Last Updated: June 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BENICAR HCT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BENICAR HCT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed Emory University N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00185068 ↗ An Examination of the Safety and Blood Pressure Lowering Effect of Increasing Doses of Benicar® and Benicar® HCT in Patients With Hypertension Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Phase 4 2004-03-01 Effect of increasing doses of olmesartan medoxomil and olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure in patients with hypertension
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BENICAR HCT

Condition Name

Condition Name for BENICAR HCT
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 5
Healthy 4
Essential Hypertension 2
Healthy Subjects 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BENICAR HCT
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 7
Essential Hypertension 2
Cardiovascular Diseases 1
Obesity 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BENICAR HCT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BENICAR HCT
Location Trials
United States 118
Mexico 5
Chile 4
China 2
Peru 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BENICAR HCT
Location Trials
California 5
North Dakota 5
New York 5
Florida 5
Texas 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BENICAR HCT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BENICAR HCT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BENICAR HCT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Not yet recruiting 1
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BENICAR HCT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BENICAR HCT
Sponsor Trials
Daiichi Sankyo Inc. 4
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. 4
Mylan Pharmaceuticals 4
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BENICAR HCT
Sponsor Trials
Industry 18
Other 4
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

BENICAR HCT (Olmesartan Medoxomil + Hydrochlorothiazide): Clinical Trials Update and Market Projection

Last updated: May 4, 2026

What is BENICAR HCT and how is it positioned clinically?

BENICAR HCT is a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil (ARB) plus hydrochlorothiazide (thiazide diuretic) indicated for treatment of hypertension in adults. It is marketed as a combination option when monotherapy is insufficient. The product’s clinical evidence base relies on randomized efficacy and safety data that compare combination therapy to each component and placebo in adults with hypertension, with additional support from long-term ARB trial data that inform class expectations (cardiovascular and renal outcomes vary by indication and patient population).

Key clinical mechanism

  • Olmesartan medoxomil: blocks angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R).
  • Hydrochlorothiazide: reduces sodium reabsorption in distal tubules; promotes diuresis.

Therapeutic role in practice

  • Used after incomplete BP control on monotherapy or when a combination is preferred for faster attainment of target BP.
  • Standard antihypertensive labeling strategy: combination lowers BP more than each monotherapy at lower doses, with diuretic-related laboratory and volume effects.

Primary regulatory product reference: BENICAR HCT prescribing information (US) provides the official indication, dosing approach, contraindications, boxed warnings where applicable, and adverse event profile. [1]

What clinical trials underpin efficacy and safety?

Clinical development for the fixed-dose ARB and thiazide combination approach used randomized controlled trials in adult hypertensive populations. The totality of evidence is typically structured around:

  • Dose-ranging and short-term BP change (primary endpoint: change from baseline to a defined time point).
  • Safety characterization (electrolytes, renal function, metabolic parameters).
  • Comparative arms (olmesartan vs hydrochlorothiazide vs combination).

Representative trial architecture used in BENICAR HCT development

Because BENICAR HCT is an approved fixed-dose combination, much of the clinical evidence is embedded in the original regulatory submission and subsequent label-described studies. These studies generally show:

  • Greater mean systolic and diastolic BP reductions for the combination versus monotherapy.
  • Class-consistent adverse events: dizziness, headache, GI symptoms.
  • Diuretic-associated lab effects: hypokalemia, hyponatremia, increased uric acid, possible creatinine changes.

Ongoing “new” interventional trials

As of the available public registries and publications through the knowledge cutoff, BENICAR HCT’s current clinical landscape is dominated by:

  • Postmarketing observational studies (real-world use, adherence, switch patterns).
  • Extrapolation within label for treatment goals rather than new large Phase 3 programs.

What is the latest clinical-trials update for BENICAR HCT?

No discrete late-stage (Phase 3) “registration-defining” BENICAR HCT trials with clear, updated outcomes are visible as a dominant theme in publicly indexed trial listings and recent literature, indicating the product is in a mature/maintenance clinical phase rather than a late-development launch phase.

The practical clinical update is instead driven by:

  • Label maintenance and safety signal surveillance.
  • Real-world comparative effectiveness and regimen optimization analyses that evaluate ARB-thiazide combinations versus other first-line strategies.

Regulatory baseline: BENICAR HCT US label is the controlling clinical source for dosing, adverse events, and contraindications. [1]

How does the safety profile shape market use?

BENICAR HCT safety is consistent with ARB plus thiazide pharmacology. Key risks that influence payer and clinician selection include:

  • Renal function changes: monitor creatinine in at-risk patients.
  • Electrolyte disturbances: hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and metabolic changes related to thiazide exposure.
  • Volume depletion and dizziness: common with diuretic-containing regimens.
  • Hypersensitivity and electrolyte abnormalities: thiazide-related.

These points are captured in the official prescribing information. [1]

What is the market landscape for ARB-thiazide fixed-dose combinations?

Competitive set

ARB-thiazide fixed-dose combinations compete in a mature antihypertensive market that is dominated by:

  • Fixed-dose ARB/HCTZ products from multiple companies.
  • Generic ARBs and generics of hydrochlorothiazide.
  • Fixed-dose ARB/chlorthalidone options (in some markets, depending on availability and prescriber preference).

BENICAR HCT’s market lever

  • Brand equity in the ARB class historically, with gradual share pressure as generic ARB components expand.
  • Formulary preference depends on copay tiers, rebates, and clinical outcomes data plus real-world formulary adoption.

What drives utilization in the US?

  • Prescriber preference for fixed-dose regimens when titration speed matters.
  • Generic substitution pressure on the branded fixed-dose product once component generics proliferate.
  • Payer formularies that often steer to lower-cost fixed-dose options.

What is the market outlook and projection for BENICAR HCT?

A defensible projection requires market sizing inputs (category TAM, branded share, pricing trajectory, formulary status, and competitor mix). The provided source set supports clinical and regulatory status but does not contain sufficient numeric market-forecast inputs to produce a complete, accurate financial projection.

Accordingly, no quantified revenue forecast is issued here.

What claims and regulatory status matter for projection risk?

Patent and exclusivity relevance

Market projection for branded fixed-dose antihypertensives turns on:

  • Remaining patent protection (brand/device manufacturing or combination patents).
  • Generic entry timing (component or fixed-dose).
  • Exclusivity expirations affecting first generic or authorized generic status.

Regulatory baseline

BENICAR HCT is a marketed antihypertensive combination with established label and postmarketing safety monitoring under the US FDA approval framework. [1]

How does dosing practice influence adoption?

Dosing pattern

Fixed-dose combinations tend to follow:

  • Initiation at lower dose strengths for patients naive to either component.
  • Up-titration within the fixed-dose strength range based on BP response.
  • Switching when BP control is inadequate or when diuretic side effects occur.

The BENICAR HCT prescribing information provides the approved dosing framework by strength and patient BP response. [1]

Key Takeaways

  • BENICAR HCT is an approved, mature fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil plus hydrochlorothiazide for adult hypertension, supported by randomized clinical evidence embedded in label and class-consistent long-term ARB expectations. [1]
  • The current clinical-trials pattern is maintenance and postmarketing rather than a visible late-stage registration-driven pipeline update for BENICAR HCT specifically.
  • Market competition is structurally intense due to generic ARB and fixed-dose alternatives, with utilization driven by formulary and cost-sharing, not new clinical breakthroughs.
  • A quantified market projection cannot be produced from the available cited materials without introducing unverified numeric forecasts.

FAQs

1) What is BENICAR HCT indicated for?

It is indicated for treatment of hypertension in adults. [1]

2) What are the key active components in BENICAR HCT?

Olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide. [1]

3) What safety monitoring is most relevant for ARB-HCTZ combinations?

Electrolytes and renal function are typically the key monitoring areas given thiazide and ARB pharmacology, as reflected in the US label safety sections. [1]

4) Is BENICAR HCT in late-stage clinical development?

The publicly evident development posture is mature/maintenance rather than an actively visible late-stage, registration-defining program for BENICAR HCT. (Label remains the controlling clinical reference.) [1]

5) What most influences BENICAR HCT market share?

Pricing and payer formulary placement relative to generic and competing fixed-dose ARB-thiazide options, plus patient tolerance of diuretic effects. [1]


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. BENICAR HCT (olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide) prescribing information. FDA label database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.