for BPG since 1998. In the United States (US), BPG often comes prepackaged and lidocaine is unable to be used as a diluent with the same ease as it is in Europe. In light of this, the investigators propose a randomized controlled trial of benzathine penicillin G with and without lidocaine to quantify any site pain reduction with lidocaine in patients being treated for syphilis. This study is a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled trial. During this study, patients needing BPG treatment for syphilis will be screened for any penicillin allergies and consented to their participation. Each participant will receive 2 injections of BPG, 1.2 million units each (2x1.2 million units = 2.4 million units, the standard dose for syphilis treatment), as intramuscular injections, one in each gluteal muscle, with one of the injections randomly having 0.5ml of 1% lidocaine added while the other has 0.5 ml normal saline solution. The side of each injection will be randomized by the medical assistant (MA)/nurse filling the vials and the injecting MA will be blinded, as well as the study participant, as to which vial contains lidocaine and which contains normal saline. The participants will then be asked to rate their pain from 0-10 on each site of injection at 10 minutes post injection, then again at 24 hours after injection via email electronic survey (via RedCap). The differences in pain from the two injections will be compared and analyzed to see if lidocaine reduces pain associated with BPG injections compared to the control of normal saline added to BPG.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BICILLIN C-R

Condition Name

Condition Name for BICILLIN C-R
Intervention Trials
Benzathine Penicillin Adverse Reaction 1
Psoriasis 1
Syphilis 1
Syphilis Infection 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BICILLIN C-R
Intervention Trials
Syphilis 2
Psoriasis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BICILLIN C-R

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BICILLIN C-R
Location Trials
United States 7
Madagascar 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BICILLIN C-R
Location Trials
Maryland 1
Louisiana 1
Indiana 1
Alabama 1
Missouri 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BICILLIN C-R

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BICILLIN C-R
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BICILLIN C-R
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
RECRUITING 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BICILLIN C-R

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BICILLIN C-R
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 1
University of Tennessee 1
Washington University School of Medicine 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BICILLIN C-R
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Bicillin C-R (penicillin G benzathine and penicillin G procaine) clinical trials update, market analysis, and launch/exclusivity outlook

Last updated: May 14, 2026

Bicillin C-R is an off-patent, legacy injectable penicillin combination used for susceptible bacterial infections. Public disclosure of active late-stage clinical development and current commercial revenue is limited in accessible sources; the practical market outlook is driven by (1) supply continuity for penicillin G benzathine/procaine, (2) guideline-driven demand, (3) substitution to other long-acting penicillins, and (4) payer and hospital formulary decisions rather than patent exclusivity.


What is Bicillin C-R and what active ingredients does it contain?

Bicillin C-R is a combination product of two injectable penicillin components:

  • Penicillin G benzathine (long-acting depot fraction)
  • Penicillin G procaine (intermediate-acting fraction)

Drug class: Natural penicillins.
Route/dosage form: Intramuscular injection (depot suspension).

Clinical positioning: Treatment of susceptible infections where clinicians use a long-acting penicillin regimen (historically including selected streptococcal infections and other susceptible bacterial infections per label and local practice).


What clinical trials exist for Bicillin C-R, and what is the latest update?

Featured snippet answer: No current, well-indexed late-stage (Phase 3/registrational) clinical trials for “Bicillin C-R” specifically are consistently surfaced in major public trial registries in a way that supports a credible “latest update” statement for ongoing pivotal studies.

Trial evidence base: what’s typically available for this product class

For legacy depot penicillin combinations like benzathine/procaine penicillin, much of the evidentiary footprint is historical:

  • Microbiology and susceptibility-based rationale
  • Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability considerations for depot formulations
  • Older comparative or supportive studies rather than modern Phase 3 programs

How to interpret “clinical trials update” in this asset

For off-patent injectables, “updates” in practice usually come from:

  • New guideline recommendations for streptococcal disease prophylaxis/therapy
  • Safety communications for penicillin-class risks (hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis)
  • Shortages or supply reallocations that affect administered volume more than trial pipelines

Practical take: Market changes for Bicillin C-R are more likely to track supply and guideline utilization than new trial readouts.


What patents protect Bicillin C-R, and how strong is the patent estate?

Featured snippet answer: Bicillin C-R is a legacy penicillin combination with an evidentiary basis that strongly indicates the core product is off-patent in most relevant jurisdictions; any remaining protection is more likely to be narrow (secondary formulation/manufacturing improvements) or tied to specific branded labeling/packaging rather than the fundamental active ingredient combination.

Likely patent landscape structure for legacy penicillins

For older combination injectables:

  • The fundamental chemistry and composition of known penicillins are typically early-dated and expired.
  • Current exclusivity, if any, is usually not composition-based but may include:
    • manufacturing process improvements
    • specific formulation stability claims
    • packaging or method-of-use claims for particular regimens

How patent strength affects business decisions

When patent estate strength is low:

  • Generic and authorized equivalents dominate procurement options.
  • Value shifts to supply reliability, contract pricing, and distribution coverage.
  • Litigation risk is more about manufacturing site and label carve-outs than blockbuster exclusivity.

Note: Without an Orange Book listing and listed patents for a specific NDA/ANDA identifier tied to Bicillin C-R in accessible records here, a definitive patent-number and expiry table cannot be produced from the supplied prompt.


When does Bicillin C-R lose exclusivity, and what Orange Book status applies?

Featured snippet answer: Bicillin C-R is treated commercially as an established generic/authorized equivalent class; any “exclusivity” that could have existed is not expected to be operative in the current market.

What “Orange Book status” usually means for this type of product

For older injectables, Orange Book entries (if present) often reflect:

  • old patents that have expired
  • patent listings that no longer prevent generic competition

No actionable Orange Book table can be generated here because the prompt does not provide the precise NDA/ANDA reference number and the underlying patent listing content needed for a complete status mapping.


What formulations or dosage strengths of Bicillin C-R exist, and what matters for competition?

Bicillin C-R is sold as an IM depot suspension with fixed proportions of benzathine and procaine penicillin components. Competitive differentiators in depot penicillin markets commonly include:

  • Concentration and suspension characteristics (clinician handling)
  • Stability and shelf life (distribution planning)
  • Needle compatibility and injection volume (administration efficiency)
  • Supply continuity (hospital purchasing systems prioritize delivery reliability)

Market participants typically treat substitutes as functionally equivalent if they share:

  • the same active ingredient combination
  • comparable dosing instructions
  • compatible manufacturing controls

What generic entry risks exist for Bicillin C-R?

Featured snippet answer: The main “entry risk” is not a patent-wall barrier. It is a manufacturing and supply execution risk for any new entrant or authorized generic provider of depot penicillin combinations.

What can still block or delay market participation

Even with expired patents:

  • GMP manufacturing scale and filtration/lyophilization-related process maturity can be a barrier
  • Supply constraints for penicillin G starting materials can drive allocation behavior
  • Labeling and clinical instructions must meet regulatory requirements

What patent litigation affects Bicillin C-R?

Featured snippet answer: Bicillin C-R is not associated with ongoing, widely publicized patent-infringement events at a level that supports an actionable litigation summary from the supplied prompt.

How litigation typically shows up for legacy injectables

When litigation does occur for established generics, it is often:

  • centered on method-of-use, REMS-adjacent label changes, or narrow formulation claims
  • driven by ANDA-to-NDA patent listing disputes rather than composition novelty

No litigation docket mapping can be provided here without the specific NDA/ANDA and patent listing set.


How does Bicillin C-R compare with other long-acting penicillin products?

In practice, decision-making compares Bicillin C-R against other long-acting penicillin formulations (often by:

  • dosing schedule
  • injection volume
  • duration of action
  • availability)

Practical substitution factors

  • Clinical protocol fit (hospital pathways and national guideline alignment)
  • Availability and cost for depot injectables
  • Administration logistics (nursing time, stock on hand)

What is the FDA regulatory pathway status for Bicillin C-R and related equivalents?

Featured snippet answer: Bicillin C-R is an approved marketed injectable under an established regulatory history; contemporary new entrants for the same actives generally use generic (ANDA) or authorized equivalent pathways if eligible.

What matters for regulatory/commercial timing

For older, off-patent products:

  • Regulatory timelines are usually shorter than for novel entities
  • Market impact is more sensitive to supply chain and manufacturing capacity than to regulatory exclusivity

Market analysis: who buys Bicillin C-R and why?

Featured snippet answer: Purchasers are dominated by hospitals, public health programs, and inpatient/outpatient clinics that administer depot penicillin regimens under local stewardship and guideline protocols.

Demand drivers

  • Guideline utilization for susceptible bacterial infections where long-acting penicillin is preferred or recommended
  • Seasonal infection patterns and periodic public health emphasis
  • Stock and allocation due to penicillin-class supply fluctuations
  • Payer reimbursement and hospital contract pricing

Demand suppressors

  • Shift toward alternative antibiotic classes in some protocols due to perceived risks or availability
  • Inventory management constraints that move clinicians to whichever long-acting penicillin is reliably in stock
  • Prescriber preference changes with emerging resistance patterns and stewardship policies

Market projection for Bicillin C-R: base case, upside, downside scenarios

Featured snippet answer: For an off-patent injectable, the most realistic projections are range-based and tied to supply stability and formulary share rather than patent-driven growth. A robust projection requires current unit volumes or revenue figures, which are not provided in the prompt.

Projection framework that fits legacy depot penicillin markets

Key variables to model:

  1. Annual treatment volume for guideline-aligned indications
  2. Market share vs alternatives (other long-acting penicillins, penicillin V/oral regimens where applicable)
  3. Net price erosion from generic competition
  4. Supply availability (stockouts can cap administered units)
  5. Switching friction (how quickly formularies adopt substitute products)

Practical business implication

Even without exact numbers, the market is typically:

  • mature
  • price-competitive
  • supply-sensitive
  • bounded by clinical use protocols

Geographic coverage: where is Bicillin C-R most likely to be competitive?

Featured snippet answer: Competition is primarily within countries where long-acting benzathine/procaine penicillin products are included in essential medicines lists, formularies, and national treatment guidance.

Competitive intensity expectations

  • High in markets with multiple authorized equivalents
  • Lower where depot penicillin supply is limited and procurement is constrained by manufacturer availability

Manufacturing and IP barriers: what blocks entrants besides patents?

Featured snippet answer: For depot penicillin injectables, the binding constraints are manufacturing execution, compliance, and supply-chain continuity.

Non-IP barriers that affect speed-to-market

  • Scaling the depot suspension process with consistent particle characteristics
  • Sterility assurance and batch-to-batch uniformity
  • Regulatory inspection readiness
  • Raw material sourcing for penicillin G derivatives

Key Takeaways

  • Bicillin C-R is a long-acting depot penicillin combination (benzathine + procaine) used as an established injectable therapy.
  • A credible “latest clinical trials update” for Phase 3/registrational activity is not supported by the prompt’s provided dataset and the legacy nature of the product.
  • Any remaining IP protections, if present, are unlikely to function as major market exclusivity drivers; commercial outcomes depend more on supply continuity and formulary share.
  • Market growth is more likely to track guideline-driven utilization and manufacturing availability than new scientific differentiation.
  • For projections, a business-useful model should be volume-and-supply driven rather than patent-expiration driven.

FAQs

  1. Is Bicillin C-R considered interchangeable with other benzathine/procaine penicillin injectables?
  2. Do shortages of penicillin G benzathine or procaine affect Bicillin C-R availability and hospital utilization?
  3. What types of regulatory filings are typically used by entrants seeking equivalents of legacy penicillin depot products?
  4. How do hospital formularies decide between long-acting penicillin injections and oral antibiotic alternatives?
  5. What safety and administration risks most commonly drive changes in prescribing behavior for depot penicillins?

References (APA)

  1. FDA. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). ClinicalTrials.gov. U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  3. World Health Organization. (n.d.). WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.