Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BETAPACE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BETAPACE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00392106 ↗ High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Ablation System Study Suspended ProRhythm, Inc. Phase 3 2006-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if the HIFU Pulmonary Vein Ablation System is effective in the treatment of paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation compared to the control of best medical therapy with FDA approved antiarrhythmic drugs.
NCT00578617 ↗ Ablation vs Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation - Pilot Trial Completed Abbott Medical Devices N/A 2006-09-01 The CABANA pilot study is designed to test the hypothesis that the treatment strategy of percutaneous left atrial catheter ablation for the purpose of the elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF) is superior to current state-of-the-art therapy with either rate control or anti-arrhythmic drugs for reducing AF recurrences at 1 year follow-up.
NCT00578617 ↗ Ablation vs Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation - Pilot Trial Completed Duke Clinical Research Institute N/A 2006-09-01 The CABANA pilot study is designed to test the hypothesis that the treatment strategy of percutaneous left atrial catheter ablation for the purpose of the elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF) is superior to current state-of-the-art therapy with either rate control or anti-arrhythmic drugs for reducing AF recurrences at 1 year follow-up.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BETAPACE

Condition Name

Condition Name for BETAPACE
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 4
Arrhythmia 1
Heart Failure 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BETAPACE
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 4
Tachycardia, Ventricular 1
Tachycardia 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BETAPACE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BETAPACE
Location Trials
United States 33
Canada 1
Czech Republic 1
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BETAPACE
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 3
Ohio 3
Maryland 3
Minnesota 2
North Carolina 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BETAPACE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BETAPACE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
N/A 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BETAPACE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Terminated 2
Unknown status 1
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BETAPACE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BETAPACE
Sponsor Trials
Mayo Clinic 2
Duke Clinical Research Institute 2
St. Jude Medical 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BETAPACE
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
Industry 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 1, 2026

BETAPACE (sotalol) Clinical Trials Update and Market Outlook

BETAPACE is the brand of sotalol, a class III antiarrhythmic with beta-blocking activity, used for rhythm control in atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. The clinical program landscape for BETAPACE itself is mature, with no material phase-development signal in the way new molecular entities typically show; market dynamics instead track patent/market exclusivity status, generic penetration, guideline positioning, and safety-driven prescribing behavior for sotalol as a class.


What is BETAPACE and how is it positioned clinically?

BETAPACE (sotalol hydrochloride) is used for:

  • Atrial arrhythmias (e.g., atrial fibrillation/flutter, depending on country label)
  • Ventricular arrhythmias (e.g., ventricular tachycardia, depending on country label)

Its clinical identity is defined by:

  • QT prolongation risk (torsades de pointes concern drives dose selection, electrolyte management, and monitoring)
  • Use patterns that are more conservative in broader practice compared with agents that show lower proarrhythmia incidence

Regulatory labeling standards for sotalol typically center on:

  • Dose titration with renal function considerations
  • Baseline and follow-up ECG monitoring
  • Electrolyte correction (K+, Mg2+)

What does the clinical trials update look like for BETAPACE?

Are there new late-stage BETAPACE-specific trials?

No clean, BETAPACE-branded late-stage signal is evident in the public trial record for the product brand. Clinical evidence over time is largely reflected through:

  • Trials supporting sotalol as a class therapy
  • Comparative studies versus other rhythm-control options (including other antiarrhythmics)
  • Safety and effectiveness literature that informs guideline recommendations and dosing practices

What trial themes still matter for current practice?

For sotalol, the evidence base that still drives prescribing and risk mitigation focuses on:

  • Efficacy in rhythm suppression in atrial and ventricular arrhythmias
  • Proarrhythmic risk management (torsades risk) tied to QTc, dose, drug interactions, and renal elimination
  • Comparative tolerability versus class Ic agents, amiodarone, and class III alternatives in specific patient subgroups

Bottom line: The “update” for BETAPACE is less about new pivotal trials and more about evolving real-world prescribing under risk controls, generic availability, and guideline refinements.


How do safety and monitoring requirements affect utilization?

Sotalol’s utilization is materially shaped by:

  • QT prolongation monitoring (serial ECGs in initiation and dose changes)
  • Renal function adjustment because sotalol is eliminated largely via the kidneys
  • Electrolyte management to reduce torsades risk
  • Drug-drug interaction screening for other QT-prolonging drugs and bradycardic agents

This safety structure creates:

  • Higher operational burden at initiation than many alternatives
  • Greater “stop or switch” risk in patients with fluctuating renal function or electrolyte disturbances

What is the market landscape for sotalol and BETAPACE?

Generic penetration dominates the sotalol brand economics

BETAPACE competes in a class where:

  • Generic sotalol is widely available
  • Price and volume are heavily influenced by payer formularies and acquisition costs
  • Brand sales typically face sustained pressure, unless a brand has unique dosing forms, distribution contracts, or local market protections

Key demand drivers

Demand remains supported by:

  • Guideline inclusion for certain rhythm-control scenarios
  • Clinician familiarity and entrenched care pathways
  • The availability of sotalol as a cost-effective option where amiodarone or newer class III agents face access constraints

Key headwinds

  • Torsades risk profile reduces use in higher-risk QTc or electrolyte-unstable populations
  • Competition from other rhythm-control strategies (rate control, catheter ablation, and alternative antiarrhythmics with different safety profiles)
  • Ongoing generic price compression

Clinical and commercial comparative pressure: sotalol vs alternatives

Where sotalol tends to win

  • Situations where clinicians want class III effects with an oral beta-blocking component
  • Settings where renal-adjustable, guideline-supported rhythm control is appropriate

Where sotalol tends to lose

  • Patients with baseline QTc elevation, significant bradycardia, or interacting therapies that raise torsades risk
  • Where alternative therapies offer easier monitoring or superior net clinical benefit in a given patient profile

Market projection: base case, upside, downside

Because BETAPACE is a brand of a long-established molecule and faces generic competition, projection is fundamentally driven by:

  1. Formulary share vs generics
  2. Unit price trajectory
  3. Utilization in rhythm-control pathways
  4. Safety events and label-driven caution

Scenario framework (directional)

  • Downside scenario: Faster generic substitution and constrained access under formulary management tied to QT-risk stewardship.
  • Base case: Stable clinical relevance with continued generic-led price pressure; brand share stabilizes at a lower level.
  • Upside scenario: Targeted formulary preference or procurement advantages in specific markets plus steady guideline-aligned use.

Projection outlook (directional):

  • BETAPACE sales growth is unlikely to be structurally driven in mature markets.
  • Volumes may remain stable, but revenue growth is constrained by generic pricing.
  • Long-run trend is flat to declining revenue, with localized pockets possible through contracting and brand preference.

What should investors and R&D planners watch for BETAPACE specifically?

Commercial signals

  • Brand-to-generic formulary shifts for sotalol products
  • Changes in procurement terms tied to QT-risk stewardship programs
  • Patent and exclusivity status developments in key markets (brand protection impacts are typically minimal for established drugs with full generic access, but local/regional nuances can matter)

Clinical signals

  • Updated guideline positions impacting class III drug selection
  • New comparative evidence that shifts practice away from torsades-prone agents in specific populations
  • Safety labeling changes and risk-management program evolution

Key Takeaways

  • BETAPACE is a mature sotalol brand with a clinical role shaped by QT prolongation risk and renal-adjusted dosing.
  • The “clinical trials update” for BETAPACE is mainly evidence consolidation and practice evolution, not a new late-stage BETAPACE-specific pipeline signal.
  • Market outcomes are dominated by generic penetration, with brand revenue facing sustained downward pressure unless protected by local formulary or contracting structures.
  • Projection remains flat-to-declining for brand revenue in most mature markets, with stability possible in constrained-access segments.
  • The most actionable levers are formulary share management, procurement contracting, and safety-driven patient selection protocols.

FAQs

1) What arrhythmias is BETAPACE used to treat?

BETAPACE (sotalol) is used for rhythm control in atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, with use determined by label-specific indications and clinician risk assessment. (See regulatory and clinical literature sources.)

2) Why does sotalol require stringent monitoring?

Because sotalol can prolong QT and increase the risk of torsades de pointes, requiring ECG and electrolyte monitoring, especially during initiation and dose changes.

3) Is BETAPACE’s growth driven by new clinical trials?

No. BETAPACE is an established product; clinical evolution largely comes from updated comparative evidence and guideline-driven practice rather than new brand-specific late-stage trials.

4) How does generic competition impact BETAPACE?

Generic sotalol availability compresses pricing and shifts market share away from branded sotalol products, limiting brand revenue growth even if clinical use persists.

5) What is the most important factor in deciding whether to use sotalol?

Patient-specific proarrhythmia risk, especially QTc level, renal function, electrolytes, and interacting drugs.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval Reports and product labeling materials for sotalol-containing products (BETAPACE).
[2] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Product information for sotalol-containing medicinal products.
[3] DailyMed. BETAPACE (sotalol hydrochloride) prescribing information and safety/monitoring sections.
[4] Clinical trial literature and reviews on sotalol efficacy and torsades de pointes risk in atrial and ventricular arrhythmia populations (class III antiarrhythmic evidence base).
[5] Guideline statements (ACC/AHA/ESC) that address antiarrhythmic selection, QT risk, and rhythm control in atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.