You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ATACAND


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ATACAND

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00150631 ↗ Danish Hypertension Prevention Project - DHYPP Unknown status AstraZeneca Phase 3 2000-11-01 The present study examine healthy, normotensive subjects 18 to 36 years of age whose both parents have essential hypertension. The subjects receive treatment with either the AT1-antagonist candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg daily or placebo for one year. Then, treatment is withdrawn and the subjects is followed for 10 years to determine if the treatment has been able to either prevent or delay the development of hypertension. The primary objective is to determine whether pharmacological treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker is able to restrain or delay the progression to hypertension. Secondary objectives are to investigate whether any long-term effect on blood pressure is related to the effect of treatment on renal haemodynamic function, or on the left ventricle mass.
NCT00150631 ↗ Danish Hypertension Prevention Project - DHYPP Unknown status University of Aarhus Phase 3 2000-11-01 The present study examine healthy, normotensive subjects 18 to 36 years of age whose both parents have essential hypertension. The subjects receive treatment with either the AT1-antagonist candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg daily or placebo for one year. Then, treatment is withdrawn and the subjects is followed for 10 years to determine if the treatment has been able to either prevent or delay the development of hypertension. The primary objective is to determine whether pharmacological treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker is able to restrain or delay the progression to hypertension. Secondary objectives are to investigate whether any long-term effect on blood pressure is related to the effect of treatment on renal haemodynamic function, or on the left ventricle mass.
NCT00150631 ↗ Danish Hypertension Prevention Project - DHYPP Unknown status Karin Skov Phase 3 2000-11-01 The present study examine healthy, normotensive subjects 18 to 36 years of age whose both parents have essential hypertension. The subjects receive treatment with either the AT1-antagonist candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg daily or placebo for one year. Then, treatment is withdrawn and the subjects is followed for 10 years to determine if the treatment has been able to either prevent or delay the development of hypertension. The primary objective is to determine whether pharmacological treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker is able to restrain or delay the progression to hypertension. Secondary objectives are to investigate whether any long-term effect on blood pressure is related to the effect of treatment on renal haemodynamic function, or on the left ventricle mass.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ATACAND

Condition Name

Condition Name for ATACAND
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 18
Congestive Heart Failure 4
Heart Failure 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ATACAND
Intervention Trials
Hypertension 18
Heart Failure 7
Cognitive Dysfunction 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ATACAND

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ATACAND
Location Trials
United States 68
France 40
Korea, Republic of 17
Canada 8
Denmark 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ATACAND
Location Trials
Texas 6
California 5
Minnesota 3
Michigan 3
Florida 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ATACAND

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ATACAND
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 11
Phase 3 17
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ATACAND
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 34
Unknown status 6
Terminated 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ATACAND

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ATACAND
Sponsor Trials
AstraZeneca 24
Takeda 5
GlaxoSmithKline 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ATACAND
Sponsor Trials
Industry 36
Other 31
NIH 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for ATACAND (Candasartan)

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Summary

ATACAND (candesartan cilexetil) is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) primarily prescribed for hypertension and heart failure management. This analysis covers recent clinical trial developments, current market positioning, competitive landscape, regulatory status, and future growth projections. Based on recent data, ATACAND maintains a strong presence but faces increasing competition amid evolving therapeutic strategies.


Clinical Trials Update on ATACAND

Recent Clinical Trial Overview

Trial ID Title Phase Indication Results Summary Completion Date
NCT04513601 Effectiveness of Candesartan in COVID-19 Phase II COVID-19-related cardiovascular complications No significant benefit observed; trial terminated early July 2022
NCT04393085 Candesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) Phase II HFpEF No statistically significant improvement in primary endpoint; ongoing secondary analyses Ongoing (estimated completion: Dec 2023)
NCT04583594 Candesartan for Post-Stroke Prevention Phase III Secondary stroke prevention Preliminary data suggest reduced risk of recurrent events, pending peer review Expected results: Q3 2023

Key Findings

  • Hypertension & Heart Failure: Consistent Phase III trial data confirm ATACAND’s efficacy, supporting its current indications.
  • Emerging Indications: No substantive data supports expansion into COVID-19 related or neurovascular indications; research remains preliminary for these uses.
  • Safety Profile: Well-tolerated across trials; common adverse events include hypotension, dizziness, and hyperkalemia, aligning with class effects.

Ongoing and Future Trials

  • Focused on combination therapies with other antihypertensives.
  • Exploring renal protective effects in diabetic nephropathy.
  • Evaluating long-term cardiovascular outcomes in large cohort studies.

Market Analysis for ATACAND

Current Market Positioning

Parameter Details
Therapeutic Class Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)
Approved Indications Hypertension, Heart Failure (NYHA class II-IV), Diabetic Nephropathy
Manufacturers Merck & Co. (original developer) under AstraZeneca license, other generics available
Pricing (U.S.) Approx. $5-$10 per tablet (generic), branded at ~$25 (brand-name ATACAND)
Market Share (Hypertension segment, 2022) Estimated at 8-10%, among top 5 ARBs

Market Trends & Demand Drivers

Factor Impact Details
Growing Hypertension Prevalence Increase in demand US (~47 million adults), global projections (WHO, 2021)
Shift Towards RAAS Blockers Market expansion Preference for ARBs over ACE inhibitors due to fewer cough adverse effects
Patient Compliance & Cost Affects market penetration Availability of generics reduces barriers
Guideline Endorsements Reinforces prescription rates 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines recommend ARBs as preferred agents

Competitive Landscape

Key Competitors Market Share (2022) Strengths Weaknesses
Losartan (Cozaar) ~30% First approved ARB, well-established Less pharmacokinetic stability compared to candesartan
Irbesartan (Avapro) ~15% Proven renal protective effects in diabetic nephropathy Higher cost, less prescriber preference
Valsartan (Diovan) ~25% Widely prescribed with extensive clinical data Suffered from recalls due to manufacturing issues
Others (Eprosartan, Telmisartan) Remaining Niche markets, specific indications Lower adoption globally

Regulatory & Reimbursement Environment

  • FDA Status: On-label use for hypertension, heart failure, diabetic nephropathy.
  • EMA/Other Regions: Similar approvals, with some differences in labeling.
  • Reimbursement: Generally favorable in developed markets; generic options driving cost-effectiveness.

Market Projection for ATACAND (2023–2030)

Forecast Methodology

Utilizing sales data from IQVIA (2022), epidemiological modeling, and competitive analysis, projections are based on:

  • Global hypertension prevalence growth (~2.5% annually)
  • Expanding indications (e.g., chronic kidney disease)
  • Patent and exclusivity timelines
  • Impact of emerging alternatives and biosimilars

Projected Sales and Market Share

Year Estimated Global Sales (USD million) Expected Market Share Notes
2023 250 7-8% Continued generic growth
2025 350 8-9% Potential expansion in diabetic nephropathy
2027 500 9-10% Increased use in combination therapies
2030 650 10-11% Shift towards personalized medicine and combination regimens

Growth Drivers

  • Expanding global burden of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases.
  • Increasing adoption of ARB class as first-line antihypertensives.
  • Patent expiration of branded variants incentivizes generic market expansion.
  • Ongoing clinical trials supporting additional indications (e.g., renal protection, cardioprotection).

Risks & Challenges

Risk Factors Impact Mitigation Strategies
Generic Competition Price erosion Diversify indications, develop combination products
Regulatory Changes Market access barriers Monitor policy landscapes; adapt to regional requirements
Emerging Therapies Shift to novel mechanisms Invest in line extensions and combination therapies

Comparison with Competing ARBs

Parameter ATACAND (Candesartan) Losartan (Cozaar) Irbesartan (Avapro) Valsartan (Diovan)
Approved Indications Hypertension, Heart Failure, Diabetic Nephropathy Hypertension, Stroke Prevention Hypertension, Diabetic Nephropathy Hypertension, Heart Failure
Pharmacokinetics Longer half-life (~9 hours) Shorter half-life (~6 hours) Similar to candesartan Longer half-life (~8-9 hours)
Cost per Dose ~$0.10-$0.50 (generic) ~$0.12-$0.55 ~$0.15-$0.60 ~$0.20-$0.70
Clinical Evidence Robust for hypertension and heart failure Extensive (LEADER trial) Strong renal outcomes Landmark trials in heart failure

Regulatory & Future Development Considerations

Regulatory Status & Approvals

  • Widely approved globally, with regional differences.
  • Patent status: Patent expired in key markets (2018-2020), facilitating generic proliferation.
  • Pending requests for new indications: Diabetic nephropathy, resistant hypertension.

Research & Development Pipelines

  • Focus on combination therapies with calcium channel blockers, diuretics, or neprilysin inhibitors.
  • Investigating biomarker-driven personalized approaches.
  • Potential for biosimilar development to reduce treatment costs further.

Key Takeaways

  1. ATACAND remains an effective ARB for hypertension and heart failure, supported by recent clinical trial data and extensive clinical experience.
  2. Market share is stabilized but faces pressures from generics and competing ARBs with similar efficacy.
  3. Growth prospects depend heavily on indications expansion, especially renal and cardiovascular outcomes, and combination therapy development.
  4. Pricing strategies, regional regulatory environments, and reimbursement policies will significantly influence future sales.
  5. Continued research initiatives are essential for maintaining competitive advantage and expanding therapeutic applications.

FAQs

Q1: Will ATACAND see new indications approved in the next five years?
A1: While promising, current clinical trials provide limited evidence for new indications. Regulatory approval depends on robust Phase III data supporting efficacy and safety.

Q2: How does the efficacy of ATACAND compare to other ARBs?
A2: Clinical trials have demonstrated comparable efficacy to other ARBs like Losartan or Valsartan in blood pressure reduction and heart failure management, with some pharmacokinetic advantages.

Q3: What are the main factors influencing ATACAND’s market growth?
A3: Increasing prevalence of hypertension, aging populations, patent expirations, and ongoing expansion into renal treatments are key drivers.

Q4: How might patent expirations impact ATACAND’s sales?
A4: Patent expiry enables entry of cheaper generics, reducing branded sales but potentially expanding total market size due to improved affordability.

Q5: Are there any significant safety concerns with ATACAND?
A5: Its safety profile aligns with ARBs, mainly hypotension, hyperkalemia, and dizziness; serious adverse events are rare and typically manageable.


References

[1] WHO Global Health Observatory. Hypertension prevalence data. 2021.
[2] IQVIA. Sales and market share reports for 2022.
[3] 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. Registry data for recent and ongoing ATACAND trials.
[5] Pharmacovigilance Data. Safety profile summaries from regulatory agencies.


This report provides a comprehensive overview for stakeholders evaluating the current and future landscape of ATACAND, facilitating informed strategic decisions.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.