Last Updated: August 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BETA CAROTENE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for BETA CAROTENE

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT02131194 ↗ The Post-Vitrectomy Lenstatin™ Study Completed Lenstatin LLC N/A 2014-06-01 To determine the efficacy of Lenstatin™, an over-the-counter nutritional supplement, in inhibiting the progression of nuclear cataract in eyes after pars plana vitrectomy.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for BETA CAROTENE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000152 ↗ Randomized Trial of Beta-Carotene and Macular Degeneration Unknown status National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1982-04-01 To determine whether 50 mg of beta-carotene taken every other day reduces the risk of developing age-related macular degeneration (AMD) among male U.S. physicians who were aged 40 to 84 in 1982. To investigate the possible relationship of AMD with other antioxidants, including selenium and vitamins A, C, and E. To identify potential risk factors for development of AMD. Possible risk factors include height, systemic hypertension, cardiovascular disease, blood cholesterol, cigarette smoking, iris and skin color, sunlight exposure, body mass index, diabetes, and alcohol intake.
NCT00000157 ↗ Randomized Trial of Aspirin and Cataracts in U.S. Physicians Terminated National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1982-04-01 To determine whether 325 mg of aspirin taken on -alternate days reduces the risk of developing cataract among male U.S. physicians who were aged 40 to 84 in 1982. To identify potential risk factors for cataract development, such as age, blood pressure, blood cholesterol, height, diabetes, medication use, and history of previous eye trauma or surgery.
NCT00000161 ↗ Randomized Trials of Vitamin Supplements and Eye Disease Unknown status National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1993-08-01 To determine whether vitamin E supplementation reduces the risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in women. To determine whether vitamin C supplementation reduces the risk of cataract and AMD in women. To determine whether beta-carotene supplementation reduces the risk of cataract and AMD in women. To determine whether alternate day, low-dose aspirin reduces the risk of cataract and AMD in women. To identify potential risk factors for cataract and AMD including cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, blood pressure, blood cholesterol, cardiovascular disease, height, body mass index, and diabetes.
NCT00000500 ↗ Physicians' Health Study Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1981-09-01 To assess the effect on cardiovascular mortality of alternate-day consumption of 325 milligrams of aspirin and, secondarily, the effect on cancer incidence of alternate-day consumption of 50 milligrams of beta-carotene.
NCT00000500 ↗ Physicians' Health Study Completed Brigham and Women's Hospital Phase 3 1981-09-01 To assess the effect on cardiovascular mortality of alternate-day consumption of 325 milligrams of aspirin and, secondarily, the effect on cancer incidence of alternate-day consumption of 50 milligrams of beta-carotene.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BETA CAROTENE

Condition Name

Condition Name for BETA CAROTENE
Intervention Trials
Heart Diseases 4
Cardiovascular Diseases 4
Cataract 3
Myocardial Ischemia 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BETA CAROTENE
Intervention Trials
Macular Degeneration 4
Heart Diseases 4
Cardiovascular Diseases 4
Cataract 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BETA CAROTENE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BETA CAROTENE
Location Trials
United States 49
China 2
Italy 2
Israel 2
United Kingdom 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BETA CAROTENE
Location Trials
Maryland 3
Texas 3
Florida 3
Wisconsin 2
Tennessee 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BETA CAROTENE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BETA CAROTENE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 13
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BETA CAROTENE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Unknown status 5
Recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BETA CAROTENE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BETA CAROTENE
Sponsor Trials
National Eye Institute (NEI) 5
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 5
Indonesia University 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BETA CAROTENE
Sponsor Trials
Other 52
NIH 14
Industry 9
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 26, 2026

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast for Beta Carotene

Beta carotene is a naturally occurring carotenoid used as a dietary supplement and, in some jurisdictions and settings, as a therapeutic ingredient. Public clinical-trial and commercialization visibility is fragmented across products (dietary supplements, formulations, and special nutrition). There is no single, consolidated “beta carotene drug” with a unified FDA NDA/EMA MA review timeline; market performance and trial pipelines depend on the specific intended use, dosing form, and regional regulatory status (supplement vs. drug).

Given the lack of a single, identifiable “beta carotene” product label and the absence of a scoped lead-indication, a complete, litigation-grade clinical and patent/approval timeline cannot be produced from verifiable public records in a way that is decision-ready.

What clinical trials are currently recruiting or active for beta carotene?

A decision-grade trials update requires at least one of the following to anchor the pipeline: (i) a specific brand/product, (ii) an intended indication (eg, cancer prevention, retinopathy, COPD, photoprotection, anemia, neonatal protection), or (iii) a regulatory status (drug vs. supplement) tied to trial identifiers and endpoints. Without that anchor, “beta carotene” trial listings aggregate heterogeneous studies with different formulations, doses, and comparators.

Which endpoints dominate beta carotene studies (and what that implies for outcomes)

Across published literature and trial registries, beta-carotene studies tend to cluster around:

  • Carotenoid biomarker endpoints (serum/plasma levels, tissue deposition)
  • Retinal/ocular endpoints (where relevant to ophthalmic indications)
  • Oxidative-stress and inflammatory biomarkers
  • Clinical endpoints in chronic disease prevention contexts (often with mixed results in older, large-prevention programs)

Why trial interpretability varies

  • Formulation differences: mixed carotenoid products vs purified beta carotene
  • Dose differences: physiological vs high-dose regimens
  • Population risk profiles: smokers vs non-smokers materially affect risk/benefit signals in prevention settings

Is beta carotene an FDA-approved drug or a dietary supplement, and how does that affect trial design?

What the regulatory split changes

  • If treated as a dietary supplement, trials often focus on biomarker modulation, tolerability, and nutrition status rather than drug-approval endpoints.
  • If developed as a drug for a defined disease modification claim, sponsors generally need controlled pivotal endpoints, safety characterization, and regulatory-grade CMC.

What to expect in FDA-style evidence

For a “drug-like” development path, evidence typically needs:

  • Clinical endpoint trials tied to a specific indication
  • Safety monitoring for known carotenoid class risks in relevant populations
  • Standardized dosing and manufacturing controls

What is the global market for beta carotene and how is it segmented?

A “market” answer must be segmented by regulatory category and end-use, because beta carotene is sold as:

  • Nutritional ingredient (fortification and supplements)
  • Feed/pet nutrition ingredient (often significant in supply chains)
  • Specialty formulations (cosmeceutical/skin-related positioning in some regions)

Key market segmentation drivers

  • Fortification demand: infant and maternal nutrition strategies in some markets
  • Consumer trends: eye-health and antioxidant positioning
  • Industrial supply: carotenoid production capacity and raw-material availability
  • Regulatory environment: supplement claim restrictions by jurisdiction

Where does demand come from: supplements vs fortification vs specialty use?

Supplements

Demand is driven by:

  • Consumer health positioning (antioxidant, eye support, “prevention” narratives)
  • Product form factors (softgels, tablets, liquids)
  • Compliance and labeling in major markets

Fortification and nutrition programs

Demand tracks:

  • Institutional procurement cycles
  • Nutrition guideline changes
  • Availability of alternative carotenoids in blended products

Specialty formulations

Demand depends on:

  • Regional regulatory permissiveness for skin/photoprotection claims
  • Delivery system improvements that stabilize carotenoids and improve bioavailability

How big is the beta carotene opportunity in 2025-2035 and what could grow the fastest?

A credible projection requires:

  • An explicit starting revenue base
  • Clear definition of “beta carotene” market scope (API ingredient only vs branded finished goods)
  • Regional coverage and whether feed/specialty uses are included

Without those definitions, any numeric forecast would mix non-comparable units (ingredient kg market vs finished product revenue). That prevents a decision-ready projection.

Growth vectors that typically lift demand

  • Increased adoption of eye-health and nutrition supplements in aging populations
  • Continued reformulation for stability and bioavailability (oil-based delivery, microencapsulation, emulsions)
  • Expansion of fortification programs where permitted and economically viable

What competitive landscape matters for beta carotene (ingredient vs finished products)?

Ingredient suppliers vs branded supplement brands

Beta carotene competition often splits into:

  • Ingredient producers competing on grade, consistency, and supply reliability
  • Finished-product brands competing on formulation, marketing, and distribution

How to interpret competitive intensity

  • If you buy API/ingredient: you compete on specification, supply continuity, and cost of goods.
  • If you sell finished goods: you compete on consumer trust, claims compliance, and shelf-space economics.

What formulation technologies are used to improve beta carotene stability and bioavailability?

This category is where product differentiation usually occurs.

Common technical approaches

  • Lipid-based carriers (oil solutions, softgels)
  • Emulsion systems (improved handling and distribution)
  • Microencapsulation (stability against oxidation and light)
  • Antioxidant co-formulation (to reduce degradation during storage)

What CMC risks are usually relevant

  • Oxidation control during manufacturing and storage
  • Consistency of carotenoid content (assay and blend uniformity)
  • Bioavailability variation due to vehicle and patient factors

What regulatory risks exist for beta carotene claims and dosing?

Claims risk (jurisdiction-specific)

  • Antioxidant and disease-prevention claims are restricted differently across US, EU, UK, and Asia.
  • High-dose positioning can trigger tighter scrutiny due to historical safety signals in certain populations.

Safety characterization risk

  • Carotenoid class safety concerns can concentrate in smoker populations in prevention contexts.
  • Safety data must match the intended dose and population.

How does beta carotene compare with other carotenoids (lutein, zeaxanthin, lycopene) in market positioning?

Substitution dynamics

  • Eye-health markets often favor lutein/zeaxanthin because of ocular deposition narratives.
  • General antioxidant positioning frequently includes lycopene and beta carotene depending on region and product strategy.

Commercial implication

  • Beta carotene can face substitution pressure unless it is anchored to a distinct claim, formulation advantage, or population benefit.

Key Takeaways

  • Beta carotene’s clinical and commercial landscape is fragmented across supplements, fortification ingredients, and specialty formulations rather than a single, unified “drug.”
  • Decision-grade clinical-trial updates require an anchored product/indication to avoid aggregating incompatible studies.
  • Market sizing and forecasting depend on scope (ingredient kg vs finished goods revenue) and regulatory category. Without that scope, numeric projections are not decision-ready.
  • Differentiation typically comes from formulation stability and bioavailability plus claim strategy compliant with local regulations.

FAQs

  1. What are the main indications studied for beta carotene in clinical trials?
  2. How does high-dose beta carotene safety compare with moderate supplementation?
  3. Which formulation types improve beta carotene absorption most consistently?
  4. What labeling and health-claim restrictions apply to beta carotene in the US and EU?
  5. How does beta carotene pricing behave versus lutein and zeaxanthin in the eye-health supplement market?

References

  1. N/A (no specific, citable clinical-trial or market data sources were provided in the prompt).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.