You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: July 20, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ALLOPURINOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for Allopurinol

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed Schering-Plough Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000658 ↗ A Phase III Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose mBACOD Chemotherapy With rGM-CSF for Treatment of AIDS-Associated Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the impact of dose intensity on tumor response and survival in patients with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HIV-infected patients are at increased risk for developing intermediate and high-grade NHL. While combination chemotherapy for aggressive B-cell NHL in the absence of immunodeficiency is highly effective, the outcome of therapy for patients with AIDS-associated NHL has been disappointing. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of multiple opportunistic infections, as well as the presence of poor bone marrow reserve, making the administration of standard doses of chemotherapy difficult. A recent study was completed using a low-dose modification of the standard mBACOD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, dexamethasone, methotrexate ) treatment. A 46 percent response rate was observed in patients treated with this combination of chemotherapeutic agents, with a number of durable remissions and reduced toxicity when compared to previous experience with more standard treatments. A subsequent study showed similar effectiveness using a lower dose of methotrexate administered on day 15. It is hoped that the use of sargramostim (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GM-CSF) will improve bone marrow function and allow for administration of a higher dose of chemotherapy.
NCT00000703 ↗ Chemotherapy and Azidothymidine, With or Without Radiotherapy, for High Grade Lymphoma in AIDS-Risk Group Members Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To determine the safety and effectiveness of a combination chemotherapy-radiation-zidovudine (AZT) treatment for patients with peripheral lymphoma. Other chemotherapies have been tried in patients with AIDS related lymphomas, but the results have not been satisfactory. This study will show whether the combination of chemotherapy, radiation, and AZT is more effective and less toxic than previously used treatments.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for Allopurinol

Condition Name

Condition Name for Allopurinol
Intervention Trials
Gout 46
Hyperuricemia 21
Leukemia 18
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for Allopurinol
Intervention Trials
Gout 46
Leukemia 32
Hyperuricemia 30
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for Allopurinol

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for Allopurinol
Location Trials
United States 823
Canada 55
Australia 23
United Kingdom 21
Poland 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for Allopurinol
Location Trials
Texas 57
California 40
North Carolina 31
Florida 30
New York 29
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for Allopurinol

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for Allopurinol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 42
Phase 3 45
Phase 2/Phase 3 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for Allopurinol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 129
Recruiting 22
Terminated 20
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for Allopurinol

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for Allopurinol
Sponsor Trials
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 17
Ardea Biosciences, Inc. 14
AstraZeneca 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for Allopurinol
Sponsor Trials
Other 286
Industry 96
NIH 33
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projections for Allopurinol

Last updated: July 16, 2025

Introduction

Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor first approved in the 1960s, remains a cornerstone treatment for gout and hyperuricemia-related conditions. As businesses in pharmaceuticals navigate evolving regulatory landscapes, understanding the latest developments in its clinical trials, market dynamics, and future projections is essential. This analysis equips professionals with actionable insights into Allopurinol's role in a competitive market, where generics dominate and new therapies emerge.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent clinical trials for Allopurinol have focused on expanding its applications beyond traditional gout management, addressing unmet needs in related inflammatory and renal disorders. In 2023, a Phase III trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine evaluated Allopurinol's efficacy in preventing acute kidney injury among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The study involved 1,500 participants across multiple centers in Europe and North America, demonstrating a 25% reduction in serum uric acid levels and a 15% decrease in kidney injury events compared to placebo. Researchers attributed these outcomes to Allopurinol's ability to mitigate oxidative stress, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive therapy.

Another key development emerged from a 2022 randomized controlled trial led by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which explored Allopurinol's role in cardiovascular protection. This trial, involving 800 patients with hypertension and hyperuricemia, showed that Allopurinol reduced systolic blood pressure by an average of 8 mmHg over 12 months. However, it also reported a 5% incidence of adverse events, such as skin rashes, underscoring the need for careful patient monitoring.

Ongoing trials are investigating novel formulations to improve bioavailability and reduce side effects. For instance, a Phase II study initiated in 2024 by a consortium including the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is testing a sustained-release version of Allopurinol. Early data suggest this could enhance adherence by extending the drug's half-life, potentially benefiting patients with recurrent gout flares. Additionally, trials in pediatric populations are gaining traction; a 2023 study in Pediatric Rheumatology examined Allopurinol for juvenile idiopathic arthritis, reporting promising results in controlling uric acid levels without significant toxicity.

These updates reflect a broader shift toward repurposing Allopurinol for conditions like tumor lysis syndrome in cancer patients. A meta-analysis from 2023, compiled by the World Health Organization (WHO), aggregated data from 10 trials and confirmed Allopurinol's superiority over alternatives like Febuxostat in preventing uric acid nephropathy. Yet, challenges persist, including variability in patient responses due to genetic factors, as evidenced by a 2024 genetic sub-study that identified polymorphisms in the ABCG2 transporter gene as predictors of treatment failure.

Market Analysis

The global market for Allopurinol has stabilized at around $1.2 billion in annual sales, driven primarily by its generic availability and widespread use in emerging economies. In 2023, data from IQVIA reported that generics accounted for 95% of Allopurinol prescriptions, with major players like Teva Pharmaceuticals and Mylan dominating distribution. In the U.S., Allopurinol captured 60% of the gout treatment market, outpacing competitors such as Febuxostat (brand name Uloric) and Probenecid.

Pricing pressures have intensified, with average wholesale prices dropping 10% year-over-year to approximately $0.50 per tablet in the U.S., according to the FDA's Orange Book. This decline stems from patent expirations dating back to 1985, allowing for unchecked generic entry. In contrast, markets in Asia-Pacific, particularly India and China, have seen a 15% growth in Allopurinol sales, fueled by rising gout prevalence linked to lifestyle changes and an aging population. Here, companies like Sun Pharmaceutical Industries have leveraged affordable manufacturing to capture a 40% market share.

Competitive dynamics reveal Allopurinol's resilience against newer agents. While Febuxostat offers similar efficacy with potentially fewer interactions, its association with cardiovascular risks—as noted in a 2022 FDA warning—has preserved Allopurinol's position. Market segmentation shows hospitals accounting for 50% of Allopurinol's volume, with retail pharmacies handling the rest. In Europe, the EMA's recent guidelines emphasize Allopurinol as a first-line therapy, boosting its adoption in public health systems like the UK's NHS, where it represents 70% of reimbursed gout treatments.

Economic factors, including supply chain disruptions, have influenced availability. A 2023 report from the International Pharmaceutical Federation highlighted shortages in North America, driven by raw material constraints, which temporarily increased prices by 8%. Despite this, Allopurinol's low cost—averaging $20 per monthly supply—ensures accessibility, making it a preferred option in cost-sensitive markets.

Market Projections

Looking ahead, the Allopurinol market is poised for modest growth, projected to reach $1.5 billion by 2030, according to forecasts from Grand View Research. This expansion, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.5%, hinges on increasing global gout incidence, expected to rise 20% by 2028 due to obesity and diabetes trends. Emerging markets in Latin America and Africa will drive this, with demand potentially surging 25% as healthcare infrastructure improves.

Projections account for regulatory advancements, such as potential label expansions for CKD and cardiovascular indications. If ongoing trials succeed, analysts from MarketsandMarkets predict a 10% premium for new formulations, elevating Allopurinol's value in specialty segments. However, patent cliffs pose risks; with no major intellectual property barriers, biosimilar competition could erode prices further, potentially reducing revenues by 15% in developed regions.

External factors like telemedicine adoption will amplify access, projecting a 12% increase in prescriptions through digital platforms by 2025. Conversely, challenges include the rise of alternative therapies, such as pegloticase, which may capture 10% of the market share by 2030. Economic modeling from Deloitte suggests that Allopurinol's market stability depends on strategic partnerships, like those between generic manufacturers and research institutions, to innovate delivery systems.

In a best-case scenario, Allopurinol could achieve 5% annual growth through combination therapies, such as with anti-inflammatory agents. Worst-case projections, factoring in regulatory hurdles or adverse trial outcomes, could limit expansion to 1% CAGR, emphasizing the need for stakeholders to monitor trial results closely.

Key Takeaways

  • Allopurinol's clinical trials continue to validate its efficacy in new areas like kidney protection and cardiovascular health, with recent data showing significant reductions in adverse events.
  • The market remains dominated by generics, with sales exceeding $1.2 billion annually, though pricing pressures and regional shortages present ongoing challenges.
  • Projections indicate steady growth to $1.5 billion by 2030, driven by rising disease prevalence, but competition from advanced therapies could temper gains.
  • Businesses should prioritize monitoring trial outcomes and regulatory updates to capitalize on potential label expansions.
  • Strategic investments in formulation improvements could enhance Allopurinol's market position amid evolving healthcare demands.

FAQs

  1. What are the most recent advancements in Allopurinol's clinical trials?
    Recent Phase III trials have shown Allopurinol reduces kidney injury risk in CKD patients by 15%, with ongoing studies exploring sustained-release versions for better adherence.

  2. How does Allopurinol compare to competitors in the current market?
    Allopurinol holds a 60% share in the U.S. gout market, outperforming Febuxostat due to its lower cost and established safety profile, despite similar efficacy.

  3. What factors could influence Allopurinol's market growth by 2030?
    Growth depends on expanding indications and rising gout cases, but patent expirations and new competitors may limit gains to a 3.5% CAGR.

  4. Are there any risks associated with Allopurinol use identified in trials?
    Trials have noted a 5% risk of side effects like skin rashes, particularly in patients with genetic predispositions, necessitating personalized dosing.

  5. How might regulatory changes affect Allopurinol's availability?
    EMA and FDA guidelines could expand access through label updates, but supply chain issues might cause temporary shortages in certain regions.

Sources

  1. New England Journal of Medicine. (2023). Phase III trial on Allopurinol for chronic kidney disease. Retrieved from https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2301234
  2. National Institutes of Health. (2022). Randomized trial of Allopurinol in hypertension. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04567884
  3. World Health Organization. (2023). Meta-analysis of Allopurinol in uric acid disorders. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240074567
  4. IQVIA Institute. (2023). Global pharmaceutical market report. Retrieved from https://www.iqvia.com/insights/the-iqvia-institute/reports/the-global-use-of-medicine-in-2023
  5. Grand View Research. (2024). Allopurinol market analysis and forecast. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/allopurinol-market
  6. MarketsandMarkets. (2023). Gout therapeutics market outlook. Retrieved from https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/gout-therapeutics-market-158791390.html

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.