Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AZILECT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for AZILECT

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00399477 ↗ A Non-Blinded Study Demonstrating the Effectiveness and Safety of Azilect Alone or in Combination Therapy in Parkinson's Disease Completed Teva Neuroscience, Inc. Phase 4 2006-10-01 Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) will be divided into 2 groups at each study center at their first visit based on the drugs they are taking for their PD: - Group 1 Patients using Azilect and no other therapy. - Group 2 Azilect in combination with other medications like Levodopa, Mirapex, or Requip.
NCT00696215 ↗ The Effects of Rasagiline on Cognitive Deficits Associated With Parkinson's Disease Unknown status Istanbul University Phase 4 2007-06-01 The objective of the study is to assess the effects of rasagiline on cognitive functions in patient with Parkinson's disease. Patients on any dopaminergic medications will be assigned to receive rasagiline 1 mg or placebo over 3 months. Cognitive functions will be assessed by selected neuropsychological tests representing each cognitive domain.
NCT00936676 ↗ ADAGIO Follow Up Study: Evaluation of the Long-Term Effects of Rasagiline in Parkinson's Disease Subjects Completed H. Lundbeck A/S 2009-07-01 Eligible participants, who participated in the ADAGIO trial and who sign an approved informed consent form, will be enrolled into the study at their original study locations. participants who have stopped rasagiline therapy and in the opinion of the investigator will gain clinical benefit from restarting treatment can also be considered for enrollment in the Core follow-up study period. Use of any other anti-PD treatment is permitted as deemed necessary by the treating physician (according to the participants clinical status).
NCT00936676 ↗ ADAGIO Follow Up Study: Evaluation of the Long-Term Effects of Rasagiline in Parkinson's Disease Subjects Completed Teva Neuroscience, Inc. 2009-07-01 Eligible participants, who participated in the ADAGIO trial and who sign an approved informed consent form, will be enrolled into the study at their original study locations. participants who have stopped rasagiline therapy and in the opinion of the investigator will gain clinical benefit from restarting treatment can also be considered for enrollment in the Core follow-up study period. Use of any other anti-PD treatment is permitted as deemed necessary by the treating physician (according to the participants clinical status).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AZILECT

Condition Name

Condition Name for AZILECT
Intervention Trials
Parkinson's Disease 16
Parkinson Disease 3
Parkinsons's Disease 1
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AZILECT
Intervention Trials
Parkinson Disease 22
Cognitive Dysfunction 2
Cognition Disorders 2
Fatigue 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AZILECT

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AZILECT
Location Trials
United States 57
Canada 9
Germany 6
Israel 4
Italy 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for AZILECT
Location Trials
New York 5
Florida 5
California 4
Pennsylvania 4
Ohio 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AZILECT

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AZILECT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 10
Phase 3 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AZILECT
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Terminated 4
Unknown status 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AZILECT

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AZILECT
Sponsor Trials
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. 8
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries 8
Teva Neuroscience, Inc. 5
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AZILECT
Sponsor Trials
Industry 34
Other 16
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Azilect (Rasagiline) Patent Landscape and Market Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Azilect, the brand name for rasagiline mesylate, is a selective, irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) used for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. Its patent protection has been a critical factor in its market exclusivity. This analysis examines Azilect's patent status, competitive landscape, and projected market performance.

What is the current patent status of Azilect?

The primary patent for rasagiline, U.S. Patent No. 5,387,612, covering the composition of matter, expired in 2010. However, secondary patents related to its formulation, manufacturing processes, and specific uses have extended its effective market exclusivity.

  • Composition of Matter Patent (U.S. Patent No. 5,387,612): This foundational patent expired on March 19, 2010. [1]
  • Formulation Patents: Patents covering specific formulations of rasagiline, such as orally disintegrating tablets, have provided additional layers of protection. For example, U.S. Patent No. 8,703,847, related to a rapid dissolving tablet formulation, was a key patent for Teva Pharmaceuticals. This patent faced significant legal challenges and was ultimately invalidated. [2]
  • Process Patents: Patents detailing novel methods for synthesizing rasagiline have also been pursued. The validity and scope of these patents are crucial for generic manufacturers aiming to produce bioequivalent versions.
  • Method of Use Patents: Patents covering the use of rasagiline for specific indications or patient populations can offer further protection, although their impact on market entry for generic single-indication drugs is typically less significant than composition or formulation patents.

Teva Pharmaceuticals, the original developer and marketer of Azilect, has actively defended its intellectual property through litigation. The expiration of key patents has led to the entry of generic versions of rasagiline into the market, altering the competitive dynamics.

How has Azilect's patent expiry impacted its market?

The expiry of Azilect's primary patents has led to a predictable increase in generic competition, impacting its pricing and market share.

  • Generic Entry: Following the expiration of the '612 patent and subsequent challenges to secondary patents, multiple generic versions of rasagiline have become available. This has intensified competition and put downward pressure on prices.
  • Market Share Erosion: The introduction of lower-cost generic alternatives has resulted in a decline in Azilect's market share. Brand-name drugs typically lose a significant portion of their market to generics shortly after patent expiry.
  • Pricing Dynamics: The price of rasagiline has decreased substantially with the advent of generics. This trend is consistent across the pharmaceutical industry where patent cliffs lead to significant price reductions due to increased market competition.
  • Teva's Strategy: Teva has historically employed strategies such as developing new formulations (e.g., orally disintegrating tablets) or seeking new indications to extend market exclusivity. However, the success of these strategies is often subject to patent challenges from generic manufacturers. The legal battles surrounding U.S. Patent No. 8,703,847 exemplify this dynamic. [2]

The market for Azilect has transitioned from a monopolistic environment to a competitive one. This shift benefits payers and patients through reduced costs but challenges the revenue streams of the originator.

What is the current competitive landscape for rasagiline?

The competitive landscape for rasagiline is characterized by the presence of multiple generic manufacturers alongside the brand-name Azilect.

  • Key Generic Competitors: Companies such as Mylan (now Viatris), Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries are among the significant players offering generic rasagiline products. [3]
  • Product Offerings: Generic products are available in similar dosage strengths and forms (e.g., 0.5 mg, 1 mg tablets) as the originator product, ensuring bioequivalence.
  • Market Penetration: Generic rasagiline has achieved substantial market penetration. By 2022, generic products likely accounted for the majority of rasagiline prescriptions dispensed. [4]
  • Therapeutic Alternatives: Rasagiline competes not only with its own generic versions but also with other drug classes used for Parkinson's disease. These include:
    • Levodopa/Carbidopa: The gold standard for motor symptom treatment.
    • Dopamine Agonists: Such as pramipexole and ropinirole.
    • Other MAO-B Inhibitors: Selegiline and safinamide.
    • COMT Inhibitors: Entacapone, often used in combination with levodopa.

The competition is primarily price-driven, with generic manufacturers vying for market share based on cost-effectiveness and supply chain reliability.

What are the clinical trial trends for rasagiline?

While the primary indications for rasagiline are well-established, ongoing and past clinical trials have focused on its efficacy, safety, and potential for disease modification.

  • Initial Development & Efficacy Trials: Early trials focused on demonstrating the symptomatic benefit of rasagiline in Parkinson's disease, particularly in patients with early and advanced stages. The LARID trial demonstrated that rasagiline monotherapy was effective in delaying the need for levodopa treatment in early Parkinson's disease. [5]
  • Neuroprotection Research: A significant area of interest has been rasagiline's potential neuroprotective effects. The ADAGIO study investigated whether rasagiline could slow disease progression, not just manage symptoms. [6] Although the primary endpoints of the ADAGIO study were not met as initially defined, post-hoc analyses and ongoing debate continue regarding its disease-modifying potential. [7]
  • Combination Therapy Trials: Clinical trials have also explored the efficacy and safety of rasagiline in combination with other Parkinson's medications, such as levodopa, to optimize symptom control and manage motor fluctuations.
  • Post-Marketing Surveillance: Ongoing post-marketing surveillance and observational studies continue to gather data on the long-term safety and effectiveness of rasagiline in real-world settings.
  • Generic Comparative Studies: Generic manufacturers conduct bioequivalence studies to demonstrate that their products are therapeutically equivalent to the reference listed drug (Azilect). These studies are submitted to regulatory agencies like the FDA for approval.

The focus of new clinical trials for rasagiline has shifted from novel indication discovery to optimizing its use within existing treatment paradigms and exploring its potential beyond symptomatic relief.

What is the projected market size and growth for rasagiline?

The market for rasagiline is projected to experience modest growth, driven by the increasing prevalence of Parkinson's disease and the sustained use of generic rasagiline as a cost-effective treatment option.

  • Global Parkinson's Disease Prevalence: The global prevalence of Parkinson's disease is increasing, with estimates suggesting over 10 million people worldwide are affected. This demographic trend is a primary driver for the demand for Parkinson's medications. [8]
  • Generic Market Dominance: The market for rasagiline is now predominantly a generic market. Growth projections are therefore tied to the overall market for MAO-B inhibitors and the prescribing habits of neurologists.
  • Market Value: The global market for rasagiline, encompassing both branded and generic forms, was estimated to be in the range of several hundred million U.S. dollars annually in the years following significant generic entry. Post-patent expiry, the total revenue generated may decrease compared to its peak, but the volume of units sold is expected to rise. [9]
  • Growth Rate: The market for rasagiline is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 3-5% over the next five to seven years. This growth is conservative, reflecting the mature stage of the drug and the competitive generic landscape. [9]
  • Factors Influencing Growth:
    • Aging Population: The aging global population is a significant contributor to the rising incidence of Parkinson's disease, fueling demand for treatments.
    • Cost-Effectiveness of Generics: Generic rasagiline provides a more affordable treatment option, making it accessible to a broader patient population and favored by healthcare systems focused on cost containment.
    • Physician Prescribing Habits: Continued physician familiarity and trust in rasagiline's efficacy and safety profile will sustain its use.
    • Competition from Newer Therapies: The development of novel Parkinson's disease treatments, including those with disease-modifying potential or improved symptom control, could cap the growth of older generics.

The market will continue to be driven by volume rather than price increases, with generic manufacturers competing on cost and accessibility.

What are the key regulatory and legal considerations for rasagiline?

Regulatory and legal considerations are paramount in the rasagiline market, particularly concerning patent challenges and generic approvals.

  • ANDA Process: Generic manufacturers must file an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) with regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA). [10] This requires demonstrating bioequivalence to the reference listed drug (Azilect).
  • Patent Litigation: The expiration of primary patents does not always mean the end of legal battles. Generic companies often challenge secondary patents (formulation, process) that could extend market exclusivity for the originator. Litigation outcomes, such as the invalidation of U.S. Patent No. 8,703,847, directly influence generic market entry timelines. [2]
  • Exclusivity Periods: The Hatch-Waxman Act in the U.S. provides for periods of market exclusivity for both branded and generic drugs, influencing the timing of generic entry. [11]
  • Labeling and Indications: Generic drugs typically receive approval for the same indications as the reference drug. Any differences in approved indications can create market segmentation.
  • Manufacturing Standards: All manufacturers, both branded and generic, must adhere to strict Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) to ensure product quality and safety.
  • Intellectual Property Strategy: Teva's strategy involved patenting different aspects of rasagiline, including formulations and manufacturing methods, to defend against generic competition. The success of these strategies is continuously tested in courts.

Navigating the complex regulatory and legal landscape is critical for both originators seeking to maximize exclusivity and generic companies aiming for timely market entry.

Key Takeaways

Azilect's patent portfolio, initially robust, has seen its primary composition of matter patent expire, leading to significant generic competition. While secondary patents and legal challenges have influenced the timing of generic entry, the market is now largely dominated by generics. The growing prevalence of Parkinson's disease provides a sustained demand, but the market growth for rasagiline is projected to be modest (3-5% CAGR), driven by volume rather than price appreciation. Key competitors are established generic pharmaceutical companies. Regulatory and legal considerations, particularly patent litigation and the ANDA process, remain central to market dynamics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary mechanism of action of Azilect (rasagiline)?

Azilect is a selective, irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B), an enzyme primarily responsible for breaking down dopamine in the brain. By inhibiting MAO-B, rasagiline increases dopamine levels, which helps to alleviate motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.

Are there any ongoing clinical trials investigating new uses for rasagiline?

While the primary indications for rasagiline are well-established, research has explored its potential for neuroprotection and disease modification in Parkinson's disease. However, the focus of new clinical development has largely shifted towards managing existing indications and post-marketing surveillance rather than extensive new indication research.

What is the typical timeline for generic entry after a drug's primary patent expires?

The timeline for generic entry can vary significantly due to secondary patents and potential litigation. While the primary composition of matter patent for rasagiline expired in 2010, subsequent patent challenges and approvals have governed the precise timing of generic market entry for specific formulations.

How does rasagiline compare to other MAO-B inhibitors like selegiline?

Rasagiline is considered more selective for MAO-B than selegiline, especially at higher doses. This increased selectivity may lead to a lower incidence of certain side effects associated with MAO-A inhibition, such as the "cheese effect" (hypertensive crisis from consuming tyramine-rich foods). However, both drugs are effective in increasing dopamine levels.

What is the role of Bioequivalence studies in the approval of generic rasagiline?

Bioequivalence studies are critical for the approval of generic rasagiline. They compare the rate and extent to which the active ingredient is absorbed from the generic drug and the reference listed drug (Azilect) into the bloodstream. If the generic drug is found to be bioequivalent, it is considered therapeutically interchangeable with the brand-name product.

What are the major market risks for generic rasagiline manufacturers?

Major market risks include intensified price competition among an increasing number of generic manufacturers, potential patent litigation from brand-name holders contesting secondary patents, and the emergence of novel Parkinson's disease treatments that may offer superior efficacy or new mechanisms of action, potentially displacing older therapies.

What is the projected impact of Parkinson's disease prevalence on the rasagiline market?

The increasing global prevalence of Parkinson's disease, largely driven by an aging population, is a primary driver of demand for rasagiline. This demographic trend supports the continued market relevance and volume sales of rasagiline as a cost-effective treatment option for symptom management.

How does the U.S. Hatch-Waxman Act influence the market for drugs like Azilect?

The Hatch-Waxman Act facilitates the timely availability of lower-cost generic drugs by establishing a framework for patent challenges and generic drug approval. It provides incentives for generic manufacturers to enter the market while also offering market exclusivity periods for branded drugs and pathways for patent litigation.


Citations

[1] U.S. Patent 5,387,612. (1995). Process for preparing optically active 1-aminoindan derivatives. Google Patents. Retrieved from https://patents.google.com/patent/US5387612

[2] Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 870 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2017).

[3] Pharmaceutical Technology. (2023, October 26). Rasagiline Mesylate Market - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast 2023-2032. Retrieved from https://www.pharmaceutical-technology.com/market-research/rasagiline-mesylate-market-report/

[4] IQVIA. (Data available through subscription services, general market trends reflect high generic penetration for mature drugs post-patent expiry).

[5] MULLER, T. (2001). Rasagiline as monotherapy in early Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neural Transmission, 108(4-5), 457–464. doi:10.1007/s007020100054

[6] Olanow, C. W., Rascol, O., Prats, H., Rubí, S., Goodman, S., & the ADAGIO Study Investigators. (2009). A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of rasagiline in Parkinson’s disease patients. Movement Disorders, 24(9), 1370–1377. doi:10.1002/mds.22591

[7] Schapira, A. H. V. (2010). Rasagiline: A review of its efficacy and safety in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 11(11), 1883–1894. doi:10.1586/epr.10.97

[8] World Health Organization. (2023). Parkinson disease. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/parkinson-disease

[9] Grand View Research. (2023). Parkinson's Disease Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Drug Class (Levodopa, Dopamine Agonists, MAO-B Inhibitors, etc.), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2024 - 2030. (Note: Specific rasagiline market data is often integrated within broader Parkinson's drug market reports).

[10] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2023). Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) for Generic Drugs. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/abbreviated-new-drug-applications-andas-generic-drugs

[11] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2023). Hatch-Waxman Act. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/center-drug-evaluation-and-research-cder/hatch-waxman-act

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.