Last Updated: November 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BENICAR

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for BENICAR

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00122447 ↗ Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk and Prevention in Early Glucose Intolerance Completed Emory University N/A 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers, β-cell function, and insulin sensitivity can be improved by targeting mechanisms of both diabetes and CVD - using an antioxidant, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an anti-inflammatory agent - in patients with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in a randomized, controlled trial.
NCT00185068 ↗ An Examination of the Safety and Blood Pressure Lowering Effect of Increasing Doses of Benicar® and Benicar® HCT in Patients With Hypertension Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Phase 4 2004-03-01 Effect of increasing doses of olmesartan medoxomil and olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure in patients with hypertension
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BENICAR

Condition Name

Condition Name for BENICAR
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 5
Healthy 4
Essential Hypertension 2
Healthy Subjects 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BENICAR
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 7
Essential Hypertension 2
Myocardial Ischemia 1
Coronary Artery Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BENICAR

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BENICAR
Location Trials
United States 118
Mexico 5
Chile 4
China 2
Argentina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BENICAR
Location Trials
New York 5
Florida 5
California 5
North Dakota 5
Texas 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BENICAR

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BENICAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BENICAR
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Not yet recruiting 1
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BENICAR

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BENICAR
Sponsor Trials
Mylan Pharmaceuticals 4
Daiichi Sankyo Inc. 4
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. 4
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BENICAR
Sponsor Trials
Industry 18
Other 4
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 24, 2026

Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Patent-Driven Generic/Biosimilar Outlook

Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil) is an established angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) used for hypertension and, in select jurisdictions, for reduction of risk of CV events in high-risk patients. Its US market exclusivity is expired; the current competitive outlook is dominated by generic ARBs and class-level substitution rather than brand-specific late-stage assets. Current clinical-trials activity is limited and mostly incremental (registries, observational programs, real-world outcomes, and label-exploration studies) rather than new pivotal programs.


What phase clinical trials are active for Benicar (olmesartan) right now?

Featured snippet answer: Active Benicar-specific clinical trials are generally non-pivotal, often observational, and are not indicative of a near-term new molecular entity or major new indication comparable to original NDA-era pivotal trials.

Trial types typically reported for olmesartan in recent years

  • Observational post-marketing studies in hypertension management pathways
  • Comparative effectiveness studies versus other ARBs or ACE inhibitors
  • Safety-focused work, including renal outcomes, hyperkalemia incidence, and adherence
  • Pharmacovigilance or registry studies
  • Real-world comparative studies tied to reimbursement or guideline adherence

What “update” usually means for an older branded ARB

For marketed ARBs like olmesartan, clinical-trials updates in databases commonly reflect:

  • completion/termination notices
  • recruitment status changes
  • protocol amendments for observational studies
  • follow-up completion and publication timelines for registry cohorts

Why is Benicar’s late-stage pipeline thin compared with newer antihypertensives?

Featured snippet answer: Olmesartan is off-patent for the branded molecule in most major markets, shifting incentives toward generic competition, class-line extension, and real-world evidence rather than new pivotal NDA work.

Commercial logic affecting trial investment

  • Generics capture the majority of volume once branded patents and regulatory exclusivity expire.
  • Any new pivotal trial would need to support a new proprietary claim with patent coverage, which is harder for an already-used ARB scaffold.
  • Payor formularies increasingly favor lowest net cost within ARB classes.

What is the global market size for olmesartan/Benicar and how fast is it growing?

Featured snippet answer: The olmesartan/ARB market remains large but growth is driven primarily by volume replacement in underserved patients and uptake in HTN cohorts, while Benicar-specific share trends downward as generics expand and prices compress.

Market dynamics that shape Benicar performance

  • Class effects: ARBs are used broadly in patients intolerant to ACE inhibitors and those requiring BP targets.
  • Price compression: Generic ARBs drive net price erosion; branded ARB share shrinks quickly after material patent or exclusivity milestones.
  • Formulary substitution: Large integrated payors often substitute within ARB classes unless a patient has documented intolerance.
  • Safety and switching behavior: Safety perceptions and renal monitoring protocols affect prescriber comfort but typically do not create a durable “brand moat” once generics dominate.

Practical market read-through

For business planning, Benicar should be modeled as a mature, shrinking-through-substitution asset with:

  • declining brand revenues in the US after generic penetration
  • more durable demand in markets where generic penetration is slower
  • limited upside from incremental observational evidence

How does Benicar (olmesartan) compare with other ARBs on efficacy and tolerability?

Featured snippet answer: Olmesartan is clinically similar across ARBs for BP reduction; differences that matter commercially are typically adherence, formulary positioning, dose convenience, and patient-specific tolerability.

Competitive landscape: other ARBs

  • Losartan
  • Valsartan
  • Irbesartan
  • Telmisartan
  • Candesartan

What drives real-world choice

  • Net price and rebate structure
  • Pill strength availability and switching ease
  • Patient history of cough/angioedema (ACE intolerance)
  • Provider familiarity and guideline alignment

When did Benicar lose exclusivity, and what does that mean for generic entry risk?

Featured snippet answer: Benicar’s US branded exclusivity is effectively over; generic olmesartan medoxomil entry risk is driven by ANDA readiness and patent/Orange Book status rather than exclusivity calendars.

US framework that typically governs ARB generics

  • Brand exclusivity ends first (with earlier NCE/505(b)(2) type drivers not applicable in modern time for older drugs).
  • Patent-based barriers depend on remaining listed patents in the Orange Book.
  • Generic launch timing is usually governed by Paragraph IV opportunities and litigation/settlement outcomes if any Orange Book patents remain in force.

What is the Orange Book status of Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil) and which patents matter?

Featured snippet answer: Benicar is a mature product with Orange Book patents that are generally either expired or have been cleared for generic entry; the relevant remaining barriers, if any, are typically formulation/dose-specific or packaging-related patents, and brand leverage is limited.

Why Orange Book coverage matters for an older ARB

  • For an established ARB, most value has already transferred to generics.
  • Any remaining listed patents typically do not delay class-level competition unless they cover a specific dosage form, strength, or manufacturing method.

What patent estate strength does Benicar have today?

Featured snippet answer: The practical patent estate strength for Benicar is low relative to its market size because the molecule is long past core composition coverage.

Most likely remaining patent categories

  • Manufacturing process patents (often weak for generic design-around)
  • Formulation patents (can be designed around, but may delay specific strengths)
  • Packaging and method-of-use patents (less common as meaningful barriers for ARBs at this stage)

What Paragraph IV ANDA challenges exist for olmesartan/Benicar, and how did they resolve?

Featured snippet answer: The Paragraph IV ecosystem for olmesartan is largely historical; contemporary “Benicar-specific” litigation is not a primary driver of near-term competition.

How to model litigation historically for planning

  • Use litigation outcomes to infer which patent categories were enforceable.
  • Assume ongoing generic competition unless a specific, still-listed patent prevents a specific strength from launch.

What litigation and settlements affect Benicar’s competitive timeline?

Featured snippet answer: Competitive timeline impact is generally already realized for olmesartan because any litigated Orange Book barriers have been resolved long before now.

How those outcomes typically show up commercially

  • Sudden step-changes in generic count after settlements
  • Rapid retail and wholesaler net price declines
  • Formulary switching accelerations following final judgments or consent decrees

What biosimilar risk applies to Benicar?

Featured snippet answer: No biosimilar pathway applies. Olmesartan is a small-molecule drug, so the competitive framework is ANDAs (generics) rather than biosimilars.


What formulation patents could protect specific Benicar strengths, and are they commercially meaningful now?

Featured snippet answer: Formulation or manufacturing patents can block certain strengths or dosing designs, but commercial meaningfulness is limited for a mature ARB where multiple generic equivalents already exist across strengths.

Commercial implications

  • If formulation barriers exist, they tend to be narrow.
  • Even if one strength is delayed, patient demand can shift within the class and across strengths.

Regulatory status: Is Benicar under any current FDA safety monitoring or label changes that affect sales?

Featured snippet answer: Benicar has had label and safety communications historically, but those are not equivalent to a current, new regulatory exclusivity driver.

Safety themes that have historically mattered for olmesartan

  • GI symptom reporting and the risk of sprue-like enteropathy has been a known label topic for olmesartan class products
  • Renal function monitoring and hyperkalemia risk management in typical ARB use

Market projection: What will happen to Benicar revenues over the next 3 to 5 years?

Featured snippet answer: Benicar revenues will likely remain in steady decline or flat at best in the US, driven by ongoing generic substitution, price erosion, and limited incremental clinical or regulatory upside.

Projection model inputs that matter

  • Net price trend: continued compression as generics compete
  • Share loss: continuing substitution to lowest-cost ARBs and multi-source generics
  • Volume stability: may be supported by guideline-driven BP management but offset by switching
  • Channel behavior: wholesaler and PBM contracting increasingly favor ARB equivalents at lowest net cost

Three scenario projection (business planning framing)

  • Base case: gradual revenue decline driven by net price compression
  • Downside: accelerated share erosion if additional low-cost entrants expand
  • Upside: stabilization if a narrower unique product position emerges (unlikely for mature ARB), or if a specific market delays generic penetration

Regional commercialization outlook: where does Benicar retain more value than in the US?

Featured snippet answer: Value retention is typically higher where generic penetration is slower, pharmacovigilance processes slow substitution, or where local supply constraints keep branded/legacy usage higher.

Drivers by market type

  • Developed markets with rapid generic acceptance: faster price erosion
  • Emerging markets with slower approvals: more prolonged branded survival
  • Procurement systems: tend to switch quickly once multiple suppliers are available

How does Benicar’s competitive pressure affect adoption of combination therapies?

Featured snippet answer: ARB-class competition pushes combination prescribing toward the lowest-cost ARB backbone plus partner classes (thiazides, CCBs), rather than sustaining branded monotherapy positioning.

Common combination directions

  • Olmesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide
  • ARB plus calcium channel blocker strategies in guideline-driven regimens
  • Back-end shifting by PBMs using tiered formulary rebates

Key takeaways on Benicar’s clinical and market path

  • Benicar is a mature small-molecule ARB with limited new pivotal clinical trial momentum.
  • Market competition is dominated by generic olmesartan and cross-ARB substitution.
  • Patent and exclusivity-driven brand protection is not a near-term factor for new barriers; any remaining impact is usually narrow and strength-specific.
  • Forward-looking revenue projection should be modeled primarily as net price and share erosion rather than pipeline upside.

FAQs

1) Are there any new FDA approvals for Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil) recently?

No new meaningful FDA approvals are indicated by an ongoing branded exclusivity strategy, consistent with a mature generic-dominant ARB profile.

2) Does olmesartan have any unique safety signal compared with other ARBs?

Olmesartan has historically included label discussion around sprue-like enteropathy-like symptoms, which has influenced prescriber awareness and monitoring practices relative to some peers.

3) Can generics launch immediately in the US if Orange Book patents are expired?

Generics can launch upon readiness and absence of active patent injunction barriers for the specific formulation/strength; the controlling factor is current Orange Book status and any live litigation.

4) What BP outcome advantage does Benicar offer versus cheaper ARBs?

No clinically distinct advantage is required for BP control; selection is typically driven by economics, formulary positioning, and patient tolerance.

5) Is there any biosimilar competition for Benicar?

No. Olmesartan is not a biologic; competition is via ANDAs for generics, not biosimilars.


References (APA)

  1. FDA. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. FDA. (n.d.). Orange Book: Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil). Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Olmesartan medoxomil studies. U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.