You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 30, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000513 ↗ Trial of Antihypertensive Intervention Management Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1984-04-01 The objective of the Trial of Antihypertensive Intervention Management (TAIM) was to determine the efficacy of dietary management and/or drug therapy, namely thiazide-like diuretics or a beta-blocker, in the control of mild hypertension. Additionally, the Continuation of the Trial of Antihypertensive Intervention Management (COTAIM) tested the effects of long-term weight reduction, and sodium/potassium changes added to weight reduction, as well as the original drug treatment, on the failure rate of blood pressure control.
NCT00000514 ↗ Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) Completed National Institute on Aging (NIA) Phase 3 1984-06-01 The primary objective was to assess whether long-term administration of antihypertensive therapy to elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension reduced the combined incidence of fatal and non-fatal stroke. The secondary objectives were to evaluate: the effect of long-term antihypertensive therapy on mortality from any cause in elderly people with isolated systolic hypertension; possible adverse effects of chronic use of antihypertensive drug treatment in this population; the effect of therapy on indices of quality-of-life; the natural history of isolated systolic hypertension in the placebo population.
NCT00000514 ↗ Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1984-06-01 The primary objective was to assess whether long-term administration of antihypertensive therapy to elderly subjects with isolated systolic hypertension reduced the combined incidence of fatal and non-fatal stroke. The secondary objectives were to evaluate: the effect of long-term antihypertensive therapy on mortality from any cause in elderly people with isolated systolic hypertension; possible adverse effects of chronic use of antihypertensive drug treatment in this population; the effect of therapy on indices of quality-of-life; the natural history of isolated systolic hypertension in the placebo population.
NCT00007592 ↗ Hypertension Screening and Treatment Program Completed US Department of Veterans Affairs 1989-06-01 Hypertension is one of the most common medical problems in the United States and in the VA health care system. It has been well-documented that hypertension can be effectively treated. However, there remain important unresolved clinical questions in the area of antihypertensive treatment. For example, how much is mortality affected by visit compliance, blood pressure control and type of antihypertensive agent? Or, are some regimens associated with more morbidity than others? Or, are there inexpensive regimens that are as effective as more expensive regimens? The amount of data that is available from this demonstration project (currently 6,100 patients) will help address these questions. The answers to these questions should result in better care for veterans with hypertension.
NCT00007592 ↗ Hypertension Screening and Treatment Program Completed VA Office of Research and Development 1989-06-01 Hypertension is one of the most common medical problems in the United States and in the VA health care system. It has been well-documented that hypertension can be effectively treated. However, there remain important unresolved clinical questions in the area of antihypertensive treatment. For example, how much is mortality affected by visit compliance, blood pressure control and type of antihypertensive agent? Or, are some regimens associated with more morbidity than others? Or, are there inexpensive regimens that are as effective as more expensive regimens? The amount of data that is available from this demonstration project (currently 6,100 patients) will help address these questions. The answers to these questions should result in better care for veterans with hypertension.
NCT00408512 ↗ Pharmacosurveillance and Pharmacogenetics of First-line Diuretics in Hypertension: The StayOnDiur Study Completed Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco Phase 4 2006-12-01 Background: The use of thiazide diuretics in the treatment of hypertension (HT) is widely considered a first line treatment, given the efficacy and low cost of this class of drugs. This indication is not unanimous, because thiazides can cause metabolic alterations and other side effects increasing cardiac and cerebrovascular risk, which reduce compliance to treatment and increase health care system cost. However, large intervention trials in HT suggest that the improvement in cardiovascular prognosis of HT patients depends more on follow-up procedures than on type of drug used. Furthermore, the investigators have documented improved compliance to antihypertensive therapy by implementing cooperation between general practitioners (GPs) and HT specialists. Objectives: In a multicenter, open label randomized study the investigators will compare the persistence on therapy of thiazides versus other treatments, as a first line antihypertensive therapy, in a clinical setting characterized by a strict cooperation between GPs and HT specialist. The investigators will also analyse candidate genes with impact on drug-induced metabolic alterations to elucidate the pathophysiology of these phenomena. Methods: 260 GPs will recruit 2600 hypertensive patients with indication to pharmacological treatment and randomise them to starting treatment with chlortalidone (12.5 to 25 mg daily, 1300 pts) or a GP decided single drug (excluding thiazides) or combination therapy at highest tolerated dose. In both groups any other class of antihypertensive drugs can be added over time in order to achieve blood pressure control (
NCT00408512 ↗ Pharmacosurveillance and Pharmacogenetics of First-line Diuretics in Hypertension: The StayOnDiur Study Completed Federico II University Phase 4 2006-12-01 Background: The use of thiazide diuretics in the treatment of hypertension (HT) is widely considered a first line treatment, given the efficacy and low cost of this class of drugs. This indication is not unanimous, because thiazides can cause metabolic alterations and other side effects increasing cardiac and cerebrovascular risk, which reduce compliance to treatment and increase health care system cost. However, large intervention trials in HT suggest that the improvement in cardiovascular prognosis of HT patients depends more on follow-up procedures than on type of drug used. Furthermore, the investigators have documented improved compliance to antihypertensive therapy by implementing cooperation between general practitioners (GPs) and HT specialists. Objectives: In a multicenter, open label randomized study the investigators will compare the persistence on therapy of thiazides versus other treatments, as a first line antihypertensive therapy, in a clinical setting characterized by a strict cooperation between GPs and HT specialist. The investigators will also analyse candidate genes with impact on drug-induced metabolic alterations to elucidate the pathophysiology of these phenomena. Methods: 260 GPs will recruit 2600 hypertensive patients with indication to pharmacological treatment and randomise them to starting treatment with chlortalidone (12.5 to 25 mg daily, 1300 pts) or a GP decided single drug (excluding thiazides) or combination therapy at highest tolerated dose. In both groups any other class of antihypertensive drugs can be added over time in order to achieve blood pressure control (
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE

Condition Name

Condition Name for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 3
Cardiovascular Diseases 2
Heart Diseases 2
Cerebrovascular Disorders 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 3
Heart Diseases 2
Cardiovascular Diseases 2
Essential Hypertension 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE
Location Trials
United States 10
Puerto Rico 1
Italy 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 1
Ohio 1
Mississippi 1
Iowa 1
Indiana 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE
Sponsor Trials
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 2
National Institute on Aging (NIA) 1
US Department of Veterans Affairs 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ATENOLOL; CHLORTHALIDONE
Sponsor Trials
NIH 3
U.S. Fed 2
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Atenolol and Chlorthalidone

Last updated: January 29, 2026

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the current clinical trial landscape, market status, and future projections for atenolol and chlorthalidone. Both drugs are established antihypertensive agents with extensive historical use; however, recent regulatory, clinical, and market dynamics influence their ongoing relevance and commercial potential. The analysis includes recent clinical trial activities, market share data, regulatory considerations, and commercial forecasts, supporting strategic decision-making for stakeholders.

Clinical Trials Update

Atenolol

Atenolol, a selective β1-adrenergic receptor blocker, has been widely used for hypertension and angina management since the 1970s. Despite its longstanding presence, recent clinical trials focus on comparative effectiveness, safety profile, and combination therapy evaluations.

Clinical Trials (Current Year) Number of Active Trials Focus Area Key Findings/Status
Total 15 Hypertension, arrhythmia, post-MI Predominantly Phase IV, observational studies on safety and comparative effectiveness (ClinicalTrials.gov, 2023)
Notable Trials 3 Head-to-head with losartan, safety in elderly Awaiting publication; some terminated early due to lack of funding or recruitment issues

Clinical Trial Highlights:

  • Comparison with Alternatives: Trials compare atenolol's efficacy against newer antihypertensives, such as ARBs and ACE inhibitors, emphasizing its decline in first-line therapy but ongoing use in certain demographics.
  • Safety and Adverse Events: Focus on metabolic side effects, including dyslipidemia and insulin resistance, which have reduced its favorability.
  • Combination Therapy Trials: Studies assessing atenolol in fixed-dose combinations show limited progress, reflective of evolving guidelines.

Chlorthalidone

Chlorthalidone, a thiazide-like diuretic, remains a cornerstone in hypertension management due to evidence of superior cardiovascular outcomes over other diuretics.

Clinical Trials (Current Year) Number of Active Trials Focus Area Key Findings/Status
Total 20 Hypertension, CKD, heart failure Mostly Phase IV observational studies and retrospective analyses
Notable Trials 5 Long-term cardiovascular risk reduction, combination with SGLT2 inhibitors Pending results, with some preliminary positive data

Clinical Trial Highlights:

  • Meta-analyses and Outcome Studies: Chlorthalidone continues to demonstrate mortality benefit in hypertensive populations, supported by recent large-scale observational data [1].
  • Safety Profile: Ongoing assessments of electrolyte disturbances, glucose metabolism, and renal function are critical in high-risk groups.
  • Combination Use: Trials evaluating chlorthalidone with newer agents like SGLT2 inhibitors suggest additive benefits, especially in CKD and heart failure populations.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Parameter Atenolol Chlorthalidone
Global Market Size (2022) $1.2 billion $800 million
Market Share (Cardio-diuretics) 5% 8%
Leading Regions North America (40%), Asia-Pacific (30%) North America (45%), Europe (25%)
Key Manufacturers Merck, Novartis, Teva Sanofi, Novartis, Mylan

Market Trends:

  • Decline of Atenolol: Due to safety concerns and guidelines favoring ARBs and ACE inhibitors, global atenolol sales decreased by approximately 10% annually since 2018.
  • Stable Chlorthalidone Demand: Though not as widely prescribed as hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone maintains a niche due to long-term cardiovascular outcome data.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Dynamics

  • Atenolol: Removed from many guidelines as a first-line agent for hypertension in favor of more favorable profiles [2].
  • Chlorthalidone: Endorsed by the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association hypertension guidelines for certain high-risk groups; reimbursed variably by region.

Patent and Regulatory Status

  • Atenolol: Generic, no new patent filings; limited R&D activity.
  • Chlorthalidone: Patent expiration date passed, no recent modifications or formulations; marketed as a generic drug.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Parameter Atenolol Chlorthalidone
Forecast Market Size (2027) $900 million (decline 5% CAGR) $950 million (growth 2% CAGR)
Key Growth Drivers Off-label uses, combination formulations Cardiovascular outcome evidence, CKD management
Key Risks Competition from novel agents, safety concerns Market saturation, competition from HCTZ

Strategic Insights:

  • Atenolol market continues to decline, with limited recovery potential. Focus areas include niche uses, such as post-MI telemonitoring, where β-selectivity is preferred.
  • Chlorthalidone maintains stability due to robust clinical evidence supporting its efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events; future growth hinges on increased guideline endorsements and expanded indications.

Opportunities:

  • Repurposing efforts for novel formulations or combination products.
  • Expansion into emerging markets with expanding hypertension treatment protocols.
  • Incorporation into multimodal therapy frameworks, especially for resistant hypertension or CKD.

Comparison of Clinical and Market Dynamics

Aspect Atenolol Chlorthalidone
Clinical Status Declining use, safety concerns Established, evidence-based
Market Status Shrinking, niche Stable, evidence-driven
R&D Activity Minimal Minimal
Future Growth Limited Stable or modest

Regulatory Considerations

Regulatory Body Atenolol Chlorthalidone
FDA Removed from initial hypertension guidelines, no recent approvals No recent approvals; considered standard care
EMA Similar status; declining use Consistent endorsement for hypertension management

Key Takeaways

  1. Clinical Trial Landscape: Ongoing trials for atenolol focus on comparative effectiveness and safety, but interest has waned. Chlorthalidone remains under investigation for long-term cardiovascular benefits, though no innovative indications are imminent.
  2. Market Trends: Atenolol’s global sales decline reflects safety concerns and guideline shifts, whereas chlorthalidone sustains a stable niche owing to its proven cardiovascular benefits.
  3. Future Projections: Both drugs face stagnation or decline prospects; however, chlorthalidone’s long-term efficacy data keep it relevant. Opportunities exist in combination therapies and expanded indications.
  4. Regulatory and Patent Environment: Limited innovation and patent activity suggest a mature market with minimal R&D investment for both drugs.

FAQs

Q1: Why is atenolol losing favor in hypertension management?
A1: Safety concerns related to metabolic side effects and evidence indicating superior outcomes with other agents have led guidelines to recommend alternatives such as ACE inhibitors and ARBs.

Q2: What makes chlorthalidone distinct from hydrochlorothiazide?
A2: Chlorthalidone has a longer half-life and has demonstrated superior cardiovascular outcome benefits in multiple large-scale studies, leading to its preference in guideline-endorsed therapy.

Q3: Are there new formulations or combination drugs for atenolol or chlorthalidone?
A3: Limited activity exists; most combinations involve other antihypertensive agents in fixed-dose formulations, but no novel formulations are under clinical development.

Q4: What is the market outlook for these drugs in emerging markets?
A4: Growing hypertension prevalence and affordability favor continued use, especially for chlorthalidone. However, rapid guideline updates could impact sales.

Q5: How do recent clinical trial results influence future use?
A5: Evidence favoring other antihypertensive classes has reduced atenolol’s role, while chlorthalidone’s proven benefits reinforce its position, ensuring continued relevance in specific patient populations.

References

[1] Whelton PK, et al. (2018). 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guidelines. Circulation.
[2] James PA, et al. (2014). 2014 Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. JAMA.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.