Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR BACTRIM PEDIATRIC


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT03431168 ↗ A Novel Regimen to Prevent Malaria and STI in Pregnant Women With HIV Active, not recruiting University of Alabama at Birmingham Phase 2 2018-03-07 More than 3 billion people worldwide are at risk of acquiring malaria and pregnant women living with HIV in Africa are at particular risk. An effective prophylaxis regimen capable of preventing malaria and other common perinatal infections would have great potential to improve adverse birth outcomes. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate a new combination prophylaxis regimen in pregnant women with HIV in Cameroon to determine its efficacy and safety.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000936 ↗ A Study To Test An Anti-Rejection Therapy After Kidney Transplantation Terminated National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1999-11-01 Kidney transplantation is often successful. However, despite aggressive anti-rejection drug therapy, some patients will reject their new kidney. This study is designed to test two anti-rejection approaches. Two medications in this study are currently used in children, but there is no information regarding which drug is safer or more effective. Survival rates in renal transplantation are unacceptably low. Therefore, there is a need for an improved post-transplant treatment, such as the induction therapy used in this study.
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00002524 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With AIDS-Related Lymphoma Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 2 1993-06-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more cancer cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy in treating patients with AIDS-related lymphoma.
NCT00002850 ↗ Antibiotic Therapy in Preventing Early Infection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Receiving Chemotherapy Completed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase 3 1997-03-01 RATIONALE: Giving antibiotics may be effective in preventing or controlling early infection in patients with multiple myeloma and may improve their response to chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying antibiotics to see how well they work compared to no antibiotics in preventing early infection in patients with multiple myeloma.
NCT00002850 ↗ Antibiotic Therapy in Preventing Early Infection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Receiving Chemotherapy Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1997-03-01 RATIONALE: Giving antibiotics may be effective in preventing or controlling early infection in patients with multiple myeloma and may improve their response to chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying antibiotics to see how well they work compared to no antibiotics in preventing early infection in patients with multiple myeloma.
NCT00002850 ↗ Antibiotic Therapy in Preventing Early Infection in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Receiving Chemotherapy Completed Gary Morrow Phase 3 1997-03-01 RATIONALE: Giving antibiotics may be effective in preventing or controlling early infection in patients with multiple myeloma and may improve their response to chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying antibiotics to see how well they work compared to no antibiotics in preventing early infection in patients with multiple myeloma.
NCT00023231 ↗ Pediatric Kidney Transplant Without Calcineurin Inhibitors Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 2001-02-01 The purpose of this study is to see the effect of using drugs other than calcineurin inhibitors to improve the rate of kidney transplant failure. Kidney transplantation can help children with end-stage kidney disease. However, it has been difficult to find treatment for donor graft rejection that does not have a lot of side effects. Researchers hope to find treatments (immunosuppressants) with fewer side effects. One approach is to avoid using calcineurin inhibitors and to try a new drug known as sirolimus instead. Another is to use steroids less often. This study will test whether using sirolimus, fewer steroid treatments, MMF, and certain antibodies will improve long-term graft survival in children receiving kidney transplants from living donors.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC

Condition Name

Condition Name for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 6
Abscess 4
Urinary Tract Infections 4
Lymphoma 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC
Intervention Trials
Infections 15
Infection 14
Communicable Diseases 12
Leukemia 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC
Location Trials
United States 120
France 4
Peru 3
Italy 3
Canada 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC
Location Trials
Texas 18
Ohio 9
Pennsylvania 8
New York 6
Michigan 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 8
[disabled in preview] 40
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 35
Terminated 7
Withdrawn 5
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC
Sponsor Trials
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 11
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 7
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 5
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC
Sponsor Trials
Other 115
NIH 17
Industry 17
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: April 25, 2026

BACTRIM PEDIATRIC (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole): Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is BACTRIM PEDIATRIC and how is it used?

BACTRIM PEDIATRIC is a pediatric formulation of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), an oral antibacterial combination used for a range of infections. TMP-SMX dosing and indications depend on organism and clinical syndrome, and the drug’s regulatory positioning is tied to established antimicrobial use cases rather than a single disease-specific breakthrough program.

Regulatory class and IP posture (practical view)

  • TMP-SMX is a long-established generic antimicrobial worldwide.
  • The “BACTRIM PEDIATRIC” brand is a product formulation/brand within an active ingredient class that has largely exited meaningful patent exclusivity in major markets.
  • Commercial outcomes therefore hinge on competitive generic pricing, antibiotic stewardship demand, and formulary access, not novel molecular patent life.

What clinical trial updates apply to BACTRIM PEDIATRIC?

BACTRIM PEDIATRIC does not represent a distinct, late-stage, molecule-level development program. Clinical evidence is anchored to the TMP-SMX active ingredient’s broad clinical use record, and to formulation-specific packaging/labeling rather than independent late-stage trials.

Clinical trial reality for TMP-SMX (relevant to pediatric use)

  • Pediatric practice relies on established dosing and safety efficacy evidence accumulated over decades for TMP-SMX.
  • Contemporary research activity is typically concentrated in:
    • Comparative effectiveness of antibiotic strategies (including TMP-SMX) for common pediatric infections.
    • Safety, dosing optimization, and resistance-driven outcomes across settings.
    • Trials that evaluate stewardship pathways rather than brand-level product performance.

What this means for a “BACTRIM PEDIATRIC clinical trial update”

  • There is no basis to claim a specific, brand-scoped Phase 3 or Phase 2 readout for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC as an independent development asset.
  • Any “update” in the public domain is expected to be indirect (TMP-SMX clinical literature and guideline integration), not a brand-specific pipeline milestone.

How does the market for TMP-SMX pediatric therapy look today?

The pediatric TMP-SMX market is shaped by four forces:

  1. Generic dominance and price compression

    • TMP-SMX is widely available as generics globally.
    • Brand differentiation in pediatrics is largely limited to formulation convenience (pediatric suspension), labeling, supply reliability, and contracted formulary access.
  2. Antibiotic stewardship and guideline-driven substitution

    • TMP-SMX use is sensitive to guideline recommendations and local susceptibility patterns.
    • Stewardship pressure reduces empirical use in some syndromes when alternatives are preferred and resistance patterns are unfavorable.
  3. Resistance and indication mix

    • TMP-SMX has retained utility in select infections where susceptibility remains favorable.
    • Market demand shifts when resistance to TMP-SMX increases or when resistance trends change by geography.
  4. Formulary and payer contracting

    • Pediatric liquid antibiotics are frequently subject to formulary control due to utilization and budget impact.

Market segmentation (commercially actionable)

  • Core pediatric oral antibiotic demand for infections where TMP-SMX is an accepted option.
  • Institutional and outpatient pediatrics where suspension formulations support adherence and dosing flexibility.
  • Acute care vs. chronic/relapsing use patterns depend on local infection epidemiology (for example, recurrent infections where TMP-SMX is guideline-supported).

What are the key drivers and headwinds for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC?

Drivers

  • Stable pediatric need for oral antibiotics where TMP-SMX is indicated.
  • Formulation convenience (liquid/pediatric administration) and stable pediatric dosing practices.
  • Contracted access through pediatric formularies where BACTRIM pediatric is stocked.

Headwinds

  • Generic substitution pressure remains the central pricing risk.
  • Antibiotic stewardship lowers empirical usage where TMP-SMX is not first-line.
  • Rising resistance in key pathogens can reduce relative preference.
  • Regulatory or payer tightening around antibiotic selection can shift utilization toward alternatives.

Market projection: What is a realistic outlook for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC (2026-2030)?

A projection for BACTRIM PEDIATRIC is best modeled as a brand share and pricing story inside a generic drug class, not a molecule growth story.

Projected scenario framework (directional, for planning)

  • Base case: flat-to-low growth in unit demand for pediatric TMP-SMX (driven by population and infection incidence), with brand revenue growing slowly if BACTRIM maintains formulary position. Pricing is likely to be pressured by generics.
  • Downside case: utilization declines due to stewardship and resistance-led preference shifts; brand revenue contracts even if total pediatric antibiotic volume remains steady.
  • Upside case: favorable contracting or stronger persistence in pediatric suspension preference supports modest share retention; resistance patterns stabilize for key infections.

Implication for business planning

  • Revenue growth is most likely to come from share retention and contracted formulary access, not from therapeutic expansion.
  • Investment prioritization should focus on:
    • Supply reliability and pediatric supply continuity.
    • Payer contracting and formulary navigation.
    • Labeling and compliance support tied to pediatric administration and dosing accuracy.

How should investors and R&D teams evaluate BACTRIM PEDIATRIC vs. the TMP-SMX class?

Key decision lens

  • Treat BACTRIM PEDIATRIC as a commercial brand within a mature, generic class.
  • The competitive map is defined by suspension availability, pricing, and contracting rather than proprietary drug performance.

Practical benchmark metrics

  • Share of pediatric oral TMP-SMX suspension category.
  • Net price erosion versus generic basket.
  • Formulary inclusion across top pediatric health systems.
  • Stock-out rate and distribution performance (often decisive in pediatric liquid antibiotics).

Key Takeaways

  • BACTRIM PEDIATRIC is a pediatric TMP-SMX brand, not a standalone pipeline asset; clinical updates are expected to reflect TMP-SMX’s established evidence base, not brand-specific Phase 2/3 milestones.
  • Market outlook is driven by generic competition, formulary access, antibiotic stewardship, and resistance patterns, not by innovation-led demand expansion.
  • Projections (2026-2030) should be modeled as share and price dynamics within a mature generic category: base case is typically low growth or flat revenue with higher risk of decline under resistance or stewardship shifts.

FAQs

1) Does BACTRIM PEDIATRIC have a distinct late-stage development program?

No. BACTRIM PEDIATRIC is a pediatric formulation of an established antimicrobial; brand value depends on commercialization and access within the generic TMP-SMX market.

2) Are current clinical trials likely to generate label expansion for the brand?

Publicly visible trial activity for TMP-SMX is generally not brand-scoped and is more often tied to treatment strategies, comparative outcomes, or stewardship rather than brand-specific pediatric formulation trials.

3) What most affects demand for pediatric TMP-SMX?

Formulary decisions, antibiotic stewardship protocols, and local resistance patterns in pediatric pathogens.

4) What is the biggest commercial risk to BACTRIM PEDIATRIC?

Generic substitution and net price erosion, which can outweigh modest changes in underlying infection volumes.

5) Where can growth realistically come from?

From retaining or expanding formulary share for pediatric oral suspension use and maintaining favorable payer contracting rather than from new clinical differentiation.


References

[1] FDA. Drug approvals and labeling information for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole products (BACTRIM/BACTRIM PEDIATRIC listings and prescribing information). (Accessed via FDA databases).
[2] Global databases for clinical trial records and study identifiers for TMP-SMX (search results for “trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole” pediatric). (Accessed via clinicaltrials.gov and related registries).
[3] Professional guideline documents addressing TMP-SMX use in pediatric infections and resistance context (pediatric infectious disease guidance). (Accessed via society and guideline publications).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.