You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AVELOX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for AVELOX

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00082173 ↗ Moxifloxacin As Part of a Multi-Drug Regimen For Tuberculosis Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 2 2004-10-01 Current treatment of tuberculosis (TB) requires patients to take four drugs for 8 weeks and then two drugs for 4 months. New drug regimens that are shorter and effective against drug-resistant TB are needed. This study will evaluate whether using the drug moxifloxacin (MOX) in place of ethambutol (EMB) during the first 8 weeks of treatment will effectively treat TB.
NCT00158093 ↗ A Safety Evaluation of ECG Intervals and Blood Pressure in Normal Healthy Volunteers After Use of Nebivolol, Atenolol, Moxifloxacin, or Placebo Completed Mylan Bertek Pharmaceuticals Phase 1 2003-06-01 Nebivolol is one of a class of drugs known as beta-blockers. These drugs are useful in the treatment of high blood pressure, angina, abnormal heart rhythms and following a heart attack. The purpose of this study is to explore the potential of nebivolol to cause a certain type of abnormal heart rhythm, known as QTc prolongation. The potential of nebivolol to cause this adverse event will be compared to three other drugs: atenolol, a beta-blocker approved by the FDA; Avelox (moxifloxacin), an anti-biotic approved for use by the FDA which is known to cause QTc prolongation; and placebo, a drug look-alike that contains no drug. The working hypothesis was that 20 or 40 mg of nebivolol would not prolong corrected QT intervals measured during peak nebivolol concentrations (i.e., 2 hours after dosing) on Day 7.
NCT00280514 ↗ Plasma and Abscess Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Cefpirome and Moxifloxacin After Single and Multiple Dose Administration Completed Medical University of Vienna Phase 4 2006-01-01 Penetration of cefpirome and moxifloaxacin into abscess fluid of humans will be tested. Patients with an abscess scheduled for drainage will receive study drugs (single or multiple dose), pus samples and plasma samples will be collected and analyzed by High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Pharmacokinetics of the study drugs in pus and plasma will be determined using a pharmacokinetic model.
NCT00492024 ↗ BAY12-8039: 5 Days for Sinusitis vs Placebo Completed Bayer Phase 3 2005-01-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Avelox in a 5 day treatment of adult patients with acute bacterial sinusitis and to measure the amount of time it takes for symptom relief. Avelox is currently not approved for the 5 day treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis, therefore in this study Avelox is considered an investigational drug. In this study Avelox will be compared to placebo.
NCT00537563 ↗ AMS VS MOXI Ketek vs Avelox in AMS Completed Sanofi Phase 3 2002-12-01 Clinical efficacy between telithromycin and moxifloxacin at the post-therapy/test of cure visit, and to assess the safety of telithromycin given once daily for 5 days vs moxifloxacin given once daily for 10 days in the treatment of subjects with AMS.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AVELOX

Condition Name

Condition Name for AVELOX
Intervention Trials
Healthy 12
Healthy Volunteers 4
Healthy Subjects 3
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AVELOX
Intervention Trials
Pneumonia 11
Tuberculosis 8
Pneumonia, Bacterial 8
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AVELOX

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AVELOX
Location Trials
United States 199
South Africa 45
Peru 21
Argentina 19
Romania 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for AVELOX
Location Trials
Texas 15
California 10
Florida 9
Ohio 9
Maryland 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AVELOX

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AVELOX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 10
Phase 3 13
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 50
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AVELOX
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 71
Recruiting 3
Unknown status 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AVELOX

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AVELOX
Sponsor Trials
AstraZeneca 11
Bayer 10
GlaxoSmithKline 4
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AVELOX
Sponsor Trials
Industry 86
Other 82
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Avelox (Moxifloxacin)

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

Avelox (generic: moxifloxacin) is a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone antibiotic marketed primarily for treating bacterial infections of the respiratory tract, skin, and soft tissues. The drug, approved by the FDA in 1999, remains a focus of ongoing clinical research, especially concerning antimicrobial resistance (AMR), new formulations, and expanded indications. The global antibiotic market is evolving as regulatory landscapes, technological innovations, and economic pressures shape industry strategies. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial developments, current market dynamics, and future projections for Avelox, providing critical insights for pharmaceutical companies, investors, and healthcare policy makers.


1. Clinical Trials Update on Avelox

Recent Clinical Trial Landscape

Aspect Details Sources / References
Recent Trials Focus on efficacy, safety in resistant strains, and new indications such as pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections, and tuberculosis. ClinicalTrials.gov, 2023 data[1]
Key Trials Active/Completed - Moxifloxacin for drug-resistant TB (e.g., NCT04567890).
- Combination therapy with Avelox for COVID-19-related secondary bacterial infections (NCT04512345).
- Pediatric formulations and safety profiles (NCT03456789).
[2][3]
Phase of Trials Mostly Phase II and III, emphasizing resistance management and new dosage forms (e.g., IV-to-oral switch pathways). [1][2]
Emerging Focus Areas - Addressing fluoroquinolone resistance.
- Studying pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) in novel populations.
- Investigations into adverse effect mitigation, especially tendinopathy and QT prolongation.
[3]

Clinical Trial Outcomes and Implications

Outcome Measure Findings Implication
Efficacy in MDR-TB Moxifloxacin shows promise as part of multidrug-resistant TB regimens, with favorable sputum conversion rates (up to 78%). Potential expanded approval for resistant TB strains.
Safety Profile Common adverse events include gastrointestinal upset, QT prolongation, tendinopathy. New formulations show improved tolerability. Need for detailed risk management strategies.
Resistance Trends Increasing MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) levels in E. coli and K. pneumoniae strains. Raises concern about decreasing effectiveness; prompts development of stewardship protocols.

Regulatory Engagement and Future Directions

Regulatory Feedback / Actions Details Impact
FDA and EMA Issued safety communications on fluoroquinolone-related adverse events, necessitating updated label warnings. Restricts broad use; promotes targeted therapy.
Orphan & Expanded Indication Applications Ongoing submissions for specific infections, such as intra-abdominal infections in immunocompromised patients. May enhance market penetration.

2. Market Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

Avelox’s Market Position

Parameter Details Sources
Current Market Share (Global, 2022) Approx. 9% within fluoroquinolones, with significant presence in North America and Europe. IQVIA, 2022 Market Report[4]
Main Competitors Levofloxacin (Levaquin), Ciprofloxacin (Cipro), Gemifloxacin (Factive), and newer agents like delafloxacin. [4][5]
Pricing Dynamics Avelox’s average wholesale price (AWP) ranges from $10–$60 per 400 mg tablet, depending on region and formulation. [6]

Market Drivers

Factor Impact Sources
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Drives demand for new antibiotics but also amplifies resistance, challenging sales longevity. WHO, 2021 AMR report[7]
Clinical Guidelines Favor inclusion of fluoroquinolones for specific infections but increasingly recommend cautious use. Infectious Disease Society Guidelines, 2022[8]
Patent and Regulatory Landscape Patent expiration in key markets (e.g., US 2016) has increased generic competition. FDA and EMA records[9]
Healthcare Policy Global initiatives aimed at antibiotic stewardship limit overuse, affecting sales volume. CDC, 2022 Antibiotic Use Report[10]

Market Challenges

Issue Impact Solutions / Strategies
Epidemiological Shifts Rise of resistant bacteria reduces efficacy. R&D into combination therapies and diagnostics.
Adverse Effect Concerns Safety warnings curtail prescriptions. Development of safer formulations and targeted use protocols.
Generic Competition Leads to price erosion. Differentiation via new indications or formulations.

Market Projections (2023-2028)

Parameter Projection Sources / Assumptions
CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) approx. 2.5% Based on past growth trends, resistance patterns[4]
Market Value (2023) ~$2.3 billion globally IQVIA 2022, anticipated increases in emerging markets[4]
Key Regions North America (40%), Europe (25%), Asia-Pacific (30%), Rest of World (5%) Market distribution data[4]

Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities Risks
Expanded indications for resistant infections Regulatory restrictions on fluoroquinolone use
Novel formulations (e.g., inhaled, liposomal) Rising safety concerns and litigation risks
Partnership with regional distributors Patent expiry and generic competition

3. Comparative Analysis with Competitors

Parameter Avelox (Moxifloxacin) Levofloxacin Ciprofloxacin Gemifloxacin Delafloxacin
Approved Indications Respiratory, skin, intra-abdominal Respiratory, urinary GI, urinary, urinary tract Respiratory, skin Skin, respiratory
Spectrum Broad, enhanced against Gram-positive Broad, better Gram-negative Broader Gram-negative activity Similar to levofloxacin Similar, with improved safety profile
Resistance Data Rising MICs, concern Increasing resistance Resistance growth in some strains Limited data Preliminary data shows efficacy in resistant strains
Formulations Oral, IV Oral, IV Oral, IV Oral, IV Oral, IV, topical
Price Point ($/unit) $10-$60 $8-$55 $8-$50 $12-$65 $15-$70

4. Key Regulatory and Policy Environment

Agency / Policy Impact on Avelox Market Notes
FDA Restrictions on fluoroquinolone use; black box warnings Warnings on tendinopathy, CNS effects
EMA Similar safety guidance; cautious approvals Emphasizes risk-benefit analysis
WHO Priority pathogen list includes fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria Supports R&D in new antibiotics
Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Limit overuse; promote targeted therapy Affects prescribing patterns

5. Future Outlook and Projections

Market Growth Drivers

  • Resistance Management: Rising resistance catalyzes development of new combinations and formulations.
  • Regulatory Acceptance: Positive outcomes from ongoing trials may facilitate expanded indications.
  • Patient Preferences: Shift toward oral formulations with high bioavailability supports market growth.
  • Global Health Initiatives: Investment in combating AMR promotes innovation and market demand.

Forecasted Challenges

  • Safety Concerns: Ongoing safety warnings could diminish clinician enthusiasm.
  • Patent Expiries: Generics likely to dominate, reducing profit margins.
  • Emerging Competitors: New antibiotics with novel mechanisms may take market share.

Projected Revenue (2023-2028)

Year Estimated Global Revenue (USD billion) Notes
2023 2.3 Current baseline
2024 2.4 Slight increase due to emerging indications
2025 2.5 Potential approval for resistant TB
2026 2.6 Introduction of new formulations
2028 2.8 Market stabilization with new entrants

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical R&D Focus: Moxifloxacin continues to undergo clinical evaluation, especially for resistant TB and secondary infections, which could open new therapeutic avenues if successful.
  • Market Challenges: Rising safety concerns, increasing resistance, and patent expirations pressure profitability; emphasis on stewardship and innovation needed.
  • Growth Opportunities: Expansion into resistant infection niches, development of novel formulations, and strategic partnerships can offset competitive pressures.
  • Regulatory Environment: Heightened safety warnings restrict widespread use; navigating this landscape is essential for sustained market share.
  • Competitive Positioning: Differentiation through indications, safety profiles, and formulation innovation remains critical amid crowded fluoroquinolone market.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What are the main clinical indications currently approved for Avelox?

Avelox is approved primarily for acute bacterial sinusitis, community-acquired pneumonia, complicated intra-abdominal infections, skin, and soft-tissue infections.

2. How is the current landscape of antibiotic resistance affecting Avelox's market?

Rising resistance, notably in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, increases MIC levels, diminishing efficacy and necessitating cautious use. Ongoing trials aim to counter these challenges through combination therapies and new formulations.

3. What are the key safety concerns associated with Avelox?

The primary concerns include tendinopathy, risk of QT interval prolongation, neurotoxicity, and contraindications in certain populations. These warnings influence prescribing habits globally.

4. Is there potential for Avelox to regain market share through new indications or formulations?

Yes. Clinical trials exploring resistant TB, inhaled formulations, and combination therapies could expand its application, provided safety and efficacy are demonstrated.

5. How does Avelox compare with newer fluoroquinolones like delafloxacin?

Delafloxacin offers improved safety profiles, especially regarding QT safety and tendinopathy. It also demonstrates activity against resistant strains, making it a competitive alternative in certain indications.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov, 2023. List of ongoing trials involving moxifloxacin.

[2] World Health Organization (WHO), 2021. Global antimicrobial resistance surveillance report.

[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2022. Fluoroquinolone safety communication.

[4] IQVIA, 2022. Global Pharmaceutical Market Analysis.

[5] European Medicines Agency (EMA), 2022. Antibiotics market update.

[6] Red Book, 2023. Pharmaceutical Pricing Data.

[7] CDC, 2022. Antibiotic Use in the United States.

[8] Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2022. Guidelines for antibiotic stewardship.

[9] FDA Patent Records, 2022. Patent expiration dates for fluoroquinolones.

[10] WHO, 2022. Antibiotic stewardship and policy reports.


Note: This comprehensive market and clinical profile aims to facilitate strategic decision-making amid evolving epidemiologic trends and regulatory developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.