Last Updated: August 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00347932 ↗ A Study to Determine if 0.6% ISV-403 is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis. Completed Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Phase 3 2006-06-01 Evaluation of the clinical and microbial efficacy of 0.6% ISV-403, compared to vehicle in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
NCT00348348 ↗ A Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of BOL-303224 in the Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis Completed Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Phase 3 2006-06-01 This is a study to investigate a novel drug candidate for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.
NCT00407589 ↗ Systemic Pharmacokinetics of BOL-303224-A Completed Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Phase 1 2006-10-01 This is a multi-center, open-label, single dose/multiple dose, pharmacokinetic study in participants with bacterial conjunctivitis. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent of systemic exposure to BOL-303224-A following single and multiple topical administration of BOL-303224-A in participants with suspected bacterial conjunctivitis.
NCT00622908 ↗ Clinical and Microbial Efficacy of ISV403 in Bacterial Conjunctivitis Completed Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Phase 2 2004-12-01 To evaluate the clinical and microbial efficacy of ISV-403 administered three times a day (TID) for 5 days compared to vehicle three times a day for 5 days in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Condition Name

Condition Name for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Bacterial Conjunctivitis 5
Acute Bacterial Conjunctivitis 2
Cataract Extraction 2
Cataract Surgery 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Intervention Trials
Conjunctivitis, Bacterial 8
Conjunctivitis 8
Cataract 5
Eye Injuries, Penetrating 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
United States 14
Canada 1
Mexico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Location Trials
New York 5
New Jersey 2
Tennessee 1
Pennsylvania 1
Massachusetts 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 5
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 12
Terminated 3
Unknown status 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated 12
SCRI Development Innovations, LLC 1
Cornea Consultants Of Nashville 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BESIFLOXACIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Sponsor Trials
Industry 13
Other 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Besifloxacin Hydrochloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Besifloxacin hydrochloride is a topical fluoroquinolone used for bacterial conjunctivitis. As a legacy ophthalmic antibiotic, the competitive set is dominated by branded and generic fluoroquinolones and a smaller group of alternative anti-infectives. Public clinical-trial activity for besifloxacin specifically is limited versus newer ophthalmic anti-infectives, which constrains near-term pipeline upside. Market trajectory is therefore driven mainly by prescription maintenance, substitution pressure from generics, and label-constrained competitive dynamics rather than new clinical endpoints.


What clinical trials involve besifloxacin hydrochloride right now?

Current pipeline status from public registries

Publicly disclosed clinical-trial activity for besifloxacin hydrochloride is sparse and does not show a robust, ongoing global Phase 2/3 program typical of a growth-stage asset. The drug’s development footprint is largely historical, tied to earlier efficacy and safety programs for bacterial conjunctivitis.

What this means for near-term “update” cycles

  • Search- and trial registry visibility is low relative to ophthalmic antibiotics with active late-stage programs.
  • Any incremental development is more likely to be formulation, subgroup analysis, or postmarketing studies rather than new mechanism expansion.

What trial endpoints have historically mattered for besifloxacin

For topical ocular antibiotics, typical registries and approvals have focused on:

  • Clinical cure rates and/or bacterial eradication
  • Time to symptom improvement
  • Safety endpoints including ocular irritation, corneal effects, and adverse events

Geographic and sponsor patterns

Where besifloxacin trials remain visible, they generally align with standard ophthalmic regulatory requirements rather than new strategic expansions (no clear pattern of large multicenter Phase 3 programs across major regions).


Why does besifloxacin’s clinical development pace look slower than newer ophthalmic antibiotics?

Patent and exclusivity-driven incentives

A legacy branded ophthalmic antibiotic can face reduced marginal incentive to run large comparative trials when:

  • Core IP has expired or is close to expiration
  • Generic substitution reduces protected pricing power
  • Payor and pharmacy substitution changes the value of incremental efficacy claims

Regulatory friction for new claims

Expanding into new indications (beyond conjunctivitis variants) typically requires:

  • New label-enabling clinical datasets
  • Targeted patient recruitment and endpoint strategy
  • Additional manufacturing validation under current regulatory expectations

Clinical strategy shift in the class

Newer ophthalmic anti-infectives often pursue:

  • Improved dosing regimens
  • Alternative anti-bacterial spectrums
  • Adjunctive claims tied to ocular surface outcomes Those strategies can be more straightforward to differentiate than besifloxacin’s incremental changes.

What is the Orange Book status of besifloxacin hydrochloride?

Orange Book listing logic for an ophthalmic fluoroquinolone

Besifloxacin hydrochloride is generally treated as a small-molecule branded ophthalmic antibiotic with one or more listed patent families in the FDA Orange Book when applicable to the approved formulation and dosage form.

What matters for exclusivity and generic entry risk

For legacy ophthalmics, the key is not just patent dates but also:

  • Any unexpired listed patents tied to formulation/manufacturing
  • Enforcement history and any settlement-triggered timelines
  • Whether the brand granted exclusivity for specific formulations or instructions

Featured snippet answer: Besifloxacin’s exclusivity outlook has already been heavily shaped by prior approvals and generic entry pressure, and current clinical development visibility does not indicate a new exclusivity cycle driven by a late-stage breakthrough.


When does besifloxacin hydrochloride lose exclusivity and what generic entry risks exist?

Generic entry risk framework

For an ophthalmic antibiotic, generic risk is driven by:

  • Listed patent expiration timing (composition and formulation patents)
  • Paragraph IV filings tied to Orange Book listings
  • “Design-around” feasibility for excipients, particle specs, and manufacturing controls
  • Ocular tolerability comparability, especially for low-viscosity drops where instability can drive formulation differences

Practical market implication

Even when brand IP persists, competitive dynamics can shift due to:

  • Pharmacy substitution
  • Tendering by health systems
  • Retail tiering and contracting
  • Wholesale price competition from authorized generics in some markets

Bottom line: The generic entry risk for besifloxacin is structurally consistent with a legacy small-molecule ophthalmic antibiotic, where substitution is typically faster and more durable than in systems therapies.


How many patents protect besifloxacin hydrochloride and what types are they?

Patent estate composition categories

For ocular antibiotics in this class, patent estates typically include:

  • Composition of matter (active ingredient and salt form)
  • Formulation patents (vehicle, preservatives, viscosity, stability)
  • Manufacturing process patents (mixing, sterilization, filtration, fill)
  • Method-of-use patents (indication and dosing regimen)
  • Packaging and device-related patents (if applicable)

What drives enforcement outcomes

Enforcement strength often correlates with:

  • Whether formulation/manufacturing patents are still listed for the exact NDA/strength
  • Whether generics can use alternative excipient sets that avoid literal infringement
  • Whether method-of-use claims are enforceable under prescribing practices and labeling

Featured snippet answer: Besifloxacin’s protection history likely includes composition and formulation categories typical of ophthalmic fluoroquinolones, but the practical enforceability has to be tested against the current Orange Book listing status for the specific strength and dosage form.


What formulations are protected for besifloxacin hydrochloride?

Dosage form constraints

Besifloxacin is administered as an ophthalmic solution (drop). Formulation protection focuses on:

  • Chemical stability of besifloxacin in the vehicle
  • Preservative selection and concentration
  • pH and tonicity targets to limit ocular irritation
  • Particle dissolution and shelf life controls
  • Manufacturing and sterilization controls to ensure microbial safety

What generics must match

Generics generally need to meet:

  • Release specifications
  • Stability across shelf life
  • Comparable ocular tolerability and dosing performance

How does besifloxacin compare with other topical fluoroquinolones for bacterial conjunctivitis?

Competitive set

Besifloxacin sits in the same commercial and prescribing channel as topical fluoroquinolones such as:

  • Ofloxacin
  • Ciprofloxacin
  • Levofloxacin
  • Moxifloxacin
  • Gatifloxacin (where marketed historically)

Differentiation levers that influence switching

  • Dosing frequency (adherence and prescribing habits)
  • Formulation tolerability
  • Brand contracting and patient co-pay positioning
  • Local formulary inclusion
  • Prescriber experience and perceived clinical performance

Generic substitution reality

Because multiple fluoroquinolones are widely genericized, differentiation often collapses to:

  • Contracting and price
  • Margin support to wholesalers and pharmacy chains
  • Patient-specific tolerability and prescriber preferences

Featured snippet answer: Besifloxacin’s differentiation is less about unique clinical superiority and more about legacy formulary position and tolerability perceptions within the topical fluoroquinolone class.


What antibiotic alternatives compete with besifloxacin hydrochloride?

Non-fluoroquinolone anti-infectives

Alternatives vary by region and formulary, but ophthalmic antibiotic competition typically includes:

  • Aminoglycosides
  • Macrolides
  • Broad-spectrum combinations used in specific indications
  • Adjunctive antiseptics in certain practice pathways

Why switching may be limited

Clinicians often rely on established empirical treatment patterns for conjunctivitis. Unless:

  • Resistance patterns change materially
  • A competitor shows superior tolerability or dosing
  • Formularies or payer policies force substitution switching may remain gradual.

What ophthalmic brands and generics take share from besifloxacin?

Retail and institutional drivers

Share shifts in legacy ophthalmics are driven by:

  • “Cheapest equivalent” purchasing
  • Tendering dynamics in hospitals
  • Managed-care formulary updates
  • Pharmacy substitution rules
  • Co-pay support for brands (if still active)

How to read “market analysis” signals for this product type

For legacy topical antibiotics, meaningful signals include:

  • Script growth or decline on formulary churn
  • Wholesale acquisition cost changes
  • Generic market share capture following patent lapses/settlements

Market projection for besifloxacin hydrochloride: does demand grow or shrink?

Demand drivers

  • Recurrence and seasonality of conjunctivitis episodes
  • Prescriber preference for fluoroquinolone coverage
  • Awareness and labeling for bacterial conjunctivitis
  • Antimicrobial stewardship practices (which can reduce antibiotic usage in uncertain viral cases)

Headwinds

  • High generic penetration in the class
  • Continued formulary pressure toward the lowest-cost equivalent
  • Reduced incentive for new clinical-label expansions absent differentiation

Projection logic (practical model)

For assets like besifloxacin:

  • Volume is typically stable-to-slowly declining as generics erode brand share.
  • Price per script trends downward toward generic parity.
  • Total category demand may stay flat if conjunctivitis incidence remains stable.

Featured snippet answer: The most likely near-to-mid-term outcome is a stable or shrinking brand revenue profile with limited growth unless the product holds a protected formulary position or payer contracting support.


How large is the besifloxacin hydrochloride opportunity and what revenue sensitivity dominates?

Revenue sensitivity

For legacy ophthalmic antibiotics, revenue sensitivity usually concentrates in:

  • Brand vs generic mix
  • Average net price after rebates and contracts
  • Prescriber coverage within managed care plans
  • Seasonal prescribing and outbreak-driven spikes

Commercial implication

Even small changes in contracting can move revenue materially, while true underlying incidence-driven growth is harder to affect.


What patent litigation affects besifloxacin hydrochloride?

Litigation pattern for legacy ophthalmics

Where litigation occurs, it generally clusters around:

  • Orange Book listed patents
  • Paragraph IV challenges tied to generic versions
  • Settlement agreements affecting launch timing

How litigation translates to market outcomes

Litigation affects:

  • “Design launch” dates and carve-outs
  • Authorized generic timing
  • Court-ordered or settlement-driven entry delays
  • Switching behavior during the dispute window

Featured snippet answer: Public litigation relevance for besifloxacin is expected to be historical and IP-cycle-driven, with current market risk largely determined by whether any remaining listed patents still control the exact marketed strength and formulation.


What settlements and licensing deals change generic launch timing for besifloxacin?

Settlement mechanics that matter

  • Scope of permitted launch design (formulation, bottle size, strength)
  • Trigger dates
  • Confidentiality provisions on pricing and supply
  • “No challenge” or mutual release terms affecting future patent attacks

Commercial outcome

In legacy ophthalmics, settlements often produce:

  • One-time delay in generic entry
  • Short-term stability in brand pricing
  • Eventual erosion once exclusivity ends and market expands to additional generics

What is the FDA regulatory status of besifloxacin hydrochloride?

Pathway considerations

For small molecules already approved, current entrants usually follow:

  • Abbreviated pathways supported by bioequivalence (for generics)
  • Supplement pathways for formulation or manufacturing changes (for authorized changes)

Postmarketing obligations

Ongoing compliance typically covers:

  • Pharmacovigilance
  • Chemistry, manufacturing, controls updates
  • Label updates tied to safety communications

Which companies are most exposed to besifloxacin share shifts?

Brand vs generic exposure

Exposure maps to:

  • Branded holders if still active in supply and contracting
  • Generic manufacturers with market access to equivalent products
  • Wholesalers and distributors through inventory and procurement channels

Why distributor networks matter

Ophthalmic drop products are sensitive to:

  • Trade channel contract terms
  • Store-brand substitution and private label pressure
  • Pharmacy switching protocols

How does biosimilar risk apply to besifloxacin?

No biosimilar pathway relevance

Besifloxacin hydrochloride is a small molecule, so biosimilar risk does not apply.


Key Takeaways

  • Besifloxacin hydrochloride’s clinical-trial visibility is limited, with no strong public signal of a large late-stage program driving new differentiation.
  • Market dynamics are dominated by substitution pressure from generics across topical fluoroquinolones rather than new clinical evidence.
  • Near-to-mid-term revenue outlook is most likely stable-to-declining on a brand basis, driven by net price erosion and mix shift rather than category growth.
  • Patent and exclusivity factors still influence timing of generic launch, but the practical competitive landscape is structurally set by longstanding fluoroquinolone genericization.

FAQs

  1. How does besifloxacin’s efficacy compare to ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin in bacterial conjunctivitis trials?
  2. Do generic besifloxacin ophthalmic solutions face formulation differences that affect ocular tolerability?
  3. What managed-care formulary factors most influence besifloxacin prescribing vs cheaper fluoroquinolone generics?
  4. Are there ongoing postmarketing or observational studies for besifloxacin hydrochloride in eye infections?
  5. What dosing frequency and adherence considerations drive switching among topical fluoroquinolone antibiotic drops?

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Accessed 2026-07-28).
  2. U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for besifloxacin hydrochloride. (Accessed 2026-07-28).
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval Packages and labeling documents for besifloxacin hydrochloride ophthalmic products. (Accessed 2026-07-28).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.