Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR AUGMENTIN ES-600


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for AUGMENTIN ES-600

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Dosage NCT02778828 ↗ Pharmacokinetic and Therapeutic Adaptation of Linezolid in the Treatment of Multi-Resistant Tuberculosis Completed Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph N/A 2015-11-04 Linezolid, primary treatment for MDR-TB combination therapy anti. Until it is the dose of 600 mg x1 / day, rather sensible for most patients is more, which was unanimous. It is true that if a dosage is consensus, it goes without saying, because of the interindividual variability, marked moreover to linezolid, a therapeutic monitoring assay of plasma levels is indispensable for most pharmacological treatments. This therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) often gives rise, as known, to dosage changes. It turns out that at present no real STP on the basic objectives PK / PD is really made in France in the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) and the bibliography remains rather poor recommendations, and yet all the elements are there: indeed linezolid is an antibiotic whose activity is purely "time-dependent". So one should fulfill 2 PK / PD objectives whose precise boundaries are sometimes still to be determined: -% T> MIC, or percentage of time spent with plasma concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration of linezolid (LNZ) for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In practice, the residual concentration before the next shot must be> MIC (0.125 to 1 mg / l) - A fortiori it must also take into account the concentration preventing the appearance of resistant mutants, amounting to 1.2 mg / l - AUC / MIC> 80, or ratio of the area under the curve (AUC, Area under curve) of plasma concentration versus time and CMI LNZ Until then, and without real bibliographic support, and for the sake of kindness to patients coupled with an economic advantage, the STP consisted of 2 samples, a peak 1:30 after taking (Cmax) and a residual before taking (C min) , after all, to 600mg x1 / 24 correlates well with the AUC (55% peak and 75% for the residual). Following an observation that 25 to 30% of patients had a C min
OTC NCT06076304 ↗ Nasal Steroids, Irrigation, Oral Antibiotics, and Subgroup Targeting for Effective Management of Sinusitis Active, not recruiting Medstar Health Research Institute Phase 4 2023-11-21 Sinus infections are sometimes treated with antibiotics or nasal sprays, while some patients get better on their own. Some patients may wait a few days or use common over-the-counter remedies to see if their symptoms improve without further treatment. The overall goal of this clinical trial to see which patients with sinus infections are more likely to respond to different treatments, and which improve with supportive care alone.
OTC NCT06076304 ↗ Nasal Steroids, Irrigation, Oral Antibiotics, and Subgroup Targeting for Effective Management of Sinusitis Active, not recruiting Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Phase 4 2023-11-21 Sinus infections are sometimes treated with antibiotics or nasal sprays, while some patients get better on their own. Some patients may wait a few days or use common over-the-counter remedies to see if their symptoms improve without further treatment. The overall goal of this clinical trial to see which patients with sinus infections are more likely to respond to different treatments, and which improve with supportive care alone.
OTC NCT06076304 ↗ Nasal Steroids, Irrigation, Oral Antibiotics, and Subgroup Targeting for Effective Management of Sinusitis Active, not recruiting Penn State College of Medicine Phase 4 2023-11-21 Sinus infections are sometimes treated with antibiotics or nasal sprays, while some patients get better on their own. Some patients may wait a few days or use common over-the-counter remedies to see if their symptoms improve without further treatment. The overall goal of this clinical trial to see which patients with sinus infections are more likely to respond to different treatments, and which improve with supportive care alone.
OTC NCT06076304 ↗ Nasal Steroids, Irrigation, Oral Antibiotics, and Subgroup Targeting for Effective Management of Sinusitis Active, not recruiting University of California, Los Angeles Phase 4 2023-11-21 Sinus infections are sometimes treated with antibiotics or nasal sprays, while some patients get better on their own. Some patients may wait a few days or use common over-the-counter remedies to see if their symptoms improve without further treatment. The overall goal of this clinical trial to see which patients with sinus infections are more likely to respond to different treatments, and which improve with supportive care alone.
OTC NCT06076304 ↗ Nasal Steroids, Irrigation, Oral Antibiotics, and Subgroup Targeting for Effective Management of Sinusitis Active, not recruiting University of Washington Phase 4 2023-11-21 Sinus infections are sometimes treated with antibiotics or nasal sprays, while some patients get better on their own. Some patients may wait a few days or use common over-the-counter remedies to see if their symptoms improve without further treatment. The overall goal of this clinical trial to see which patients with sinus infections are more likely to respond to different treatments, and which improve with supportive care alone.
OTC NCT06076304 ↗ Nasal Steroids, Irrigation, Oral Antibiotics, and Subgroup Targeting for Effective Management of Sinusitis Active, not recruiting University of Wisconsin, Madison Phase 4 2023-11-21 Sinus infections are sometimes treated with antibiotics or nasal sprays, while some patients get better on their own. Some patients may wait a few days or use common over-the-counter remedies to see if their symptoms improve without further treatment. The overall goal of this clinical trial to see which patients with sinus infections are more likely to respond to different treatments, and which improve with supportive care alone.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for AUGMENTIN ES-600

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002149 ↗ Acupuncture and Herbal Treatment of Chronic HIV Sinusitis Completed Immune Enhancement Project N/A 1969-12-31 To compare Traditional Chinese Medicine versus standard antibiotic therapy consisting of pseudoephedrine ( Sudafed ) plus amoxicillin / clavulanate potassium combination ( Augmentin ) in reducing symptoms and recurrence of acute HIV-related sinusitis. Chronic sinusitis in HIV-infected individuals is a recurrent and persistent infection with potentially serious complications: it can exacerbate pulmonary disease, cause recurrences of life-threatening sepsis, and progress to central nervous system involvement. Symptoms of sinusitis in HIV patients are often refractory to aggressive Western medical management, and antibiotic intolerance can occur. Traditional Chinese Medicine consisting of acupuncture and herbal treatment may provide a low-risk, low-cost alternative to conventional antibiotic therapy.
NCT00174694 ↗ CHOOSE : Telithromycin, Acute Bacterial Sinusitis Completed Sanofi Phase 4 2004-11-01 Primary objective: - To demonstrate that the clinical efficacy of telithromycin (800 mg od for 5 days) is non-inferior to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (875/125 mg bid for 10 days) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (Day 17-21) in subjects with acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS). Secondary objective(s): - To assess the time to resolution of signs and symptoms between the baseline (Day 1) and TOC (Day 17-21) visits, - To assess the rate of clinical relapse at the follow-up visit (Day 41-49), - To assess health economic outcome until follow-up visit (Day 41-49), - To assess quality of life up to the follow-up visit (Day 41-49), - To compare the safety of telithromycin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, - To compare the bacteriologic outcome of both treatments as observed at TOC (Day 17-21) and at follow-up visit (Day 41-49),in subjects with ABS.
NCT00185939 ↗ The Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics In the Management of Dog Bites Completed National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-08-01 This double blinded RCT will help to ascertain the usefulness of prophylactic antibiotics in the management of uncomplicated dog bites, utilizing currently best available antibiotics (Augmentin) and an important clinical outcome of infection. By enrolling 100-150 patients in this pilot trial as part of a k-award the investigators plan to utilize the point estimates of infection, side effects and other important outcomes and incorporate these into a cost most to determine the most cost effective management of these wounds and to determine if further study is warranted based on the findings.
NCT00185939 ↗ The Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics In the Management of Dog Bites Completed Stanford University Phase 2/Phase 3 2003-08-01 This double blinded RCT will help to ascertain the usefulness of prophylactic antibiotics in the management of uncomplicated dog bites, utilizing currently best available antibiotics (Augmentin) and an important clinical outcome of infection. By enrolling 100-150 patients in this pilot trial as part of a k-award the investigators plan to utilize the point estimates of infection, side effects and other important outcomes and incorporate these into a cost most to determine the most cost effective management of these wounds and to determine if further study is warranted based on the findings.
NCT00343135 ↗ AUGMENTIN 1gm In Skin And Soft Tissue Infection Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-12-01 Study to evaluate the effects of AUGMENTIN 1gm in the treatment of Skin and Soft tissue infections
NCT00354965 ↗ Pharmacokinetic Profiles Of Amoxicillin 2000 mg And Clavulanate 125 mg In Adolescent Patients Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 1 2006-01-19 Clinical research study to test amoxicillin and clavulanate tablet formulation for use in Acute Bacterial Sinusitis (ABS) in adolescent patients weighing at least 40 kilogram (kg) and no more than 16 years old. ABS is an acute bacterial infection of the sinus. The purpose of this study is to find out how children tolerate Augmentin XR and what happens to Augmentin XR in the body after it has been swallowed by children.
NCT00367120 ↗ Zmax Compared to Augmentin in Sinusitis Completed Pfizer Phase 4 2006-06-01 This study will enroll patients with Bacterial Sinusitis who will be treated with either Zmax (Azithromycin Extended Release) or Augmentin (Amoxicillin/Clavulanate). The purpose of the study is to compare early resolution of symptoms between the two treatments. Patients will report resolution of their sinusitis symptoms through a daily questionnaire. There will be two follow-up telephone interviews on days 12 and 28 to evaluate quality of life, satisfaction with therapy, and use of healthcare services.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for AUGMENTIN ES-600

Condition Name

Condition Name for AUGMENTIN ES-600
Intervention Trials
Healthy 8
Sinusitis 6
Infection 4
Acute Otitis Media 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for AUGMENTIN ES-600
Intervention Trials
Infections 9
Sinusitis 8
Infection 8
Communicable Diseases 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for AUGMENTIN ES-600

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for AUGMENTIN ES-600
Location Trials
United States 82
France 19
Canada 7
Switzerland 4
Estonia 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for AUGMENTIN ES-600
Location Trials
California 10
Pennsylvania 6
Texas 5
Ohio 5
Massachusetts 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for AUGMENTIN ES-600

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for AUGMENTIN ES-600
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 27
Phase 3 7
[disabled in preview] 38
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for AUGMENTIN ES-600
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 46
Not yet recruiting 11
Recruiting 6
[disabled in preview] 13
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for AUGMENTIN ES-600

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for AUGMENTIN ES-600
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 6
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited 4
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 4
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for AUGMENTIN ES-600
Sponsor Trials
Other 84
Industry 30
NIH 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 28, 2026

Augmentin ES-600 Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forecast (2026–2036)

What is Augmentin ES-600 and what clinical-trial data exist?

Augmentin ES-600 is an extended-release amoxicillin-clavulanate pediatric suspension/mixture intended for infections in children. Public clinical-trial update coverage for “Augmentin ES-600” specifically is sparse in FDA and trial registries because the product is generally tracked under the broader Augmentin (amoxicillin/clavulanate) franchise and pediatric oral formulations rather than as a uniquely registered clinical program.

How does the clinical evidence usually map to ES-600 labeling?

For amoxicillin-clavulanate pediatric use, trial evidence commonly consists of:

  • Randomized controlled trials in pediatric acute bacterial infections where dosing regimens and clavulanate exposure are aligned to outcomes
  • Pharmacokinetic bridging from adult and pediatric data to justify formulation-specific dosing
  • Safety and tolerability assessments with pediatric adverse-event endpoints (GI intolerance is the key recurring safety signal for beta-lactam exposure and clavulanate)

What is the practical “clinical trials update” for business planning?

For a commercial forecast, the gating items are typically not whether a new Phase 3 exists for ES-600. The gating items are:

  • Whether any new exclusivity or new Orange Book exclusivities attach to ES-600-specific formulation or method-of-use patents
  • Whether FDA label changes or new dosing frequency changes expand eligible indications or shift payer coverage dynamics

Public sources do not show a consistently updated, ES-600-specific Phase 3 pipeline narrative comparable to a new active ingredient launch; ES-600 behaves like a life-cycle pediatric product within the established Augmentin antibiotic class.


What is the Orange Book status of Augmentin ES-600?

A complete, product-specific Orange Book extraction for “Augmentin ES-600” requires an exact FDA product identifier (applicant/ANDA/BLA/strength/form), and that mapping is not provided in the prompt. Without it, a reliable patent listing count, listed patents, and exclusivity end dates cannot be produced without risk of misattribution to other Augmentin pediatric SKUs.

How do exclusivity and listed-patent structures typically affect ES-600?

For combination oral beta-lactams, patent estates often split across:

  • Composition of matter (API salts or combinations, sometimes granted and then outlived)
  • Formulation patents (pH, taste-masking, suspension stability)
  • Method-of-manufacture patents (granulation, drying, blend)
  • Method-of-use patents (often limited for older antibiotics)

From a market-planning standpoint, once the core composition patents expire, commercial differentiation is usually driven by formulation line extensions, pediatric acceptability, and distribution contracts rather than ongoing exclusivity monopolies.


When does Augmentin ES-600 lose exclusivity and when can generics launch?

A defensible answer requires:

  • Product-specific Orange Book listed patents with their expiration dates
  • FDA exclusivity identifiers (if any) tied to the specific NDA product
  • Any patent litigation with paragraph IV notices affecting the exact SKU

The prompt does not supply the NDA holder and product-specific identifier, and public confirmation that “Augmentin ES-600” corresponds to the same Orange Book entry as other Augmentin suspensions cannot be made reliably. Therefore, a specific exclusivity loss date or first generic launch window cannot be stated.


What generic entry risks exist for Augmentin ES-600?

For established pediatric antibiotic suspensions, generic entry risk is usually driven by:

  • Availability of bioequivalent ANDAs for amoxicillin-clavulanate oral suspensions at comparable strengths
  • Formulation stability constraints (suspension shelf-life and reconstitution procedures)
  • Pediatric dosing acceptance and substitution dynamics at the pharmacy counter

What typically blocks generic substitution in pediatric antibiotics?

  • Practical differences in excipients and suspension viscosity affecting dosing accuracy
  • Patient adherence and tolerability data used by clinicians and payers
  • Pharmacy and wholesaler formulary positions based on contract pricing

In practice, once generic amoxicillin-clavulanate suspensions are widely available, ES-600 tends to become a contract-driven SKU rather than an exclusivity-driven product.


How does Augmentin ES-600 compare with other Augmentin formulations (and with amoxicillin-clavulanate competitors)?

Augmentin brand portfolio products differ by:

  • Strength and clavulanate ratio
  • Release profile (immediate vs extended dosing designations)
  • Dosing convenience and pediatric dosing volume/measurement

Competitor landscape usually includes:

  • Other branded amoxicillin-clavulanate suspensions with different strengths or taste formulations
  • Generic amoxicillin-clavulanate suspensions and tablets
  • Occasional brand differentiation through pediatric prescriber preference and payer contracts

For forecasting ES-600 specifically, the key comparison is not another “augmentin” trial program. It is whether clinicians shift volume toward:

  • Other Augmentin pediatric SKUs
  • Higher-concentration or alternate dosing suspensions with lower dosing frequency
  • Non-penicillin alternatives for intolerance or resistance patterns

What patent litigation affects Augmentin ES-600?

A litigation update requires identification of the relevant NDA product number and the specific Orange Book-listed patents for that SKU. Without that mapping, listing court dockets, parties, asserted patents, and settlement outcomes would be speculative.

What litigation outcomes would matter to market forecasts if present?

For pediatric antibiotic suspension SKUs, outcomes typically change:

  • Timing of FDA approval and at-risk commercial launch for generics
  • Settlement-based “launch design triggers,” such as formulation workarounds or delayed entry carve-outs
  • Brand-to-generic share transition speed after legal resolution

No product-specific litigation dates or docket references are provided here, so no reliable litigation-impact narrative can be constructed.


What is FDA regulatory status of Augmentin ES-600 and what are the latest label changes?

FDA regulatory status for the product also requires product-specific identifier lookups (NDA, applicant, label history). The prompt does not include those details.

What FDA signals typically drive commercial trajectory for pediatric antibiotics?

  • Safety labeling updates (GI adverse events, hypersensitivity warnings)
  • Dosage optimization for pediatric subpopulations
  • Revisions to clinical trial references in labeling
  • Bioequivalence guidance updates that change substitution behavior

Without the label revision history for the exact ES-600 SKU, a precise “latest changes” update cannot be produced.


Market analysis: How big is Augmentin ES-600’s opportunity and where does revenue come from?

A forecast for “Augmentin ES-600” must isolate one product from the broader Augmentin pediatric franchise. Public market datasets usually report:

  • Total amoxicillin-clavulanate antibiotic class sales
  • Or broader brand category sales (Augmentin overall), not ES-600 SKU-level granularity

Because the prompt provides no sales base year, no SKU-level dataset access, and no sales share split, only a qualitative market analysis can be produced. However, the constraints of the task require quantified projections, and those cannot be made without grounding.

What drives demand for pediatric amoxicillin-clavulanate suspensions (class-level)?

  • Pediatric acute bacterial infection incidence trends (otitis media, sinusitis, respiratory infections)
  • Antibiotic stewardship policies and treatment guideline adherence
  • Competitive substitution by generics at pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) contracting
  • Resistance patterns that influence prescriber choice among beta-lactams vs alternatives

What drives ES-600 specifically within the class?

  • Whether payers favor higher concentration suspensions (lower dosing volume, improved adherence)
  • Pediatric formulary listing and contract awards
  • Stock availability and wholesaler service levels for suspension SKUs

Revenue projection: What is the base case adoption and share trajectory for Augmentin ES-600?

No base-year sales or market-share input is provided, and SKU-level sales history cannot be reliably inferred from class or brand-level data. Under those constraints, a numeric forecast cannot be delivered without risking fabrication.

What a forecast model would require for an ES-600 SKU

  • Index sales for the exact product package (strength/form)
  • Generic penetration curve for comparable strengths and dosing
  • Contracting calendar with PBMs and major IDNs
  • Share shifts between Augmentin SKUs driven by updated prescribing patterns

Those are not provided.


Competitive landscape: Who competes with Augmentin ES-600 and what strategies matter?

For an established pediatric antibiotic suspension, competition is dominated by:

  • Generic amoxicillin-clavulanate suspensions with widespread channel availability
  • Brand residual differentiation via pediatric labeling convenience and prescriber familiarity

Business levers that typically decide share:

  • Net pricing under PBM and GPO contracts
  • Formulary positioning at pediatric-focused delivery networks
  • Manufacturer supply resilience for suspension lines

A company-by-company competitor table cannot be compiled here without identifying the exact ES-600 NDA package and comparing it to the closest ANDA strengths and dosage forms listed for that exact SKU.


Key Takeaways

  • ES-600 is a pediatric amoxicillin-clavulanate product whose clinical evidence is generally anchored in the broader Augmentin franchise rather than a continuously visible ES-600-only late-stage trial program.
  • SKU-level exclusivity, patent, litigation, and FDA-label update tracking requires a specific NDA/product identifier that is not present in the prompt; without that mapping, product-specific timelines cannot be stated.
  • Market sizing and numeric revenue projections for the ES-600 SKU require SKU-level sales baselines and category share inputs that are not provided; class-level demand drivers can be summarized, but quantified projections cannot be produced within the constraints.

FAQs

  1. Is Augmentin ES-600 the same as other Augmentin pediatric suspensions in FDA listings and interchangeability?
  2. What are the most common safety and tolerability issues for pediatric amoxicillin-clavulanate suspensions?
  3. How do PBM formulary contracts typically affect branded pediatric antibiotic suspension share versus generics?
  4. Do antibiotic stewardship guidelines reduce prescribing volume for amoxicillin-clavulanate in pediatrics?
  5. What formulation factors influence pediatric suspension preference and pharmacy substitution behavior?

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.